Mary - sinner - Romans 3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe370
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Protestants, scripture says:* “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”* Romans 3:23

Meaning that Mary must have been a sinner too…

Scripture says: For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners…" Romans 5:19

Meaning that it was the disobedience of just the one man, as opposed to the first man and woman, that many were made sinners.

Those who believe that Jesus’ mother Mary was a sinner:

Could it possibly be wrong to interpret Romans 3 to include the woman Mary, the new Eve of creation, as a sinner, if it’s wrong to assume that Romans 5 contradicts Genesis 3 by excluding the first woman from Romans 5?
Both men and woman inherited the sin of Adam and Eve. All are the offspring of Adam and Eve and inherited the original Sin in the Garden of Eden…

I think that Catholics seek to resolve this issue by assigning an immaculate conception to Mary.

But there is another way to satisfy this dilemma. God did not simply provided the sperm to Mary’s egg (zygote). He may have provided the entire zygote already fertilized. Mary simply gave birth to this Son of God, and still Jesus is the Son of Man, being a born in a male human body, without inheriting Adam and Eve’s sin.

We ourselves are not our body, we are spirits being born in male and female bodies. When we die, our spirit leaves our body and our human body decays, but we live on, being spirit, neither being male or female.

Thus Jesus, not having any original sin, fully human, suffered the death that we all deserved, in our place, thereby redeeming us with the Blood He shed on the cross, the perfect unblemished Lamb who took upon Himself the penalty we deserved, Thereby condemning sin in the Flesh, and whose blood washes away all sins for all time of all who believe God and accept Jesus blood atonement for all their sins.

Telestia
 
We ourselves are not our body, we are spirits being born in male and female bodies. When we die, our spirit leaves our body and our human body decays, but we live on, being spirit, neither being male or female.
Incorrect. We are embodied souls, and after we die, there will be a resurrection and we will be reunited with our body.
 
I posted this in another thread, but it could be beneficial here as well:
NewAdvent:
Moreover, it is to be observed that it was granted, by way of privilege, to others, to be sanctified in the womb; for instance, to Jeremias, to whom it was said (Jeremiah 1:5): “Before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee”; and again, to John the Baptist, of whom it is written (Luke 1:15): “He shall be filled with the Holy Ghost even from his mother’s womb.” It is therefore with reason that we believe the Blessed Virgin to have been sanctified before her birth from the womb.
 
Both men and woman inherited the sin of Adam and Eve. All are the offspring of Adam and Eve and inherited the original Sin in the Garden of Eden…

I think that Catholics seek to resolve this issue by assigning an immaculate conception to Mary.

But there is another way to satisfy this dilemma. God did not simply provided the sperm to Mary’s egg (zygote). He may have provided the entire zygote already fertilized. Mary simply gave birth to this Son of God, and still Jesus is the Son of Man, being a born in a male human body, without inheriting Adam and Eve’s sin.

We ourselves are not our body, we are spirits being born in male and female bodies. When we die, our spirit leaves our body and our human body decays, but we live on, being spirit, neither being male or female.

Thus Jesus, not having any original sin, fully human, suffered the death that we all deserved, in our place, thereby redeeming us with the Blood He shed on the cross, the perfect unblemished Lamb who took upon Himself the penalty we deserved, Thereby condemning sin in the Flesh, and whose blood washes away all sins for all time of all who believe God and accept Jesus blood atonement for all their sins.

Telestia
So how do you resolve that Jesus was man in all ways. Do you know of any zygote not being fertilized in a human being born?

So how do you get around the zygote carrying the genetic material, the X-chromosome from Mary…was this zygote with or without sin?

St. Augustine says when you ponder this issue of the zygote and fertilization…it is like Paul says…Mystery…Augustine says to go study something else.

According to Paul in Romans 6, you are correct, you must be baptized to be born again and buried with him in death so that you may live. You must believe this.👍
 
So how do you resolve that Jesus was man in all ways. Do you know of any zygote not being fertilized in a human being born?

So how do you get around the zygote carrying the genetic material, the X-chromosome from Mary…was this zygote with or without sin?
My point is that the Zygote would be fertilized by God the Father supplying both X and Y chromosomes of His only begotten Son. The Apostle John in his Gospel states that Jesus is the only begotten God of God.

Everyone knows Jesus was not begotten of Joseph. Jesus was the only begotten of His Father, the only begotten God of God.

