Lutheran church-Missori Synod/ Close to Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter spiritchsr1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
BillyT92679:
The Lutherans closest to Catholicism are in the Nordic countries… some even have statues of Our Blessed Lady!

As close as it might be, it’s still a Protestant ecclesial community without valid Sacraments or Apostolic Succession.
Actually, one of the Scandinavian Lutheran bodies did retain an Apostolic Succession after the Reformation – the Swedes, I believe. But, like the Anglicans, I imagine that things would be a bit problematic!

Blessings,
 
I know at least 10 families that have left the LCMS in the last 5 years. One went to a non-denom mega church, one went to the EFree, 2 went to the ELCA, 3 went Catholic and the rest have given up on Church. The ELCA is in worse shape, I think.

I talked to a Priest the other day and he said that Luther wouldn’t even recoginize the modern Lutheran Church (being that he was Catholic).

My husband is a born and bred Lutheran and he won’t attend his Lutheran Church anymore He hated the praise music, 4 piece bands and the Liturgical Dancing, but the last straw was the powerpoint presentations and the overhead projecters in leiu of the regular communion service. He hasn’t been back since. Occasionally he goes to Mass.
 
oat soda:
evangelical mega-churches are going to break down as well. they have to cater to the american way of life which is about convenience and individuality. in this way, america and protestanism are created for one another. it is all about having that personal relationship with God so that you don’t need to go to church on the weekends or belong to an “organized” religion. in fact i just read an article about how this mega-church doesn’t have christimas services because people feel by spending time with their families they are doing just as well.
I’ve heard this called the heresy of individualism.
 
40.png
JSmitty2005:
As far as Fides and Gratia, didn’t we straighten that out in the JDDJ?
I think the LCMS was one of the North American Lutheran bodies that did not sign the JDDJ.
 
40.png
JSmitty2005:
Indeed He did, but I don’t think He established the LCMS.
The LCMS was founded in 1847. First synod president was Carl Ferdinand W. Walther. That was one of my “wait a moment, could the Catholic Church be right?” moments.😉
40.png
JSmitty2005:
Sola Scriptura is just plain dumb. Read this article. As far as Fides and Gratia, didn’t we straighten that out in the JDDJ?
The LCMS wasn’t part of the JDDJ.😛 That was all ELCA, and if you want to see the LCMS response, it’s both in the FAQS (short response) and here (PDF file) (if the pdf link doesn’t work, go to lcms.org, hit search, and put in JDDJ. justclp.pdf is the file). Funny that the LCMS has more in common with the Catholic Church than ELCA does, yet ELCA signed the JDDJ. However, the LCMS participated in the round XI of talks. lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=9186
40.png
JSmitty2005:
I’d laugh, but it hurts too much. It’s a horrible feeling not feeling one way or another. My mom was at a funeral mass a couple weeks ago and proceeded to tell me that she could never be a Catholic because she can’t stand the horrible songs they use instead of hymns. Imagine what fun I had trying to explain that the Catholic Church has many of the same problems we do in the synod 😃 and that not everything is as it appears.
 
Carol Marie:
They were taught the 3 “Solas” - Bible alone - saved by Grace alone… and what was the 3rd one? I can’t recall.
As far as I know there are FIVE SOLAS, not three:

Solus Christus: Christ alone.

Sola Scriptura: Scripture alone.

Sola Gratia: Grace alone.

Sola Fide: Faith alone.

Soli Deo Gloria: To the glory of God alone.

See the following:

monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/topic/fivesolas.html
 
Someone on one of the threads said “if you want to know something/anything about the Catholic Church, ask a Protestant.” Well…here goes…“If you want to know something about the Lutheran Church, ask a Catholic.” I don’t mean to insult, but boy are there a lot of…“I heard”…“I think”…I seem to recall"…here. (maybe not exact words, but implied.)

TinaK…I was born and raised ALC, a LCMS member for 10 years, but joined an ELCA church when I got a job there. I’m a music teacher so the change in music can be a bit strange, but one does need to understand that some people don’t all like Bach, Luther, and Handel’s, (along with other composer’s music)…contemporary music speaks to them more. So, one has to be flexible. Glad to hear from another Lutheran, though.

