Married couples: What do you wish you knew about sex and marriage during your marriage prep?

  • Thread starter Thread starter john1513
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We didn’t do marriage prep, so I can’t comment there. But if I were giving advice to someone about to be married, it would be pretty simple: “don’t be an a-hole.” It’ll take you very far.

Also, if you have managed to be chaste throughout your courtship, discuss your expectations surrounding sex. What’s on the table and what’s not on the table? If one spouse finds x the hottest thing in the world, and the other finds x distasteful and unappealing, that’s something that needs to be addressed. What is each spouse’s expectation regarding frequency? Etc.
 
We didn’t do marriage prep, so I can’t comment there. But if I were giving advice to someone about to be married, it would be pretty simple: “don’t be an a-hole.” It’ll take you very far.

Also, if you have managed to be chaste throughout your courtship, discuss your expectations surrounding sex. What’s on the table and what’s not on the table? If one spouse finds x the hottest thing in the world, and the other finds x distasteful and unappealing, that’s something that needs to be addressed. What is each spouse’s expectation regarding frequency? Etc.
This is going to be somewhat theoretical, though, if one doesn’t have actual experience.

Lots of things sound fun that aren’t. (I once read a description of a couple that discovered that the smell of stale dairy product in the bedroom isn’t all that sexy the next day.)
 
Lots of things sound fun that aren’t. (I once read a description of a couple that discovered that the smell of stale dairy product in the bedroom isn’t all that sexy the next day.)
…Story time.
 
…Story time.
That was basically the whole story.

Cosmo-type ideas can be really dumb, too. I think the dumbest I’ve ever heard (and obviously untested by the writer) was a probably 70s era suggestion to fill a tub with jello.

!!!

But a lot of ideas of that ilk seem to be composed by people unfamiliar with Earth physics.

Edited to add: On reflection, maybe some of these ideas are just excuses to cheat on one’s diet.
 
That was basically the whole story.

Cosmo-type ideas can be really dumb, too. I think the dumbest I’ve ever heard (and obviously untested by the writer) was a probably 70s era suggestion to fill a tub with jello.

!!!

But a lot of ideas of that ilk seem to be composed by people unfamiliar with Earth physics.

Edited to add: On reflection, maybe some of these ideas are just excuses to cheat on one’s diet.
Tub of jello sounds much worse after you do a good deep clean of the bathroom and unclog hairy plugholes. 😃

BTW…why do you yanks call it jello…It’s JELLY! 👍
 
I have a mixed bag of emotions about our marriage prep. So I will do a pros vs cons list.

Pros
  1. Each class was taught by a different couple, at thier home. So the nfp couple taught it in a house full of toys on the floor. The finance class was taught in a mansion, the communication class at the deacon’s home. This was a really cool way to get to know others and see “how married people live”
  1. The priest took an interest in the classes and tried to make most of the meetings.
  2. The fellowship with other young couples about to do the same thing.
  3. Because of frequent meetings there was ample time and oppprtunity to have questions answered about weddings from stressed brides.
Cons
  1. Perhaps because we were the only catholic couple out of 12, there was very little theological or religious content or teaching.
  2. The finance class was incredibly unrealistic and out of touch. It also was the one that seemed to engage most couples
  3. The nfp class was a joke. Perhaps because the class was in transition. The eye rolles were almost audible over the poor parenting and screaming kids ( it was also the parenting class). Sadly, there is no nfp class in current marriage prep. And even more sad, that couple is now divorced and gone.
  4. The communications class seem d to have a lot of pop psych elements to it.
  5. Out of the 12. Only three including us are practicing Catholics today.
I would have liked more classes focused on growing a family. Parenting, resources of the church, religious ed, etc.

As far as sex goes. Every couple was engaging in premarital sex including us. Outside of the nfp class it was not brought up.
 
I have a mixed bag of emotions about our marriage prep. So I will do a pros vs cons list.

