Mass--Too much change?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pira114
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

pira114

Guest
I don’t know if this has been discussed before, but I’m getting tired of Mass being changed every couple of months. Or, even worse, changing from Priest to Priest. For example, singing the Our Father instead of saying it. Exchanging handshakes and saying Peace be with you AFTER the Eucharist instead of before. Changing the wording of prayers. And, in my opinion, singing way too much. My church has also started having a band that plays very modern Christian songs.

Is it just my Church? Is it just me? I go to Mass now, and my wife and I don’t know what’s going on half the time. My Church has now started telling people to stand after Communion even though the Tabernacle is still inside the Church. I still kneel and I get weird looks from people. I’m not old and stuck in my ways, but if you compared the Mass I attend now with the one I grew up with (same Church) they would look nothing alike.

What do all of you think? Is anyone else experiencing the same thing?
 
I’m sick to death of priests who attempt to interject their egos into the Mass, who try to put their “stamp” on it. Ours doesn’t change much in terms of structure, but from priest to priest it varies in terms of little “quirks.” The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass should be quirkless.
 
Our parish must be lucky–the Mass doesn’t change. Our priest doesn’t seem to want to put his “stamp” on things and be different. About the only difference we ever see is in the homilies. Our priest is a great homilist, but much more quiet and reserved. We have a visiting priest who comes in when our priest is unable to be with us and he’s much more impassioned when he speaks. Both are fabulous, each in their own way. The Mass itself and the reverence for it, do not change.
 
This changing is not happening at my Parish on Long Island. We have little mistakes and little quirks but nothing like you describe.
 
40.png
pira114:
I, but if you compared the Mass I attend now with the one I grew up with (same Church) they would look nothing alike.

What do all of you think? Is anyone else experiencing the same thing?
The more the changes, the more in control the laity seems to be… they set the agenda… a weak or misinformed priest follows them. Very sad… very common… but MANY parishes are now fighting back, and supporting the “old way” - you know, more reverence, better music, stronger understanding of the Mass as not being a time of fellowship with each other, but rather the ultimate prayer to God.

Hang in there. Kneel. Be silent. And read these threads on posture, prayers, Mass, Liturgy, rubrics, GIRM, etc 👍 You will see multiple opinions expressed… and you will definitely see which is closer to real devotion. God bless.
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
I’m sick to death of priests who attempt to interject their egos into the Mass, who try to put their “stamp” on it. Ours doesn’t change much in terms of structure, but from priest to priest it varies in terms of little “quirks.” The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass should be quirkless.
Gee, Kirk. Sounds like a new springtime to me.

The bishops gathered together for the recent synod on the Eucharist seemed to agree that the liturgical “renewal” of the past 40 years is going super good. Or maybe even better.

Inventing prayers, dropping prayers, sacred vessels made of cheap glass, questionable material used to confect the Eucharist, dissent being preached from the ambo, lay people assuming inappropriate liturgical roles, a total absence of our precious lingual and musical patrimony from Mass, irreverence before the Blessed Sacrament, the Sacred Species being munched like Doritos at a picnic, sterile “worship spaces” that could pass for a non-denominational church, discursive and highly politicized Prayers of the Faithfull, dreary, rote responses from the congregation (but at least they’re ACTIVE!)…my, my my. Yes, I can see how our good shepherds could witness all this, not to mention the hundreds of horror stories on this forum, and the thousands (dare I say millions) of abuses that occur worldwide everyday, and not say that the liturgical “renewal” has been a stunning success.

Don’t you feel renewed, Kirk? Everytime you see Father inject his ego into the Mass, don’t you feel renewed? I believe scripture tells us, “He (meaning Christ) must decrease and I must increase.” Or something like that. Mmmmm…smells like springtime to me. :dancing:
 
Dr. Bombay:
Gee, Kirk. Sounds like a new springtime to me.

The bishops gathered together for the recent synod on the Eucharist seemed to agree that the liturgical “renewal” of the past 40 years is going super good. Or maybe even better.