The Lutheran Chuch was founded on the pricipals of having a church that spoke to the needs of the people. Using the language of the people…not Latin, that few people could understand, let alone read. The Liturgy is based on the Mass. The idea spread throughout Europe, and then as the people moved to the New World, it came with them. The Catholic Church also moved, but slower, and eventually had to come to grips with the fact that people wanted and needed the Mass in the vernacular of their country. Good thing Luther came along. 🙂

Don’t believe everything that you read in Lutheran pages on the web. Just because it’s written in OLD pages, does not mean things are still taught in churches. Most churches see a lot of stupidity in it’s writings from long past church leaders. So, they don’t teach it. i.e…the Pope as the anti-Christ. How stupid is that. NEVER was I told that, but it was tossed in my face on here. Hopefully common sense is used when accepting what Churches teach.

Would Luther recognize the Lutheran Church? hard to say. Would anyone from over 500 years ago recognize the world today? If you traveled back in time, could you accept the world of then, now? No internet!!! aaggghhhh!!
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
One thing I have heard repeatedly from her pastor in preaching is that their service is not a Mass, there is no Mass, there is no sacrifice, and that through the faith of the people united, but through no special words or actions of his own, when they celebrate the Lord’s Supper that Christ is present in a real, mystical way but not in any physical sense whatever. He stresses that Christ is present through grace, because the gathered people are celebrating this memorial, that he is sacramentally (thorugh grace) present in the bread and wine, which still remain bread and wine.
We on our part also retain many ceremonies and traditions (such as the liturgy of the Mass and various canticles, festivals, and the like) which serve to preserve order in the church. (Augsburg Confession XXVI:40 [German])
We are unjustly accused of having abolished the Mass. Without boasting, it is manifest that the Mass is observed among us with greater devotion and more earnestness than among our opponents. (Augsburg Confession XXIV:9 [German])

Falsely are our churches accused of abolishing the Mass; for the Mass is retained among us, and celebrated with the highest reverence. Nearly all the usual ceremonies are also preserved, save that the parts sung in Latin are interspersed here and there with German hymns, which have been added to teach the people. For ceremonies are needed to this end alone that the unlearned be taught [what they need to know of Christ]. And not only has Paul commanded to use in the church a language understood by the people 1 Cor. 14,2. 9, but it has also been so ordained by man’s law. The people are accustomed to partake of the Sacrament together, if any be fit for it, and this also increases the reverence and devotion of public worship. For none are admitted except they be first examined. The people are also advised concerning the dignity and use of the Sacrament, how great consolation it brings anxious consciences, that they may learn to believe God, and to expect and ask of Him all that is good. [In this connection they are also instructed regarding other and false teachings on the Sacrament.] This worship pleases God; such use of the Sacrament nourishes true devotion toward God. It does not, therefore, appear that the Mass is more devoutly celebrated among our adversaries than among us.
 
40.png
JSmitty2005:
Indeed He did, but I don’t think He established the LCMS. 😉

Sola Scriptura is just plain dumb. Read this article. As far as Fides and Gratia, didn’t we straighten that out in the JDDJ?

Haha! 😛
Been away for a while.

The JDF didn’t realy solve anything. The appendix basically made the whole thing a publicity stunt, but one with a good attitude. That is why the LCMS delegates didn’t sign.

As to the trend to “mega churches”, I hate that. A good friend of mine is one of the pastor ast one, and loves some of the aspects of a large congregation, but focuses more on the small groups study side .
 
40.png
Shibboleth:
Falsely are our churches accused of abolishing the Mass; for the Mass is retained among us, and celebrated with the highest reverence.
You have a liturgy… but not a Mass. The Mass is a sacrifice… Lutherans don’t believe the Eucharist to be a sacrifice. In some cases I even enjoy the LCMS service more than the Catholic Mass, depending on the parish. My ex-girlfriend used to be LCMS (now Catholic), so I do know something about the LCMS. 🙂
 
40.png
aria13:
The Lutheran Chuch was founded on the pricipals of having a church that spoke to the needs of the people. Using the language of the people…not Latin, that few people could understand, let alone read. The Liturgy is based on the Mass. The idea spread throughout Europe, and then as the people moved to the New World, it came with them. The Catholic Church also moved, but slower, and eventually had to come to grips with the fact that people wanted and needed the Mass in the vernacular of their country. Good thing Luther came along. 🙂
The point of using Latin in the liturgy was so that we would have a universal (Catholic) church. I have attended a Tridentine Latin Mass, and a Novus Ordo Latin Mass. The scriptures and the homilies are in the vernacular, and people were trained in their faith in the vernacular. I don’t really think that was such a huge problem as a lot of protestants today make it out to be. At Luther’s time, there was even 18 different Bibles in German. He was not the first to bring the faith to the people in the vernacular.

