R robertmidwest Guest Jan 11, 2018 #1 https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-cold-snap-freak-nature-quick-analysis-finds-140502572.html Wait for it… Last edited: Jan 11, 2018
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-cold-snap-freak-nature-quick-analysis-finds-140502572.html Wait for it…
1 1Lord1Faith Guest Jan 11, 2018 #2 Is it to soon for Time Magazine’s cover story to be, “Is Global Warming Dead?” Last edited: Jan 11, 2018
O OneSheep Guest Jan 11, 2018 #3 I think that scientists who try to analyze any single year or event as a result of global climate change does a disservice to climate science itself. What counts as data is not a more costly hurricane or a hot month or even year. What counts as data is what can be recorded over decades. I’m not a climate scientist, but i’m pretty sure that many agree with me.
I think that scientists who try to analyze any single year or event as a result of global climate change does a disservice to climate science itself. What counts as data is not a more costly hurricane or a hot month or even year. What counts as data is what can be recorded over decades. I’m not a climate scientist, but i’m pretty sure that many agree with me.
T Theo520 Guest Jan 11, 2018 #4 1Lord1Faith said: Is it to soon for Time Magazine’s cover story to be, “Is Global Warming Dead?” Click to expand... Newsweek will do it first, they need clickbait.
1Lord1Faith said: Is it to soon for Time Magazine’s cover story to be, “Is Global Warming Dead?” Click to expand... Newsweek will do it first, they need clickbait.
