H
hansard
Guest
In my Religious Education class (students aged about 17-18; Catholic High School), we were discussing sexual ethics.
We read several passages from the NT and OT regarding divorce, homosexuality, adultery, etc. The conversation naturally turned to more modern concerns, not mentioned explicitly in the Bible, such as abortion, contraception, and pornography.
Here is a paraphrased sample of the conversation:
THEM: The Church should allow abortion.
ME: What, on demand? Someone has a casual fling and they can get an abortion?
THEM: No, just in some cases.
ME: Why? Isn’t it against the 5th Commandment? Killing?
THEM: Yeah, but what about rape? You can’t tell us that a woman is expected to carry a child that comes from a rape.
ME: It would be terrible. The most terrible thing, perhaps, for a woman. Yet the Church’s teaching is firm. Anyone who participates in an abortion is liable to be excommunicated. The Church seems to have drawn a line in the sand, and I can’t see it changing in our lifetimes.
THEM: What about contraception, then? The pill, or condoms? Surely they could ease up on that.
ME: Well, it’s all about the sanctity of the marriage union and the purpose of sex. There’s the emotional aspect, you see, and the procreation aspect…
THEM: Why are all these things dictated by old men who have probably never had sex and can’t even get married?
ME: Well, they have a right to set the standards and outline the rules, don’t they? After all, they do run the church. Just like the Principal has the right to make rules around this place, and your parents at home. Sometimes, you just have to accept the rules.
THEM: Yeah, but women have no say in it, and they don’t take into account that times have changed. No wonder young people are not going to church any more.
ME [getting exhausted]: Why does the Church have to be “hip” and trendy, and follow the fleeting demands of popular culture? In your grandparents’ time, we would hardly be having this conversation. What’s wrong with abstaining from sex, for example, when you’re young?
THEM: It’s unrealistic. Everyone is having sex. The Church should realise that and deal with it rather than calling everyone a sinner and sending people to hell.
ME: The Church won’t send anyone to hell…that’s for God to decide.
THEM: Well, it just seems unfair that everything we do is a sin.
…and so it went on (this is a heavily truncated script, and just includes some of the main points).
I don’t know what to say to them, sometimes. For the record, I’m male, nearly 41 and far from a fossil myself, but I find the godlessness and faithlessness of the young to be one of the great disappointments of the modern era. Most of these students would profess to be Catholics if asked, as would their parents and ancestors. They are just locked into a world where individual choice is everything and there is no final, moral authority. God is somebody you pray to when times are tough; you meet him when you go to Heaven (of which there is no doubt). There is no concept of sin or consequence; no remorse or penitence.
It would be easy to give up on the young.
We read several passages from the NT and OT regarding divorce, homosexuality, adultery, etc. The conversation naturally turned to more modern concerns, not mentioned explicitly in the Bible, such as abortion, contraception, and pornography.
Here is a paraphrased sample of the conversation:
THEM: The Church should allow abortion.
ME: What, on demand? Someone has a casual fling and they can get an abortion?
THEM: No, just in some cases.
ME: Why? Isn’t it against the 5th Commandment? Killing?
THEM: Yeah, but what about rape? You can’t tell us that a woman is expected to carry a child that comes from a rape.
ME: It would be terrible. The most terrible thing, perhaps, for a woman. Yet the Church’s teaching is firm. Anyone who participates in an abortion is liable to be excommunicated. The Church seems to have drawn a line in the sand, and I can’t see it changing in our lifetimes.
THEM: What about contraception, then? The pill, or condoms? Surely they could ease up on that.
ME: Well, it’s all about the sanctity of the marriage union and the purpose of sex. There’s the emotional aspect, you see, and the procreation aspect…
THEM: Why are all these things dictated by old men who have probably never had sex and can’t even get married?
ME: Well, they have a right to set the standards and outline the rules, don’t they? After all, they do run the church. Just like the Principal has the right to make rules around this place, and your parents at home. Sometimes, you just have to accept the rules.
THEM: Yeah, but women have no say in it, and they don’t take into account that times have changed. No wonder young people are not going to church any more.
ME [getting exhausted]: Why does the Church have to be “hip” and trendy, and follow the fleeting demands of popular culture? In your grandparents’ time, we would hardly be having this conversation. What’s wrong with abstaining from sex, for example, when you’re young?
THEM: It’s unrealistic. Everyone is having sex. The Church should realise that and deal with it rather than calling everyone a sinner and sending people to hell.
ME: The Church won’t send anyone to hell…that’s for God to decide.
THEM: Well, it just seems unfair that everything we do is a sin.
…and so it went on (this is a heavily truncated script, and just includes some of the main points).
I don’t know what to say to them, sometimes. For the record, I’m male, nearly 41 and far from a fossil myself, but I find the godlessness and faithlessness of the young to be one of the great disappointments of the modern era. Most of these students would profess to be Catholics if asked, as would their parents and ancestors. They are just locked into a world where individual choice is everything and there is no final, moral authority. God is somebody you pray to when times are tough; you meet him when you go to Heaven (of which there is no doubt). There is no concept of sin or consequence; no remorse or penitence.
It would be easy to give up on the young.