Mathew 7:21-23

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stouts989
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Stouts989

Guest
Here’s the verses:

Matthew 7:21-23

21"Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.
22"Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’
23"And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.’

Who do you think Christ is speaking about in these verses? Only non-Christians? Only the non-saved and/or non-baptized?
I think one of the key verses/phrases in this passage is “I never knew you”. Never is an absolute…no exceptions…otherwise its no longer never.

So I think Jesus is talking to those who don’t know Him personally and aren’t putting their trust for salvation fully in Him. Instead they are entrusting in part to their Faith that Jesus is who He said He is AND what they have done for Jesus.

So basically this person is at Judgment day saying, “Lord, you should let me into heaven because look at all that I’ve done for You.” And Jesus answers, “depart from Me, I never knew you”.

Jesus knows all of His creation, so its goes beyond a general knowledge of who we are. Its a matter of relationship and fully entrusting Him for our deliverance.

Also I think we need to ask…“What does Jesus say the will of the Father is?” Because Jesus says…only those who do the will of the Father will enter.

How does this verse show that we can lose our salvation? Jesus says…“I never knew you”…how can you say that this is talking about people who were saved and lost it along the way?

I hope you’re enjoying your Sunday!
 
I think one of the key verses/phrases in this passage is “I never knew you”. Never is an absolute…no exceptions…otherwise its no longer never…
Jesus knows all of His creation, so its goes beyond a general knowledge of who we are. Its a matter of relationship and fully entrusting Him for our deliverance.
Hi Stouts - I hope you had a good weekend too! Not a big deal but when I compare these two sentences from your reply it seems you’re not being consistent. You’re saying in your first sentence never means never otherwise it doesn’t mean never but then you say Jesus knows all His creation and qualify that with it’s a matter of relationship - not consistent to me. Anyway, I agree with you that this gets into your relationship with Christ and fully trusting Him.
So I think Jesus is talking to those who don’t know Him personally and aren’t putting their trust for salvation fully in Him. Instead they are entrusting in part to their Faith that Jesus is who He said He is AND what they have done for Jesus.

So basically this person is at Judgment day saying, “Lord, you should let me into heaven because look at all that I’ve done for You.” And Jesus answers, “depart from Me, I never knew you”.
It is certainly possible that there were/are people who both in Jesus’ time and after who did "religious’ things in Jesus name and really had little knowledge of Him or little/no personal relationship with Him. I can’t agree that Jesus’ statement excludes anyone who did/does have a relationship with Him - I think you’re really stretching to come to that conclusion - if that is, in fact , your conclusion. If these folks don’t know Jesus why would they prophesy, drive out demons and/or do mighty deeds in His name (v 22)? I think many of them definitely ‘know’ Him - not sure we know what Jesus means by ‘know’ here though.

Also, I don’t understand you logic behind “don’t know Him personally” compared to “…aren’t putting their trust for salvation **fully **in Him” compared to “Instead they are entrusting in part to their Faith that Jesus is who He said He is.” According to your reading Stouts which is it - do they know Him or know Him only partially, or not know Him?

If you read this very literally it would apply to only those who did the things Jesus talks about so if you didn’t prophesy, cast out demons, etc in His name you’re off the hook. I guess you could read it that way but Catholics don’t (more on that below).

Big picture I think many, if not all, of the people Christ is talking about know Him and have chosen to turn away from Him even though they have done works in His name. The Catholic Study Bible says of verses 21-23 “The attack on the false prophets is continued (Matthew 7:15-19), but is broadened to include those disciples who perform works of healing and exorcism in the name of Jesus (Lord) but live evil lives. Entrance into the kingdom is only for those who do the will of the Father. On the day of judgment the morally corrupt prophets and miracle workers will be rejected by Jesus.”

You seem to be focusing on a more evangelical definition of ‘works’ (can’t use works to get into heaven) and we’re focusing on people doing evil/amoral things that really go against Christ, yet they still want to have a relationship with Him. What He’s saying here is you can’t have it both ways. So we take this as a warning to have a right relationship with Jesus and not be hypocritical by saying you love Him but then doing things that go against Him. There are possible consequences for that and in the worst case you’re out of heaven.
Also I think we need to ask…“What does Jesus say the will of the Father is?” Because Jesus says…only those who do the will of the Father will enter. How does this verse show that we can lose our salvation? Jesus says…“I never knew you”…how can you say that this is talking about people who were saved and lost it along the way? I hope you’re enjoying your Sunday!
Let’s also look at following verses 24-27 where Jesus says “Everyone who listens to these words of mine and acts on them will be like a wise man who built his house on rock…Any everyone who listens to these words of mine but does not act on them will be like a fool who built his house on sand…And it collapsed and was completely ruined.”

Doesn’t it potentially follow that to DO the will of the Father means to DO the things Christ asks us to do in chapters 5-7 - to '…act on His words" as He asks us to? I think doing will of the Father involves having faith in Him, without doubt, but also taking action, living by the 10 commandments, living a moral life, following other stipulations from the Bible and Church and DOING good things and not doing bad things. The whole of the Sermon on the Mount and verses leading into these verses in question are talking about both attitudes and works - loads of commandments here from Jesus about what we should do and not do - so what you DO seems to be very important to Christ.