As a matter of fact, Luther’s first liturgy was actually in Latin… 😉
 
Semper Fi:
You have a liturgy… but not a Mass. The Mass is a sacrifice… Lutherans don’t believe the Eucharist to be a sacrifice. In some cases I even enjoy the LCMS service more than the Catholic Mass, depending on the parish. My ex-girlfriend used to be LCMS (now Catholic), so I do know something about the LCMS. 🙂
This seems to be another instance where the same definition has failed to attach itself to the same title. Both Lutherans and Catholics believe in the Sacrifice of the Mass. The argument was always more in the area of what constitutes a Sacrifice or what is the definition of a Sacrifice. When both sides sit down and tell their side of the story the Lutherans and Catholics are not much different. But unfortunately labels are confusing…

Anyways the The Defense of the Augsburg Confession has pages on the Sacrifice of the Mass and what it constitutes and does not constitute.

I would guess that after the Joint Declaration on Holy Orders this might be the next target the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church tackle just because they are so close on the issue.

And I don’t blame your wife for leaving the LC-MS, they are separatists and have no wish for ecumenism. I doubt there is a more anti-Catholic Synod in America.
 
40.png
Shibboleth:
And I don’t blame your wife for leaving the LC-MS, they are separatists and have no wish for ecumenism. I doubt there is a more anti-Catholic Synod in America.
Ex-girlfriend, not my ex-wife. But I to tend to agree with you on that point, however at the parish that I was at most of the people were pretty welcoming and didn’t try and belittle me for being a Catholic.

I’m also curious about Jsmitty’s question above… are you Catholic now? and which synod are you thinking of converting to? ELCA or Wisconsin?

p.s. according to the lcms.org website they have re-entered discussions with the CC. If I ever thought about converting lutheranism, it would probably be to the lcms synod since they actually seem to be teaching what luther taught, however I don’t have any wish to (and of course don’t agree with luther on most points).
 
40.png
JSmitty2005:
Shibboleth, what religion are you currently?
Sorry I have been meaning to update my profile for a while now… I am Greek Orthodox. I was looking into Lutheranism for a while but I disagreed with their view of an invisible church, forensic justification, and Sola Scriptura – amongst other things…

If you go back through my posts of which I have many you can kind of see where the switch happened because I started reading the writings of the Church fathers.

In regards to the other statements on the LC-MS. I respect the fact that they keep to the Confessions and Lutheran doctrine as well as they do but I disagree as to why and how they do it…

The LC-MS defines itself by how it differs from other Synods and other Christian churches in general so they will always find ways to categorically anathematize all other Christian Synods – if they do not they will loose their identity. They practice Closed Communion which is the equivalent of the Catholic ‘excommunication’ or ‘being out of communion with…’. In the Catholic and Orthodox views of how sin is effective and infused grace closed communion is sound but in a sola fide world withholding the Eucharist from a faithful person because of their knowledge or what they believe doesn’t make much sense.

There is a dying Lutheran Synod called the Evangelical Catholic Church that is very close to Catholicism but isn’t so schismatic in philosophy. Bishop Karl even seems to have a valid line of Apostolic Succession – whether or not he has been fully elevated to Episkopos is arguable.

Bishop Karl, however, tends to agree with some of the bizarre concepts that Luther tended to exhibit from time to time. Even the LC-MS will agree that those statements were Luther being Luther.
 
40.png
Shibboleth:
This seems to be another instance where the same definition has failed to attach itself to the same title. Both Lutherans and Catholics believe in the Sacrifice of the Mass. The argument was always more in the area of what constitutes a Sacrifice or what is the definition of a Sacrifice. When both sides sit down and tell their side of the story the Lutherans and Catholics are not much different. But unfortunately labels are confusing…Anyways the The Defense of the Augsburg Confession has pages on the Sacrifice of the Mass and what it constitutes and does not constitute.
:clapping: And it depends on what church one is at. At my grandparents’ church, the pastor would agree with this and even calls the church service Mass. They have a tabernacle on the alter. (The catholics nearby say if you want to see what the Mass used to be like, go to the Lutheran church.) At my church, just a few miles away, the pastors might agree with this, but one will never hear them refer to it as Mass. We’re getting closer and closer to church Prussian Union style. (Both LCMS churches, BTW.)
I would guess that after the Joint Declaration on Holy Orders this might be the next target the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church tackle just because they are so close on the issue.
:confused:
And I don’t blame your wife for leaving the LC-MS, they are separatists and have no wish for ecumenism. I doubt there is a more anti-Catholic Synod in America.
Stereotype. There are some of the most anti-catholic people in the LCMS, but what about Jesus First, DayStar, and RIM? They are a majority now. It was proven at the convention last year. They are for ecumenism.
However, I propose that there are even more in the LCMS who are anti-Lutheran. There are some pastors who left synod publicly crying they were run out because they were too Lutheran (LutherQuest), but these are not the ones I’m talking about. I’m talking about the ones who quietly left — those who were run out by their own members (I’ve seen that happen way too much), those who had to go out and work at gas stations because their District President will remove their names from the call list and make sure that they will never get a pastoral posistion again, and those who even received death threats. That’s why many don’t even want to hear the word “ecumenism.” How can ecumenical talks happen between synods and denominations when it can’t even happen in synod?

