At the time, the pope claimed secular power and required communion with him to receive God’s grace - in the fervor of the time I could see why such language was used.
We
have to understand that the Pope had Excommunicated these people as marked them for damnation as per two Papal Bulls.
God gave these people the Gospel, and the Bishop of Rome gave them damnation - frankly, I would have acted less unwisely then them.
…
I decided to crack open out Giant Book of Rules and noted with satisfaction that this anti-christ language doesn’t appear in the Augsburg Confession itself *. In rereading, the Augsburg, I’m actually stuck at how level-headed it is - even by modern standards.
- Please correct me if I’m wrong, I very well could be as I skimmed it.