You’re working from the premise that you cannot lose your salvation (at least I think you are) - Catholics don’t believe this - some Protestants don’t either. Many Evangelicals wrongly believe Catholics think we can work our way into heaven - that’s not our belief. The belief is that works play a part in our justification - but no part in our salvation, that is pure grace. If people who are saved choose to act immorally, break the commandments, etc. and don’t repent of those actions/sins they can lose their salvation and not be received by Christ on the last day. We think that is what these verses **may **point to as relevant to us, so we take them very seriously and do our best to do the things Christ talks about in chapters 5-7and repent and confess our sins when we don’t.

I’ll stop there - I’m sure you have some thoughts.
 
medtate on this, this is what he means. This is his gospel

Matthew 7:21

21"Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.
 
I think one of the key verses/phrases in this passage is “I never knew you”. Never is an absolute…no exceptions…otherwise its no longer never.

So I think Jesus is talking to those who don’t know Him personally and aren’t putting their trust for salvation fully in Him. Instead they are entrusting in part to their Faith that Jesus is who He said He is AND what they have done for Jesus.

So basically this person is at Judgment day saying, “Lord, you should let me into heaven because look at all that I’ve done for You.” And Jesus answers, “depart from Me, I never knew you”.

Jesus knows all of His creation, so its goes beyond a general knowledge of who we are. Its a matter of relationship and fully entrusting Him for our deliverance.

Also I think we need to ask…“What does Jesus say the will of the Father is?” Because Jesus says…only those who do the will of the Father will enter.

How does this verse show that we can lose our salvation? Jesus says…“I never knew you”…how can you say that this is talking about people who were saved and lost it along the way?

I hope you’re enjoying your Sunday!
Jesus never knew them in the sense of eternity: He knew from eternity who is His, so He would know who would reject Him, and this thought of the damned would of course causes Him great agony in the garden during His Passion, because He loves us so much, and in His love He created us for Heaven. Because He knew they wouldn’t enter Heaven, He says He never knew them. That’s why He uses the absolute. The reason, though, why He never knew them is because they chose to reject Him and chose to go to Hell. This means two things: One, love of God begets friendship of God (hence, God knows us in the sense a friend knows a friend), and two, the eternity of Hell is absolute (hence, God never knew the reprobates in that Hell is a long time, indeed, endless).
 
Hi Stouts - I hope you had a good weekend too! Not a big deal but when I compare these two sentences from your reply it seems you’re not being consistent. You’re saying in your first sentence never means never otherwise it doesn’t mean never but then you say Jesus knows all His creation and qualify that with it’s a matter of relationship - not consistent to me.
Jesus knows everyone, but yet here he says I never knew you. So we know what he is saying goes beyond a general sense of “know”. That’s all I meant. Sorry for the confusion.
I can’t agree that Jesus’ statement excludes anyone who did/does have a relationship with Him - I think you’re really stretching to come to that conclusion - if that is, in fact , your conclusion.
I don’t think its a stretch. And yes its part of my conclusion. I say this, because of what Jesus says what the will of the Father is in John 6.

John 6:39
"This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day.

John 6:40
“For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.”

Do a search on Bible Gateway…and type in the words “will of” (make sure the search engine is set to “exact phrase”). I think you’ll be interested in what you find. Also I used the NASB when I did my search.
If these folks don’t know Jesus why would they prophesy, drive out demons and/or do mighty deeds in His name (v 22)? I think many of them definitely ‘know’ Him - not sure we know what Jesus means by ‘know’ here though.
I think we both can agree that there are plenty of people who are doing wacky and crazing things in Jesus name. Just because people say they are doing things in the name of God…doesn’t mean God is behind it. We don’t have to look to hard to even find that in the history of the RCC.
Big picture I think many, if not all, of the people Christ is talking about know Him and have chosen to turn away from Him even though they have done works in His name. The Catholic Study Bible says of verses 21-23 “The attack on the false prophets is continued (Matthew 7:15-19), but is broadened to include those disciples who perform works of healing and exorcism in the name of Jesus (Lord) but live evil lives. Entrance into the kingdom is only for those who do the will of the Father. On the day of judgment the morally corrupt prophets and miracle workers will be rejected by Jesus.”
I’m sorry but I can’t find anywhere in scripture where it teaches that our entrance into heaven is based on how well we can keep the commandments of God.

Romans 3:28
For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.

Romans 4:6
just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
You seem to be focusing on a more evangelical definition of ‘works’ (can’t use works to get into heaven) and we’re focusing on people doing evil/amoral things that really go against Christ, yet they still want to have a relationship with Him. What He’s saying here is you can’t have it both ways. So we take this as a warning to have a right relationship with Jesus and not be hypocritical by saying you love Him but then doing things that go against Him. There are possible consequences for that and in the worst case you’re out of heaven.
Those who fit this category…I would question the notation that they are truly regenerate (saved). The inter-working of the Holy Spirit is a gift and promise from Christ to all believers…to the elect. I thank God everyday for His continuous work in me…a sinful creature who received what I don’t deserve…Grace.
The whole of the Sermon on the Mount and verses leading into these verses in question are talking about both attitudes and works - loads of commandments here from Jesus about what we should do and not do - so what you DO seems to be very important to Christ.
I totally agree that what we do matters to Christ. We are representing Him on this earth…we are His ambassadors (humbling thought).

