MERGED: Where are these 40,000 plus Protestant denominations

  • Thread starter Thread starter roveau
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
For the Bible, as a sole rule of faith, is not quite clear about this.

And when we look at the Bible as the sole rule of faith, we don’t know whether…

infants ought to be baptized or not…
or whether the Lord’s Day ought to be celebrated on Saturday or Sunday.

Reasonable people have come to wildly different conclusions after reading this “sole rule of faith”.

Why is that?
The sublime irony is that the Bible is quite clear that it is not the sole rule of faith.
 
My point was essential is essential. Non-essential are non-essential.
That is a tautology and not helpful in advancing the dialogue at all.
If we can all agree that which is essential, then we can be in unity. This is one faith.
Yes, it is the faith given to us by Christ, and handed on through the Apostles and their successors.
 
Hi, Araninski,

Actually, the topic (thread) is the location of 40,000+ Protestant denominations - not what is essential or non-essential.

If the idea is that questioning abut essentials vs non-essentials is what lead to 40,000+ Protestant denominations, (or whatever number you feel comfortable with as long as it is larger than one), then tell me, is this why you think there is this multiplicity of Protestant denominations? Or, do you think there is some other reason for this?

God bless
Well we got detracted from the topic.

My point was essential is essential. Non-essential are non-essential.

The poster above posted “One God, One faith and One Baptism.”

If there’s a Catholic who believe in aliens and one who doesn’t they don’t have the same faith. If there’s a Catholic who believes in the Genesis as told and one who believes is just allegorical, then it isn’t one faith. And the list can go on and on. The same applies to evangelicals. They acknowledge we must keep the sound doctrine of the Lord. However they don’t think it is essential to believe Marian doctrines, or the rapture, or intercession of the saints, or that is necessary to speak in tongues, and the list can go on and on.

I am going to quote a great follower of the Messiah

This is my point, now everybody is saying that everything is essential but this guy clearly knew there were essentials and non essentials.

If we can agree in that which is essential we will have perfect unity. Perfect unity is not being a copy of every person. Not everyone believes like the Pope, or like your priest or me.

If we can agree on essentials the Lord has already told us we will not get astray.

Leviticus 26:3-7

“'If you follow my decrees and are careful to obey my commands,I will send you rain in its season, and the ground will yield its crops and the trees of the field their fruit.Your threshing will continue until grape harvest and the grape harvest will continue until planting, and you will eat all the food you want and live in safety in your land.”'I will grant peace in the land, and you will lie down and no one will make you afraid. I will remove savage beasts from the land, and the sword will not pass through your country."

The doctrine has already been given to us, and the Lord already told us that if we follow it we will be fruitful, safe, and will have victory.This is sound doctrine. The Lord told us the Messiah was to come, and we should believe Him when He came, that He will cleanse our sins and that He would give us eternal life. When He came He fulfilled what God told us (we should keep and seek), and told us one more thing, “share this Gospel with everyone.”

Now I believe that some “doctrines” that man have “discovered” are the things that create confusion. And because of that we have divisions.

If we can all agree that which is essential, then we can be in unity. This is one faith. One Faith has nothing to do with primacy of Peter , or Marian doctrines, or transubstantiation, or intercession of Saints , all of these are extra stuff, that in my opinion, are doubtful, am I granted liberty to not believe them? After all they aren’t essential. I have beliefs that are not essential , I will not tell you, you should believe them because anyways they aren’t essential. There is heresy and there is non-agreement on non-essential stuff.

Well, Saint Augustine would agree with me.

Love of our Elohim Yahweh be with you.
 
Hi, 1HolyCatholic,

You know … I have always found that astoundingly ironic. And, to be honest, it would seem that somewhere along the 500 year line someone in a Protestant denomination would have said something like, “Hey! Just where is the basis for SS if the pilar of truth is the Church?” But, I am quite unaware of anyone having done this.

God bless
The sublime irony is that the Bible is quite clear that it is not the sole rule of faith.
 
=Publisher;7089806]Are you saying that ALL Catholics believe the EXACT SAME THING as to what the scriptures mean? Has the CC provided a definitive interpretation of each and every passage of scripture?
IF they are:

Informed

Practing Catholics

YES!

Why?

**As Pope Bendict said on the day he became pope:

“There can’t be your truth and my truth or there would be no truth.”**

Love and prayers,
Pat
 
IF they are:

Informed

Practing Catholics

YES!

Why?

**As Pope Bendict said on the day he became pope:

“There can’t be your truth and my truth or there would be no truth.”**

Love and prayers,
Pat
Exactly.

If they are Catholic and believe something other than what the Church teaches and they are not aware that their beliefs are not in accord with the Church then they are in material heresy.

If they are Catholic and believe something other than what the Church teaches and they are aware that their beliefs are not in accord with the Church then they are in formal heresy.
 