Gotta run and save my chickens.
 
TinaK said:
:clapping: And it depends on what church one is at. At my grandparents’ church, the pastor would agree with this and even calls the church service Mass. They have a tabernacle on the alter. (The catholics nearby say if you want to see what the Mass used to be like, go to the Lutheran church.) At my church, just a few miles away, the pastors might agree with this, but one will never hear them refer to it as Mass. We’re getting closer and closer to church Prussian Union style. (Both LCMS churches, BTW.)

:confused:

Stereotype. There are some of the most anti-catholic people in the LCMS, but what about Jesus First, DayStar, and RIM? They are a majority now. It was proven at the convention last year. They are for ecumenism.
However, I propose that there are even more in the LCMS who are anti-Lutheran. There are some pastors who left synod publicly crying they were run out because they were too Lutheran (LutherQuest), but these are not the ones I’m talking about. I’m talking about the ones who quietly left — those who were run out by their own members (I’ve seen that happen way too much), those who had to go out and work at gas stations because their District President will remove their names from the call list and make sure that they will never get a pastoral posistion again, and those who even received death threats. That’s why many don’t even want to hear the word “ecumenism.” How can ecumenical talks happen between synods and denominations when it can’t even happen in synod?

Gotta run and save my chickens.

The LC-MS is having their problems to be sure but that is because of their separatist mindset. My best guess is that you will end up with a split with two Synods claiming to be the LC-MS. One will be far more stringent and accuse the other of being non-Confessional and the other will say that they are being un-Christ-like.

Honestly though I don’t know why the one party doesn’t just join WELS?

Not that the ELCA is in any better condition. When the verdict finally gets passed down on Homosexual ministers it will cause a schism of that I have little doubt…

Within the next few years people will be longing for the time when the biggest problem in the Lutheran Church was what color hymnal to use.
 
40.png
Shibboleth:
Anyways the The Defense of the Augsburg Confession has pages on the Sacrifice of the Mass and what it constitutes and does not constitute.
The Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church are trying to hammer out another statement like the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification but in this instance it will be on the subject of Holy Orders.

Personally I don’t see how they can bridge this gap. I guess some of the precepts of the Historic Episcopate could be applied but considering that the Lutheran’s believe in an invisible Church and many of the Synods ordain women… I dunno they will either have to ignore certain huge differences or use obfuscatory language.
 
40.png
Shibboleth:
The Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church are trying to hammer out another statement like the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification but in this instance it will be on the subject of Holy Orders.

Personally I don’t see how they can bridge this gap. I guess some of the precepts of the Historic Episcopate could be applied but considering that the Lutheran’s believe in an invisible Church and many of the Synods ordain women… I dunno they will either have to ignore certain huge differences or use obfuscatory language.
No human can bridge this gap. But God can.

We all know that disunity is not what Christ wanted in His Church. Just because mere humans can’t see the light at the end of hte tunnel doesn’t mean that His followers can’t and shouldn’t work toward this end. To do so in the midst of so many seemingly unbridgable obstacles requires faith.
 
40.png
Shibboleth:
The Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church are trying to hammer out another statement like the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification but in this instance it will be on the subject of Holy Orders.

Personally I don’t see how they can bridge this gap. I guess some of the precepts of the Historic Episcopate could be applied but considering that the Lutheran’s believe in an invisible Church and many of the Synods ordain women… I dunno they will either have to ignore certain huge differences or use obfuscatory language.
Now that is very interesting! The LCMS is involved in some talks, but this is the first I heard of that subject. Any documentation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top