Major scandal; Now proven that the entire global warming threat is based on fabricated data

[kimmielittle]

It would seem that the majority of the world’s scientists do agree on global warming

Please check out this link:
pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=902

Hiyas

What do those Scientist think about “Cap-and-trade”?
Do they think this will reverse Climate Change?

If you look at the questions…do you see a problem?

Example: “Warming is do to human activity”

That seems, to me, a very generic question. In other words, It doesn’t address: Which Activity. When I turn the heat on in my home…I indeed heat-up OR cause the atmosphere within my home to warm. As “Green” as I am, I’m sure some of that radiant heat escapes to the Worlds atmosphere.

While I hold Pew in high esteem… They fail to publish which / type scientist were polled. many scientist are indeed brilliant in their respected fields but fail miserably outside that field. If they did know; we wouldn’t need specialized fields.

I am a firm believer that humankind does indeed impact the environment. But The good scientist have failed to prove CO2 is 1; the cause…2; That the massive Cap-and-Trade legislation…will curb climate change. 3: That this Cap-and-Trade is the safe alternative to sane environmental stewardship of resources.

One if indeed an environmentalist ] must not only look at the evidence of climate change…But what is being sold as a 'fix" And what is being called the culprit.

I believe, Nature is far from simple and far from definable…at the present.
I believe, Scientists should be above conflicts of interests. Write your books etc after you proved your theory - Not write your books etc to prove your theory.

As always, just my thoughts

 

[kimmielittle]

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235395/SPECIAL-INVESTIGATION-Climate-change-emails-row-deepens–Russians-admit-DID-send-them.html#ixzz0ZWuk74d5

Hiyas
Thanks for the link

 

[Don_L]

**
“I am a firm believer that humankind does indeed impact the environment.” **

Yes, but the eco-worsshippers fail to see the tremendous good that we have done fot mankind as a result. It just takes a few minutes of thinking to recall all those myriad of ways in which we’'ve impacted nature for the good of all. Have we made mistakes, certainly, but we’ve also repaired many.

Nature is not a static thing to be worshipped from afar, nor a system so fragile that it will fall apart if we use it properly (conservation)

Nature is not a system that would be perfect were man removed from it,as some believe, for man is as much a part of nature, or as some believe, just another species. In a religious site -we know that man is called to have dominion over it - and that includes proper use and conservation - not worship or fear.

 

[kimmielittle]

**
“I am a firm believer that humankind does indeed impact the environment.” **

Yes, but the eco-worsshippers fail to see the tremendous good that we have done fot mankind as a result. It just takes a few minutes of thinking to recall all those myriad of ways in which we’'ve impacted nature for the good of all. Have we made mistakes, certainly, but we’ve also repaired many.

Nature is not a static thing to be worshipped from afar, nor a system so fragile that it will fall apart if we use it properly (conservation)

Nature is not a system that would be perfect were man removed from it,as some believe, for man is as much a part of nature, or as some believe, just another species. In a religious site -we know that man is called to have dominion over it - and that includes proper use and conservation - not worship or fear.

I can not agree more

 

[Cracker_Mom]

Global warming seems just one more concept that those who wold control society can hide behind.
As someone pointed out, back in the '70’s it was the coming “Ice Age” & the “Population Bomb.” We were supposed to have run out of food & natural resources by now…
Folks act like scared sheep. That said, there is always room for improvement re.the way we use natural resources. You only have to look at the passenger pigeon to see the waste that can occur. People are often short sighted.

 

[kimmielittle]

I have a simple Question:

Why do you think COP15 centers itself on “Global Warming” and the supposed culprit CO2 emissions?

Hints:

You can’t make a lot of money:
Teaching a reverence for ALL life.
Feeding the Poor.
Sending Specialist to help developing Nations protect the environment while farming better.
Educating the illiterate.
Planting trees.
Protecting renewable resources
Cleaning up water pollutants
Improving infrastructure.

These cost money.
These issues above, are what The Holy Father wants us to address. And He doesn’t mention CO2 AGW

As always, just my thoughts

VATICAN - Holy Father tells FAO Summit: “Hunger is the most cruel and concrete sign of poverty. Opulence and waste are no longer acceptable when the tragedy of hunger is assuming ever greater proportions.”