It is an assumption that the ‘X’ Chromosomes came from Mary.

Jn 1:14-18

And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of THE ONLY BEGOTTEN FROM THE FATHER, full of grace and truth. John testified about Him and cried out, saying, “This was He of whom I said, ’ He who comes after me has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.’” For of His fullness we have all received, and grace upon grace. For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth were realized through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time; THE ONLY BEGOTTEN GOD [Jesus] who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. NASU

Adam and Eve were not born of any man and woman. God Gave them their X and Y Chromosomes, that they may bear human offspring. We do this today with our technology. A woman who can not bear children can have a fertilized zygote by another man and woman supplying the the X and Y Chromosomes implanted her womb. Well, to be exact, the donor woman will supply the XX female Chromosome, while the donor Male will provide the XY Chromosome.
St. Augustine says when you ponder this issue of the zygote and fertilization…it is like Paul says…Mystery…Augustine says to go study something else.

According to Paul in Romans 6, you are correct, you must be baptized to be born again and buried with him in death so that you may live. You must believe this.👍
Yes.
 
Incorrect. We are embodied souls, and after we die, there will be a resurrection and we will be reunited with our body.
Your point is well taken.

I do not know if we enter a period of hibernation where we sleep until the resurrection at some later time as told to Jewish Daniel. Or do Christians get resurrected immediately, as Jesus said to the man on the cross next to Him:

Lk 23:39-43

39 One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying, “Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!” But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” And he was saying, “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!” And He [Jesus] said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.” NASU

After all, Jesus declared the Jews who were first, would be last, and the last (those who became Christians) will be first.

So E.E.N.S.;8449471, which one is it?
 
My point is that the Zygote would be fertilized by God the Father supplying both X and Y chromosomes of His only begotten Son. The Apostle John in his Gospel states that Jesus is the only begotten God of God. Everyone knows Jesus was not begotten of Joseph. Jesus was the only begotten of His Father, the only begotten God of God.

It is an assumption that the ‘X’ Chromosomes came from Mary.

Jn 1:14-18

And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of THE ONLY BEGOTTEN FROM THE FATHER, full of grace and truth. John testified about Him and cried out, saying, “This was He of whom I said, ’ He who comes after me has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.’” For of His fullness we have all received, and grace upon grace. For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth were realized through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time; THE ONLY BEGOTTEN GOD [Jesus] who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. NASU

Adam and Eve were not born of any man and woman. God Gave them their X and Y Chromosomes, that they may bear human offspring. We do this today with our technology. A woman who can not bear children can have a fertilized zygote by another man and woman supplying the the X and Y Chromosomes implanted her womb. Well, to be exact, the donor woman will supply the XX female Chromosome, while the donor Male will provide the XY Chromosome.

Yes.
A zygote without any genetic material would be nothing. Genetic material is the essence of life. You are creating a real mess of understanding for life suggesting that Jesus was in the womb zygote without any genetic material fertilized by God to escape that Jesus was man in every way except sin in His humanity. You might want to look at the gospels with geneologies…what purpose is there for a geneology in the gospels for God to supersede the natural process. You may also want to look at Jesus was a Jew. He had to be born of a Jewish woman to be a Jew. This would make Jesus born of a Jewish woman as a carrier of completely created in utero genetic material that denies the geneology. Why can’t you just accept that Jesus was born of a Virgin, born of a woman that contributed her zygote like any other woman and God produced a miracle of conception.

The only begotten Son in His divinity true and the only begotten God/man in his humanity. Now reconcile your notion of begotten from the Father with the following…There was nothing anything created that was created that was not created by Him…Gospel of John.

That is why we have a teaching Church to sort all this stuff out. I can put my mind through all sorts of convulutions using Scripture and reason and darned I have to admit that there are Theologians today and there have been theologians over the past 2000 years that reside in the Church, some pretty smart fellers…that have hammered all this out so I don’t get a charlie horse between my ears.

It must be difficult for you to try to reason your way to understanding. The Church with brillilant theologians have done this for me, the mystery hidden for all ages, through which the manifest wisdom of God is known…all I have to do is believe…isn’t that what you say it is all about…to believe.?

I am a simple minded Catholic, who reads a little, and knows little, I got to Church, I pray, I listen to the Bible being read in Church, and I study a little. You may want to think about asking an Apologist about your proposition or see what some of the smarter guys on this thread have to say.
 