So my question for you…to what extent do we have to keep all of God commandments to ensure that we keep ourselves saved? Where in scripture does it talk about this?
The belief is that works play a part in our justification - but no part in our salvation, that is pure grace.
Justification = Salvation

You believe works plays a part in our justification?

Romans 3:28
For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.
If people who are saved choose to act immorally, break the commandments, etc. and don’t repent of those actions/sins they can lose their salvation and not be received by Christ on the last day. We think that is what these verses **may **point to as relevant to us, so we take them very seriously and do our best to do the things Christ talks about in chapters 5-7and repent and confess our sins when we don’t.
We all act immorally, break the commandments of God every day. It is our nature. It comes down to attitude, the best way I can articulate it. Faith is a gift from God, grace is a gift from God, and sanctification is the work of God, promised to all that He has called.

Romans 8:30
and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.

(I think its interesting that this passage is all in past tense).

If a person is claiming to be a Christian and isn’t struggling with their sin, I would doubt their claims.

I’ve noticed when talking about salvation Catholics like to reference Philippians 2:12 in reference to working out their faith. But they always leave out verse 13. “for it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure.”

I believe that Christians can’t lose their salvation, because its totally and completely the work of God. Not only a work of God, but a promise of God to keep and protect the ones He has called into salvation.

Lastly,

Do you believe that God grants faith and the ability to repent?

Do you believe that we are made children of God by His will and not ours?

Do you believe that those who are saved were chosen by God before the foundations of the world according to His will?

Thanks for your time and willingness to discuss this. May God bless our time!

Thanks again.
 
Thanks for your time and willingness to discuss this. May God bless our time! Thanks again.
You’re welcome. You’ve asked a lot of questions and I’ll go to work on them but in the meantime do me a favor and answer a few for me so I understand where you’re coming from and we do our best to avoid talking past each other.

Please define salvation. What does God do to save us? What do people do to be saved?

You mention above that people who act in a certain way may never have been saved - so how does one truly know when they’ve been saved?

You mention you find it interesting that Romans 8:30 is past tense - I assume you’re using this verse to show salvation is a one time only event - once saved always saved (OSAS)? If so, are there any verses in the Bible that speak of salvation as a future event?

From an historical perspective, when did the notion of OSAS come into being?

I’ll be back to you as soon as I can but I’m very busy so it may be a day or so. Thanks!
 
You’re welcome. You’ve asked a lot of questions and I’ll go to work on them but in the meantime do me a favor and answer a few for me so I understand where you’re coming from and we do our best to avoid talking past each other.

Please define salvation. What does God do to save us? What do people do to be saved?

You mention above that people who act in a certain way may never have been saved - so how does one truly know when they’ve been saved?

You mention you find it interesting that Romans 8:30 is past tense - I assume you’re using this verse to show salvation is a one time only event - once saved always saved (OSAS)? If so, are there any verses in the Bible that speak of salvation as a future event?

From an historical perspective, when did the notion of OSAS come into being?

I’ll be back to you as soon as I can but I’m very busy so it may be a day or so. Thanks!
Take your time…no rush.

Salvation is to be made right in the eyes of God, declared righteous. We fell and sinned against God. An infinite debt, because it was against a perfect and infinite Holy God. So the only one who can fulfill that debt is God…hence Jesus.

Where in scripture does it teach that God declares us righteous based on the works we perform? Paul teaches on the contrary.

Once we are mad right before God…we’ve been justified for our sin. So…Justification = Salvation. I think Romans 5 is a great place to read about this.

God’s part is grace to those who he has chosen. Our part is faith…faith that has been given by God.

It all comes down to the work of God within us.

We are saved by our faith in God. The Perseverance of the saints. I think evidence for our salvation is the work of the Holy Spirit within us. Evidence of sanctification.

Yes there are verses that point to salvation as a future event. But our time and God’s time are two completely different things. Words only mean what they mean in context. This both applies the verses in Romans 8 and the verses you’re referring to.

Which verses were you thinking of in particular?

I know OSAS is a doctrine from the reformation. The actually doctrine is called “The Perseverance or Preservation of the Saints” (both are used). But just to be clear. I don’t believe this is true because of the reformers. I look at scripture believe what it says.

I find it interesting that the RCC can believe that God through the work of the Holy Spirit can keep the church in a state of infallibility despite their teachings of human free will. But when it comes to the the keeping of those who God has called into Glory through the work of the Holy Spirit despite human free will (and I’m not denying that we have free will), the church out right rejects that God could do that.

I hope that was helpful.
 
OHCAC - I can’t agree that Jesus’ statement excludes anyone who did/does have a relationship with Him - I think you’re really stretching to come to that conclusion - if that is, in fact , your conclusion.

Stouts989 - I don’t think its a stretch. And yes its part of my conclusion. I say this, because of what Jesus says what the will of the Father is in John 6.

John 6:39 - 40 "This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day. “For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.”
Not sure I get your point here – I think we’ve established Christ knows everyone and that He will not lose any the Father has given Him. This does not mean they won’t walk away from Him.
I think we both can agree that there are plenty of people who are doing wacky and crazing things in Jesus name. Just because people say they are doing things in the name of God…doesn’t mean God is behind it. We don’t have to look to hard to even find that in the history of the RCC.
God’s not behind people doing wacky things – I didn’t say or imply He was nor do the verses in question. Yes, RCC’s have done wacky things, as have many people of many faiths. What’s your point?
I’m sorry but I can’t find anywhere in scripture where it teaches that our entrance into heaven is based on how well we can keep the commandments of God.

