Masturbation is a sin.

  • Thread starter Thread starter iaskquestions
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, TeachCCD is right…it is grave MATTER not grave SIN. For it to be sin, conditons have to be met. If one does this activity at 5 years old, he didn’t sin! If one does this in his/her sleep unconciously, there is no sin! If it were grave sin, it would always be actual sin when done, even when a person has no control over their actions. This is not sound teaching.

According to the Church, it is not always sinful, as you say above.
Committing a sin which is of grave matter does not mean you have commiitted a mortal sin. The sin of grave matter is not a mortal sin without the three conditions being met. Therefore a sin of grave matter (i.e. a grave sin) is not necessarily a mortal sin.
 
No, TeachCCD is right…it is grave MATTER not grave SIN. For it to be sin, conditons have to be met. If one does this activity at 5 years old, he didn’t sin! If one does this in his/her sleep unconciously, there is no sin! If it were grave sin, it would always be actual sin when done, even when a person has no control over their actions. This is not sound teaching.

According to the Church, it is not always sinful, as you say above.
No, because you left out the third part, full consent of the will. Whats done in one sleep is not sinful because you do not meet that third condition.

The 5 year old presumably has not met the age or reason and is not capable of having full knowledge of what he’s doing.

It is always grave matter, but all the conditions have to be met to incur the guilt of mortal sin.
 
Committing a sin which is of grave matter does not mean you have commiitted a mortal sin. The sin of grave matter is not a mortal sin without the three conditions being met. Therefore a sin of grave matter (i.e. a grave sin) is not necessarily a mortal sin.
Doing something that is grave matter can also be not a sin at all, due to the circumstances. That’s why I was trying to get the point across that MB is grave matter, not grave sin. Some very basic conditions have to be present for it to be at least venial, and some very complex things for mortal. But it is not always a sin, even though it is grave matter.
 
Doing something that is grave matter can also be not a sin at all, due to the circumstances.
Thats, I think, where all the subjectiveness goes wrong and people start rationalizing why they didn’t comment a sin.

Its STILL a mortal sin. You might not be guilty of it, but the action is still inherently sinful.
That’s why I was trying to get the point across that MB is grave matter, not grave sin. Some very basic conditions have to be present for it to be at least venial, and some very complex things for mortal. But it is not always a sin, even though it is grave matter.
Yes and no

Deliberate (note the word deliberate) Masturbation is grave matter, I’d have to double check this but, I believe this is because it is against Natural Law, not the way God intend that part to work, (thanks original sin sigh) making it intrinsically evil.

If you don’t know, how wrong it is, or not fully in control of your self, you don’t incur full guilt for the sin (if any at all) but that doesn’t change the nature of the sin its self and does not down grade it to a venial sin.
 
Back in March, I attended my Moms funeral and Mass. Before Mass, I grabbed the priest and asked for a quick confession, so I could receive Communion.

Everyone there was wondering where I disappeared to. I explained to the priest that I had a mortal sin and couldnt receive. I confessed my sins and he smiled and said that Masturbation isnt a mortal sin, it’s a venial sin. Then he absolved me.

So with that said…the sin of masturbation is sometimes blown out proportion. To some it is an addiction and needs to be addressed, but to some, the occasional self gratification seems to be wrong, but not to the extent of a Mortal sin to be damned for all eternity.
 
Back in March, I attended my Moms funeral and Mass. Before Mass, I grabbed the priest and asked for a quick confession, so I could receive Communion.

Everyone there was wondering where I disappeared to. I explained to the priest that I had a mortal sin and couldnt receive. I confessed my sins and he smiled and said that Masturbation isnt a mortal sin, it’s a venial sin. Then he absolved me.
Priests are fallible, I’ve been told its not even sinful. (I’ve also been told by many priests its mortal many many times.) There is a thread on bad experiences in confession, in which someone said that not only did the priest say some blatant sins were not sinful, he encouraged the person to engage in immoral behavior :eek:
So with that said…the sin of masturbation is sometimes blown out proportion. To some it is an addiction and needs to be addressed, but to some, the occasional self gratification seems to be wrong, but not to the extent of a Mortal sin to be damned for all eternity.
That is simply not the teaching of the Church on the mater.
 
So who do you believe? A priest is the representive of the Church and Christ. He is well trained in his field. You have to trust in them.

Is it the interpertation of the Catechism?
 
So who do you believe? A priest is the representive of the Church and Christ. He is well trained in his field. You have to trust in them.

Is it the interpertation of the Catechism?
Okay, but when two priests give you two different sets of advice (one says it’s a mortal sin, one says it isn’t a sin), then where does your trust lie? Mine lies with the consistent teaching of the Church. There are sadly some priests who have strayed from Church teaching.

I had one priest tell me “oh, no one confesses that anymore,” as if sin stops being a sin if enough Catholics decide it isn’t (masturbation, artificial birth control, etc.). That is heresy.