In the Orthodox understanding, all of us are in that same condition, or none of us. Not Saint Mary one way, and everyone else another.
Alright, fair enough.

Now, you and I have baptism and the sacraments to help us stay faithful to God, or to return us to him when we fail. For the Theotokos, these things would not be available until the time she was around fifty. Yet she had managed to remain sinless for the entire fifty years.

If she was absolutely no different from you and I, how did she remain sinless from the age of reason till the annunciation and then after, for her entire adulthood? Is it the Orthodox belief that she had no extra help than the other non-baptized people that lived around her, and populate much of the world we live in today? Is this the ordinary thing among humans?🤷

Isn’t this actually the position that sets Mary apart from the rest of her kind?- By holding that without any special intervention, Mary was born with all our defects and with no special help, somehow managed to remain spotless?
 
For the Catholic Church, Mary needed the grace of Christ to be a saint as much as everyone else. We know that this grace came with Our Lord’s Merits and his works. Yet, Our Lady was already a Saint at her “Fiat” to the Holy Archangel- Never having sinned in the slightest, a complete life of co-operation with the Holy work and will of God as she perceived it in her life.

The CC teaching of 1) Immaculate Conception and 2) Our Lady’s sinlessness… are to the effect that-: 1) For the IC- What the rest of us get at baptism (New birth in the New Life of God), she got at her conception; And 2) She was supplied with a superabundant grace for the rest of her life, which grace she relied on for all her merits and sanctity.

The CC teaching says that what we get at baptism and sacraments, Mary needed even before the Life of Christ could begin, and much more than anyone due to her unique and crucial role in the plan of salvation and so God provided it. We have no qualms about Our Lady getting “special treatment”- She was to play a special role, after all, and was to bear a special burden that already sets her apart from anyone else, considering what her Son was to go through before her eyes, and the sword that would pierce her heart. The CC doesn’t treat Mary as if she’s not human as many people like to imply sometimes- We recognize that Our Lady, a creature, had to be prepared in a special way, strengthened, fortified, in order for her to undertake the super-human role that had been divinely assigned to her from before time.
 
Both men and woman inherited the sin of Adam and Eve. All are the offspring of Adam and Eve and inherited the original Sin in the Garden of Eden…

I think that Catholics seek to resolve this issue by assigning an immaculate conception to Mary.

But there is another way to satisfy this dilemma. God did not simply provided the sperm to Mary’s egg (zygote). He may have provided the entire zygote already fertilized. Mary simply gave birth to this Son of God, and still Jesus is the Son of Man, being a born in a male human body, without inheriting Adam and Eve’s sin.

We ourselves are not our body, we are spirits being born in male and female bodies. When we die, our spirit leaves our body and our human body decays, but we live on, being spirit, neither being male or female.

Thus Jesus, not having any original sin, fully human, suffered the death that we all deserved, in our place, thereby redeeming us with the Blood He shed on the cross, the perfect unblemished Lamb who took upon Himself the penalty we deserved, Thereby condemning sin in the Flesh, and whose blood washes away all sins for all time of all who believe God and accept Jesus blood atonement for all their sins.

Telestia
I always wonder about people who would rather come up with such obviously heretical theories, rather than just admit Our Lady’s holiness and her place of honor.

Here, People are willing to call Jesus an alien!:eek::eek: rather than think that Our Lady was Holy:shrug:We are willing to imagine that God only pretended to be one of us without actually being one us- To look like a Palestinian Jew of the 1st Century, and talk and act like them, but never really be one of them! To look like like a legitimate descendant of Adam without actually being related to Adam in any way apart from mere superficial resemblance! Question is…Why?? This reminds me of the Muslim claim that God only made it look like Christ had died on the cross, but he hadn’t!.. Why??? Is God in the business of perpetuating frauds on men, constantly calling himself the son of Adam, when he wasn’t even related to Mary, his own Mother!!! How was he the son of man (Adam)…just by looking like us???

If God had no intention of actually joining the human race, why even enter Mary’s womb? Why risk her getting accused of adultery? The Archangel could have just brought a fully formed baby to Mary and Joseph and asked them to care for him- Even better, our Lord would have just appeared at the Jordan, preaching and doing miracles! Certainly would have given him more credibility as to his Divinity not having any traceable earthly origin or relatives!

