As another said, this data more or less lines up with the Pew poll data - which was generally regarded as good news for religious believers. So why is this being played up as bad news?
Simple. The articles talking about this poll are comparing 1990 to 2008. Pew compared 2001 to 2008. I’m not denying that the catholic church needs to do far more work, or that the culture hasn’t become more religion-hostile. But I will say that a good chunk of the talk about this survey is, in my view, manufactured. ‘Non-religious barely increased at all in number over past 7 years!’ doesn’t get anyone’s attention. ‘Large jumps in non-religious over the past 17 years!’ does.
The jump in ‘no religion’ from 1990 to 2001 was pretty large - 8.2% to 14.2%. From 2001 to 2008, very small - 14.2% to 15.0%. Agnostics went from 0.5 to 0.9 from 2001 to 2008. Atheists, 0.4 to 0.7 in the same period.
Other big overall moves: ‘Christian generic’ went from 10.8% to 14.2% in this period. Mainline Christian, from 17.2% to 12.9%.
Another interesting survey question: Regarding the existence of God, do you think . . . ?
There is no such thing 2.3%
There is no way to know 4.3%
I’m not sure 5.7%
There is a higher power but no personal God 12.1%
There is definitely a personal God 69.5%
Refused 6.1%
The full report is here:
b27.cc.trincoll.edu/weblogs/AmericanReligionSurvey-ARIS/reports/ARIS_Report_2008.pdf
Either way, my own reaction is this: It highlights that a lot of work needs to be done. And instead of leaving that as a vague declaration, I’ll explain what I mean.
- Understanding why people, particularly younger ones, become skeptical of religion in general and christianity/catholicism in particular. I think the overwhelming reason for this is apathy (Why look into religion? If I live a good life that’s all that matters anyway. Never mind that defining a ‘good life’ is problematic), confusion (‘Science shows God doesn’t exist, right?’ or ‘I know some so-called ‘christians’ and they’re hypocrites or weird’) and questioning (What reason does anyone have to believe in God? Why is there so much evil in the world if God exists?)
- Not just understanding, but being more aggressive in giving answers to those questions. Giving positive reasons to believe in God across the board (philosophical and moral primarily, along with stressing God’s relation to science and nature - I lean heavily thomistic in that vein), and pointing out the problems with worldviews that are atheistic or even apatheist. I think this matters even for people who identify as believers - we really need better, more fundamental ways to present the Catholic/christian case on every subject from God’s existence, to abortion, to stem cells, to otherwise.
- Reaching out in every way. Not just local and in one’s own community, but particularly on the internet. More and more people spend quite a lot of time online and insulate themselves from a lot of what happens in their communities. They’re hard to reach as a result, but it’s something that must be faced.
- Paying rapt attention to culture - what happens in one’s neighborhood, on TV, what games children play on consoles/computers, etc. We need to somehow present an identifiably Catholic culture for this modern era - and that’s a tall order. Comics, TV shows, movies, video games, books, magazines, newspapers - all are usually either apatheist or even hostile to Catholic views.
So there’s my thoughts on this matter.