Rome (Agenzia Fides) - “Hunger is the most cruel and concrete sign of poverty. Opulence and waste are no longer acceptable when the tragedy of hunger is assuming ever greater proportions.” This is what the Holy Father Benedict XVI said in his address on November 26 at the FAO headquarters in Rome, on the opening of the World Summit on Food Security.

In his address, the Pope recalled that although “statistics bear witness to the dramatic growth in the number of people suffering from hunger,” it has also been confirmed that “the world has enough food for all its inhabitants” and that “there is no cause-and-effect relationship between population growth and hunger.” Reiterating what he had affirmed in his Encyclical Caritas in veritate, Benedict XVI mentioned that “the problem of food insecurity needs to be addressed within a long-term perspective, eliminating the structural causes that give rise to it and promoting the agricultural development of poorer countries,” and “the need to oppose those forms of aid that do grave damage to the agricultural sector, those approaches to food production that are geared solely towards consumption and lack a wider perspective, and especially greed, which causes speculation to rear its head even in the marketing of cereals, as if food were to be treated just like any other commodity.”

The Pontiff then reflected on the “weakness of current mechanisms for food security and the need to re-examine them,” highlighting that the concept of cooperation should be coherent with the principle of subsidiarity. “With regard to countries that are in need of external support, the international community has the duty to assist with the instruments of cooperation, assuming collective responsibility for their development,” the Pope said. “In this way, cooperation must become an effective instrument, unbeholden to interests that can absorb a not insignificant part of the resources destined for development.”

Benedict XVI also mentioned the risk of considering hunger “as structural, an integral part of the socio-political situation of the weakest countries, a matter of resigned regret, if not downright indifference.” “It is not so, and it must never be so!” the Pope exclaimed, saying that it was essential to “start redefining the concepts and principles that have hitherto governed international relations,” as “only in the name of common membership of the worldwide human family can every people and therefore every country be asked to practice solidarity, that is, to shoulder the burden of concrete responsibilities in meeting the needs of others, so as to favor the genuine sharing of goods, founded on love.”

To eliminate hunger, international action cannot limit itself to “international action is needed not only to promote balanced and sustainable economic growth and political stability, but also to seek out new parameters – primarily ethical but also juridical and economic ones – capable of inspiring the degree of cooperation required to build a relationship of parity between countries at different stages of development.”

In the second part of his address, the Holy Father indicated several necessary steps to take to combat hunger, promoting an integral human development: not view the rural world as something of secondary importance; favor access to the international market of products from the poorest areas; separate the rules of international trade from the logic of profit viewed as an end in itself. “Nor must the fundamental rights of the individual be forgotten, which include, of course, the right to sufficient, healthy and nutritious food, and likewise water; these rights take on an important role in the realization of others, beginning with the primary one, the right to life.”

Methods of food production likewise demand attentive analysis of the relationship between development and protection of the environment, as “the desire to possess and to exploit the resources of the planet in an excessive and disordered manner is the primary cause of all environmental degradation.” In this sense, the interaction between environmental protection and climate changes are further examined and the human person, especially the most vulnerable populations, are placed at the heart of both phenomena.

“Norms, legislation, development plans and investments are not enough, however: what is needed is a change in the lifestyles of individuals and communities, in habits of consumption and in perceptions of what is genuinely needed. Most of all, there is a moral duty to distinguish between good and evil in human action, so as to rediscover the bond of communion that unites the human person and creation,” the Pope warned. (Agenzia Fides / Fides Service (Catholic; Hierarchical; Vatican Based) 17 / 11 | November / 2009)

 

[4elise]

It would seem that the majority of the world’s scientists do agree on global warming

Please check out this link:
pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=902

I’m sure we will see posted that the pew research institute is a tool, (of course like the IPCC) that the Church has been duped, - it IS the majority of the world’s scientists - I guess not the scientists one individual knows.

 

[kimmielittle]

The “Global Warmist” Have a built-in money scheme called “Carbon Credits”.

Basically, It gives you permission to pollute more IF you have enough “credits”.

So, this gimmick off-sets the supposed “good” But only for the rich.

My question then is:

If we were Taking Care of Business [TCB] as we should be as good stewards in providing these services below…Doesn’t it by their own reasoning provide “Carbon Credits”?