Inventing prayers, dropping prayers, sacred vessels made of cheap glass, questionable material used to confect the Eucharist, dissent being preached from the ambo, lay people assuming inappropriate liturgical roles, a total absence of our precious lingual and musical patrimony from Mass, irreverence before the Blessed Sacrament, the Sacred Species being munched like Doritos at a picnic, sterile “worship spaces” that could pass for a non-denominational church, discursive and highly politicized Prayers of the Faithfull, dreary, rote responses from the congregation (but at least they’re ACTIVE!)…my, my my. Yes, I can see how our good shepherds could witness all this, not to mention the hundreds of horror stories on this forum, and the thousands (dare I say millions) of abuses that occur worldwide everyday, and not say that the liturgical “renewal” has been a stunning success.

Don’t you feel renewed, Kirk? Everytime you see Father inject his ego into the Mass, don’t you feel renewed? I believe scripture tells us, “He (meaning Christ) must decrease and I must increase.” Or something like that. Mmmmm…smells like springtime to me. :dancing:
Given that that phrase is so closely associated with Pope John Paul the Great, of happy memory, I very much doubt that he had Fr. McBrien or any of the things you mention in mind as being a part of that springtime. Of course, the OBVIOUS answer is to bring back the TLM, isn’t it? We’d have perfect priests, sterling bishops, world peace, a reduction in tooth decay, etc.
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
Given that that phrase is so closely associated with Pope John Paul the Great, of happy memory, I very much doubt that he had Fr. McBrien or any of the things you mention in mind as being a part of that springtime. Of course, the OBVIOUS answer is to bring back the TLM, isn’t it? We’d have perfect priests, sterling bishops, world peace, a reduction in tooth decay, etc.
Maybe Kirk and maybe not. If you truly believe that the Church as an institution and as the Mystical Body of Christ is in a better state now than it was prior to Vatican II and all the changes that flowed from it, then I guess a lot of us on this forum need to open our eyes, and try to see where WE went wrong. Because Kirk old boy, as much as I hate to say it the Church now seems almost to be in the final stages of it’s own crucifixion.

Things were not all rosy back in the old days, but in my humble opinion, they are a whole lot worse now.

And Kirk, the title Pope John Paul the Great??? He hasn’t been made a saint yet you know. It is probably coming but not yet.
 
First, Singing or saying the Our Father is not a change. It is an option provided in the Liturgy. In fact, the whole of the liturgy is written to be sung including the readings and it is at the discression of the celebrant if he disires to sing all or portions of the liturgy or not.

Just to prepare some here we are all going to have to get used to some very serious changes in the next few years concerning the words of the liturgy. The new Missale Romanum will be fully translated soon and once it is approved for use it will be interesting to see how people get accustomed to the new responses that they will have to memorize over again.
 
40.png
mosher:
First, Singing or saying the Our Father is not a change. It is an option provided in the Liturgy. In fact, the whole of the liturgy is written to be sung including the readings and it is at the discression of the celebrant if he disires to sing all or portions of the liturgy or not.

Just to prepare some here we are all going to have to get used to some very serious changes in the next few years concerning the words of the liturgy. The new Missale Romanum will be fully translated soon and once it is approved for use it will be interesting to see how people get accustomed to the new responses that they will have to memorize over again.
Wow, changes to the Pauline Mass?? Say it ain’t so!!! :bigyikes: Please, it’s perfect. Why, it is a marvel in simplicity. it is closer to the ancient vernacular mass, everybody can take part not just the wicked old priests, you can hear everything so nobody can illicitly perform the consecration, it can be changed to suit everybodys cultural tastes and whims, you don’t have to learn any of that nasty old dead language LATIN, we can use fritos and bagels and home baked raisin bread for the host and grape kool aid and Budweiser for the blood, if you don’t have a chalice you can use a plastic bucket, everyone’s a saint and we all go home early. What could possibly be wrong with it??? :confused:

