MERGED Why do some say the Catholic Church is not Christian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bamaster47
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But I didn’t rise…He did it. I never would have.
I understand your view which you have stated well. I get your view. I just absolutely see it the other way.
I too was saved from Alchoholism 25 years ago by Christ-working through the Catholic church. And I an eternally greatful for that.
 
It is easy to determine who has the truth. Only one Church can trace its Authority back to jesus and the Apostles. only one Church has held to the same teachings and dooctrines from the Day Jesus rose until today. It is the same Church that gave us the Bible. All other denomoinations sprung from disent born from pride over 1500 years after Jesus rose from the dead

I am glad that you have found a denomination that has helped you and as a chrisitan denomination it has a piece of the truth. Hopefully you will soon be ready to move on and embrace the fullness of truth found only in the Catholic Church. We’ll leave a light on for you.
Lots of churches have apostolic succession. Or claim to, the specifics are open to intepretation I understand.
The Truth must correspond with what we know is Truth. His scriptures. I know enough history to know that relying on history and tradition can cause people to believe things that are not true.
But you knew I thought that or I would be Catholic.
I have no interest in joining your churchnor leaving what God did for me.
The second attempt to convert. Something that is not allowed
 
If your Church uses the bible, your most basic beliefs are rooted in the Catholic church - no legitimate argument can possibly counteract this statement despite any spin that may be put on it. This very nature makes one thing remarkably clear: Catholics can not be defined by other Christian denominations, but other denominations can be partially defined by Catholicism.
 
Quote: How Old Is Your Church?

If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex- monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517. If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to remarry. If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560. If you are a Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England founded by Samuel Seabury in the American colonies in the 17th century. If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582. If you are a Methodist, your religion was launched by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1744. If you are a Unitarian, Theophilus Lindley founded your church in London in 1774. If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, N.Y., in 1829. If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1605. If you are of the Dutch Reformed church, you recognize Michaelis Jones as founder, because he originated your religion in New York in 1628. If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865. If you are a Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy as its founder. If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as 'Church of the Nazarene," “Pentecostal Gospel.” “Holiness Church,” “Pilgrim Holiness Church,” “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past century. If you are Catholic, you know that your religion was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ the Son of God, and it is still the same Church.

ewtn.com/faith/teachings/churb4.htm
 
The Bible has God as its author. Which is of course Catholic doctrine as well
But yes, the majority text has its origins in Anglicanism and prior to that Catholicism/Orthodoxy.
Of course there is thousands of years of history but our church itself does not come from the Catholic Church.
Of course prior Christians existed but any relationship is quite small.
JL: Does you church teach God is a Trinity?
 
But no, I had a conversion experience. I was saved. I left atheism, and this is in no certain order, I was healed, stopped drinking and a few other things I care not to mention, and had my life turned around. Not exactly the kind of guy who leaves THAT for something else.
Congratulations on accepting the work of the Holy Spirit in your life. I’m very happy for you.

Please pray for us, that we all accept the need for continual conversion - and a life in Christ.
 
There is no shared history between the Lutherans and the Catholic Church prior to 1500. The Lutherans rejected the church 500 years ago. Fortunately they have held on to some of the fundamental truths protected by the Church for the first 1500 years after Christ died. It is well that you are Christian-even better if you would come home.
At the risk of entering into a “no-win” argument, Lutherans did not just pop out of the woodwork in 1517 ex nihilo. There would be no Lutherans if the Catholic Church had not existed. We owe our understanding of God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – to those who carried the faith; we owe the creeds we confess (Apostles’, Nicene, and Athanasian) to those who carried the faith; we owe the canon of Holy Scripture to those who carried the faith; we owe our knowledge of the early church fathers to those who preserved their teachings over all those centuries. Had we Lutherans sprung out of nothing we would have none of those things.

To be sure, the sharing of those fifteen centuries is imperfect but there is sharing. And for that I thank God.
 
Quote: How Old Is Your Church?