Originally Posted by tqualey
Hi, Araninski,
Actually, the topic (thread) is the location of 40,000+ Protestant denominations - not what is essential or non-essential.
If the idea is that questioning abut essentials vs non-essentials is what lead to 40,000+ Protestant denominations, (or whatever number you feel comfortable with as long as it is larger than one), then tell me, is this why you think there is this multiplicity of Protestant denominations? Or, do you think there is some other reason for this?
God bless
Yeah you are right, I just wanted to make my point that there may be 40,000 denominations but they (not all) don’t vary on the essentials. There is a new denomination because of a different view on how people should evangelize , someones teach you have to put more focus on the Holy Spirit, others thing its for later after conversion. Or also because one denominations thinks it is better to have a lot of worship and less teaching. And the other thinks its better to have a lot of teaching and moderate worship time. Others that you only need to eat Eucharist and leave. (just kidding:p)

The differences are not important think about it. Now there are some denominations that do vary on essential things, allowing abortion, gay marriage,saying its OK premarital sex, you can get drunk, smoke, get tattoos, you can have bad-mouth, etc.
Originally Posted by PRmerger
That is a tautology and not helpful in advancing the dialogue at all.
Yes, it is the faith given to us by Christ, and handed on through the Apostles and their successors.
PRmerger as always, you don’t address all my post.

I am sure I have the faith handed through the apostles. The Apostles celebrated all of the Jewish (Given by God) Feast do you? The Apostles kept Sabbath holy , do you? Do you have the same exact set of beliefs like them? Oh no? Then you don’t have the same faith as gave to the Apostles :confused: .

Yahweh bless you. I guess I’ve made my point.
 
I am sure I have the faith handed through the apostles. The Apostles celebrated all of the Jewish (Given by God) Feast do you? The Apostles kept Sabbath holy , do you? Do you have the same exact set of beliefs like them? Oh no? Then you don’t have the same faith as gave to the Apostles :confused: .

Yahweh bless you. I guess I’ve made my point.
Given that the Apostles condemned Judaisers and Judaising, yes, you certainly have made your point.
 
I am sure I have the faith handed through the apostles. The Apostles celebrated all of the Jewish (Given by God) Feast do you? The Apostles kept Sabbath holy , do you? Do you have the same exact set of beliefs like them? Oh no? Then you don’t have the same faith as gave to the Apostles :confused: .

Yahweh bless you. I guess I’ve made my point.
The Apostles celebrated Jewish customs but found them to be no longer binding. they TAUGHT this to Gentile Christians:

Colossians 1:16-17

Let no one, then, pass judgment on you in matters of food and drink or with regard to a festival or new moon or sabbath.
**These are shadows of things to come; the reality belongs to Christ. **

When teachers went out from among the Apostles who were not sent BY them and taught the Gentiles that they had to adhere to Jewish Law - THIS is what they reposnded with:

Acts 15:28-29

"It is the decision of the holy Spirit and of us not to place on you any burden beyond these necessities, namely, to abstain from meat sacrificed to idols, from blood, from meats of strangled animals, and from unlawful marriage. If you keep free of these, you will be doing what is right. Farewell."

So - yes, we DO possess the faith of the Apostles - the same Catholic faith that they spread throughout the world. The real question is why do you think you do when you reject so many of their teachings?
 
PRmerger as always, you don’t address all my post.
As always? LOL! We’ve had probably the equivalent of a 15 minute conversation, tops, here on the CAFs. I hardly think that qualifies for “always”. :rolleyes:
I am sure I have the faith handed through the apostles. The Apostles celebrated all of the Jewish (Given by God) Feast do you? The Apostles kept Sabbath holy , do you? Do you have the same exact set of beliefs like them? Oh no? Then you don’t have the same faith as gave to the Apostles :confused: .
Let’s see you back up your claim. My understanding is that the AoG is, maybe, a century old?

Where’s any writings of AoG ministers in the 2nd century stating how they worshipped?

Can you cite any references for your minister being anointed by a minister who was anointed by a minister……who was anointed by an apostle?

Here’s my list of the faith handed down through the apostles. 🤷
 
Hi, Araninski,

Chances are, with a wee bit more effort … you could have made a much better point! 😃 Let me explain…
Yeah you are right, I just wanted to make my point that there may be 40,000 denominations but they (not all) don’t vary on the essentials.

I don’t want to get too wild here… but, there really are major differences between these groups. For example, your AoG believes that speaking in tongues is essential after baptism (ag.org/top/beliefs/statement_of_fundamental_truths/sft_short.cfm) but, I really do not think any other Protestant group holds to that. I can tell you that the Catholic Church does not believe that. The differences are real, profound and date back to the Luther and Calvin not seeing eye to eye on important matters when getting together would have been mechanically so much easier then. But, that is just speculation on my part.

There is a new denomination because of a different view on how people should evangelize , someones teach you have to put more focus on the Holy Spirit, others thing its for later after conversion.

