K
KMG
Guest
Limbo is not “out of date.” Catholics are permitted to believe in Limbo.
- Status
K
KMG
Guest
The Magisterium has not said Limbo isn’t a valid thesis to explain what happens to the unbaptized.
K
KMG
Guest
NOR did the Magisterium ever say all Protestants automatically go to hell.
K
KMG
Guest
And how dare you demand answers when you arrogantly accuse people of Sedevacantism?
D
DisorientingSneeze
Guest
You know where people like to limbo?
On a boat.
I’m sorry. I’m possibly the worst human on this boat.
On a boat.
I’m sorry. I’m possibly the worst human on this boat.
Last edited:
T
twf
Guest
You have a very Protestant mindset. Just as they insist that no one will be confused by privately interpreting Scripture, so you insist no one will be confused by privately interpreting the magisterial documents of the past. Faithful Catholics understand both Scripture and Tradition through the lens of the LIVING Magisterium.
P
PetraG
Guest
OK, except that Pope St. Pius X obviously had to “develop” doctrine in rebuttal to modernism, since it was a new development in philosophical thought. New things do occasionally come down the pike. New things also arise as mere customs and ingratiate themselves as “traditions,” as if the mere passage of time changes a small “t” tradition into a capital “T” Tradition. Doctrine does not “develop” in that way, either! If that was the way it worked, the traditional Mass would be all in Aramaic or perhaps in Greek, not in Latin!!
But yes, there are people who post things that are in opposition to clear teachings of the Church. I think any of us who are old know that most of the “changes brought on by Vatican II” were brought on by people who obviously weren’t trying to conform their actions to the actual documents of Vatican II or pronouncements of the Vatican, which they could not have read carefully. I will append an example.
- Status