Quite, but the process of discerning marriage will (or should) reveal debt, tattoos, and sexual history.
And at that point, you have to decide–can I deal with this particular thing?
Some more thoughts, culled from some other discussions elsewhere (and some new):
–There is such a thing as medical debt.
–There’s also such a thing as sexual assault and molestation.
–I have to say that the debt-free thing strongly favors the young (we’re all born debt-free) and/or women from well-off, supportive families who are willing to provide her a place to live as long as she wants and are available to bail her out if she has car trouble or some other emergency. Obviously, it’s a good thing to have a well-off, supportive family, but looking for that is pretty close to golddigging by the young man…
–On the other hand, coming from a poorer and/or unsupportive family will lead young women (and men) into debt without there being a great deal of culpability on their part.
–Well-off, supportive, functional families tend to send their daughters to college. They also tend to have standards for their future sons-in-law.
–Attitudes toward tattoos are socioeconomically and geographically specific. Other areas are different, but in our area women with tattoos seem to be a) poor with chest and neck tattoos, often about kids or deceased relatives or b) campus hipster Christian types, often with theological tattoos (yeah, I’m not kidding), generally on the arm.
–Debt-free, tattoo-free virgins of average looks aren’t that attractive to young men. At least, you’re not going to find them lined up around the block.
–Lori Alexander said that debt-free, tattoo-free virgins have gotten very uncommon even in church. Maybe that’s at least partly because those aren’t actually things that attract men?