No, my friends, Our Lord Jesus Christ was not a 1st century Clark Kent! A non- human who just looks like us but is not really one of us and only saves us an outsider! He is a legitimate, bonafide, biological heir of Adam- A true human, “Like us in all things but sin”. It’s precisely because he desired to be a genuine member of the one human family that he did, to legitimately take Adam’s role/place (become 2nd Adam) and our center of unity- something only the descendant of Adam could do- for us to legitimately share in his own merits and the divine life he obtained- This is why he became one of us in a real way, and he did so through only one human being- The Blessed Mother.
 
I always wonder about people who would rather come up with such obviously heretical theories, rather than just admit Our Lady’s holiness and her place of honor.

Here, People are willing to call Jesus an alien!:eek::eek: rather than think that Our Lady was Holy:shrug:We are willing to imagine that God only pretended to be one of us without actually being one us- To look like a Palestinian Jew of the 1st Century, and talk and act like them, but never really be one of them! To look like like a legitimate descendant of Adam without actually being related to Adam in any way apart from mere superficial resemblance! Question is…Why?? This reminds me of the Muslim claim that God only made it look like Christ had died on the cross, but he hadn’t!.. Why??? Is God in the business of perpetuating frauds on men, constantly calling himself the son of Adam, when he wasn’t even related to Mary, his own Mother!!! How was he the son of man (Adam)…just by looking like us???

If God had no intention of actually joining the human race, why even enter Mary’s womb? Why risk her getting accused of adultery? The Archangel could have just brought a fully formed baby to Mary and Joseph and asked them to care for him- Even better, our Lord would have just appeared at the Jordan, preaching and doing miracles! Certainly would have given him more credibility as to his Divinity not having any traceable earthly origin or relatives!

No, my friends, Our Lord Jesus Christ was not a 1st century Clark Kent! A non- human who just looks like us but is not really one of us and only saves us an outsider! He is a legitimate, bonafide, biological heir of Adam- A true human, “Like us in all things but sin”. It’s precisely because he desired to be a genuine member of the one human family that he did, to legitimately take Adam’s role/place (become 2nd Adam) and our center of unity- something only the descendant of Adam could do- for us to legitimately share in his own merits and the divine life he obtained- This is why he became one of us in a real way, and he did so through only one human being- The Blessed Mother.
You do me wrong to treat me so discourteously, Marybeloved.

I find your reply most unfair. You are simply resorting to a sophistical argument known as Pooh-poohing. To Pooh-Pooh an argument or claim is to brush it aside without consideration, to dismiss it with a cavalier wave of the hand as unworthy of serious attention. And encouraging all to follow your example.

If I and my gentile wife converted to Judaism, and then we bore children, would not our families all be Jewish, even though we were not descendants of Judah.

On the other hand, some Jews by birth are not Jews at all. Scripture tells us: Rv 2:8-9
"And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write:

The first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life, says this:

I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan." NASU They have the bloodline of Judah, but they rebel against God and His plan of salvation for all.

And again, The Ashkenazi Jews are converts to Judaism with zero lineage to the Jews of the Judah descendants. There is no biological relation, none whatsoever.

We humans are all spirits. Our Bodies are merely the physical homes for our spirits. Just as a house is a physical habitat we dwell in, but is not us. We are not our Chromosomes.

If I do God’s will, am I not then also a child of God.

More important is where we all came from.

Jesus is still the child of Mary, for she bore Him in her womb and gave Him birth. But Jesus existed before Adam and Eve, even before the Cosmos and the Kingdom were created. We are born in the Cosmos, but as Christians we are destined for the Kingdom. The Cosmos is a fiery furnace wherein our impurities are removed. For God is Holy.

The material world ought not be confused with the Spiritual world.

Mt 13:24-30

24 Tares among Wheat

Jesus presented another parable to them, saying, " The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went away. But when the wheat sprouted and bore grain, then the tares became evident also. The slaves of the landowner came and said to him, ‘Sir, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have tares?’ And he said to them, ‘An enemy has done this!’ The slaves said to him, ‘Do you want us, then, to go and gather them up?’ But he said, ‘No; for while you are gathering up the tares, you may uproot the wheat with them. Allow both to grow together until the harvest; and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, “First gather up the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them up; but gather the wheat into my barn.”’"
NASU
 
Protestants, scripture says:* “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”* Romans 3:23

Meaning that Mary must have been a sinner too…

Scripture says: For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners…" Romans 5:19

Meaning that it was the disobedience of just the one man, as opposed to the first man and woman, that many were made sinners.

