C
ClearWater
Guest
Some people are introverted, shy…not good at meeting people.
I don’t think there’s really an increase in homosexuality. It’s just that society has become more accepting, and so homosexual people more openly identify as such. Either way, it’s still a really small number of people, like 1-3%.I remember my supervisor saying of late that the increasing rate of homosexuality is making it even harder on people to find marriage partners, in her opinion. So, even though there are some men and women, some are basically…unavailable.
There are just a bunch of factors all coming together.
yea it’s mind blowing, that’s why I like to visit family over in europe who live in a village, i can go around the town of a few thousand and people will talk to me. Here in the city it can get very stifling and lonely due to the rush.We can actually be in a city with hundreds of thousands, even millions of people but still be, in many ways, extraordinarily isolated. Ironic but true.
I am not sure of the stats, if there is an increase or not. I’ve known a number of even bisexual people, and I just don’t think it was as prevalent. It’s just an impression.I don’t think there’s really an increase in homosexuality. It’s just that society has become more accepting, and so homosexual people more openly identify as such. Either way, it’s still a really small number of people, like 1-3%.
I’m not sure there’s ever been a study on sexuality that I would regard as reliable. I think there’s a fair point that 100 years ago a gal like me would likely have been bundled off into a marriage to a nice man and no one would have thought anything about it. 50 years ago the pressure to marry would still be high but if not one could merely end up as a spinster, again with no word of homosexuality breathed.I am not sure of the stats, if there is an increase or not. I’ve known a number of even bisexual people, and I just don’t think it was as prevalent. It’s just an impression.
Where I live, especially, it is SO common and obvious. I just think it must have increased.
I simply smirk and recall the number of ridiculously childish beliefs held by people of the pro-marriage/pro-family demographic.As a single person, I naturally find the implications here rather frustrating. How should one respond to such things?
I’m really not sure what you’re on about lately. The Catholic belief is that all of us are called to chastity according to our station. It is spiritually immature for a person to want commitment-free sex, whether they are single or married. Immaturity does not imply any of the things you mentioned, either - there are plenty of smart, socially adept, immature people. What makes them immature is that they are still in the me-focused nature of childhood.I simply smirk and recall the number of ridiculously childish beliefs held by people of the pro-marriage/pro-family demographic.It’s a good case for obscuring the definition of ‘mature.’
I mean, so what if I entertain the idea of sex without commitment? Does this really make me less of a developed human being as you are? Does this automatically mean I’m dumber, less socially adept, or less mentally/physically capable?![]()
I’ll help you out with that–the answer is “yes.”I simply smirk and recall the number of ridiculously childish beliefs held by people of the pro-marriage/pro-family demographic.It’s a good case for obscuring the definition of ‘mature.’
I mean, so what if I entertain the idea of sex without commitment? Does this really make me less of a developed human being as you are? Does this automatically mean I’m dumber, less socially adept, or less mentally/physically capable?![]()
Yes.There are also plenty of people who marry fairly young for immature reasons, and fancy themselves all grown up just because they went through that rite of passage. Then they struggle along for a short time or a long time, and end up divorced, because they never really knew what marriage really means and/or went into it ill-prepared. I know some people in late 20s or 30ish who’ve divorced this year and it’s really sad. In one case there are little children suffering.
A person, single or married, is immature or mature regardless of their marital status. :twocents:
And sadly enough I know plenty of people, some my own cousins’ offspring, and some of those graduates of Catholic schools, who are living hedonistically - partying, going to concerts and sports events (occasionally posting some pix of their drunken antics on Facebook), having all the luxuries - and either cohabiting or who knows what.I’ll help you out with that–the answer is “yes.”
If a man wants to use women’s bodies for pleasure, with no consideration for the women’s physical or psychological well-being, and with no consideration for potential children’s welfare, and if he chooses to spend his abundant free time and financial resources on selfish amusements while complaining about why everybody else doesn’t cater to all of his needs, why yes, that does make him a less developed human being than a responsible, loving, capable father of a family who lives a life of devoted service to others.
That’s not a tricky question. (Now, it might be trickier if the single person was chastely following the Pauline vision of a single life of service, and if the married man was selfish and lazy and abusive.)
Yeah that’s about it.Respond? Maybe with laughter. You would certainly not want to engage in any debate with such rude people.
This is sort of my approach as well. A lot of times it comes across as thoughtless more than deliberately rude. Usually it’s not directed at anyone, but more that sort of careless conversation that’s not taking into account who’s around (say, sitting at a table with three married grad students who are talking about the subject in complete oblivion).Hold on…could be a conversation worth having.![]()