Fortunately, we in the U.S., don’t have to worry about any of that nonsense. The Bishops here are not going to let those old reactionaries in Rome push them around. No sir, they know what Americans want. Just ask Cardinal Mahoney. 👍
 
40.png
palmas85:
Maybe Kirk and maybe not. If you truly believe that the Church as an institution and as the Mystical Body of Christ is in a better state now than it was prior to Vatican II and all the changes that flowed from it, then I guess a lot of us on this forum need to open our eyes, and try to see where WE went wrong. Because Kirk old boy, as much as I hate to say it the Church now seems almost to be in the final stages of it’s own crucifixion.

Things were not all rosy back in the old days, but in my humble opinion, they are a whole lot worse now.

And Kirk, the title Pope John Paul the Great??? He hasn’t been made a saint yet you know. It is probably coming but not yet.
Correlation is no proof of causation. Lots of institutions suffered as a result of the late 60’s and early 70’s. Vatican II is one thing, the “Spirit of Vatican II” is quite another. I shall pray that your faith in Christ’s promise that the gates of hell wouldn’t ever prevail against the Church will be renewed. And yes, John Paul the Great. The Church never bestows this appelation, it comes from common usage and thru history. I use it, hoping others will do so, and that it will become as common as Leo the Great, Gregory the Great. He deserves it.
 
40.png
palmas85:
And Kirk, the title Pope John Paul the Great??? He hasn’t been made a saint yet you know. It is probably coming but not yet.
And PS: yeah, you’re right…it’s coming.
 
40.png
palmas85:
Wow, changes to the Pauline Mass?? Say it ain’t so!!! :bigyikes: Please, it’s perfect. Why, it is a marvel in simplicity. it is closer to the ancient vernacular mass, everybody can take part not just the wicked old priests, you can hear everything so nobody can illicitly perform the consecration, it can be changed to suit everybodys cultural tastes and whims, you don’t have to learn any of that nasty old dead language LATIN, we can use fritos and bagels and home baked raisin bread for the host and grape kool aid and Budweiser for the blood, if you don’t have a chalice you can use a plastic bucket, everyone’s a saint and we all go home early. What could possibly be wrong with it??? :confused:

Fortunately, we in the U.S., don’t have to worry about any of that nonsense. The Bishops here are not going to let those old reactionaries in Rome push them around. No sir, they know what Americans want. Just ask Cardinal Mahoney. 👍
Usually I am in the mood for such hyperbole but when it comes to the integrity of the liturgy I am not game. It is this type of attitude that gives those who patron the Tridintine Liturgy a bad name. Such lack of reverence for the Novus Ordo is no different than the lack of respect and reverence the modern Catholic has for the traditional Latin Rites.
 
There is one good option in the San Jose area that is a reverent mass that retains much tradition. Try Our Lady of Peace parish in Santa Clara, near Great America.
40.png
pira114:
I don’t know if this has been discussed before, but I’m getting tired of Mass being changed every couple of months. Or, even worse, changing from Priest to Priest. For example, singing the Our Father instead of saying it. Exchanging handshakes and saying Peace be with you AFTER the Eucharist instead of before. Changing the wording of prayers. And, in my opinion, singing way too much. My church has also started having a band that plays very modern Christian songs.

Is it just my Church? Is it just me? I go to Mass now, and my wife and I don’t know what’s going on half the time. My Church has now started telling people to stand after Communion even though the Tabernacle is still inside the Church. I still kneel and I get weird looks from people. I’m not old and stuck in my ways, but if you compared the Mass I attend now with the one I grew up with (same Church) they would look nothing alike.

What do all of you think? Is anyone else experiencing the same thing?
 
