If I understand the original poster correctly, her husband’s family either influences or controls outright:
- his income
- her income (and dismissing her also controls her income, by deleting it)
- her medications
- other medical care (because an in-law is her physician)
- her health insurance (because of the interference)
- their reproductive schedule (by citing “stay at home mom” as the reason she lost her job)
- pretty much anything else in their marriage
- her relationship with God.
And her response to it is to cohabit with a man who influences or controls outright:
- pretty much everything in her marriage
- her morals
- her relationship with God.
I know I’ve missed a few points, possibly a lot of them.
At the risk of a Dr. Phil bounding into the room and declaring, “Where did you get your medical degree? I must have missed that. Because I, Dr. Phil, am a real doctor.” (No, I don’t like talk shows.) …
At the risk of the above, I would suggest that Husband and Wife both have boundary issues, combined with a false belief in the supremacy of the people they cling to. (See, for example, Junior Bevil in the admittedly lightweight Disney-fied film
Cool Runnings. “The man, you act like he is king of the whole world!” says a character to another in astonishment.)
So I would suggest that if you can’t work/go to a doctor/go to church in Town A, go to Town B. **There is a whole world out there where They ain’t. **
In fact I would suggest that you go to a retreat for a long time. I’m talking weeks, maybe a month or more. Husband should go too, but not to the same one. Ignore any squawks about how the family business (or your lover) will survive without you. If you or Husband were run over by the Hypothetical Bus tomorrow, they’d find a replacement by the end of the week.
Seriously, consider a retreat. You need to figure out who you are as just-you-and-God, or you’ll just keep seeking or attracting boundary-breakers.