C
CuriousInIL
Guest
Is it true that being on your period is not sufficient cause to refuse the marital debt?
I believe it is a matter of personal preferance. At any time, if you don’t want to, then don’t. Or don’t feel you have to just because your partner wants to.Is it true that being on your period is not sufficient cause to refuse the marital debt?
~ Kathy ~
In a word: NoIs it true that being on your period is not sufficient cause to refuse the marital debt?
That’s not correct. She asked if she can refuse it during her period, and the answer is she cannot. Postponing was your interjection. Postponing it = refusing it for a few days (sinning during this time), and not refusing after a few days (ceasing to sin at that time).In a word: No
The marital embrace is an essential element of the marriage. But, what you are talking about is postponing it a few days until the wife feels up to it, not refusing it.
As a side note, Aquinas did not write this part of the Summa… The Supplementum was written after he had died.Check Aquinas on this subject. Item #3.
What happens if the other does not lovingly respect that–I am not talking about heavy handedness–what if there is a good faith disagreement here?Menstruation is something each couple must decide together whether or not it is a reasonable request.
If one is very turned off by it - the other should lovingly respect that.
works with the idea that neither partner is supposed to be selfish–are all these folks asking only when they think their partner wants relations and not when they do?Should one spouse request the other spouse to ‘renew their vows’ - he or she has a grave moral obligation to honor that request and give themselves freely and completely without reservation to the other.
As to the first question, the one who wants it is entitled to receive it (except under certain grave exceptions).Two questions:
First,
What happens if the other does not lovingly respect that–I am not talking about heavy handedness–what if there is a good faith disagreement here?
Second, I do not want to hijack this thread, but I have never understood how this concept of requesting relations
works with the idea that neither partner is supposed to be selfish–are all these folks asking only when they think their partner wants relations and not when they do?
Just to clarify, my second question is more like this–if one spouse does request relations and does so because they are interested and the other is not (or is indifferent), is that itself not sinful sexual selfisness? Logically it seems that way, but I guess it must not be or the whole concept of the marital debt and requests for relations do not make sense.As to the second one, which wasn’t really a question, but the idea is that if the one spouse is aware of the other one’s desire, they are duty bound to provide if they are able. One hopes it doesn’t come down to having to flat out ask for it, but I am sure stranger things have happened, especially when dealing with an uninterested spouse. Further, it would be good judgment to satisfy one’s spouse, rather than allow them to face other possible temptations in this unchaste world of bad example…
The are lots of things that people do that they really don’t feel like. For example… I get up every morning, and leave my wife and children to go to work. Even when I get at work, I find myself wishing I was home. Every once in awhile, my boss asks me to go out of town for an extended period, or to work on weekends. It is his right to do so… It is my job.…if one spouse does request relations and does so because they are interested and the other is not (or is indifferent), is that itself not sinful sexual selfisness? Logically it seems that way, but I guess it must not be or the whole concept of the marital debt and requests for relations do not make sense.
One thing that just came to mind was that if a spouse wants to make love, wants to feel that connection and makes it obvious to the other, I kinda think that the unwilling spouse would see that in their eyes and realize that their spouse is longing for that deep spiritual connection, and knowing that they can give that to the other, fulfill their needs, that would be a great gift to give I think.
Aquinas was wrong on other issues, and I hardly consider him the final say-so on every issue of Moral Theology. That is not to say that I would not consider him excellent in many ways, but if this is the best that you can provide to say that the wife must have sexual intercourse any time her husband demands it, then I would suggest that the Church needs a bit more insight into marital relations.That’s not correct. She asked if she can refuse it during her period, and the answer is she cannot. Postponing was your interjection. Postponing it = refusing it for a few days (sinning during this time), and not refusing after a few days (ceasing to sin at that time).
Here is someone asking clear questions, needing clear answers.
Check Aquinas on this subject. Item #3.
stjamescatholic.org/summa/XP/XP064.html
~ Kathy ~