Pros
  1. Each class was taught by a different couple, at thier home. So the nfp couple taught it in a house full of toys on the floor. The finance class was taught in a mansion, the communication class at the deacon’s home. This was a really cool way to get to know others and see “how married people live”
  1. The priest took an interest in the classes and tried to make most of the meetings.
  2. The fellowship with other young couples about to do the same thing.
  3. Because of frequent meetings there was ample time and oppprtunity to have questions answered about weddings from stressed brides.
Cons
  1. Perhaps because we were the only catholic couple out of 12, there was very little theological or religious content or teaching.
    2. The finance class was incredibly unrealistic and out of touch. It also was the one that seemed to engage most couples
  2. The nfp class was a joke. Perhaps because the class was in transition. The eye rolles were almost audible over the poor parenting and screaming kids ( it was also the parenting class). Sadly, there is no nfp class in current marriage prep. And even more sad, that couple is now divorced and gone.
  3. The communications class seem d to have a lot of pop psych elements to it.
  4. Out of the 12. Only three including us are practicing Catholics today.
I would have liked more classes focused on growing a family. Parenting, resources of the church, religious ed, etc.

As far as sex goes. Every couple was engaging in premarital sex including us. Outside of the nfp class it was not brought up.
What was the deal with the finance portion? I’m currently reading Dave Ramsey’s daughter’s book “Love Your Life, Not Theirs” and while I love the title and loved her and her dad’s book “Smart Money, Smart Kids,” I do find myself rolling my eyes at some of the examples. They’re very DINK or at least double income one kid examples. Real family personal finance is not about do I get a boat or do we go to Disneyland (that’s not exactly her examples, but it’s in that ballpark). Even with a great income, once you have a growing family, it’s usually not about choosing between luxuries or between luxuries and necessities, but about prioritizing different real needs or figuring out how to pay for needs.

For example, we recently had to shelve some plans for enclosing our back yard–enclosed back yards are typical in our area–in favor of switching two kids’ bedrooms, painting one bedroom, putting in a window that actually opens (!), and if there’s still money left over, buying a first big girl bed and a dresser for a nearly 5-year-old child who sleeps on a mattress on the floor and whose stuff is mainly stored in plastic bins. A year or two ago, we spent $2400 on oral surgery for one kid and nearly three years ago, we spent probably about $1500 on dealing with a small kitchen flood (the bulk of that was just rental costs for several dehumidifiers). The $700 ER bill is also a fairly predictable event at our house, not to mention the $500 appliance replacement.

So, I feel like the expensiveness and inevitability of large boring adult expenses (especially for homeowners) is probably something that deserves more attention.

I’m actually pretty friendly toward pop psych, as long as it’s not stupid pop psych. (Anybody who tells me that women want to be loved, not respected is going to have a lot of fun with me…)

You probably didn’t want more parenting classes from the soon-to-be-divorced-couple, right?
 
What was the deal with the finance portion? I’m currently reading Dave Ramsey’s daughter’s book “Love Your Life, Not Theirs” and while I love the title and loved her and her dad’s book “Smart Money, Smart Kids,” I do find myself rolling my eyes at some of the examples. They’re very DINK or at least double income one kid examples. Real family personal finance is not about do I get a boat or do we go to Disneyland (that’s not exactly her examples, but it’s in that ballpark). Even with a great income, once you have a growing family, it’s usually not about choosing between luxuries or between luxuries and necessities, but about prioritizing different real needs or figuring out how to pay for needs.

For example, we recently had to shelve some plans for enclosing our back yard–enclosed back yards are typical in our area–in favor of switching two kids’ bedrooms, painting one bedroom, putting in a window that actually opens (!), and if there’s still money left over, buying a first big girl bed and a dresser for a nearly 5-year-old child who sleeps on a mattress on the floor and whose stuff is mainly stored in plastic bins. A year or two ago, we spent $2400 on oral surgery for one kid and nearly three years ago, we spent probably about $1500 on dealing with a small kitchen flood (the bulk of that was just rental costs for several dehumidifiers). The $700 ER bill is also a fairly predictable event at our house, not to mention the $500 appliance replacement.

