Massachusetts Catholic School Bars Same-Sex Couple From Prom

  • Thread starter Thread starter setter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Truth is more than an idea.
Fix,
Check out GreenJeans posts in other forums. (S)he just keeps asking the same question over and over. Keeps on baiting. If the challenges were reasonable, this would be interesting, but they often are not.

Dan
 
Fix,
Check out GreenJeans posts in other forums. (S)he just keeps asking the same question over and over. Keeps on baiting. If the challenges were reasonable, this would be interesting, but they often are not.

Dan
One might also observe no answer has been given to the basic question. We have learned what NL is. We have learned what the process of determining NL is. We have learned that NL is absolute. But we haven’t learned how we determine if a NL opinion is a correct discernment of NL.

So, when someone comes along and tells us that NL exists and we should shape our society along the lines of his opinion on NL, it’s reasonable to ask him how he knows 1) NL exists, and 2) if it exists, how we determine if his NL opinion is a correct discernment of NL.

I’m just asking the second question. Perhaps you can provide an answer?
 
IMHO this whole permissive attitude on the part of students (even Catholic students) is due to the profound deteriorating morals of our times BOTH in the secular world and in our Church as well.😦 Sad, but true. Pray, pray, pray.:gopray2:
 
Fix,
Check out GreenJeans posts in other forums. (S)he just keeps asking the same question over and over. Keeps on baiting. If the challenges were reasonable, this would be interesting, but they often are not.

Dan
I’m pretty sure fix knows exactly who he is dealing with. The question would be, why? Isn’t one deja vu moment enough?:rolleyes:
 
If that is the case, when faced with two opinions on NL, how do we determine which is the correct discernment of NL? Let’s say we accept it can be discerned. If so, how do we know it has been correctly discerned?
It is what is rational. These issues are known from our rational nature. I think the problem is many are so corrupted they no longer morally reason well.

Here is some more help:
…how curious it is in the modern age that we have so little consensus on the most straightforward claims of natural law; what seems obvious to some, seems ridiculous to others. Whereas some take this lack of consensus to suggest that natural law is not universal, MacIntyre took this lack of consensus to indicate the moral corruption of our times. That is, we have become so corrupt, we cannot discern what is obvious…
 
It is what is rational. These issues are known from our rational nature. I think the problem is many are so corrupted they no longer morally reason well.

Here is some more help:
There are different offerings of the rational, all by rational people. How do we know which offering is correct? How does someone determine that?
 
Good! It would be a bad example to others to allow a same-sex couple into the prom. I personally find homosexual acts to be absolutely disgusting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top