Romans 3:28 - For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. Romans 4:6 - just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works.
If I came across as saying that a) you work your way into heaven or b) entrance is based on keeping the commandments as in the old covenant, I apologize – that is not my intent. Christ’s death on the cross changed that as Paul makes clear in Romans.

Faith alone will not get you into heaven, works do play a part. This is where we’ll probably part company and not come to agreement but that’s ok. My intent Stouts is to try to make clear how Catholics see salvation, justification and the part works play – that’s it, no more. I’m not trying to get you to accept it, my aim is to try to make it somewhat clear.

Regarding justification: James 2:24 - the phrase “faith alone” (the Greek “pisteos monon”) only occurs once in the Bible. “Man is justified by works and NOT faith alone.” Unlike what many Protestant churches teach, no where in Scripture does it say that man is justified or saved by “faith alone.” To the contrary, man is not justified by faith alone. In Catholic theology, a person is justified by faith and works acting together, which comes solely from God’s divine grace. Faith alone never obtains the grace of justification (Council of Trent, chapter 8, canon 9). Also, the word “justified” (dikaiow) is the same word Paul uses for justification in Rom. 4:3 in regard to Abraham (so Protestants cannot argue James is not referring to “justification” in James 2:24 unless they argue Paul wasn’t in Rom. 4:3 either).

Heb. 11:6 - faith is indeed the minimum requirement without which we cannot please God. But this is just the beginning of the process leading toward justification. Faith alone does not justify a person. Justification is only achieved by faith and works. Also, this gratuitous gift of faith from God also includes the grace of hope and love the moment the person is justified.

Eph. 2:8-9 – Paul teaches us that faith is the root of justification, and that faith excludes “works of law.” But Paul does not teach that faith excludes other kinds of works, as we will see below. The verse also does not say we are justified by “faith alone.” It only indicates that faith comes first. This, of course, must be true, because those who do works outside of faith are in a system of debt, not of grace (more on that later). But faith alone does not justify. A man is justified by works, and not by faith alone. James 2:24.

2 Cor. 10:15 – this faith must also increase as a result of our obedience, as Paul hopes for in this verse. Obedience is achieved not by faith alone, but by doing good works.

2 Cor. 13:5 – Paul also admonishes us to examine ourselves, to see whether we are holding to our faith. This examination of conscience is a pious Catholic practice. Our faith, which is a gift from God, must be nurtured. Faith is not a one-time event that God bestows upon us.
 
OHCAC - So we take this as a warning to have a right relationship with Jesus and not be hypocritical by saying you love Him but then doing things that go against Him. There are possible consequences for that and in the worst case you’re out of heaven.

Stouts989 - Those who fit this category…I would question the notation that they are truly regenerate (saved).
So how does one know when they’re truly saved?
So my question for you…to what extent do we have to keep all of God commandments to ensure that we keep ourselves saved? Where in scripture does it talk about this?
We are not guaranteed salvation; we hope for salvation:

Heb. 7:27, 9:12,26;10:10; 1 Pet 3:18 - Jesus died once and redeemed us all, but we participate in the application of His redemption by the way in which we live.

Heb. 9:12 - Christ’s sacrifice secured our redemption, but redemption is not the same thing as salvation. We participate in and hope for salvation. Our hope in salvation is a guarantee if we are faithful to Christ to the end. But if we lose hope and fail to persevere, we can lose our salvation. Thus, by our own choosing (not by God’s doing), salvation is not a certainty. While many Protestant churches believe in the theology of “once saved, always saved,” such a novel theory is not found in Scripture and has never been taught by the Church.

Rom. 5:2 - we rejoice in the “hope” (not the presumptuous certainty) of sharing the glory of God. If salvation is absolutely assured after accepting Jesus as Savior, why would Paul hope?

Rom. 5:5 - this “hope” does not disappoint us, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit. Our hope is assured if we persevere to the end.

Rom. 8:24 - this “hope” of salvation that Paul writes about is unnecessary if salvation is guaranteed. If salvation is assured, then why hope?

This information and the above relating to justification is all taken from www.scripturecatholic.com
 
Justification = Salvation
You believe works plays a part in our justification? Romans 3:28 - For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.
Justification actually starts before Salvation and is due solely to God’s grace through faith, as you rightly point out by pointing to St. Paul. This is a summary from the Council at Trent “As its first effect this supernatural faith produces in the soul a fear of God’s avenging justice, and then, through the consideration of God’s mercy, it awakens the hope of forgiveness for Christ’s sake, which is soon followed by the first beginnings of charity. The next step is a genuine sorrow for all sin with the resolution to begin a new life by receiving holy baptism and by observing the commandments of God. The process of justification is then brought to a close by the baptism of water, inasmuch as by the grace of this sacrament the catechumen (person desiring baptism) is freed from sin (original and personal) and its punishments, and is made a child of God. The same process of justification is repeated in those who by mortal sin have lost their baptismal innocence; with this modification, however, that the Sacrament of Penance replaces baptism.”