So, I feel like the expensiveness and inevitability of large boring adult expenses (especially for homeowners) is probably something that deserves more attention.

I’m actually pretty friendly toward pop psych, as long as it’s not stupid pop psych. (Anybody who tells me that women want to be loved, not respected is going to have a lot of fun with me…)

You probably didn’t want more parenting classes from the soon-to-be-divorced-couple, right?
I am not a fan of Dave Ramsey, but I think some of his stuff can be useful for some people. If you have $20k in credit card debt, then you need to be highly focused on getting out of debt. On the other hand, some of his stuff is way too extreme for my tastes and some of his stuff is downright dishonest. On the other hand, most people seem to be horrible money managers, I have even been amazed at how badly some people who should know better manage money. Part of it is how children are raised, if children are used to getting everything they want without sacrifice, they tend to grow up as adults who never sacrifice and thus end up at 65 without savings. On the other hand, you can have scrooges and spendthrifts come out of the same family. It is quite a mystery.
 
One of the things that marriage prep needs to do is get people to think outside the box. My mother grew up in a house that was at most 1500 square feet and my grandparents had 9 children. Today, most people couldn’t conceive of such a thing. I am not suggesting that was ideal, but could a family of six fit into such a house. Not under our current expectations, but perhaps if we changed our worldview as to what is acceptable. Of course, our local regulations would also have to change to allow such a house. In the old section of my town there are 1200-1500 houses on 0.5 acre lots. Such houses could not be built today, they would be illegal.
 
Oh…I never knew that. From watching American TV I just thought all jelly was called jell-o.
You’re basically correct.

If we were respecting the Trademark, we’d call the non-brand stuff “gelatin dessert,” but in practice, everybody says Jello no matter who makes it.

In the US, jelly is what you spread on your toast.

(Or, bringing it back to the main topic, there’s also KY Jelly.)
 
You’re basically correct.

If we were respecting the Trademark, we’d call the non-brand stuff “gelatin dessert,” but in practice, everybody says Jello no matter who makes it.

In the US, jelly is what you spread on your toast.

(Or, bringing it back to the main topic, there’s also KY Jelly.)
Lol, I spit out my Coke watching someone eat jello, and now I have to get a Kleenex to wipe it up…

(A brand name sentence…)
 
You’re basically correct.

If we were respecting the Trademark, we’d call the non-brand stuff “gelatin dessert,” but in practice, everybody says Jello no matter who makes it.

In the US, jelly is what you spread on your toast.

(Or, bringing it back to the main topic, there’s also KY Jelly.)
You should warn people to swallow their coffee before posting stuff like this. LMAO
 
What was the deal with the finance portion? I’m currently reading Dave Ramsey’s daughter’s book “Love Your Life, Not Theirs” and while I love the title and loved her and her dad’s book “Smart Money, Smart Kids,” I do find myself rolling my eyes at some of the examples. They’re very DINK or at least double income one kid examples. Real family personal finance is not about do I get a boat or do we go to Disneyland (that’s not exactly her examples, but it’s in that ballpark). Even with a great income, once you have a growing family, it’s usually not about choosing between luxuries or between luxuries and necessities, but about prioritizing different real needs or figuring out how to pay for needs.

For example, we recently had to shelve some plans for enclosing our back yard–enclosed back yards are typical in our area–in favor of switching two kids’ bedrooms, painting one bedroom, putting in a window that actually opens (!), and if there’s still money left over, buying a first big girl bed and a dresser for a nearly 5-year-old child who sleeps on a mattress on the floor and whose stuff is mainly stored in plastic bins. A year or two ago, we spent $2400 on oral surgery for one kid and nearly three years ago, we spent probably about $1500 on dealing with a small kitchen flood (the bulk of that was just rental costs for several dehumidifiers). The $700 ER bill is also a fairly predictable event at our house, not to mention the $500 appliance replacement.

So, I feel like the expensiveness and inevitability of large boring adult expenses (especially for homeowners) is probably something that deserves more attention.

