R
redeemedbyJesus
Guest
But you yourself said it was faith AND works…
you can’t have it both ways.
you can’t have it both ways.
Faith and Works is right. Our works will be rewarded in Heaven. Not because we deserve these rewards, but because Christ honors His promises.But you yourself said it was faith AND works…
you can’t have it both ways.
Don’t get started on the Scripture Alone thing. Thats not the discusiion you want to get into.While I agree we will be rewarded for our works… we won’t be damned at that judgment seat.
Whereas Catholics teach that if you sin and don’t confess it, it can mean you are damned. That is not what the bible teaches!
The bible lists how we can lose salvation and it’s not by sinning…
Notice these are not “sins” per se but more of a rejection of what God requires of believers. (not it’s not a free ride as some Catholics seem to think that’s what we mean)
- unforgiveness - not forgiving someone when we have been forgiven
- not having mercy
- Denying Jesus
But this is not what the Catholic church teaches in it’s abundances of rules now is it?
If you miss mass, it’s a mortal sin is it not?
that is just one of the hundreds of additions the catholic church has added to scripture, and that is what I don’t believe is right.
God bless.
Oh really? Then why does Jesus give the Apostles the authority to forgive sins.While I agree we will be rewarded for our works… we won’t be damned at that judgment seat.
Whereas Catholics teach that if you sin and don’t confess it, it can mean you are damned. That is not what the bible teaches!
The bible lists how we can lose salvation and it’s not by sinning…
- unforgiveness - not forgiving someone when we have been forgiven
- not having mercy
- Denying Jesus
Notice these are not “sins” per se but more of a rejection of what God requires of believers. (not it’s not a free ride as some Catholics seem to think that’s what we mean)
Doesn’t the Church have the authority to make an abundance of rules, or do you deny that Scripture gives this?But this is not what the Catholic church teaches in it’s abundances of rules now is it?
If I willingly miss a Sunday Mass, then yes its a sin, as it should be. Why would you want to sit home and watch TV when you can go worship the Lord?If you miss mass, it’s a mortal sin is it not?
That is just one of the hundreds of additions the catholic church has added to scripture, and that is what I don’t believe is right.
It’s only Scriptural!God bless.
The Church is not a building, but the Body of Christ, who have been led by holy men of God, starting with St. Peter and the 12. Matthew 16:18. which you referncwe is very much the start of the Church, which is the “pillar snd source of all truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). Nowhere is it indicated that every believer has the authority of the apostles. To do this leads to the sad division we see today among the thousands of Protestant denominations.Jesus gave authority to all Christians not just to the apostles… but I guess you believe that when Jesus was saying he will build his church on the rock you thought he meant Peter too…
Your argument is the Catholic Church is God’s church because the Catholic church says so. How do you know that the Church has not twisted scripture to suit it’s own ideas?
Maybe the “church” is not a building but a person who has been filled with the holy spirit and it’s the holy spirit who gives the correct meaning of the scriptures… do you think that could be a possibility?
And if that is the truth… what is guiding the Catholic church and how do you discern it if the Catholic church is the final authority? How can you discern truth for yourself if you aren’t allowed to interpret the scriptures for yourself?
This is interesting.Jesus gave authority to all Christians not just to the apostles… but I guess you believe that when Jesus was saying he will build his church on the rock you thought he meant Peter too…
Well… there was only one Church back then. I bet I can trace my bishop, here in Beaumont, all the way back to one of the 12. Can you?Your argument is the Catholic Church is God’s church because the Catholic church says so. How do you know that the Church has not twisted scripture to suit it’s own ideas?
That’s only half of it. Protestants, in general, have been wasting the last 500 years trying to tear down the other half. From its very infancy, the Church has shown that there has to be a visible authority to resolve issues. This has not changed down through the ages.Maybe the “church” is not a building but a person who has been filled with the holy spirit and it’s the holy spirit who gives the correct meaning of the scriptures… do you think that could be a possibility?
Jesus’ words in John 15 come to mind. Historical tracking backs it up.And if that is the truth… what is guiding the Catholic church and how do you discern it if the Catholic church is the final authority? How can you discern truth for yourself if you aren’t allowed to interpret the scriptures for yourself?
It is my mind that if all Protestant faiths went back to the Catholic Church, then we would be united.It’s my opinion that if all denominations stuck with scripture as the guidelines for truth… then we would all be united.
Yeah, I agree with you. It’s just you guys that have changed the rules like the seasons.Unfortunately many churches place man made doctrines and/or traditions over scripture… which of course, leads to division and arguments. Which Paul was constantly asking people not to do… but to stick to the gospel which was first preached to them.
This is yet another example of inconsistency.Your argument is the Catholic Church is God’s church because the Catholic church says so. How do you know that the Church has not twisted scripture to suit it’s own ideas?
Sometimes you can spoil all the fun, Michael!!!Sorry, had some clean up and pruning to do.![]()
The more I go through this discussion, the more I’m convinced that the stumbling block is the definition of the word “believe” in the context of the bible. Just look a little further down, to the last verse of John 3.Does Jesus add anything to believing in Him? .
:John 3:36
36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever disobeys the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains upon him.
It is crystal clear that belief connotates obedience.1 John 5:1-2
1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is begotten by God, and everyone who loves the father loves (also) the one begotten by him.
2 In this way we know that we love the children of God when we love God and obey his commandments.
This is so true.It’s like, if someone says we have to do action A to gain heaven, that won’t work. Our work is what Jesus leads us to do. Our humble obedience is important. But if we say, “look what I did for you,” we get into trouble. It’s either humble obedience or arrogant, selfish showing off. It’s the showoffs who won’t get there.
Right on, right on!The more I go through this discussion, the more I’m convinced that the stumbling block is the definition of the word “believe” in the context of the bible. Just look a little further down, to the last verse of John 3.
Clearly Christ is saying that disobedience is the opposite of belief. It then follows that obedience is belief.
John hits this point again in 1 John.
It is crystal clear that belief connotates obedience.
No, it isn’t.Yes, the Catechism explains it rather well, I must say. Wonderful Book!!! Wonderful Teaching!!!
So?I think our good friend Xenos is a dispensationalist.
Properly interpreted the bible has no contradictions.It I’m correct, he might think that St. Paul’s teachings may over-ride Jesus’ teachings when there’s a conflict - since Jesus taught the Jews and Paul taught the Gentiles.
No, I don’t, see above for good works discussion.Of course, that means he has to ignore St. Paul’s teachings on good works, as well.