Military Cuggles

  • Thread starter Thread starter friardchips
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
friardchips said:
Of course, all that was complete twaddle, the art of twonk, pretty much the sum of what I think of unserious thinking in serious matters:

Don’ts :bluelite:

One can’t base an opinion on surmising.
On can’t rely on generalisations or speculation.
One can’t get inside info. if not in a position to.
One can’t believe in media-hype.
One can’t be swayed by the art of distraction.
One can’t get caught up in conspiracy theories (sell the tin/foil hat?).
DOs :hey_bud:

Have a theory based on the FACT of non-action or dubious practices.

Follow strings and research.

Check sources.

Collate quantifiable data.

Research strings of further sourced evidence.

Piece together a theorem.

Find someone who does know the military and get them to investigate.

Make the public aware.
No twaddle then…just sound reasoning turned solid constructive opposition.
Click to expand...
Not to worry. The twaddle has been easy to spot, from the beginning.
 
friardchips said:
TO DO LIST:

Have a theory based on the FACT of non-action or dubious practices.

Follow strings and research.

Check sources.

Collate quantifiable data.

Research strings of further sourced evidence.

Piece together a theorem.

Find someone who does know the military and get them to investigate.

Make the public aware that:

'It was the best of plugs; it was the worst of plugs…

it was the New Age of ‘wisdom’;…the age of utter foolishness…

it was the age of military Yoga!’

🤓
Click to expand...
What I need from all this now is a good 'ol spider diagram!
 
GKC said:
No, that response is no more coherent that the thread itself. If you want an answer, rephrase the question. Might not help, but unlikely to hurt.
Click to expand...
I have an answer: when I was on the way to Tesco, to get a can of fizzy, it flashed in my head as if a little green man!

I will give you two clues:
  1. It is not a conspiracy.
  2. But it is down to a sage.
:newidea:

From these two clues, you get to ask two more clues - and I can answer “yes” or “no”, and then we build it up like that, so on and so forth…
  • a game, it is, I hope someone plays!..
🍿
 
friardchips said:
I have an answer: when I was on the way to Tesco, to get a can of fizzy, it flashed in my head as if a little green man!

I will give you two clues:
  1. It is not a conspiracy.
  2. But it is down to a sage.
:newidea:

From these two clues, you get to ask two more clues - and I can answer “yes” or “no”, and then we build it up like that, so on and so forth…
  • a game, it is, I hope someone plays!..
🍿
Click to expand...
I wish you well with that.
 
GKC said:
Nope. Assert, if you wish. Fads in the military (and I’ve lived through a variety. Sponsored at least one, myself) anise in various ways.
Click to expand...
It was a relatively harmless conclusion, but okay.

I’ll just have to continue to wait. :tanning:
 
GKC said:
Long as it is, either.
Click to expand...
Utopia is not for us, in this life, IMO. Joy can be. And peace.

It depends what you think happiness means? Yet, this doesn’t certify that what an individual believes is true happiness, is necessarily.

IOW, I feel less complacent using ‘could’, as opposed to “should”.
 
friardchips said:
Utopia is not for us, in this life, IMO. Joy can be. And peace.

It depends what you think happiness means? Yet, this doesn’t certify that what an individual believes is true happiness, is necessarily.

IOW, I feel less complacent using ‘could’, as opposed to “should”.
Click to expand...
Nonono. “(it had a happy ending)”.

Life should be like that. A happy ending.

Utopia, of course not. Molnar/UTOPIA: THE PERENNIAL HERESY.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top