Feeding the Poor.
Sending Specialist to help developing Nations protect the environment while farming better.
Educating the illiterate.
Planting trees.
Protecting renewable resources
Cleaning up water pollutants
Improving infrastructure.

How will we accomplish this without emitting CO2?

 

[Cracker_Mom]

I’m sure we will see posted that the pew research institute is a tool, (of course like the IPCC) that the Church has been duped, - it IS the majority of the world’s scientists - I guess not the scientists one individual knows.

OK. The Pew Research Institute is a tool.
Seriously, I’d wonder about them & their history. I don’t believe it’s a neutral, non-biased outfit at all.

 

[4elise]

I have a simple Question:

Why do you think COP15 centers itself on “Global Warming” and the supposed culprit CO2 emissions?

Hints:

You can’t make a lot of money:
Teaching a reverence for ALL life.
Feeding the Poor.
Sending Specialist to help developing Nations protect the environment while farming better.
Educating the illiterate.
Planting trees.
Protecting renewable resources
Cleaning up water pollutants
Improving infrastructure.

These cost money.
These issues above, are what The Holy Father wants us to address. And He doesn’t mention CO2 AGW

As always, just my thoughts

kimmie - this post from the Holy Father is beautiful - and the issues are the primary reason my husband and I became vegan a few years ago - not because of the animals, although I can’t stand to think of animals suffering - but the issue of resources and environmental damage caused by the production of meat, poultry, and dairy - I truly believe that my faith calls me to make this change - and I would invite anyone who really says that they care about what they can do as global stewards in response to the needs of the poor around the world - to consider making this change -

 

[4elise]

OK. The Pew Research Institute is a tool.
Seriously, I’d wonder about them & their history. I don’t believe it’s a neutral, non-biased outfit at all.

ta da!

 

[Cracker_Mom]

kimmie - this post from the Holy Father is beautiful - and the issues are the primary reason my husband and I became vegan a few years ago - not because of the animals, although I can’t stand to think of animals suffering - but the issue of resources and environmental damage caused by the production of meat, poultry, and dairy - I truly believe that my faith calls me to make this change - and I would invite anyone who really says that they care about what they can do as global stewards in response to the needs of the poor around the world - to consider making this change -

Shame on those shepherds abiding in the fields…
There are alternative methods of raising livestock today that actually improve the land, such as rotational grazing.

 

[spn82756]

It would seem that the majority of the world’s scientists do agree on global warming

Please check out this link:
pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=902

Like I said in previous posts…that is what the media wants you to believe. My guess is that if the media slanted something that made it anti-catholic you’d be right there talking about how unreliable and bias the media is. You telling me that I’m out to lunch is like you telling a priest how to say mass.

Ignorance is bliss. Oh…BTW…have you checked out sites like www.icecap.us? We are meteorologists and climatologists not actors…politicians…and scientists being made rich by fraudulent research.

 

[spn82756]

I’m sure we will see posted that the pew research institute is a tool, (of course like the IPCC) that the Church has been duped, - it IS the majority of the world’s scientists - I guess not the scientists one individual knows.

Escalating sarcasm. I guess I’ve never heard the Church say that AGW is occurring. As a matter of fact…the naive AGW folk no longer even call it GW…they call it climate change. They know they’ve lost.

BTW…this is site for the Non-Governmental International Panel on Climate Change.

nipccreport.org/

Bet you never heard of them or care to learn from them. That would acknowledge you being duped for so many years.

But then again…you’re the scientist…not me.

I heard the Vatican is looking for atheist humanists to guide them on worship.

Gotta run

 

[spn82756]

kimmie - this post from the Holy Father is beautiful - and the issues are the primary reason my husband and I became vegan a few years ago - not because of the animals, although I can’t stand to think of animals suffering - but the issue of resources and environmental damage caused by the production of meat, poultry, and dairy - I truly believe that my faith calls me to make this change - and I would invite anyone who really says that they care about what they can do as global stewards in response to the needs of the poor around the world - to consider making this change -

Well I will say this. have agreed that if the AGW hoax helps to make life better for developing and 3rd world countries is a great unintended outcome. But where are you going to be when you or your husband wife loses a job because of AGW? What are you going to think when your protective government raises taxes by 300% on fossil fuels and your husband or wife can’t afford to drive 50 miles each way to work.

Being personally naive is fine…but when you risk ruining the lives of others it’s sinful.