“Considering merely the psychological analysis of the conversion of sinners, as given by the council, it is at once evident that faith alone, whether fiduciary or dogmatic, cannot justify man. Since our Divine adoption and friendship with God is based on perfect love of God or charity, dead faith devoid of charity cannot possess any justifying power. Only such faith as is active in charity and good works can justify man, and this even before the actual reception of baptism or penance, although not without a desire of the sacrament.”
Romans 8:30 - and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified. (I think its interesting that this passage is all in past tense).
RCC look at salvation and justification as ongoing. The sacraments of baptism and confirmation, that both indelibly mark the soul with grace, happen only once. But we fall away from God through sin on an ongoing basis as you’ve rightly pointed out below. So it is correct to say that we have been saved, are being saved and will be saved:

I Have Been Saved (past event): Rom. 8:24 - for in this hope we were saved. Eph. 2:5,8 - for by grace you have been saved through faith.

I Am Being Saved (present event): 1 Cor. 1:18 - for the word of the cross is folly to those perishing, but for to us who are being saved, it is the power of God. Salvation is not a one-time event. It is a process of perseverance through faith, hope and love.

I Will Be Saved (future event): Matt. 10:22, 24:13; Mark 13:13 - Jesus taught that we must endure to the very end to be saved. Salvation is a past, present and future event (not a one-time event at an altar call). Mark 16:16 – Jesus says whoever believes and is baptized will be saved.
If a person is claiming to be a Christian and isn’t struggling with their sin, I would doubt their claims.
Agreed
I’ve noticed when talking about salvation Catholics like to reference Philippians 2:12 in reference to working out their faith. But they always leave out verse 13. “for it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure.”

I believe that Christians can’t lose their salvation, because its totally and completely the work of God. Not only a work of God, but a promise of God to keep and protect the ones He has called into salvation.
Then how do you reconcile Phil 2:12 with 2:13? If salvation and justification are a one time event, OSAS, you can’t lose it, what is there to work out? Aren’t you ignoring 2:12 just like you’re accusing RCC of ignoring 2:13? No RCC would say that God is not at work in you or that Christ will lose any that God has given Him. The argument still stands however, and is supported by scripture and the early Church Fathers, that YOU can reject God’s call to justification, YOU can walk away from your salvation and from Christ – Christ hasn’t lost you, you’ve chosen not to accept the gift, or to give it back. Otherwise it’s not a gift and/or we have no free will.
Lastly, Do you believe that God grants faith and the ability to repent?
Yes
Do you believe that we are made children of God by His will and not ours?
It is God’s will that all be saved, but all will not be saved and we do play a part in it. “…the process of salvation from sin begins with the grace of God which touches a sinner’s heart, and calls him to repentance. This grace cannot be merited; it proceeds solely from the love and mercy of God. Man may receive or reject this inspiration of God, he may turn to God or remain in sin. Grace does not constrain man’s free will. (oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Salvation under Individual Salvation).
Do you believe that those who are saved were chosen by God before the foundations of the world according to His will?
Yes, as the Bible tells me. But I may not believe this in the way you believe it. God knows what will happen before it does in a way we cannot understand. How this interacts with man’s free will is also something we cannot fully understand, although we know it happens. If you interpret this verse in a Calvinistic, predestination way, no I do not believe that is what the verse is saying.

Since you spend some time at this site try going under both the Faith and Encyclopedia tabs at the top of the webpage. Once there search for grace, salvation and justification to get a much better and bigger picture of how RCC few these. Faith is the cliff notes, Encyclopedia gets much more in depth.

Thank you too! I’ll be back to you on the second post in a day or so. May Christ’s peace be with you.
 
Not sure I get your point here – I think we’ve established Christ knows everyone and that He will not lose any the Father has given Him. This does not mean they won’t walk away from Him.
What about John 10? And then parallel it with the John 6 verses already mentioned about Jesus not losing any who has been given to Him by the Father.

John 10:27-29

"My sheephear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. “My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.”

So you’re saying the only exception to this is ourselves? No one can take away our salvation in Christ except for us?
If I came across as saying that a) you work your way into heaven or b) entrance is based on keeping the commandments as in the old covenant, I apologize – that is not my intent. Christ’s death on the cross changed that as Paul makes clear in Romans.
But if we are justified by faith and our works…they unless we do works we can’t enter into heaven. So we are working our way into heaven by definition. What am I missing if you’re saying you don’t believe we work our way into heaven, but then say we are saved by faith and works?

Mortal sins are what cause catholics to fall from a state of grace. What are most of those moral sins based on?..the Old Testament Law, specifically the 10 commandments.