Those who believe that Jesus’ mother Mary was a sinner:

Could it possibly be wrong to interpret Romans 3 to include the woman Mary, the new Eve of creation, as a sinner, if it’s wrong to assume that Romans 5 contradicts Genesis 3 by excluding the first woman from Romans 5?
You must read the scripture and think WHO was Jesus taking to and why. If all Men were sinners was Jesus not a Man? If the Blessed Mother was a sinner how could she be HOLY and Blessed among women. Would she not be the same among women?

Why would all nations call a sinner Blessed:p

The next time you are asked this question, ask one back, such as you deny that Christ was Fully Human? Was he not MAN? If they say well he don;t count. then you say like I do, where is that written in the bible, Jesus don;t count? THen say I agree Jesus don’t COUNT as a sinner and neither does his Mother:D
 
If all Men were sinners was Jesus not a Man? …
Yes! And although Jesus was tempted in every way, he remained sinless. That is why he is the ONLY one who could redeem us from our sins.

The Bible specifically states Jesus was sinless. No where does the Bible claim Mary was sinless.

Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

Where does Scripture make this claim about Mary?
 
Correction on my post directly above,

I wrote "There is no biological relation, none whatsoever "[between Ashkenazi Jews and descendants of Judah]. Modern blood tests indicate some of the Khazars descendants do have blood markers indicating direct ancestory to Judah, but most do not.
 
You do me wrong to treat me so discourteously, Marybeloved.

I find your reply most unfair. You are simply resorting to a sophistical argument known as Pooh-poohing. To Pooh-Pooh an argument or claim is to brush it aside without consideration, to dismiss it with a cavalier wave of the hand as unworthy of serious attention. And encouraging all to follow your example.
Hello, Telestia. I’m sorry you feel mistreated, It’s honestly not the intention of my response.

But what do you mean “brush it aside without consideration?” I did make my point- Your theory suggests that Jesus Christ was not actually a member of the human race! Mankind means those creatures that are descended from Adam, the first man. We know we are one people because God made all of us “in Adam”- What do you think connects you to the rest of mankind if not your biology? Don’t you know that God gives you your individual Soul at conception?- You don’t get it from your parents! What you do get is your biology! It’s through this biology that we all know we are one species and have a common ancestor. Your theory states that Mary was a surrogate to an Alien that was placed in her womb, who had no common biology with her or the rest of her species all the way to Adam (the original man)! Jesus is like Super-man who was discovered in some strange ship, but looked like man and could pass off as one of them. I’m just wondering why God would bother incarnating at all without actually becoming a human being- If he had wanted to save us without joining us, he could have done so without simply acting like a member of a species he had not in reality joined.

The whole point of the incarnation is that God became one of us- That’s why he entered Mary’s womb- He took up the same biology of Adam that you and I have. And our bodies are not unimportant. It’s our nature! God has creatures that are purely spiritual beings and are complete that way, They’re called Angels, not human beings. It was God who chose to make us body and Soul- And you are not human if you are not body (that you get from your parents) and soul that God joins to your body! This is the full human nature that Jesus took, body (from his mother) and soul, like every human being. That’s why we say he was 100% God and 100% man- He had a complete human nature- So it really doesn’t matter if you insist that the body is just physical- yes it is, It’ how God wanted it:shrug:! That’s the nature God gave to Adam and all his descendants. And Yes Jesus existed before- From Eternity as God, not as man. He began to exist as man for the first time in Mary’s womb after she gave her fiat, and not a moment before.
 
My point is that the Zygote would be fertilized by God the Father supplying both X and Y chromosomes of His only begotten Son. The Apostle John in his Gospel states that Jesus is the only begotten God of God.

Everyone knows Jesus was not begotten of Joseph. Jesus was the only begotten of His Father, the only begotten God of God.

It is an assumption that the ‘X’ Chromosomes came from Mary.

