Malaysian churches fire-bombed as 'Allah' row escalates

  • Thread starter Thread starter CmGuy89
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Makes you want to run right out and convert to that “Religion of Peace” doesn’t it? :rolleyes::mad:

Newsflash: “Allah” was the Arabic word for God BEFORE THE FALSE RELIGION CALLED ISLAM WAS EVEN INVENTED!!!

In Christ,

Ellen
 
Row my bum. That’s is an attack on us thanks to the “Religion of Peace”.
 
The word ‘Allah’ as has evolved in the Islamic religion, is likely more accurately translated as some derivative of the word ‘Satan’ as it is commonly used in the Christian vernacular.

These are not God-worshippers we are dealing with. These are resentful envious devil-worshippers following in the pridefull ways of their father, Satan.

It is the peace of the devil, with the resentful, unsatisfied hordes being brought together in the ritual violence against a convenient scapegoat. Rather than direct the violence toward each other, this violence that is the byproduct of their unfilled lives, a byproduct of the state of covetous envy that following the precepts of Mohammed will perpetuate, they direct the violence onto a powerless third party, thereby re-consolidating tribal loyalty and a temporary state of harmony.
Such is the lot of those who reject Christ in their worship of God.

Without Christ, Allah takes on all the characteristics of a demon in the eyes of those who worship such a deity.
 
Not quoting directly, but the catechism tells us there are elements of truth in Islam. John Paul II the Great kissed a koran he received as a gift as a sign of respect (diplomatically, not deferentially to the Islamic religion). I’ve tried to have Christian charity towards Islam, but everyday another story like this…

Is it wrong to judge a tree by the fruit it produces (or lack thereof)?
 
aswingleh said:
Not quoting directly, but the catechism tells us there are elements of truth in Islam. John Paul II the Great kissed a koran he received as a gift as a sign of respect (diplomatically, not deferentially to the Islamic religion). I’ve tried to have Christian charity towards Islam, but everyday another story like this…

Is it wrong to judge a tree by the fruit it produces (or lack thereof)?
Click to expand...
Quite the contrary, it is wrong not to judge a tree by the fruit it produces or lack thereof.

The attempts by popes and catechism to reach out may or may not be politically misguided, but in they end they are more about diplomacy and respect than they are about anything to do with the truth of Islam. We must recognize that Pope John Paul’s life was defined by the murder of six million Jews in Europe due to intolerance, some of them his close friends. His was an opposition to the forces that led to this butchery.
Liberal guilt now has that fair play entails that we ourselves succumb to such barbarity. Two wrongs do not make a right of course.

Compared to the tribal primitiveness of the Arabs that came before it, the catechism is indeed diplomatically correct in seeing the elements of Judeo-Christian belief introduced to these primitives by Mohammed as being progress. That in no way takes away from the fact that this is with the end goal of Christ in mind.

Without Christ, Moslems are lost, and it shows more and more as the actual elements of their faith are being reintroduced to them. It is more a pagan religion than a Judeo-Christian heresy.
 
aswingleh said:
Not quoting directly, but the catechism tells us there are elements of truth in Islam. John Paul II the Great kissed a koran he received as a gift as a sign of respect (diplomatically, not deferentially to the Islamic religion). I’ve tried to have Christian charity towards Islam, but everyday another story like this…

Is it wrong to judge a tree by the fruit it produces (or lack thereof)?
Click to expand...
John Paul did that politically not for religious reasons and let me tell something the only reason their is even a bit of real history in the demonic koran is because the murderer muhammad followers plagarized from other religions mainly christianity and changed up their ideas in order to start a false religion(islam) so they could have more money and power!

The assyrians which were one of the first christians and still today are 99% christian created the word alaahaa and were the first ones to use it and all of them still use it today and all through history. then the arabic(foreigners) christians which existed before muslims came in and stole the word from assyrians and took the last part and changed it to allah and now the crazy muslims are complaining about a word which does not even belong to them it belongs to christians. Islam by far is the most dumb and voilent religion to ever exist!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top