So the church is teaching that we enter into the kingdom of heaven by keeping the commandments, cause if we don’t then we fall from a state of grace and loose our place in heaven unless we, repent, take communion, etc…
Faith alone will not get you into heaven, works do play a part. This is where we’ll probably part company and not come to agreement but that’s ok. My intent Stouts is to try to make clear how Catholics see salvation, justification and the part works play – that’s it, no more. I’m not trying to get you to accept it, my aim is to try to make it somewhat clear.
I’m here to learn…not persuade as well. So again I thank you for your time.
Regarding justification: James 2:24 - the phrase “faith alone” (the Greek “pisteos monon”) only occurs once in the Bible. “Man is justified by works and NOT faith alone.” Unlike what many Protestant churches teach, no where in Scripture does it say that man is justified or saved by “faith alone.” To the contrary, man is not justified by faith alone. In Catholic theology, a person is justified by faith and works acting together, which comes solely from God’s divine grace. Faith alone never obtains the grace of justification (Council of Trent, chapter 8, canon 9). Also, the word “justified” (dikaiow) is the same word Paul uses for justification in Rom. 4:3 in regard to Abraham (so Protestants cannot argue James is not referring to “justification” in James 2:24 unless they argue Paul wasn’t in Rom. 4:3 either).
Actually the Bible does say that we are justified by faith alone. The phrase faith alone doesn’t exist, except for the James 2 verse given…that is true. But I gave you the Romans 3:28 verse, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.” Faith without works…faith alone. Paul continues to talk about it in Romans 4 as you’ve brought up.

In Reform theology James 2 is interpreted based on Romans 4, because both Paul and James are both quoting Gen. 15:6. Paul also quotes it again in Galatians.

Lets look at Romans 4.

1What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, has found?
2For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God.
3For what does the Scripture say? "ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS."
4Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due.
5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,
6just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
7"BLESSED ARE THOSE WHOSE LAWLESS DEEDS HAVE BEEN FORGIVEN,
AND WHOSE SINS HAVE BEEN COVERED.
8"BLESSED IS THE MAN WHOSE SIN THE LORD WILL NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT."
9Is this blessing then on the circumcised, or on the uncircumcised also? For we say, “FAITH WAS CREDITED TO ABRAHAM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS.”
10How then was it credited? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? **Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised; **

The covenant of circumcision is paralleled with baptism all the time through Paul’s writings. Here Paul tells us that Abraham was credited as righteous (Justified or made right before God), while he was still uncircumcised. But that’s another topic.

Paul is nailing away that Abram was made righteous before God because of his belief…his faith apart from his works. If Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God (vs2). Our works don’t justify us before God. The justification that James is talking about in chapter 2 is the justification works brings to our faith. A true and real faith will have works. Our works justify our faith. Matthew 7:17-18 "So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. “A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.” And those who don’t bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

So again, James it talking about two types of faiths, ascentia and fiducia. Ascentia is the mental ascent, the mental acknowledgment of something’s existence. The demons acknowledge and believe that God exists. Fiducia is more than mental acknowledgment. It involves a trust in something, a giving over to it, a complete believing and acceptance of something.

Those who have the faith described in greek as fiducia, will bear good fruit, because they have a saving faith.

I hope that was clear and how Romans 4 and James 2 or interpreted in light both quoting Gen. 15:6

I’ll stop here for now to help keep the discusion focus and to not take up to much time reading and responding. I’ll read through the scripture you posted below and will comment on your other posts when I find more time.

Blessings!
 
So how does one know when they’re truly saved?
Evidence of sanctification. The 2 Cor 13:5 reference you gave I think is a good verse to point to. Also in 1 Peter 1:6-9
Heb. 9:12 - Christ’s sacrifice secured our redemption, but redemption is not the same thing as salvation.
So far you’ve shared that justification and salvation are not the same thing. Now that redemption is not the same thing as salvation.

What is salvation exactly then?

What are we being saved from?
Our hope in salvation is a guarantee if we are faithful to Christ to the end.
Perseverance…or remaining faith to the end can only be down by the power of God. Nothing within us has the power to do that. We can’t do it with out God. And I know you will agree with that. But lets look at 1 Peter 1:3-5. Perseverance of the saints, the ones called by God, is a promised of God. Also lets look at 1 John 2:19

“They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for it they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.”

This brings us back to a real and false faith in Christ. I hope to see the fully circle connection.
 
Salvation is to be made right in the eyes of God, declared righteous. We fell and sinned against God. An infinite debt, because it was against a perfect and infinite Holy God. So the only one who can fulfill that debt is God…hence Jesus.

Where in scripture does it teach that God declares us righteous based on the works we perform? Paul teaches on the contrary.
If you don’t find this Stouts you’re not looking – Paul does not teach to the contrary. I suspect the issue is how you interpret what Paul is saying. We are not working our way into heaven or still living by the old covenant. But works do play a part in our justification as I’ve pointed out. Paul says in Romans 3:28 “For we consider that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the law” and in 5:1 “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith…” Yet James says in 2:24 “See how a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.” Are you saying Stouts that Paul and James don’t agree – that the Bible is contradicting itself? Please tell me how you reconcile these two writers’ views on justification?

I’d suspect that you don’t agree with this because it doesn’t fit with your filter of how you see the Bible, Salvation, Justification, etc. so you pass over it, or refuse to accept it. It took me quite a while to grasp this too as I was so conditioned to a Protestant/Evangelical (E/P) way of interpreting scripture. Try at James 2:14-26 (especially 21-24) as a good start.
Once we are mad right before God…we’ve been justified for our sin. So…Justification = Salvation. I think Romans 5 is a great place to read about this.
I’ve spoken to this above.
God’s part is grace to those who he has chosen. Our part is faith…faith that has been given by God. It all comes down to the work of God within us.
Yes it does come down to God’s work within us. And I’d probably also agree in large part as the how you define those God has chosen. But after God has begun that work in us we have a part to play too - our good works. Paul is in perfect agreement with other writers of the New Testament and with Christ Himself. I’ll put here again what I answered with before - James 2:24 - the phrase “faith alone” (the Greek “pisteos monon”) only occurs once in the Bible. “Man is justified by works and NOT faith alone.” Unlike what many Protestant churches teach, nowhere in Scripture does it say that man is justified or saved by “faith alone.” To the contrary, man is not justified by faith alone. In Catholic theology, a person is justified by faith and works acting together, which comes solely from God’s divine grace. Faith alone never obtains the grace of justification (Council of Trent, chapter 8, canon 9). Also, the word “justified” (dikaiow) is the same word Paul uses for justification in Rom. 4:3 in regard to Abraham (so Protestants cannot argue James is not referring to “justification” in James 2:24 unless they argue Paul wasn’t in Rom. 4:3 either).
 
