Mark 16:9-19 man made ending?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Startingcatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Startingcatholic

Guest
So I have recently seen a lot of things talking about how the early church added on an ending to Mark and also saying how it’s the earliest Gospel and doesn’t even mention Joseph and just says son of Mary and this is all very scary . Can you explain the ending of Mark and what is the true ending as well as why Joseph is not mentioned?
 
Can you explain the ending of Mark and what is the true ending
From Haydock’s Commentary:
“[2]When S. Jerom says that most Greek copies wanted this chapter, he speaks not of chapters according to our present division, but only of the last 12 verses, which formerly made what was called a little chapter: yet these twelve verses must have been omitted in those MSS. by some negligent transcribers. Now they are found in all, both Latin and Greek copies. They are found in the Canons of Eusebius on the Gospels; in S. Jerom in several places; in S. Amb. l. iii, in Luc. tom. iii, p. 292. Ed. Paris, an. 1582, in S. Aug. l. iii, de consensu Evang. c. xxv, tom. 3, part 2, p. 142, &c. Wi. — S. Gregory of Nyssa, (orat. 2. de Resurr.) says, that the best copies of S. Mark’s gospel finished with the 8th verse, a trembling and fear had seized them: Εν τοις ακριβεστεροις το Κατα Μαρκον Ευαγγελιον μεκρι του εφοβουντο γαρ, εχει το τελος. It is the very generally received sentiment of the learned, that the last 12 verses were given by S. Mark; and the most probable reason yet offered for the omission of them in various copies is, that the transcribers followed a mutilated copy, where the last page was wanting. V.”
why Joseph is not mentioned?
By my understanding, it’s because he’s dead. The traditional understanding is that St. Joseph died some time before Jesus’ ministry started.
 
Thanks I was really freaking out like hardcore thank you! Merry Christmas!
 
So I have recently seen a lot of things talking about how the early church added on an ending to Mark and also saying how it’s the earliest Gospel and doesn’t even mention Joseph and just says son of Mary and this is all very scary . Can you explain the ending of Mark and what is the true ending as well as why Joseph is not mentioned?
Here is a helpful site on this, which gives a listen and some other resources on it - https://brandplucked.webs.com/mark16920.htm
 
The four gospels were written by different writers, addressing different audiences. They selected those narrative events of Christ’s life and ministry to get across the points they were trying to make about Christ’s person, ministry, and meaning to their intended audiences. This is no different than two people telling the same story from different vantage points selecting those points that were most significant to them from their viewpoint. The gospel of Mark actually doesn’t address the birth narratives of Christ at all (nor does John), because he was focused on solely on Jesus’ earthly ministry. Matthew addresses Jesus birth and lineage because he is emphasizing Christ’s role in fulfilling the Davidic kingship and the coming of the kingdom of heaven. John addresses the incarnation of the divine word, but never speaks directly about Jesus birth. Luke addresses the birth narrative, and even goes so far as to write the book of Acts which addresses the ascension (which none of the other gospels describe) and the beginning of the Church. All of these provide a wealth of detail about the life and ministry of Jesus Christ that provide us with a rich knowledge of what he did, and what he accomplished. Not only that, but they provide us with multiple stand-alone accounts which is valuable for corroborating the life and ministry of Christ. Don’t fret. It is nothing to panic about.
 
Last edited:
I was confused reading the Gospels at the ending when Jesus gives Mary to Peter and says “Peter, behold your mother.” The idea is that without a guy, in those days, women lost their property and house and everything. Jesus didn’t want His mother homeless so He told Peter to look after Mary. I remember thinking “wait where is Joseph?” But it’s understood that at some point before the crucifixion and probably before the entire passion (I’m not sure exactly when) Joseph died.
 
If I were you, I would focus on solid Catholicism and stop surfing up bilge that has been jettisoned from sinking ships - if you know what I mean. The web is a sewer which is corrosive to faith. It is the world and the world does not want you to believe.

IOW, learn your faith.
 
Look closely at the shorter and longer endings of Mark.
Nobody is going to end a written document and conclude it as is done here.

This strongly suggests and The tradition of the early church fathers Supports this, That this gospel was originally an oral preaching by Peter that was transcribed by Mark.

The additional longer section was the answers to questions given to Peter after he presented his teaching .

There are a lot of things not included in Mark’s Gospel. Peter knew he did not need to include them because the people he speaking to already had Matthew’s Gospel.

How the Gospels Were Written : Clementine Tradition

 
Last edited:
I don’t really get what your trying to say. Because to me it sounds like your saying don’t ask hard questions and get deeper into my faith. (I’m sure that’s not what you meant but that’s how I understood it).
 
So I have recently seen a lot of things talking about how the early church added on an ending to Mark and
Where have you heard or seen this? The scriptures have been thoroughly examined, discussed, vetted, tested and re-tested by the greatest theological minds on earth. What you have heard are apparently voices which question the Church, the canon of scripture, or both. In the first 100 years of the Church, such questioning would have been good and healthy. But, at this late date, such matters are well settled and you may have complete confidence in the deposit of faith, to include the scriptures.

You might well benefit (all Christians would, actually) from reading a copy of Rev. Henry Graham’s “Where We Got The Bible” It is a quick read, practical and nut burdened down with incessant footnotes and references. Rather, it lays out the development , canonization and preservation of the scriptures - all done at amazing human cost, so that we today might know that what we read is indeed the inspired word of God.

In our culture, there is far more doubt than there is faith. What you have seen is the product of doubt and not of faith.
 
Last edited:
I was confused reading the Gospels at the ending when Jesus gives Mary to Peter and says “Peter, behold your mother.” The idea is that without a guy, in those days, women lost their property and house and everything. Jesus didn’t want His mother homeless so He told Peter to look after Mary. I remember thinking “wait where is Joseph?” But it’s understood that at some point before the crucifixion and probably before the entire passion (I’m not sure exactly when) Joseph died.
Can you please provide a reference that shows this disciple was Peter?
 
I think though, given that John wrote this (or those who read writings of John), only a few (I believe 5) were at the Crucifixion, so we can p(name removed by moderator)oint it to a select few. It is also, I believe the same disciple who is referred to as the one that “Jesus loves”
 
Last edited:
I’m thinking of John 19:26-27 but after looking into this, yes I was thinking of John not Peter, my apologizes
Correct! But, think of this: Our Lord gave Mary to John as “your mother” - yet John’s birth mother was also there at the crucifixion! (Matthew 27:56) What’s up with that? Thus, there was more to our Lord’s action than simply replacing or expanding the maternal presence in John’s life.

The “rest of the story” is found in the Book of Revelation, Chapter 12. There, the “woman” who gives birth to a son who is to rule the nations with a rod of Iron (see Messianic Psalm 2). That “woman” is the mother of all who bear witness to Christ.

So, Mary is not simply John’s mother, but the mother of the entire Church.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top