If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex- monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517. If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to remarry. If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560. If you are a Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England founded by Samuel Seabury in the American colonies in the 17th century. If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582. If you are a Methodist, your religion was launched by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1744. If you are a Unitarian, Theophilus Lindley founded your church in London in 1774. If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, N.Y., in 1829. If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1605. If you are of the Dutch Reformed church, you recognize Michaelis Jones as founder, because he originated your religion in New York in 1628. If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865. If you are a Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy as its founder. If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as 'Church of the Nazarene," “Pentecostal Gospel.” “Holiness Church,” “Pilgrim Holiness Church,” “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past century. If you are Catholic, you know that your religion was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ the Son of God, and it is still the same Church.

ewtn.com/faith/teachings/churb4.htm
Three things…
  1. thanks for this info 👍
  2. can you (or anyone) recommend a book on this info that might provide more detail?
  3. I couldn’t help but think “man this is just like when a group of people decides to play six degrees of Kevin Bacon!”
 
The Bible was compiled for you by the Catholic Council of Carthage. /thread 🙂
Stole the words right out of my mouth.

The Orthodox/Catholic Church compiled and canonized the Bible. Any Biblical faith is dependent on the decisions of the Church at that time because th Bible cannot be separated from The Church. Conclusion: all Christian denominations find their origins in the Catholic/Orthodox Church.
 
Recently I’ve encountered several people who call themselves Christian, yet reject the status of the Catholic Church as a Christian entity…I’m really wondering why some people hold this view of the Catholic Church.

I’ve had the misfortune of being in the same room with people who were speaking badly of the Catholic Church several times…on one occasion, I was doing some work while a conversation was taking place beside me, and I could hear a friend of mine who is a member of a nondenominational church saying things like “we don’t consider the Catholic Church to be Christian” and “Catholicism is the reason why Christianity is looked down upon.” Even more disappointing than that was hearing another friend of mine, a Catholic, essentially agreeing with him, saying the Catholic Church “doesn’t make sense,” or something to that effect. Needless to say, I was incredibly angered and offended by these remarks, yet I chose to stay out of their conversation, knowing that I was not well-trained in apologetics, and not wanting to be backed into a corner by his aggressive arguments.

On other occasions I’ve heard bashings of the Pope, Papal infallibility, free will, faith and works, Catholic teachings on contraception/abortion, etc. but I know these objections are common and I hold the opinion that many people who have these objections are not fully informed as to the Catholic reasoning behind them. What really bugs me the most is people preaching that the Catholic Church is exactly what is wrong with Christianity, and that it is not Christian in its beliefs.

Could someone please be so kind as to explain why some people hold this view of the Catholic Church? I’m looking specifically for the point of view of members of other Christian denominations who think this way, but anyone with information or an opinion please feel free to post.
Churches create definitions to fit their needs. The term “Christianity” has become a very pliable term and has been given a whole range of definitions. At the very first days after the resurrection a Christian was simply one who followed Christ; believed that he was the Messiah and would be returning. Nothing more and nothing less.

Today Evangelicals have created a term that allows them to call the Catholic Church a cult, which to me is hilariously ignorant of history. Of course, Evangelicals also think Mormons are a cult. Speaking of funny, the old saying of the enemy of my enemy is my friend does not really apply here does it?

To be very frank, Catholics use a different definition; to be Christan means that one must not only be a follower of Jesus, but also believe in the doctrine of the Trinity.

Personally, I reject most definitions except the first one used at the time of the first apostles. Everything else seems to have been developed only to segregate the Body of Christ; I think God is the better judge of that than men.
 
The latest I’ve heard is that we are not Christians, but Cathlo-Islamist, which if you can get the implications without my spelling it out, seems to be a pretty loud message right now. That, and a very vocal sabbatarian/Messianic movement that blames the RCC for every evil and error they perceive in the Christian faith, whether Catholic or Protestant.
 
Recently I’ve encountered several people who call themselves Christian, yet reject the status of the Catholic Church as a Christian entity…I’m really wondering why some people hold this view of the Catholic Church.