When my wife and I were still using birth control and debating over it, one of my wife’s protests/concerns is that the birth control pill she used helped her with her acne. One of the priests at the time immediately latched on to that and said “well then the birth control is a side effect.” Even my wife, who wanted to keep using the pill at that time, knew that what he said was a complete rationalization for the use of the pill. The acne control was the side effect, not the birth control.

Sadly, people can find a priest to tell them that many sins are okay. These priests are not helping their penitents, they are hurting them.
 
So who do you believe? A priest is the representive of the Church and Christ. He is well trained in his field. You have to trust in them.

Is it the interpertation of the Catechism?
I’ve had priests tell me everything from its good and healthy, to near instant damnation.

Priest training is not standard. They are simply not all well trained in their field, or have chosen to reject their training. To think otherwise is naive and intellectually dishonest, considering the number of wildly different opinions you can get regarding any number of issues that have been very clearly laid down by the Magisterium of the Church.

I believe in the constant teaching of the Magisterium of the Church, as it is protected from error by the Holy Spirit.
 
Its STILL a mortal sin. You might not be guilty of it, but the action is still inherently sinful.

If you don’t know, how wrong it is, or not fully in control of your self, you don’t incur full guilt for the sin (if any at all) but that doesn’t change the nature of the sin its self and does not down grade it to a venial sin.
Again, you need to realize that MB in itself is gravely disordered. I think we can agree on that. The culpability doesn’t downgrade the grave matter part, I agree. BUT…grave matter becomes sin when it is acted on. It becomes a mortal sin if the three conditions are met; if any are not, it is venial. The sin is imparted once the matter is acted on. So you can say all day that MB is grave matter, and that is true. But you can’t say that someone has commited mortal sin but is not culpable for it. You can say someone has commited an act of grave matter, but the act is venial or mortal based on the conditions. To say someone has committed mortal sin and is not culpable for it is not how the ‘system’ works. Mortal sin by definition results in a complete turning away from God and a loss of sanctifying grace. So you can commit a mortal sin and have it be venial…but you can commit a gravely disordered action and have it be venial or mortal based on the conditions.

On the other poster’s comment about it being a sin blown out of proportion, I can agree with that. I have spoken with 5 priests now who agree with this…that most times for ‘good’ Catholics who avoid porno and temptation as much as possible, sometimes we just slip up due to the factors mentioned in the Catechism that MUST be taken into account when judging the personal guilt of the sinner. You would have to perform this act without giving a hoot and without any sorrow and without any remorse for it to be a Mortal sin for a ‘good living’ Catholic. By good living, I mean a charitable, church going, sacrament recieving Catholic.
 
I’ve had priests tell me everything from its good and healthy, to near instant damnation.

Priest training is not standard. They are simply not all well trained in their field, or have chosen to reject their training. To think otherwise is naive and intellectually dishonest, considering the number of wildly different opinions you can get regarding any number of issues that have been very clearly laid down by the Magisterium of the Church.

I believe in the constant teaching of the Magisterium of the Church, as it is protected from error by the Holy Spirit.
The problem is that these priests who teach and/or counsel heresy are really harming the Church. Some penitents (many? most?) who are told, “oh, that isn’t a sin,” will never confess it again and continue to separate themselves from God’s love. I have a close friend who is divorced and remarried, but receives communion because a priest told her it was okay and there is no need for an annulment. That one priest’s false statement is all she needed. When told that she needs to get an annulment, she says “nope…he said I don’t.”

How many people have found a priest (in only takes one) who told them that they don’t need to confess/repent masturbation, birth control, etc.? 😦 All we can do is pray that they come to the truth on their own through study of the Catechism and the hearing of a homily from a holy priest that gives proper instruction regarding those sins.
 
On the other poster’s comment about it being a sin blown out of proportion, I can agree with that. I have spoken with 5 priests now who agree with this…that most times for ‘good’ Catholics who avoid porno and temptation as much as possible, sometimes we just slip up due to the factors mentioned in the Catechism that MUST be taken into account when judging the personal guilt of the sinner. You would have to perform this act without giving a hoot and without any sorrow and without any remorse for it to be a Mortal sin for a ‘good living’ Catholic. By good living, I mean a charitable, church going, sacrament recieving Catholic.
Be careful with such advice. Every case is different, and you really shouldn’t be giving people a pass on their sins. Someone reading your words may say, “oh, I’m a good Catholic, so I’m okay” to a host of sins.
 
The problem is that these priests who teach and/or counsel heresy are really harming the Church. Some penitents (many? most?) who are told, “oh, that isn’t a sin,” will never confess it again and continue to separate themselves from God’s love. I have a close friend who is divorced and remarried, but receives communion because a priest told her it was okay and there is no need for an annulment. That one priest’s false statement is all she needed. When told that she needs to get an annulment, she says “nope…he said I don’t.”