Jn 1:14-18

And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of THE ONLY BEGOTTEN FROM THE FATHER, full of grace and truth. John testified about Him and cried out, saying, “This was He of whom I said, ’ He who comes after me has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.’” For of His fullness we have all received, and grace upon grace. For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth were realized through Jesus Christ. No one has seen God at any time; THE ONLY BEGOTTEN GOD [Jesus] who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. NASU

Adam and Eve were not born of any man and woman. God Gave them their X and Y Chromosomes, that they may bear human offspring. We do this today with our technology. A woman who can not bear children can have a fertilized zygote by another man and woman supplying the the X and Y Chromosomes implanted her womb. Well, to be exact, the donor woman will supply the XX female Chromosome, while the donor Male will provide the XY Chromosome.
God the Father is no human, nor any material being in any way whatsoever, he has no “genetic material”, DNA or chromosomes to fertilize Mary or anyone else!!! The comparison with Adam and Eve makes no sense- God made them by act of creation, not generation as if he was Adam’s material Father. Adam was given the original human nature by an act of creation (God did not provide genetic material in the manner suggested, as if he himself has DNA!!- God is pure spirit) From this one nature, Eve was fashioned and from the two of them the rest of the human beings by procreation. It’s obvious that mankind as a race has a single spring and origin- Adam. If Jesus had new genetic material put together, then you’re saying that God by a second act of creation created a new species, not man (Adam) but similar and then implanted this new creature into his chosen surrogate, Mary. This is a new species by a second act of creation, not the race of Adam:shrug: If God wanted to replace Adam’s race with a new race, then why bother/attempt to redeem it at all?

And God the Son is begotten from the Father in Eternity, This is a term of the Divine relations between the Divine persons of the Godhead -Trinity, God’s inner nature from Eternity. It has nothing to do with Genetic material or Jesus’ Human nature. It was not in Our Lady’s womb that God the Son was begotten from the Father! There he took human flesh and was incarnated, and became a legitimate member of Adam’s race.
 
Both men and woman inherited the sin of Adam and Eve. All are the offspring of Adam and Eve and inherited the original Sin in the Garden of Eden…

I think that Catholics seek to resolve this issue by assigning an immaculate conception to Mary.

But there is another way to satisfy this dilemma. God did not simply provided the sperm to Mary’s egg (zygote). He may have provided the entire zygote already fertilized. Mary simply gave birth to this Son of God, and still Jesus is the Son of Man, being a born in a male human body, without inheriting Adam and Eve’s sin.

We ourselves are not our body, we are spirits being born in male and female bodies. When we die, our spirit leaves our body and our human body decays, but we live on, being spirit, neither being male or female.

Thus Jesus, not having any original sin, fully human, suffered the death that we all deserved, in our place, thereby redeeming us with the Blood He shed on the cross, the perfect unblemished Lamb who took upon Himself the penalty we deserved, Thereby condemning sin in the Flesh, and whose blood washes away all sins for all time of all who believe God and accept Jesus blood atonement for all their sins.

Telestia
You have the following problems with your argument:


  1. *]Luke 1:31 is very clear that Mary will conceive in her womb.There is no way that could be construed as implanting a zygote.

    *]As for God providing sperm…he certainly did not provide sperm when he made Eve from Adams flesh. In Genesis God already established is M.O. as to how a person is born from a single person and that method does not include God having any sperm.

    *]I am sorry if I misunderstand you but are you suggesting there will be no resurrection of the body? More simply put, are you taking the position of the Sadducees that Jesus condemned?

    As for the Immaculate Conception, this tradition has been proven to have been around very early. You must also keep in mind we really do not know how early as many documents have been destroyed. More importantly, this was never an issue in any early Church council. This was never an issue until modern times. In fact, when ever the Church through council or through the Pope declares anything a dogma, it is simply a reaction to a large number of people going against tradition. Although the Pope used his Infallibility he in a sense held a long distance council because he asked for other Bishops opinions prior to the declaration.

    A good example of how dogmas are declared as a reaction is the Council of Nicaea was held specifically to counter the Arians. The Church had never had to declare the trinity dogma before because the concept was common knowledge. There wasn’t even a vote. Arius got a slap on the face on then they created the original Nicene Creed.
 
Yes! And although Jesus was tempted in every way, he remained sinless. That is why he is the ONLY one who could redeem us from our sins.

The Bible specifically states Jesus was sinless. No where does the Bible claim Mary was sinless.

Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

Where does Scripture make this claim about Mary?
Really. So then you are saying Mary played no part in helping us have our sins redeemed huh?:eek: Mary was chosen by God to gve him his Human Nature. You don’t feel that she played a part in helping us have our sins redeemed, Wow. God said she was FULL of GRACE. How can you be full of grace and then have room for sin?? Maybe you can help me there understand that.