 

[spn82756]

I’m sure we will see posted that the pew research institute is a tool, (of course like the IPCC) that the Church has been duped, - it IS the majority of the world’s scientists - I guess not the scientists one individual knows.

BTW…I think you’ll see the person who started this thread has quite a bit of knowledge on the situation also. But then again he’s one of those scientists who doesn’t see AGW…I guess he’s just one of your so called lost…as I am.

**
Wait a minute…did you stay at a Holiday Inn last night? That explains it.
**

 

[kimmielittle]

An Open letter

Written By: Over 140 Scientists
Publication date: 12/09/2009
Publisher: Compenhagen Climate Challenge
His Excellency Ban Ki Moon
Secretary-General, United Nations
New York, NY
United States of America

8 December 2009

Dear Secretary-General,

Climate change science is in a period of ‘negative discovery’ - the more we learn about this exceptionally complex and rapidly evolving field the more we realize how little we know. Truly, the science is NOT settled.
Therefore, there is no sound reason to impose expensive and restrictive public policy decisions on the peoples of the Earth without first providing convincing evidence that human activities are causing dangerous climate change beyond that resulting from natural causes. Before any precipitate action is taken, we must have solid observational data demonstrating that recent changes in climate differ substantially from changes observed in the past and are well in excess of normal variations caused by solar cycles, ocean currents, changes in the Earth’s orbital parameters and other natural phenomena.
We the undersigned, being qualified in climate-related scientific disciplines, challenge the UNFCCC and supporters of the United Nations Climate Change Conference to produce convincing OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE for their claims of dangerous human-caused global warming and other changes in climate. Projections of possible future scenarios from unproven computer models of climate are not acceptable substitutes for real world data obtained through unbiased and rigorous scientific investigation.
Specifically, we challenge supporters of the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused climate change to demonstrate that:
Variations in global climate in the last hundred years are significantly outside the natural range experienced in previous centuries;
Humanity’s emissions of carbon dioxide and other ‘greenhouse gases’ (GHG) are having a dangerous impact on global climate;
Computer-based models can meaningfully replicate the impact of all of the natural factors that may significantly influence climate;
Sea levels are rising dangerously at a rate that has accelerated with increasing human GHG emissions, thereby threatening small islands and coastal communities;
The incidence of malaria is increasing due to recent climate changes;
Human society and natural ecosystems cannot adapt to foreseeable climate change as they have done in the past;
Worldwide glacier retreat, and sea ice melting in Polar Regions , is unusual and related to increases in human GHG emissions;
Polar bears and other Arctic and Antarctic wildlife are unable to adapt to anticipated local climate change effects, independent of the causes of those changes;
Hurricanes, other tropical cyclones and associated extreme weather events are increasing in severity and frequency;
Data recorded by ground-based stations are a reliable indicator of surface temperature trends.

It is not the responsibility of ‘climate realist’ scientists to prove that dangerous human-caused climate change is not happening. Rather, it is those who propose that it is, and promote the allocation of massive investments to solve the supposed ‘problem’, who have the obligation to convincingly demonstrate that recent climate change is not of mostly natural origin and, if we do nothing, catastrophic change will ensue. To date, this they have utterly failed to do so.

to be continued

 

[spn82756]

An Open letter

to be continued

God Bless you. I’ve had long articles that I could have attached but haven’t. I’m going to have to start following your lead.

Steve

 

[kimmielittle]

Signers… BTW these are NON governmental paid] Scientists:

Habibullo I. Abdussamatov, Dr. Sci., mathematician and astrophysicist, Head of the Russian-Ukrainian Astrometria project on the board of the Russian segment of the ISS, Head of Space Research Laboratory at the Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia

Göran Ahlgren, docent organisk kemi, general secretary of the Stockholm Initiative, Professor of Organic Chemistry, Stockholm, Sweden
Syun-Ichi Akasofu, PhD, Professor of Physics, Emeritus and Founding Director, International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A.

J.R. Alexander, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Member, UN Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000, Pretoria, South Africa.