I’m actually pretty friendly toward pop psych, as long as it’s not stupid pop psych. (Anybody who tells me that women want to be loved, not respected is going to have a lot of fun with me…)

You probably didn’t want more parenting classes from the soon-to-be-divorced-couple, right?
  1. It was directed almost exclusively at building and amassing wealth. And was not applicable to us at any point in our lives. Honestly I would have liked for a fiscally responsible but “real” couple to teach it. What they should do is enroll every engaged couple in FPU… that is applicable accross the board.
  2. You are so right about real finances. I haven’t read the book and won’t. But if I had to guess I’d say it’s a marketing tool by Ramsey and his daughter to reach out to Millinials with thier “brand”
  3. My wife liked the pop psych nonsense. I saw through it. Turns out both women and men are from earth, we both like to be heard and touched. :rolleyes:
  4. The parenting and nfp class was a disaster. But that’s because of who they had teaching it. (Last night my wife reminded me that they openly discussed getting a vasectomy with the engaged couples because they were “done”. I’d forgotten that little gem…, ( it’s been 15 years) I would have loved Parenting info. Just by someone better equipped to do so!!
 
  1. **It was directed almost exclusively at building and amassing wealth. And was not applicable to us at any point in our lives. Honestly I would have liked for a fiscally responsible but “real” couple to teach it. What they should do is enroll every engaged couple in FPU… that is applicable accross the board. **
  2. You are so right about real finances. I haven’t read the book and won’t. But if I had to guess I’d say it’s a marketing tool by Ramsey and his daughter to reach out to Millinials with thier “brand”
  3. My wife liked the pop psych nonsense. I saw through it. Turns out both women and men are from earth, we both like to be heard and touched. :rolleyes:
  4. The parenting and nfp class was a disaster. But that’s because of who they had teaching it. (Last night my wife reminded me that they openly discussed getting a vasectomy with the engaged couples because they were “done”. I’d forgotten that little gem…, ( it’s been 15 years) I would have loved Parenting info. Just by someone better equipped to do so!!
  1. Oh dear. Yeah–not very relatable.
  2. I like bits and pieces of the Love Your Life, Not Theirs book, but I love virtually all of the Cruz/Ramsey book Smart Money, Smart Kids. It’s very concrete and very relatable. I can’t remember much of it, but The Legacy Journey is also very good (it’s got a lot on giving). The LYLNT book is probably meant at millennial outreach–but the problem is that millennials are broke, so any book addressed to them needs to grapple with that reality. Your millennial is much more in need of advice about how to manage to buy a car or move out of the parental home, plus how to cope with their student loans.
  3. I was wondering if Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus was in the mix.
  4. :eek: on the vasectomy. Whoa! But the problem is, do people who are competent to teach this sort of thing want to teach it? It’s like political office–it seems to repel actually nice, competent people and attract creeps and power junkies.
 
I am not a fan of Dave Ramsey, but I think some of his stuff can be useful for some people. If you have $20k in credit card debt, then you need to be highly focused on getting out of debt. On the other hand, some of his stuff is way too extreme for my tastes and some of his stuff is downright dishonest. On the other hand, most people seem to be horrible money managers, I have even been amazed at how badly some people who should know better manage money. Part of it is how children are raised, if children are used to getting everything they want without sacrifice, they tend to grow up as adults who never sacrifice and thus end up at 65 without savings. On the other hand, you can have scrooges and spendthrifts come out of the same family. It is quite a mystery.
I don’t think it’s that mysterious. As DR says, there are natural savers and natural spenders. Some get pleasure from not spending–some get pleasure from spending. My first kid is a natural spender who used to spend every dollar practically as soon as it hit her hand. Meanwhile, her baby brother is a natural saver who (by the time he was 8) had over $100 saved, accrued mostly $1 at a time. Had things been allowed to take their natural course, Big Girl wouldn’t have a dime, whereas Middle Kid would have substantial savings.