We are saved by our faith in God. The Perseverance of the saints. I think evidence for our salvation is the work of the Holy Spirit within us. Evidence of sanctification.

Yes there are verses that point to salvation as a future event. But our time and God’s time are two completely different things. Words only mean what they mean in context. This both applies the verses in Romans 8 and the verses you’re referring to. Which verses were you thinking of in particular?

I know OSAS is a doctrine from the reformation. The actually doctrine is called “The Perseverance or Preservation of the Saints” (both are used). But just to be clear. I don’t believe this is true because of the reformers. I look at scripture believe what it says.
I’m going to go on here a little so please bear with me as I think this needs to be said as I wrestled mightly with this before I joined the RCC a little over a year ago.

Yes, words only mean what they mean in context and the context you’re using to look at some of these verses is not accurate. Whether or not you believe it you ARE interpreting these verses through a Luther/Calvin lens. I grew up in a Baptist church where OSAS was accepted doctrine. Perseverance of the Saints is a decidedly Calvinistic doctrine and differs from OSAS – they are not the same thing.

When I married a RC and began attending the Catholic Church and studying Catholic interpretation of the Bible, salvation, the sacraments, justification, etc. I found that the way a Catholic understands these things to often be the same as the Reformers but also different in some critical areas – OSAS/Perseverance of the Saints is a good example. As I delved deeper into why Catholics believe what they do and how they interpret the Bible I came to realize that their understanding is often much deeper, fuller and richer than that of the Reformers and how many P/E churches understand/practice today.

RC’s do not believe they work their way into heaven but works play a part in justification as outlined above. It is clear that you read and study the Bible and I applaud you for that. It is clear you are influenced by the Reformers (whether you think you are or not) because what you’re saying in your posts is right from them - just as I am now influenced by the RCC’s Magisterium and the church Fathers.

Like it or not, believe it or not, lay people are not usually well equipped to interpret the Bible. Let me play skeptic here (and please take this in the spirit it’s meant) and respond to your statement “I don’t believe this is true because of the reformers. I look at scripture (and) believe what it says” with – who cares what you believe? Why in the world would I put any faith in your interpretation of the Bible when I have a teaching magisterium, writings from the church Fathers who lived in and just after the time of Jesus and 2000 years of church teaching that don’t agree with you? What, other than Luther, Calvin and other Reformers and your own interpretation, do you have to support your argument? You can point to the Bible but so can I and we still differ – so who’s right?

Your argument is the new argument – not the one traditionally from the church. The RCC fully understands the P/E view of OSAS, Perseverance of the Saints, salvation, justification, sanctification, etc. Stouts – you’re not telling me anything I or the church doesn’t already know and understand – I grew up with it. What I’ve found is that the RCC does a tremendously better job of explaining ALL of the Bible than the P/E.
I find it interesting that the RCC can believe that God through the work of the Holy Spirit can keep the church in a state of infallibility despite their teachings of human free will.
Please explain more fully what you mean.
But when it comes to the the keeping of those who God has called into Glory through the work of the Holy Spirit despite human free will (and I’m not denying that we have free will), the church out right rejects that God could do that.
Please explain more fully what you mean.
 
What about John 10? And then parallel it with the John 6 verses already mentioned about Jesus not losing any who has been given to Him by the Father. So you’re saying the only exception to this is ourselves? No one can take away our salvation in Christ except for us?
Ask yourself this question: Is it possible for someone to experience initial salvation but not go on to final salvation? I’d guess you’d say no. As I’ve tried to explain above RC’s see salvation as happening at baptism but also as an ongoing and future event. This is hard for many E/P’s to wrap their heads around so they often jump to things like RC’s don’t think Christ atonement on the cross was sufficient, Christ will lose some of those given to Him by God (as you’re trying to get at above), because salvation is forensic (Christ atonement only covers up our still very dirty soul – salvation does not actually cleanse our souls) and Christ did it all to give us that gift so there is no possible way we can lose it, etc. RC’s do not think Christ will lose any that God has given Him. Christ will never walk away from us but to think that no one will ever walk away from Him is rather naïve – of course that possibility exists.
But if we are justified by faith and our works…they unless we do works we can’t enter into heaven. So we are working our way into heaven by definition. What am I missing if you’re saying you don’t believe we work our way into heaven, but then say we are saved by faith and works? Mortal sins are what cause catholics to fall from a state of grace. What are most of those moral sins based on?..the Old Testament Law, specifically the 10 commandments.
No, and this is the hard part as you’re thinking about this as a P/E. That’s not the RC’s view of works – that’s your definition, not ours. Here’s some information from this website under the Faith tab (catholic.com/thisrock/1991/9109chap.asp):🙂 “OUR WORKS of obedience as Christians don’t earn our initial justification. How could they, since such deeds follow and flow from it? The Council of Trent says as much when it observes that “we are therefore said to be justified gratuitously, because none of those things that precede justification, whether faith or works, merit the grace of justification” (Session Six, Chapter VIII).