The reason why people react the way they do is that they are fed up. If you read previous threads on St Marys by the Sea parish in Orange county, you can see what Bishops and clergy can do to even reverent Novus Ordo masses if it doesnt fit the plan. It is sad that people have every single “change” shoved down their throat, yet spit on if they want anything traditional.
40.png
mosher:
Usually I am in the mood for such hyperbole but when it comes to the integrity of the liturgy I am not game. It is this type of attitude that gives those who patron the Tridintine Liturgy a bad name. Such lack of reverence for the Novus Ordo is no different than the lack of respect and reverence the modern Catholic has for the traditional Latin Rites.
 
40.png
mosher:
Usually I am in the mood for such hyperbole but when it comes to the integrity of the liturgy I am not game. It is this type of attitude that gives those who patron the Tridintine Liturgy a bad name. Such lack of reverence for the Novus Ordo is no different than the lack of respect and reverence the modern Catholic has for the traditional Latin Rites.
I actually have a lot of respect for the NO Liturgy, as I do for the Church as a whole. That does not mean however that I am blind deaf and dumb. Everyone of the things I cited in my post are documented and have occured. It’s not me who disrespects the NO Mass, it is those who do these things to it and accept them in the so called spirit of Vatican II. It is not me who brought the Novus Ordo mass to the position it is in, no it is those very people who cannot get it through their heads that change is not necessarily good or even advisable. I attend the NO Mass faithfully during the week and if it is done properly, I don’t have a problem, but when things like I have mentioned do happen, I will wail like a banshee, because the Holy Catholic Church deserves no less than that. If we are not willing to fight to protect our faith from those that would destroy it with their pathetic innovations then we deserve to lose it.

And as far as everyone being a saint, just ask around, hardly anyone commits sins anymore, they are just too old fashioned, not in step with the times. And as far as the Bishops ignoring Rome, look around, they do it all the time.

It is not disrespect to state the truth. It might be hard to take, but the truth is the truth.
 
Hello, Palmas,
… we can use fritos and bagels and home baked raisin bread for the host and grape kool aid and Budweiser for the blood, if you don’t have a chalice you can use a plastic bucket,

… but when things like I have mentioned do happen, I will wail like a banshee.
Are these things truly happening, like you mentioned? Raisin bread? Budweiser? Plastic buckets?

It sometimes happens that those who dissent are simply not understanding sufficiently the reasons for change. Maybe if you used some true examples that were not overstated, we might be able to p(name removed by moderator)oint the problems — and maybe not.

If, after reading the book of documents of VII, you still have questions, maybe you would have a right to complain. But if you have not tried to gain understanding through self-education, then I have a problem with listening to gripes.

One of the most serious consequences of the ancient Israelites’ failure to reach the promised land, was virtually caused by their grumbling and complaining. It deeply offended God, as you may well know.

Carole
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
And yes, John Paul the Great. The Church never bestows this appelation, it comes from common usage and thru history. I use it, hoping others will do so, and that it will become as common as Leo the Great, Gregory the Great. He deserves it.
AMEN!!!
 
40.png
pira114:
I don’t know if this has been discussed before, but I’m getting tired of Mass being changed every couple of months. Or, even worse, changing from Priest to Priest. For example, singing the Our Father instead of saying it. Exchanging handshakes and saying Peace be with you AFTER the Eucharist instead of before. Changing the wording of prayers. And, in my opinion, singing way too much. My church has also started having a band that plays very modern Christian songs.

Is it just my Church? Is it just me? I go to Mass now, and my wife and I don’t know what’s going on half the time. My Church has now started telling people to stand after Communion even though the Tabernacle is still inside the Church. I still kneel and I get weird looks from people. I’m not old and stuck in my ways, but if you compared the Mass I attend now with the one I grew up with (same Church) they would look nothing alike.

What do all of you think? Is anyone else experiencing the same thing?
I went to the parish I was confirmed this past Easter in a few weeks ago. They’ve started doing the same thing, singing the “Our Father”, standing after communion, etc. It was so odd (being a member of our Cathedral where everything is done week after week with no changes, etc.). After communion I knelt, I’m not sure if anyone else did or if I got bad looks from anyone, I really don’t care since I think kneeling after receiving the Eucharist is the appropriate thing to do.

