A
anon10271182
Guest
I’ve recently thought about it this way–
Can you imagine being Joseph and approaching the Mother of God, whose womb, whose entire body has been sanctified by virtue of the Incarnation, for sexual relations? I can’t.
Further, Mary and Joseph and Jesus would have slept in the same room for all of Jesus’ pre-adult, and apparently some of his adult life. That’s the way the vast majority of people lived back then, unless they were of the wealthy elite class–which they obviously weren’t. So again, can’t imagine…
I’ve encountered a number of Protestants who insist that Mary and Joseph had subsequent, natural children, despite these issues and despite the obvious fact that “brothers and sisters” as used at the time were broad terms, encompassing half brothers, cousins, etc. And desipte the fact that from the cross, Jesus gave John to Mary as her son. He wouldn’t have done that if he had living brothers, under Jewish law. Unless we’re supposed to believe that he did have brothers, and they all conveniently died before him, in the last couple of years of his three year ministry.
Those who insist that Mary and Joseph had natural children, after Mary carried the incarnate God in her womb for nine months, birthed and nourished and nurtured him, detract from the glory of Christ. As if His was just a routine Incarnation, and a routine Nativity.
Can you imagine being Joseph and approaching the Mother of God, whose womb, whose entire body has been sanctified by virtue of the Incarnation, for sexual relations? I can’t.
Further, Mary and Joseph and Jesus would have slept in the same room for all of Jesus’ pre-adult, and apparently some of his adult life. That’s the way the vast majority of people lived back then, unless they were of the wealthy elite class–which they obviously weren’t. So again, can’t imagine…
I’ve encountered a number of Protestants who insist that Mary and Joseph had subsequent, natural children, despite these issues and despite the obvious fact that “brothers and sisters” as used at the time were broad terms, encompassing half brothers, cousins, etc. And desipte the fact that from the cross, Jesus gave John to Mary as her son. He wouldn’t have done that if he had living brothers, under Jewish law. Unless we’re supposed to believe that he did have brothers, and they all conveniently died before him, in the last couple of years of his three year ministry.
Those who insist that Mary and Joseph had natural children, after Mary carried the incarnate God in her womb for nine months, birthed and nourished and nurtured him, detract from the glory of Christ. As if His was just a routine Incarnation, and a routine Nativity.
Last edited: