major mormon mistake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mercury7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D&C 132
19 And again, verily I say unto you, if a man marry a wife by my word, which is my law, and by the new and everlasting covenant, and it is sealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of promise, by him who is anointed, unto whom I have appointed this power and the keys of this priesthood; and it shall be said unto them—Ye shall come forth in the first resurrection; and if it be after the first resurrection, in the next resurrection; and shall inherit thrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths—then shall it be written in the Lamb’s Book of Life, that he shall commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, and if ye abide in my covenant, and commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, it shall be done unto them in all things whatsoever my servant hath put upon them, in time, and through all eternity; and shall be of full force when they are out of the world; and they shall pass by the angels, and the gods, which are set there, to their exaltation and glory in all things, as hath been sealed upon their heads, which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the seeds forever and ever.

20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from everlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be gods, because they have call power, and the angels are subject unto them.
Thank you for this direct LDS source!
 
You and I in a small way are contributing to the fulfillment of the prophecy of Moroni that Joseph Smith’s name would be known for good and evil among all nations, kindreds, and tongues.

lds.org/scriptures/pgp/js-h/1?lang=eng See verse 33.
anyone who is a scam artist knows that will be the case. The fact that Joseph knew this and wrote a book about a guy saying it does not change that
 
Ok, I have to get this book…LOL

How Ironic that the capitol Is Moroni, in South Africa, and they had a ban on blacks and the priesthood.

Just amazing, and just when I thought I had heard it all.
OK, please, there are some geographical and historical inaccuracies here in respect of the Comoros and South Africa:

Moroni (or whatever it may be called these days, as many cities and countries in the general region of Africa have seen name changes over the past 50 or so years), capital of the Comoros is absolutely not in South Africa, is not and never has been. The Comoros are a group of islands off southern Africa - South Africa is the country at the southern end of the continent of Africa.

And there was never a ban on blacks and the priesthood in South Africa (yes, there were some very bad things done politically and some under the cloak of Christianity, but not a ban as such).
 
The now Catholic Thomas Smith isn’t the only former Mormon who has spoken about this being their beliefs. The LDS Church doesn’t allow their Missionaries to tell people about it because they know how it sounds, but if you tell them you already know, their not supposed to deny it. They also believe that the Apostle John never died and is still wandering around the world and getting mistaken as “Big Foot”.
I’ve heard it was Cain that is alive and being mistaken for “Big Foot”
 
As with all hearesies, they make it very appealing to human nature, without regard to the Spirit that we were made in.

John 3: 5,Jesus answered, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.:hmmm:

God Bless
onenow1
 
We know that the Book of Abraham is a complete fake. Why would we assume that plagiarizing was beneath him? He plagiarized the King James Bible.
Thank you. That was my first thought.

The BoA is a complete and utter fraud, so everything is up for grabs, including where the name Moroni came from.
 
OK, please, there are some geographical and historical inaccuracies here in respect of the Comoros and South Africa:
Take it up with wiki. “At 1,862 km2 (719 sq mi), excluding the contested island of Mayotte,[3] the Comoros is the third-smallest African nation by area”
Bolding mine
Moroni (or whatever it may be called these days, as many cities and countries in the general region of Africa have seen name changes over the past 50 or so years), capital of the Comoros is absolutely not in South Africa, is not and never has been.
No one is disputing name changes over 50 +/- yrs, As far as the Captial not being in South Africa, that is not what was said. It was stated as **Southern **Africa, as in the southern part of the continent of Africa.
Try reading post # 28 again.
The Comoros are a group of islands off southern Africa - South Africa is the country at the southern end of the continent of Africa.
Again, read post # 28, that is what was stated.
And there was never a ban on blacks and the priesthood in South Africa (yes, there were some very bad things done politically and some under the cloak of Christianity, but not a ban as such).
Are you familiar with mormonism at all? They had a ban on black and their priesthood from Brigham Young’s time right up until their “revelation” in 1978 allowing it.

I think you’re mixing some apples and oranges here. 1. We are not talking about South Africa, we are talking about Southern Africa. 2. We are talking about the mormon ban on their priesthood, which was world wide until 1978, so if there was a mormon presence in southern, or even South Africa, there was indeed a ban on blacks and the mormon priesthood.

Are you confusing some of this with Apartheid? If you are, you are definitely comparing apples and oranges.

ETA: Had you been following the thread, you would have realized that my stating south africa was merely a typo. 🤷
 
The now Catholic Thomas Smith isn’t the only former Mormon who has spoken about this being their beliefs. The LDS Church doesn’t allow their Missionaries to tell people about it because they know how it sounds, but if you tell them you already know, their not supposed to deny it. They also believe that the Apostle John never died and is still wandering around the world and getting mistaken as “Big Foot”.
No, it is Cain who gets mistaken for Bigfoot.

Paul (formerly LDS, now happily Catholic)
 
gazelam, can you not defend your faith? all you can seem to do is give links. we want to know what you believe and not what others believe say about your faith.
 