"]Doesn’t this sound like rather petty material (it left ‘non-essential’ a long time ago…:D) Araninski? It really does appear minor (compared to the scandal caused to the non-Christians throughout the world with all of these groups having different dogmas - yet claiming to follow Christ)?

Or also because one denominations thinks it is better to have a lot of worship and less teaching. And the other thinks its better to have a lot of teaching and moderate worship time. Others that you only need to eat Eucharist and leave. (just kidding:p)

The differences are not important think about it. Now there are some denominations that do vary on essential things, allowing abortion, gay marriage,saying its OK premarital sex, you can get drunk, smoke, get tattoos, you can have bad-mouth, etc.

Here we have some common areas of belief - that it is morally wrong - a sin - to: encourage abortions, gay ‘marriage’ premarital sex and getting drunk. I’m not to clear on the smoking and tattoos and needing dental care is not a sin… (just kidding :p:p )

PRmerger as always, you don’t address all my post.

Actually, I thought he did address your post… but, that is between you two…

I am sure I have the faith handed through the apostles.

Now, I am a bit unclear on that … and, not finding what I was looking for on the AoG site, I went to Wiki and here is there explanatory paragraph.

The Assemblies of God has its roots in the Pentecostal revival of the early 20th century. This revival is generally traced to a prayer meeting held under the leadership of Charles Parham, at Bethel Bible College in Topeka, Kansas, on January 1, 1901…

Then I went to Pentecostal to see when that group developed. The earliest documented group I could find was in 1901. And, as you can see from this Wike article, there are some ‘essential’ differences even within this group (Trinitarian vs Nontrinitarian). And while Dr. Ward may want to take this group’s origins back to the early church… there is no documentation to support this idea.

Pentecostalism is an umbrella term that includes a wide range of different theologies and cultures. For example, many Pentecostals are Trinitarian and others are Nontrinitarian.[4]

The Apostles celebrated all of the Jewish (Given by God) Feast do you? The Apostles kept Sabbath holy , do you? Do you have the same exact set of beliefs like them? Oh no? Then you don’t have the same faith as gave to the Apostles :confused: .

Yahweh bless you. I guess I’ve made my point.
But it was this last paragraph that really got my attention. To the best of my knowledge, the Catholic Church does not celebrate ANY Jewish feasts as such. We celebrate Pentecost (and, yes, this is a Jewish feast) but, we celebrate this day as when the Holy Spirit, as recorded in Acts 2, gave special graces to those assembled and Peter went out to preach and 3,000 were baptized that day. Pentecost is really the birthday of the Catholic Church (it was the only Christian Church around at that time - the Reformation would happen 1,500 years later.)

Actually, if you look at Acts 20:7 and 1Cor 16:1-2 you will see the transition from the Sabbath (last day of the week) to Sunday - to add special focus to the Resurrection. Now, we are to observe Sunday as the Lord’s Day, we worship on Sunday and refraim from manual labor on that day out of respect for God’s command to rest. But, this is not the Sabbath as the Jews observe.

Those that practice Judiasm (to the best of my knowledge) are awaiting the Messiah; they do not believe Christ, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, is God’s Anointed Messiah.

While Christ was a Jew, and His Apostles were all Jews - Christ gave us the New Covenant and fulfilled the Old Covenant. The Law of Moses no longer applies to us. What was handed down by the Apostles was not a belief in Judiasm, but rather a belief in Christ - and specifically, that Christ founded His Church on Peter (Matt 16). There really are some major differences here…and, I hope this has been helpful.

God bless
 
Let’s try to end this thread by settling on a figure. Some say 40,000, a few say 25,000, some 33,000. let’s take an average and call it a day! 😃
 
Let’s try to end this thread by settling on a figure. Some say 40,000, a few say 25,000, some 33,000. let’s take an average and call it a day! 😃
I’m not giving up until people accept one of the numbers I’ve stated in this thread. :mad:
 
The number is 40,001. I witnessed the birth of a “denomination” a few hours ago. Much like the birth of a star - breathtaking. 😃
 
I don’t think we made much headway in determining the actual number of Protestant denominations, even using what has been published or what can be found on the Internet. Numbers have been inflated by listing denominations which include geographical locations in their names (countries, states, provinces, towns). The Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, Anglicans etc., are all known to have many geographical distinctions but are essentially the same churches.

Whatever the case, I’ll just be relieved when people refrain from trying to build up an important religious argument by then using a grossly inflated figure, a figure with no documented foundation, in order to win the point.
 
Whatever the case, I’ll just be relieved when people refrain from trying to build up an important religious argument by then using a grossly inflated figure, a figure with no documented foundation, in order to win the point.
That argument makes sense, and therefore shouldn’t exist on the internet.
 
The number is 40,001. I witnessed the birth of a “denomination” a few hours ago. Much like the birth of a star - breathtaking. 😃
Oh yeah I heard about that. Fundamentalist Grapevine Baptist Church split and now there’s Fundamentalist Grapevine Baptist Church of the Nazarene 😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top