As for the look of certain churches I think its a preference thing. I tend to like the older looking churches opposite the modern ones. The older ones seem more comfortable to me.
 
40.png
Joysong:
Hello, Palmas,

Are these things truly happening, like you mentioned? Raisin bread? Budweiser? Plastic buckets?

It sometimes happens that those who dissent are simply not understanding sufficiently the reasons for change. Maybe if you used some true examples that were not overstated, we might be able to p(name removed by moderator)oint the problems — and maybe not.

If, after reading the book of documents of VII, you still have questions, maybe you would have a right to complain. But if you have not tried to gain understanding through self-education, then I have a problem with listening to gripes.

One of the most serious consequences of the ancient Israelites’ failure to reach the promised land, was virtually caused by their grumbling and complaining. It deeply offended God, as you may well know.

Carole
Hi Carole, to answer your questions simply, yes. I have read quite a few, not all, but then no one probably has, documents that came out of Vatican II 🙂 . Unfortunately, as you WELL KNOW most of the changes that were thriust upon the faithful did not come in decrees from that council. No it was instead the desire for change on the part of certain groups within the Church that took the freedom to experiment in the way that Vatican II encouraged. The council itself actually gets a pass on this one Carole.

The examples that I gave did in facr happen. I was at the ones with the plastic bucket, they were in South Texas, in if I remember correctly 1991 or 1992. We had a charming group of Sisters, I use the term loosely, who ran things in our area due to a shortage of Priests, another of the fruits of Vatican II I guess. The rationale behind the bucket was that Jesus was poor, and worked with the poor and the Poor would not have had access to Chalices and that if Christ was walking the earth today he would use the simplest containers possible, for example, plastic cups, buckets and plates 👍

Raisin bread was confected by a group of school children during CCIC, I believe that is what it is called these days, Catechism, as I recall it, in Milwaukee Wisconsin in 2002. Their instructor allegedly said that all of Gods gifts should and could be used in the Celebration of the Mass. Why limit the host to plain flour and water? This has happened in many locations, and no not just raisin bread, but all different types of bread.

Tampering with the matter for the host is a serious and ongoing problem, would you not agree Carole? After all the Church has specific guidelines on what can and cannot be used to make the bread. But then again, maybe that too will be changed. Plain unleavened bread can be quite tasteless you know and even deadly to some people The beer was used rather extensively in masses in Europe throughout the 80’s and 90’s, and in various “Polka Masses” here in the U.S. Of course, they might not be doing it anymore, but rest assured they did. And I plead guilty to using the brand name Budweiser. I don’t know for a fact if Bud was used or not :crying: But if you’re going to use beer I say Bud is the way to go!!!

As far as everyone being a saint, well, just look around. Ten people at confession, 1,000 people receive communion. We must be in the company of Saints. But then again most saints did confess and regularly too I might add, so maybe we’re not all saints. But tell you what, I won’t tell anybody if you don"t. Wouldn’t want to show a lack of charity by pointing out the truth would we?

I’m not an expert in the Israelites passage to the promised land, but as I recall,. they began to worship Idols at some point. Maybe that had more to do with their problems then their grumbling. Who knows. As I recall the first commandment had something to do with not worshiping other Gods or something like that. You know, something old that probably needed changing and modernization. After all, their needs were probably not being met out there in the desert. And experimentation is all right, isn’t it Carole? Oh and by the way, they did not fail to reach the Promised Land. Moses did not make it there, but the Israelites did. If they didn’t make it there, there is a good posssibility that the entire Christian faith never would have been born, As you may or may not know, Christ Jesus, Mary and Joseph were all Jews and Christ was born in Bethlehem, which is in Israel, which is the Promised Land. Had the Israelites not reached it, Christ would not have been born there.

Oh and Carole your condescending tone, is as so many have used the words on this forum, lacking in Charity. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top