No, it is Cain who gets mistaken for Bigfoot.

Paul (formerly LDS, now happily Catholic)
🙂 the Mormon Missionaries who shared that with me pointed to a verse in the New Testament to “prove it” - where Jesus said “what is it to you if he lives until my coming again” - or something like that 🙂

Could Bigfoot be “Cain” in some Mormon groups & “John the Apostle” in others?
 
Could Bigfoot be “Cain” in some Mormon groups & “John the Apostle” in others?
When gnostics claim to be one church, many different people will have many different revelations. I suppose the tritheistic plus infinity church is on its way to becoming Unitarian? 😃
 
gazelam, can you not defend your faith? all you can seem to do is give links. we want to know what you believe and not what others believe say about your faith.
Sometimes referring to someone else’s research is the best way to respond. There’s no way I’m going to spend time investigating the Moroni/Comoros/Captain Kidd baloney. For one thing I’m a working stiff and not some ivory tower scholar paid to research 30 hours per week. Even if I did it would take time to read a book and then get a second opinion, by the time I did that the thread will be long dead. Here’s a posting where I defended LDS beliefs: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=10223015#post10223015

I hope this helps.
 
Sometimes referring to someone else’s research is the best way to respond. There’s no way I’m going to spend time investigating the Moroni/Comoros/Captain Kidd baloney. For one thing I’m a working stiff and not some ivory tower scholar paid to research 30 hours per week. Even if I did it would take time to read a book and then get a second opinion, by the time I did that the thread will be long dead. Here’s a posting where I defended LDS beliefs: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=10223015#post10223015

I hope this helps.
Im also no ivory tower scholar but sometimes one must take that time and do a little personal research 🙂
 
gazelam, can you not defend your faith? all you can seem to do is give links. we want to know what you believe and not what others believe say about your faith.
Yeah, being sent on a task on each and every post is getting a little old.
 
FYI gazelem, fair is aimed at the faithful. They’re “arguments” to non-Mormon eyes are thin.
 
Sometimes referring to someone else’s research is the best way to respond. There’s no way I’m going to spend time investigating the Moroni/Comoros/Captain Kidd baloney. For one thing I’m a working stiff and not some ivory tower scholar paid to research 30 hours per week. Even if I did it would take time to read a book and then get a second opinion, by the time I did that the thread will be long dead. Here’s a posting where I defended LDS beliefs: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=10223015#post10223015

I hope this helps.
Hi gazelam - Why is JS’ connection to Captain Kidd and the Island of Comoros with the capitol city of Moroni baloney?

Everyone knew that JS read about Captain Kidd - and, YES, JS could read - so why wouldn’t he know about Comoros/Moroni?

Have you ever seen a writing sample of JS? Very nice penmanship. He was not who you think he was.
 
Sometimes referring to someone else’s research is the best way to respond. There’s no way I’m going to spend time investigating the Moroni/Comoros/Captain Kidd baloney. For one thing I’m a working stiff and not some ivory tower scholar paid to research 30 hours per week. Even if I did it would take time to read a book and then get a second opinion, by the time I did that the thread will be long dead. Here’s a posting where I defended LDS beliefs: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=10223015#post10223015

I hope this helps.
Here is someone else’s research about Joseph Smith: (from Mormonthink)

Joseph’s education.
Joseph Smith did have limited formal education and that’s often heralded as ‘proof’ that he could not have written the BOM. However most people do not know that Joseph’s father, Joseph Smith, Sr., was a school teacher during the off season. Joseph’s brother, Hyrum, worked as a school teacher during the off season also. One of his sisters may have also been a teacher at some point in her life. This wasn’t a family of illiterates. Education was important to the Smith family, and although Joseph may have only had limited formal education in a typical classroom, his parents undoubtedly schooled him at home. Also Joseph was going to high school when he was 20 years old in Harmony PA with the Stowell children.

Joseph was able to read and ponder scriptures. His parents were literate. He had access to books and newspapers. He even held a position as “exhorter” at a local church. Joseph’s mother wrote that they did not neglect the education of their children.

In the early 1800s few children were able to have a full education. Most children in rural America worked on farms and often had much of their education done at home. As Joseph Smith Sr. was an actual school teacher at various times in his life, he would be quite capable of teaching general education to his children, including Joseph. Joseph’s mother, Lucy Smith, would undoubtedly help as well. Even Abraham Lincoln had a very limited formal education, and Benjamin Franklin had only one year of formal education.

Religious education

Young Joseph was able to read and ponder scriptures. Joseph also attended many protestant church services and studied the Bible in depth. According to Joseph Smith’s mother he told her, back before the BOM came forth that,

“I can take my Bible, and go into the woods, and learn more in two hours, than you can learn at meetings in two years, if you should go all the time.” [Lucy Mack Smith, Biographical Sketches of Joseph Smith, the Prophet, and His Progenitors for Many Generations (Liverpool: S. W. Richards, 1853), p. 90]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top