P
patrick457
Guest
We go back to the question: did every saint in that period use the Greek Septuagint? Where would that put Syriac Christians and post-Hieronymian Latin Christians? Were they somehow using inferior Scriptures because they used versions that are not (totally) derived from the LXX? (Especially the Vulgate.) This kinda sounds to me like a stereotypical KJV-onlyism mentality: if the King James Version is the inspired word of God, what about people who did not and do not speak English and use other versions?Because the holiest saints says so. End of story
No scholars of the “me-generation” can override the fact that the Saintly Scholars of the early church said that the Greek Old Testament should be the standard. Therefor I think it should. We should use the one used by the Saints themselves.
We should follow the advice of the fathers and leave our minds behind and reach to where understanding can not reach
In reality. Catholicism is faaaar closer to Protestantism than orthodox christianity.
I won’t deny that Latin Catholicism has some closer links to Protestantism (which after all broke from it) than Eastern Christianity. There’s a huge difference in emphasizing some theological points. Incidentally I should talk about Sacred Tradition. The East sees Tradition as something fixed and unchangeable. In Eastern thinking, it was handed down complete as it is: it is not regarded as something which grows and expands over time, forming a collection of practices and doctrines which accrue, gradually becoming something more developed. The West sees it a little differently: the Faith continues to deepen and develop over time, and in our understanding of it, all the while staying the same in essence.