At the same time, works of Christian obedience contribute something if the term justification is used to refer not merely to our initial justification, but to our growth in righteousness as regenerated children of God. This is the justification to which James refers when he writes that “a man is justified by works and not by faith alone” (James 2:24). And this makes perfect sense if you see salvation and justification as both an initial event and ongoing processes – that is what Paul and James are talking about.

“When Paul contrasts faith with works, it’s clear from the context (Romans 3:1; 4:9-12) he means works of the Mosaic Law–ritual prescriptions such as circumcision given to identify one as a Jew, to convict of sin, and to point to the Redeemer who would remit sin. This is different from works of Christian obedience which lead to righteousness (Rom. 6:16). With respect to the latter, even faith itself can be spoken of as obedience (Rom. 1:5; 16:26).”
 
Actually the Bible does say that we are justified by faith alone. The phrase faith alone doesn’t exist, except for the James 2 verse given…that is true. But I gave you the Romans 3:28 verse, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.” Faith without works…faith alone. Paul continues to talk about it in Romans 4 as you’ve brought up. … Blessings!
No Stouts the Bible doesn’t say that; Luther said it said that, but it doesn’t. I’m aware of Romans 3:28 and Romans 4, sorry but the Calvinists got it wrong. They were trying to fit the Bible to their premises of what the Bible is saying regarding salvation and justification. The premises were wrong. Unfortunately this has caused a large misunderstanding since the Reformation as to what the RCC believes and teaches. Many P/E’s want to lump all/any work together and say it’s a work and no work has anything to do with our justification. That fits Reformed theology well, unfortunately it’s doesn’t go deep enough in considering what the New Testament writers were saying and understanding that they didn’t lump all works together as Luther and Calvin did.

Consider this (catholic.com/thisrock/2003/0303sbs.asp) “Paul categorically excludes works from our salvation. But what kind of works is Paul talking about? If we believe the entire Bible, we need to see how Paul’s words fit together with James’s words, because James clearly says that “a man is justified by works.” If Paul and James mean the same thing by works, then they contradict one another. Since you and I both believe that the Bible cannot contradict itself, we must agree that Paul and James mean two different things by the word works.”

“The Catholic Church believes that we should interpret Scripture by using Scripture. You will note that sometimes Paul expands his phrase “from works” by adding the phrase “of the law,” as in Romans 3:20 and 28 and Galatians 2:16. Further, sometimes Paul substitutes the phrase “through the law” to describe the same reality. For example, in Romans 3:20, he says, “Through the law comes knowledge of sin.” In other words, when Paul uses the word works he is talking about the Old Testament law.”

The Reformers generalize Paul’s words so that any work that we put before God as a reason for him to accept us is the kind of work he condemns – unfortunately for the Reformers that is not the case. “Paul speaks about Christians fulfilling the law by following the command to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Gal. 5:14). He then explains that we must show the “fruit of the Spirit” (Gal 5:16–26) and bear one another’s burdens (Gal. 6:1ff) as a way of fulfilling the “law of Christ” (Gal. 6:2). All Paul’s teaching comes down to this: Our own works can never justify us, but works that grow out of faith in Christ are part of our justification. That’s why Paul says in Philippians 2:12 you must “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” And that squares with James’s teaching that works that grow from faith justify.

The Reformers would say that James is dealing with the problem of those who claim faith but who don’t show it by their works. In verse 17 James says this kind of faith, “if it has no works, is dead.” The Reformers would say that James’s message is this: If you have true faith, then you will have works to follow. But that does not mean that James sees works as having to do with our salvation.

Catholic’s would respond: “Okay, James is teaching that works show true faith. But we insist that James 2:14–26 shows that works are more than mere evidence of faith. Works actually justify. James is speaking about works growing out of faith. If works of faith are not a part of our justification, then it is hard to understand why James would say, as he does, that “Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?” (Jas. 2:21). **You may remember how Paul said that Abraham was not justified by works but by faith. Paul means that Abraham was not justified by keeping the Old Testament law, while James means that Abraham was justified by doing a work that grew out of his faith in God. **”

And the Reformers might say: Maybe all James means is that Abraham’s actions showed that his faith was real.

Catholics would respond: "You could argue that if James did not say explicitly, “You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by works” (Jas. 2:22). And then in verse 24 James concludes again, “A man is justified by works and not by faith alone.”

I get your point Stouts regarding Romans 4 – but the Reformers interpretation was incorrect. Again, agree or disagree, that’s not the point here. Hopefully it is becoming more clear how the RCC understands the Bible as it pertains to the part works play in justification and that we DO NOT see ourselves as working our way into heaven.

Be back to you soon to finish responding to your other questions. I’ll forewarn you I have to wrap this up soon as it simply takes too much of my time if I’m going to do it thoroughly and faithfully. I hate to do that as I enjoy this but I’m starting a new business and that must come first. Pray for me please! Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top