I’ve had the misfortune of being in the same room with people who were speaking badly of the Catholic Church several times…on one occasion, I was doing some work while a conversation was taking place beside me, and I could hear a friend of mine who is a member of a nondenominational church saying things like “we don’t consider the Catholic Church to be Christian” and “Catholicism is the reason why Christianity is looked down upon.” Even more disappointing than that was hearing another friend of mine, a Catholic, essentially agreeing with him, saying the Catholic Church “doesn’t make sense,” or something to that effect. Needless to say, I was incredibly angered and offended by these remarks, yet I chose to stay out of their conversation, knowing that I was not well-trained in apologetics, and not wanting to be backed into a corner by his aggressive arguments.

On other occasions I’ve heard bashings of the Pope, Papal infallibility, free will, faith and works, Catholic teachings on contraception/abortion, etc. but I know these objections are common and I hold the opinion that many people who have these objections are not fully informed as to the Catholic reasoning behind them. What really bugs me the most is people preaching that the Catholic Church is exactly what is wrong with Christianity, and that it is not Christian in its beliefs.

Could someone please be so kind as to explain why some people hold this view of the Catholic Church? I’m looking specifically for the point of view of members of other Christian denominations who think this way, but anyone with information or an opinion please feel free to post.
Its their claim to legitimacy, that the Church is not Christian therefore not the true Church of Christ. Therefore one should join them instead. Its nothing more than proselytizing.
 
I think it was Scott Hahn who in Rome Sweet Home said something along the lines of…‘If the Catholic were not true then it would be diabolical’ (I am paraphrashing, and NOT quoting directly AT ALL). The Church makes claims like no other christian church. It would either have to be true or severely wrong, unlike many more generalized teachings.

I almost find it easier to have a debate with someone that holds this position because at least they are trying to put things in terms of black and white, someone being right or wrong, instead of “it doesn’t really matter as long as you believe in Jesus”.
 
You know what we say to them…
Pictures can speak 1000 words but this one only speaks 5… and they’re awesome! 👍
What really bugs me the most is people preaching that the Catholic Church is exactly what is wrong with Christianity, and that it is not Christian in its beliefs.
Could someone please be so kind as to explain why some people hold this view of the Catholic Church?
As far as this… I’m eager to read the responses as well but my knee jerk reaction is that aside from whatever responses you may have. First ask them why they feel that way… don’t be surprised if you get answers that are completely devoid of any logical reasoning. Regardless of their answer I’d ask where in the Bible it indicates that any part of Catholicism is wrong… then wait for a look of stupor.

Also, it’s that thought process that’s wrong with Christianity not the Catholic Church. People that walk around claiming to be “good Christians” while judging other people and their beliefs with no real “ammo” other than the fact that it’s different from what they believe. Yes the Catholic Church has done things that are questionable… but that doesn’t make it’s teachings wrong.
 
😦 sad, but true…

…I never actually thought about it like that.👍
I think it’s the age, rather than the gender, that people are more bothered with. In any case, it’s always wrong to stereotype anyone on the basis of a few bad eggs.
 
The Bible was compiled for you by the Catholic Council of Carthage. /thread 🙂
No. That meeting added to the Old Testament and we do not use the later developing canon that you use. I had a thread on that earlier…I suppose you could look at it if bored enough
 
No. That meeting added to the Old Testament and we do not use the later developing canon that you use. I had a thread on that earlier…I suppose you could look at it if bored enough
It also established the New Testament Canon
 
It also established the New Testament Canon
Local synods cannot “establish” a canon. And in fact, it didn’t. Segments of Christianity, as I am sure you are aware, recognized different books for years after that. Revelation being a good example.
The correct canon is recognized. Man cannot establish a canon. In fact, even Vatican One agrees with me. Councils approval was subsequent but scripture is scripture because God is the author.
You also are aware that prior to Carthage and Hippo a 27 book canon was recognized by some Christians.
Now since we both know history, and know that what actual effect any synod had on practical use is conjecture based upon scant existing records, lets move on.
You know that no one wrote in 500 AD that the whole church recognizes the 27 book canon based upon a local regional synod. That does not exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top