Not liking this article AT ALL! What sort of dope wrote this? Well congrats, I’m never buying your paper again. They try to end on a niec note but it doesn’t work.Richard Dawkins has been right all along, of course—at least in one important respect. Evolution has indeed dealt a blow to the idea of a benign creator, literally conceived. It tells us that there is no Intelligence controlling the cosmos, and that life itself is the result of a blind process of natural selection, in which innumerable species failed to survive. The fossil record reveals a natural history of pain, death and racial extinction, so if there was a divine plan, it was cruel, callously prodigal and wasteful. Human beings were not the pinnacle of a purposeful creation; like everything else, they evolved by trial and error and God had no direct hand in their making. No wonder so many fundamentalist Christians find their faith shaken to the core.
She is not a Catholic theologian if that is what your asking. I don’t think she considers herself a Catholic anymore either. Nor I don’t think does she consider herself Muslem anymore (she once did). Maybe ‘deist’ or ‘agnostic’ are better terms to describe her beliefs right now.Is Karen Armstrong a fallen-away Catholic? what is her status?
So original sin caused the extinction of the dinosaurs? Bad enough to be punished for the sins of your ancestors but now we can also look forward to being punished for the sins of our descendants? That is just plain harsh.I’m sure author would never buy the argument that if God’s divine plan…“was cruel, callously prodigal and wasteful”, it was man’s doing because of original sin.
You have not stated the truth correctly, but yes, it is “harsh” - that’s the point. Look at the horrible consequences of sin. And that is nothing compared to the eternal suffering of Hell. But God has provided a way to escape that penalty for sin. The Son of God Himself, Jesus Christ, bore the guilt of your sins so that your suffering and the suffering of the world might only be temporary. And there is no other way to escape the eternal punishment due to your sins. If you were wise you would plan for your future, and seek the truth now while you still can.So original sin caused the extinction of the dinosaurs? Bad enough to be punished for the sins of your ancestors but now we can also look forward to being punished for the sins of our descendants? That is just plain harsh.
Well said.You have not stated the truth correctly, but yes, it is “harsh” - that’s the point. Look at the horrible consequences of sin. And that is nothing compared to the eternal suffering of Hell. But God has provided a way to escape that penalty for sin. The Son of God Himself, Jesus Christ, bore the guilt of your sins so that your suffering and the suffering of the world might only be temporary. And there is no other way to escape the eternal punishment due to your sins. If you were wise you would plan for your future, and seek the truth now while you still can.
I believe you’ve hit on the whole crux of the evolution debate. You think it’s just about science, about things observable and proveable, with some conjectures. Our protestant evangelist friends keep telling us that the real purpose is to disprove God. So observe behind the words and see who’s really telling the truth. (Seems like deja vous from the healthcare debate.)Did I miss something? When exactly did the theory of evolution “prove” that existence is a meaningless series of random events?