OMG, ANTICHRIST!
OK, I’m just kidding you know!
So your argument is that because the Church ‘never’ thaught this dogma then it must be false or you don’t have to believe it. Also, it is not enough to listen to the decrees of just two Councils and a non-infallible catechism. Even an edition of the Cathechism of Saint Pius X had an unintentional heresy in it (and this heresy has absoloutely nothing to do with the dogma of Baptism of Desire and blood. Forget the silly Dimonds and the even nuttier Ibrayni. It rather had something to do with the dogma that outside the Church there is no salvation, something which the Pope when He found out ordered to be removed.)
As for proof that the Church thaught that Councils are infallible:
In
Scripture, in Acts 15:28, the Apostles in the Council of Jerusalem said: “For it has seemed
good to the Holy Ghost and to us [Bishops] to lay no further burden upon you than these necessary things:”
(From the Catholic Encyclopedia) Pope Leo the Great expressly declares that “who resists the Councils of Nicaea and Chalcedon
cannot be numbered among Catholics” (Ep. lxxviii, ad Leonem Augustum). Does an Epistle or a letter written by a Pope sound similiar to an Encyclical? What a coincedence!
Also, in the same Epistle (Encyclical!), Pope Leo the Great says: In the same epistle he says that the decrees of Chalcedon were framed
instruente Spiritu Sancto, i.e. under the guidance of the Holy Ghost.
Also, for a Council to be infallible, it must be presided by the Pope and all Ecumenical Councils were presided by a Pope. We have the dogma of Papal Infallibility so if a Pope accepts the decrees of a Council, than that Council must necessarilly be infallible*. Ironicly, Papal Infallibility was not only defined by the Pope but it was also defined by a whole Council (Vatican I). Councils are also always saying for example ‘this Holy Synod decrees’, or ‘This Holy Synod defines’ or ‘This Holy Synod declares’ OR ‘Whosoever doesn’t believe in Mary’s sinlesness, let him be anathema.’
OR, THEY ALSO SAY: ‘who ever will not give philipmarie a thousand dollars every year, let him be anat…’ wait a minute, they never said that! How on earth could I make that mistake…
Anyway, if the Council anathemizes somebody who does not beleive a doctrine of faith, then Councils necasserily must be infallible. You can’t say that since Councils are not infallible, then it is up to you to decide whether you’re excommunicated or not.
*(and not as Ronald Conte says that only the teachings of the Council are infallible. We speak to our children of the doctrines of the faith yet we are not given the title of infallible. The only people, outside the Pope and Councils, that really are infallible when they speak are God and Mary, since God is God and Mary was always preserved by God from all error)
I have to buy TAN’s
Denzinger.
. I see so much evil in the world, with dirty muslims, idiotic protestants, raving modernists, filthy degenerate Freemasons and their blasted one world governemnt and their total irregard of human life. I always feel sad and lonely because God seems so harsh sometimes, I fear God’s punishments, I feel sorry for all victims of sexual abuse who had to suffer at the hands of those incredibly degenerated bastards of pedophiles. I feel sory for every single soul who had to be alive during these inglorious times of conciliarism and modernism and raving anti-papal idiots.
) who accuse us clients of Mary of being exagerated in our devotion towards Her and that we should consecrate on Christ instead. They say this though not merely because they have any concern for Christ (because their concern isn’t done out of charity) but because they cannot see bear to see others love Her more than they do. Come on people, She is the Blessed Virgin you can never be afraid of giving Her too much honor and praise.