However, we didn’t allow things to take their natural course. Among other things, Big Girl has her senior trip to Europe in 2.5 years. Starting in 8th grade, we explained to Big Girl that we are not paying for this (there’s this thing called “college” that we are saving for) and if she wants to go on the big trip with all of her friends, she needs to be saving every month. Every month at the end of the month, she needs to hand over her contribution to her senior trip fund. Big Girl has been saving for nearly two years now, and there’s been an amazing metamorphosis in terms of her ability to forego pleasure now in favor of her long-term plans. The Bank of Mom and Dad also pays 3% on deposits once a year (and there tends to be a rush to fatten up accounts before the payout). There are no withdrawals from the Bank of Mom and Dad except for approved expenses (senior trip, first car, etc).

Interestingly, while both older children have substantial accounts with the Bank of Mom and Dad, Big Girl (who is more motivated at this point), now has about twice as big a balance as Middle Kid, who previously always used to have more savings. I have a similar personality type to Big Girl, and it’s gratifying to see how much better decisions she makes than I did at the same age (or much older).

Interestingly, I grew up to be very bad with money, despite it being far from the case that I was “used to getting everything * want without sacrifice.” In my particular case, it was more that when I was a kid, money was very scarce, appeared seemingly at random, I didn’t have any earning opportunities until I was 16, and there were few opportunities to spend it (country/small town setting), so the temptation was to spend it the instant there was an opportunity. Also, I literally never had the experience of saving up for a large purchase as a child, or in fact, saving up at all–that was simply a foreign concept when I was a kid. I would say that it’s virtually impossible to learn how to manage money without having money.*
 
One of the things that marriage prep needs to do is get people to think outside the box. My mother grew up in a house that was at most 1500 square feet and my grandparents had 9 children. Today, most people couldn’t conceive of such a thing. I am not suggesting that was ideal, but could a family of six fit into such a house. Not under our current expectations, but perhaps if we changed our worldview as to what is acceptable. Of course, our local regulations would also have to change to allow such a house. In the old section of my town there are 1200-1500 houses on 0.5 acre lots. Such houses could not be built today, they would be illegal.
Well, that’s why grandma was so eager to shoo the kids out of the house until dinner time…

You wouldn’t want to have 11 people actually in that house all day.

Which raises the question–would we (in this day and age) want our kids running loose like that?

Edit: I should also add that depending on your area, that same 1200 square foot house is now $400k or more, which means that mom is working full-time, which means that you’re probably not going to have 9 children. We used to live in the DC area, and during my househunting years, I looked at a lot of 1200 sq. ft. dollhouses in the $400-$500k range. It was incredibly depressing. We eventually bailed on the area, but not everybody has the option.
 
Interestingly, I grew up to be very bad with money, despite it being far from the case that I was “used to getting everything * want without sacrifice.” In my particular case, it was more that when I was a kid, money was very scarce, appeared seemingly at random, I didn’t have any earning opportunities until I was 16, and there were few opportunities to spend it (country/small town setting), so the temptation was to spend it the instant there was an opportunity. Also, I literally never had the experience of saving up for a large purchase as a child, or in fact, saving up at all–that was simply a foreign concept when I was a kid. I would say that it’s virtually impossible to learn how to manage money without having money.*

This is actually apparently very common with people who grew up very poor. Learning to handle money takes not only having some money, it takes having enough money on hand to think about your budget, rather than simply “let’s hope it covers all the bills this month.”
 
Well, that’s why grandma was so eager to shoo the kids out of the house until dinner time…

You wouldn’t want to have 11 people actually in that house all day.

Which raises the question–would we (in this day and age) want our kids running loose like that?

Edit: I should also add that depending on your area, that same 1200 square foot house is now $400k or more, which means that mom is working full-time, which means that you’re probably not going to have 9 children. We used to live in the DC area, and during my househunting years, I looked at a lot of 1200 sq. ft. dollhouses in the $400-$500k range. It was incredibly depressing. We eventually bailed on the area, but not everybody has the option.
Washington DC is a ridiculously expensive area, I almost ended up there 25 years ago and I am thankful that I didn’t. I even toyed more recently with moving there, but the housing prices are just too high.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top