marriage

[anonymouse42]

BTW - SSM exists in the UK since March 2014. So regardless of your birth certificate, you and a partner of either sex can obtain a marriage licence.

The Catholic Church accepts your sex as per your baptismal certificate. It only recognises marriage between a man and a woman.

which is what my priest has said
he will marry us because i am recognised as a woman and my partner as a man

its taken 3 years of arguments to get this far so we are getting married in church this summer.

its the inherited medical condition proof that changed his mind.

 

[anonymouse42]

Pull the other one.

why how many have you got

 

[E_7]

try and keep up

i may have been born a man but due to genetic transsexualism passed down from my father who changed gender the my priest has decided that i am able to get married to a man under the inherited medical condition rules.therefore my acquired gender is in fact classed as my true gender as appears on my birth certificate ie female

It’s because I tried and kept up, that I don’t understand why you, born man, is marrying another man. Do you think a piece of paper determines your sexuality?

Look, anonymouse42, priests make mistakes because they are still human. There is no such thing " dad passed me the genes, so even though God gave me a penis, I can marry another man because human-made law says I am female. "

The argument should stop there, but doesn’t. Biological determinism is frequently insinuated in language used about homosexuality or transsexuality, mainly by the media, in ways that have become practically dishonest. Typically, a scientific study is quoted which suggests a correlation or link between transsexuality and hormones or brain structure etc. (The actual strength of the link is almost never mentioned.) This link is taken to show that transsexuality has “a biological basis”, or “is biological”, or “is genetic”, or “is due to hormones”. The implication then taken from this equivocal use of language is that the condition is biologically determined, whereas in all cases the evidence shows nothing of the kind and most of those with the physiological condition described do not become transsexual. Those conditions therefore are no more than minor influences. If they were major influences we would already understand unequivocally the origin of transsexuality in all cases. We don’t. More of these studies come out every year, get misreported, and the gap between what scientists really think and what the activist believes, becomes larger every year.

…

But there is no evidence for the political case that transsexuals were born that way. Read more on scientific research on LGBT at mygenes.co.nz/transsexuality.htm

 

[anonymouse42]

I dont care anymore as i am getting what i wanted. i am marrying the man i love in church.
with my priests blessing.

 

[E_7]

I dont care anymore as i am getting what i wanted.

OH ok. I thought it was a matter of being in good standing with God and to live in state of grace, and die in state of grace so as to enter heaven. I didn’t know. But, as a fellow Catholic, I must say this: you are blind in your sin. And you are being disobedient to the natural law and God himself on purpose, do not dare to commit sacrilege by taking the Eucharist. And if you die in that state of mortal sin unrepentant of your actions , you know with certainty that you will be eternally damned. You are not from this world, you are just passing by, embrace chastity, convert and live to please God, not the devil, and hope to be back home in God’s arms.

And I’m not judging. I’m just stating the truth.