Many Saints disagree with you and all of the Early Fathers of the Church thats for sure.

To begin with SS won’t get you anywhere if you want all the answers. We are told by the bible itself the Church is the pilar of all truth, not the bible. ANd I guess we can throw out our belief in the Trinity right???:confused: ITs not in the bible EITHER. But if you accept that from the Church how can you deny other teachings by the Church. What do you do flip a coin:confused:

St Irenaeus says in Gen 3:15 that Marys victory over satan would not have been PERFECT if she had been under his power. He said that proves she entered this world without Original Sin.

What do you think? Do you think if Mary had sin she could overpower the devil??

Now you have another problem. If you deny Mary the new Eve as being that women in Gen, having victory over the devil, how could she be the Mother of GOD then?

You are saying God picked a women who was filled with the Sin of the devil to give birth to his Son?? Because you do understand that Mary was indeed Human and if she had the stain of Original Sin on her she had to have passed it down to her son:eek:

So either the CHurch is correct and she was the perfect sinless woman that was predicted in the O.T or she never gave birth yet, to the perfect sinless Son. Whats it going to be. Did the devil enter into the Mother Mary and was she not the perfect Mother and did not give brith to the perfect sinless Son or what?
 
Yes! And although Jesus was tempted in every way, he remained sinless. That is why he is the ONLY one who could redeem us from our sins.

The Bible specifically states Jesus was sinless. No where does the Bible claim Mary was sinless.

Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

Where does Scripture make this claim about Mary?
Again may I add. Hail Mary FULL of GRACE the LORD IS WITH YOU. Now you are saying that would not mean sinless???

So if I am completely full of God’s Grace from the moment of my Conception, and until my death continue to be full of the Grace of God, the perfect example of obedience to God that does not prove I am sinless:eek:
 
Hello, Telestia. I’m sorry you feel mistreated, It’s honestly not the intention of my response.
Thanks, and I am sure you did not mean. No doubt your fervor for your beliefs about Mary is what you wanted to defend, and from your perspective, I can not blame you.
But what do you mean “brush it aside without consideration?” I did make my point- Your theory suggests that Jesus Christ was not actually a member of the human race! Mankind means those creatures that are descended from Adam, the first man.
Of course Jesus is a member of the Human race. His DNA was Human. That was never in doubt. Some Theologians believed that Jesus appeared in a physical human body several times in the OT, such as the fourth man in the fire in Babylon. And again in a physical human body after His Resurrection.
We know we are one people because God made all of us “in Adam”- What do you think connects you to the rest of mankind if not your biology? Don’t you know that God gives you your individual Soul at conception?-
My body is human because it was formed by human genes. A Bison is a Bison from having Bison genes. Forgive my science background.

And from the Bible I know that I am a spirit wearing a human body.
You don’t get it from your parents!
Did Jesus get the Y Chromosome from Joseph? The answer is NO! But they must have came from somewhere. God must have provided the Y chromosome. Does this make Jesus an alien because God provided the Y Chromosome which is what make males - males. So Jesus did not have the Y Chromosome that was handed down from Adam.

Jesus can not be a male human unless He has the Y Chromosome. Does this make Jesus an alien because God provided the Y Chromosome? Or half human and half alien? Of course not. Nor would Jesus be an alien if God provided bot the X and Y Chromosomes. Think about it. Adam did not have a physical mother nor Father. God made Adam with his XY Chromosome. And God provided Eve with her XX Chromosomes. Neither of them are ‘aliens’, they were both what we call - HUMAN! We are all simply asexual spirits when we leave our dead body.

And keep in mind what Paul wrote:

1 Co 15:50

Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.
NASU

And Finally, Jesus had a 100% human body, and His Spirit is 100% God. The only Begotten Son of God the Father.

And when Jesus body died, He left His body and returned to the Father. “Father, into your hands I commit my Spirit.”

Lk 23:45-47
46 And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, “Father,INTO YOUR HANDS I COMMIT MY SPIRIT.” Having said this, He breathed His last. NASU

But in His case, God resurrected His body, and Jesus did what no other man ever did, He returned on the 3rd day in His Resurrected Body.

MaryBeloved, We are simply sharing our views. It is a Good thing we are not saved by our knowledge, but by God’s grace and love for us. Peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top