Jock Allison, PhD, ONZM, formerly Ministry of Agriculture Regional Research Director, Dunedin, New Zealand

Bjarne Andresen, PhD, dr. scient, physicist, published and presents on the impossibility of a “global temperature”, Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Timothy F. Ball, PhD, environmental consultant and former climatology professor, University of Winnipeg, Member, Science Advisory Board, ICSC, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Douglas W. Barr, BS (Meteorology, University of Chicago), BS and MS (Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota), Barr Engineering Co. (environmental issues and water resources), Minnesota, U.S.A.

Romuald Bartnik, PhD (Organic Chemistry), Professor Emeritus, Former chairman of the Department of Organic and Applied Chemistry, climate work in cooperation with Department of Hydrology and

Geological Museum, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

Colin Barton, B.Sc., PhD, Earth Science, Principal research scientist (retd), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Joe Bastardi, BSc, (Meteorology, Pennsylvania State), meteorologist, State College, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Ernst-Georg Beck, Dipl. Biol. (University of Freiburg), Biologist, Freiburg, Germany

David Bellamy, OBE, English botanist, author, broadcaster, environmental campaigner, Hon. Professor of Botany (Geography), University of Nottingham, Hon. Prof. Faculty of Engineering and Physical Systems, Central Queensland University, Hon. Prof. of Adult and Continuing Education, University of Durham, United Nations Environment Program Global 500 Award Winner, Dutch Order of The Golden Ark, Bishop Auckland County, Durham, U.K.

M. I. Bhat, Professor & Head, Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India

Ian R. Bock, BSc, PhD, DSc, Biological sciences (retired), Ringkobing, Denmark

Sonja A. Boehmer-Christiansen, PhD, Reader Emeritus, Dept. of Geography, Hull University, Editor - Energy&Environment, Multi-Science (www.multi-science.co.uk), Hull, United Kingdom

Atholl Sutherland Brown, PhD (Geology, Princeton University), Regional Geology, Tectonics and Mineral Deposits, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Stephen C. Brown, PhD (Environmental Science, State University of New York), District Agriculture Agent, Assistant Professor, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Ground Penetrating Radar Glacier research, Palmer, Alaska, U.S.A.

James Buckee, D.Phil. (Oxon), focus on stellar atmospheres, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Dan Carruthers, M.Sc., Arctic Animal Behavioural Ecologist, wildlife biology consultant specializing in animal ecology in Arctic and Subarctic regions, Alberta, Canada

Robert M. Carter, PhD, Professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Dr. Arthur V. Chadwick, PhD, Geologist, dendrochronology (analyzing tree rings to determine past climate) lecturing, Southwestern Adventist University, Keene, Texas, U.S.A.

George V. Chilingar, PhD, Member, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow President, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, U.S.A. Section, Emeritus Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Ian D. Clark, PhD, Professor (isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology), Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Charles A. Clough, BS (Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), MS (Atmospheric Science, Texas Tech University), former (to 2006) Chief of the US Army Atmospheric Effects Team at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland; now residing in Bel Air, Maryland, U.S.A.

Paul Copper, BSc, MSc, PhD, DIC, FRSC, Professor Emeritus, Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Piers Corbyn, MSc (Physics (Imperial College London)), ARCS, FRAS, FRMetS, astrophysicist (Queen Mary College, London), consultant, founder WeatherAction long range forecasters, London, United Kingdom

Allan Cortese, meteorological researcher and spotter for the National Weather Service, retired computer professional, Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Richard S. Courtney, PhD, energy and environmental consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, Falmouth, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Susan Crockford, PhD (Zoology/Evolutionary Biology/Archaeozoology), Adjunct Professor (Anthropology/Faculty of Graduate Studies), University of Victoria, Victoria, British Colombia, Canada

to be continued

 

[kimmielittle]

Claude Culross, PhD (Organic Chemistry), retired, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.A.

Joseph D’Aleo, BS, MS (Meteorology, University of Wisconsin), Doctoral Studies (NYU), Executive Director - ICECAP (International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project), Fellow of the AMS, College Professor Climatology/Meteorology, First Director of Meteorology The Weather Channel, Hudson, New Hampshire, U.S.A.

Chris R. de Freitas, PhD, Climate Scientist, School of Environment, The University of Auckland, New Zealand

Willem de Lange, MSc (Hons), DPhil (Computer and Earth Sciences), Senior Lecturer in Earth and Ocean Sciences, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand

James DeMeo, PhD (University of Kansas 1986, Earth/Climate Science), now in Private Research, Ashland, Oregon, U.S.A.

