G
godisgood77
Guest
Hello,
My parish is so vibrant in so many ways… It is a great example of the school and the church working together to raise our children with a strong Catholic identity and preparing them to be great examples for our broader society.
Over the last several months an issue has cropped up. Our pastor, who is new to the parish in the past year, has introduced several devotionals that align well with his spirituality. By an large, they are very positive… he is a very prayerful man… a little awkward, but a wholesome priest…
The issue is that he is bringing devotionals in to the mass. For instance, praying the Hail Mary during the intercessory prayers… Another would be adding different prayers at the beginning or end of mass… not as optional, but as mandatory… As well as rotating different statues up at the front of the altar (Padre Pio, Mary, Joseph, etc) at different times. In general, I think most are okay with his personal devotions, but recently I have been in several conversations about how adding all of these things to the Liturgy are a bit troubling to the many in the community.
After some research, I’m come across a few things that do reinforce the point that these things are not in alignment with how the Church thinks about the Mass.
First, from the Catechism… ***846 says in the CCC, no priest or bishop can add or substract from the Liturgy on his own authority. ***
Second from Marialis Cultus…#31 …
In the first place there are certain persons concerned with the care of souls who scorn a priori, devotions of piety which, in their correct forms have been recommended by the magisterium, who leave them aside and in this way create a vacuum which they do not fill. They forget that the Council has said that devotions of piety should harmonize with the liturgy, not be suppressed. Secondly there are those who, without wholesome liturgical and pastoral criteria, mix practices of piety and liturgical acts in hybrid celebrations. It sometimes happens that novenas or similar practices of piety are inserted into the very celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice. This creates the danger that the Lord’s Memorial Rite, instead of being the culmination of the meeting of the Christian community, becomes the occasion, as it were, for devotional practices. For those who act in this way we wish to recall the rule laid down by the Council prescribing that exercises of piety should be harmonized with the liturgy not merged into it. Wise pastoral action should, on the one hand, point out and emphasize the proper nature of the liturgical acts, while on the other hand it should enhance the value of practices of piety in order to adapt them to the needs of individual communities in the Church and to make them valuable aids to the liturgy.
I think it is clear that devotionals are a great help to all Catholics when used correctly… encouraged, freely chosen and rightly ordered. They have the proven ability to help each individual develop their faith and learn more about the Catholic religion. However, in this case (and it brings me discomfort to use this word), it seems like liturgical abuse.
What are your thoughts?
How would you recommend addressing the issue??
Thanks!
Pax
Dan
My parish is so vibrant in so many ways… It is a great example of the school and the church working together to raise our children with a strong Catholic identity and preparing them to be great examples for our broader society.
Over the last several months an issue has cropped up. Our pastor, who is new to the parish in the past year, has introduced several devotionals that align well with his spirituality. By an large, they are very positive… he is a very prayerful man… a little awkward, but a wholesome priest…
The issue is that he is bringing devotionals in to the mass. For instance, praying the Hail Mary during the intercessory prayers… Another would be adding different prayers at the beginning or end of mass… not as optional, but as mandatory… As well as rotating different statues up at the front of the altar (Padre Pio, Mary, Joseph, etc) at different times. In general, I think most are okay with his personal devotions, but recently I have been in several conversations about how adding all of these things to the Liturgy are a bit troubling to the many in the community.
After some research, I’m come across a few things that do reinforce the point that these things are not in alignment with how the Church thinks about the Mass.
First, from the Catechism… ***846 says in the CCC, no priest or bishop can add or substract from the Liturgy on his own authority. ***
Second from Marialis Cultus…#31 …
In the first place there are certain persons concerned with the care of souls who scorn a priori, devotions of piety which, in their correct forms have been recommended by the magisterium, who leave them aside and in this way create a vacuum which they do not fill. They forget that the Council has said that devotions of piety should harmonize with the liturgy, not be suppressed. Secondly there are those who, without wholesome liturgical and pastoral criteria, mix practices of piety and liturgical acts in hybrid celebrations. It sometimes happens that novenas or similar practices of piety are inserted into the very celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice. This creates the danger that the Lord’s Memorial Rite, instead of being the culmination of the meeting of the Christian community, becomes the occasion, as it were, for devotional practices. For those who act in this way we wish to recall the rule laid down by the Council prescribing that exercises of piety should be harmonized with the liturgy not merged into it. Wise pastoral action should, on the one hand, point out and emphasize the proper nature of the liturgical acts, while on the other hand it should enhance the value of practices of piety in order to adapt them to the needs of individual communities in the Church and to make them valuable aids to the liturgy.
I think it is clear that devotionals are a great help to all Catholics when used correctly… encouraged, freely chosen and rightly ordered. They have the proven ability to help each individual develop their faith and learn more about the Catholic religion. However, in this case (and it brings me discomfort to use this word), it seems like liturgical abuse.
What are your thoughts?
How would you recommend addressing the issue??
Thanks!
Pax
Dan