How many people have found a priest (in only takes one) who told them that they don’t need to confess/repent masturbation, birth control, etc.? 😦 All we can do is pray that they come to the truth on their own through study of the Catechism and the hearing of a homily from a holy priest that gives proper instruction regarding those sins.
I agree, its very troubling and sad to see the state the Church is in today. I knew a couple that used ABC because one priest told them it wasn’t a sin and the Church was simply wrong. :confused:
 
Be careful with such advice. Every case is different, and you really shouldn’t be giving people a pass on their sins. Someone reading your words may say, “oh, I’m a good Catholic, so I’m okay” to a host of sins.
Good point! In no way should anyone ever embrace this or any other sins because you feel that you are a ‘good person.’ You always have to struggle to overcome, but I have fallen into some pretty bad depression due to viewpoints expressed here that anytime you perform this act, you are instantly cut off from Gods love and grace…that you must run to confession or you are destined to Hell. That is not the case, esp if you are slipping up after a serious struggle.
 
Good point! In no way should anyone ever embrace this or any other sins because you feel that you are a ‘good person.’ You always have to struggle to overcome, but I have fallen into some pretty bad depression due to viewpoints expressed here that anytime you perform this act, you are instantly cut off from Gods love and grace…that you must run to confession or you are destined to Hell. That is not the case, esp if you are slipping up after a serious struggle.
I’m sorry but, I’m not understanding why thats a bad thing. Whats worse, depression caused by habitual mortal sin that actually gets you inside the confessional, or a lackadaisical attitude toward sin that allows someone to live in the state of it for weeks.

Remember its not God that cuts you off from His love and grace but you. God still loves you and wants to give you His grace but through an act of mortal sin you have rejected God, not the other way around. Only your voluntary confession and sorrow for your sin are you capable of receiving the grace God wants to give you.

It doesn’t help anyone to diminish the seriousness of the sin because its “habit”, it only breads content to live a life of sin.
 
Good point! In no way should anyone ever embrace this or any other sins because you feel that you are a ‘good person.’ You always have to struggle to overcome, but I have fallen into some pretty bad depression due to viewpoints expressed here that anytime you perform this act, you are instantly cut off from Gods love and grace…that you must run to confession or you are destined to Hell. That is not the case, esp if you are slipping up after a serious struggle.
This is something I struggled with for many, many years, and the right course is not always clear. I had priests who told me it isn’t a sin, as I mentioned. Because I knew it was a serious sin, I would not receive communion unless I confessed. The best confessors I had, the ones who really, really helped, counselled me to confess often but *still *receive communion. Why? Because the nature of the sin, in my case, was so habitual/compulsive that the priest determined that it was not mortal.

My sicker side would sometimes take advantage of such counsel, but it was correct. The important thing was that I kept going to confession. Also, I had to fight another temptation. Once we have sinned something of this nature, it is easy to then persist in sin until the next confession. It is important to keep up the fight, even if you have fallen.
 
I’m sorry but, I’m not understanding why thats a bad thing. Whats worse, depression caused by habitual mortal sin that actually gets you inside the confessional, or a lackadaisical attitude toward sin that allows someone to live in the state of it for weeks.

Remember its not God that cuts you off from His love and grace but you. God still loves you and wants to give you His grace but through an act of mortal sin you have rejected God, not the other way around. Only your voluntary confession and sorrow for your sin are you capable of receiving the grace God wants to give you.

It doesn’t help anyone to diminish the seriousness of the sin because its “habit”, it only breads content to live a life of sin.
You are correct, but it is just as easy for sin to keep you away from the confessional due to embarrassment and self-hatred. Neither extreme - self-hatred nor a lackadaisical attitude - are healthy in your relationship with God.
 
You are correct, but it is just as easy for sin to keep you away from the confessional due to embarrassment and self-hatred. Neither extreme - self-hatred nor a lackadaisical attitude - are healthy in your relationship with God.
Well yes, but I think that depends why they hate themselves. Clinical depression needs to be treated by a medical professional or through counseling. Someone depressed to the point of despair probably has other much deeper problems then one habitual sin.

I think its pretty safe to say everyone has issues from time to time of embarrassment with confession. 🙂
 
Well yes, but I think that depends why they hate themselves. Clinical depression needs to be treated by a medical professional or through counseling. Someone depressed to the point of despair probably has other much deeper problems then one habitual sin.

I think its pretty safe to say everyone has issues from time to time of embarrassment with confession. 🙂
It doesn’t have to be clinical depression. In my experience, self-hatred can come from the constant stumbling in habitual sin and a scrupulosity that then manifests itself to the point that you avoid confession and Mass.
 
If someone has a gambling problem/addiction, and they are constantly stealing to support their habit/addiction, does that make their act a venial sin because they have an addiction?

I would be curious to know if this phenomenon, (classifying masturbation as a venial sin based on circumstances) is a post Vatican II occurrence. It seems throughout the whole history of the Church it has been deemed a mortal sin, regardless of the cirumstances–bam the sexual revolution/post sexual revolution rolls in and now we have priest saying it is a venial sin or not even a sin at all?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top