David Deming, PhD (Geophysics), Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

James E Dent; B.Sc., FCIWEM, C.Met, FRMetS, C.Env., Independent Consultant, Member of WMO OPACHE Group on Flood Warning, Hadleigh, Suffolk, England

Robert W. Durrenberger, PhD, former Arizona State Climatologist and President of the American Association of State Climatologists, Professor Emeritus of Geography, Arizona State University; Sun City, Arizona, U.S.A.

Don J. Easterbrook, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Geology, Western Washington, University, Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A.

Per Engene, MSc, Biologist, Bø i Telemark, Norway, Co-author The Climate. Science and Politics (2009)

Robert H. Essenhigh, PhD, E.G. Bailey Professor of Energy Conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.

David Evans, PhD (EE), MSc (Stat), MSc (EE), MA (Math), BE (EE), BSc, mathematician, carbon accountant and modeler, computer and electrical engineer and head of ‘Science Speak’, Scientific Advisory Panel member - Australian Climate Science Coalition, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Sören Floderus, PhD (Physical Geography (Uppsala University)), coastal-environment specialization, Copenhagen, Denmark

Louis Fowler, BS (Mathematics), MA (Physics), 33 years in environmental measurements (Ambient Air Quality Measurements), Austin, Texas, U.S.A.

Stewart Franks, PhD, Professor, Hydroclimatologist, University of Newcastle, Australia

Gordon Fulks, PhD (Physics, University of Chicago), cosmic radiation, solar wind, electromagnetic and geophysical phenomena, Corbett, Oregon, U.S.A.

R. W. Gauldie, PhD, Research Professor, Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology, University of Hawai’i at Manoa (Retired), U.S.A.

David G. Gee, Professor of Geology (Emeritus), Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavagen 16, Uppsala, Sweden

Lee C. Gerhard, PhD, Senior Scientist Emeritus, University of Kansas, past director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey, U.S.A.

Gerhard Gerlich, Dr.rer.nat. (Mathematical Physics: Magnetohydrodynamics) habil. (Real Measure Manifolds), Professor, Institut für Mathematische Physik, Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, Co-author of “Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2

Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics”, Int.J.Mod.Phys.,2009

Albrecht Glatzle, PhD, ScAgr, Agro-Biologist and Gerente ejecutivo, Tropical pasture research and land use management, Director científico de INTTAS, Loma Plata, Paraguay

Fred Goldberg, PhD, Adj Professor, Royal Institute of Technology (Mech, Eng.), Secretary General KTH International Climate Seminar 2006 and Climate analyst and member of NIPCC, Lidingö, Sweden

Wayne Goodfellow, PhD (Earth Science), Ocean Evolution, Paleoenvironments, Adjunct Professor, Senior Research Scientist, University of Ottawa, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Thomas B. Gray, MS, Meteorology, Retired, USAF, Yachats, Oregon, U.S.A.

Vincent Gray, PhD, New Zealand Climate Coalition, expert reviewer for the IPCC, author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of Climate Change 2001, Wellington, New Zealand

William M. Gray, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.

Kenneth P. Green, M.Sc. (Biology, University of San Diego) and a Doctorate in Environmental Science and Engineering from the University of California at Los Angeles, Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

Charles B. Hammons, PhD (Applied Mathematics), systems/software engineering, modeling & simulation, design, Consultant, Coyle, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

William Happer, PhD, Cyrus Fogg Bracket Professor of Physics (research focus is interaction of light and matter, a key mechanism for global warming and cooling), Princeton University; Former Director, Office of Energy Research (now Office of Science), US Department of Energy (supervised climate change research), Member - National Academy of Sciences of the USA, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, American Philosophical Society; Princeton, NJ, USA.

Howard Hayden, PhD, Emeritus Professor (Physics), University of Connecticut, The Energy Advocate, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Ross Hays, Atmospheric Scientist, NASA Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility, Palestine, Texas, U.S.A.

James A. Heimbach, Jr., BA Physics (Franklin and Marshall College), Master’s and PhD in Meteorology (Oklahoma University), Prof. Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences (University of North Carolina at Asheville), Springvale, Maine, U.S.A.

Ole Humlum, PhD, Professor, Department of Physical Geography, Institute of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Craig D. Idso, PhD, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.

to be continued