C
CPA2
Guest
Milk:
Perfect Food or Toxic Soup?
Contrary to popular belief, milk is not the perfect food. Commercial milk is a toxic soup. “Processed cow’s milk is a chemical soup that is highly toxic and a negative fountain of youth for adults. To put it simply, cow’s milk is not healthy for humans” (Lam 1). Milk is not fit for human consumption. It causes more diseases than it prevents.
The National Dairy Council holds the opposite view. These are just some of the slogans of the dairy industry: “Got Milk?” “Milk is the perfect food.” “Milk is natural.” “Everybody needs milk.” “Milk drinkers make better lovers.” Attacking milk is almost un-American. Our mothers told us to drink all of our milk so that we would grow strong and healthy. “Hurry up and drink your milk” is a common admonishment to children. The National Dairy Council says, “For athletes like Carmelo Anthony, milk is the perfect fuel to keep them in the game. With nine essential nutrients, including calcium for strong bones and protein to build muscle, it’s a natural power drink.” An article in Nutrition Today said that milk is the most reliable source of calcium. It is superior to calcium-fortified beverages. Adding calcium to drinks is not a nutritional substitute for milk. Milk provides calcium, protein, phosphorus, vitamin D, and many other nutrients (Heaney 40).
Milk is the ideal medium for chemicals. Hormones given to cows increase milk production. Drinking commercial milk exposes us to genetically engineered growth hormones. RBRH is one of the toxic chemicals in milk. It is technically known as bovine somatotropin. Bovine growth hormones are not natural. They cause inflammation of the udder and reproductive organs. Cows require greater quantities of antibiotics to combat the inflammation caused by rBRH. The antibiotics then contaminate the milk. The widespread use of rBRH increases the risk of breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer.
Once taken in orally by humans, IGF-1 from rBGH enriched milk enters the blood stream. “It is highly likely that IGF-1 promotes transformation of normal breast epithelium to breast cancer” (Harris). “IGF-1 maintains the malignancy of human breast cancer cells, including their invasiveness and ability to spread to distant organs” (Lippman). Additionally, IGF-1 from rBGH-enriched milk increases the risk of lung, prostate and colon cancer. "Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), in particular IGF-I and IGF-II, strongly stimulate the proliferation of a variety of cancer cells, including those from lung cancer. High plasma levels of IGF-I were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Plasma levels of IGF-I are higher…in patients with lung cancer than in control subjects” (Journal 2). “Selected studies have shown that men with an IGF-1 level between 300-500 mg/dl have more than four times the risk of developing prostate cancer compared to those with a level between 100 to 185 mg/dl. The risk is more pronounced in men over 60 years of age, where the risk of prostate cancer is eight times higher than control. The elevated IGF-1 levels were present several years before an actual diagnosis of prostate cancer” (Lam 5).
There have been a number of scientific studies on rBHR. The Canadian Veterinary Medical Association and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons found that the veterinary effects of rBGH were an increased incidence of mastitis, lameness and reproductive problems (Epstein). “Cows injected with rBGH show heavy localization of IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factors) in breast (udder) epithelial cells; this does not occur in untreated cows” (Furlanetto, Gregor and Cambell).
Both Europe and Canada bann rBGH laced milk. “The Codex Alimentarius Commission, the U.N. Food Safety Agency representing 101 nations worldwide, has ruled unanimously in favor of the 1993 European moratorium on Monsanto’s generically engineered hormonal milk” (Epstein). However, the Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of Monsanto’s genetically modified milk (rBGH) in 1994. The FDA is a government watchdog that does not always bark. The FDA allows the sale of unlabeled treated milk to be sold to unsuspecting and uninformed consumers. Given the cancer and other health risks, why is rBRH milk still in the marketplace?
Perfect Food or Toxic Soup?
Contrary to popular belief, milk is not the perfect food. Commercial milk is a toxic soup. “Processed cow’s milk is a chemical soup that is highly toxic and a negative fountain of youth for adults. To put it simply, cow’s milk is not healthy for humans” (Lam 1). Milk is not fit for human consumption. It causes more diseases than it prevents.
The National Dairy Council holds the opposite view. These are just some of the slogans of the dairy industry: “Got Milk?” “Milk is the perfect food.” “Milk is natural.” “Everybody needs milk.” “Milk drinkers make better lovers.” Attacking milk is almost un-American. Our mothers told us to drink all of our milk so that we would grow strong and healthy. “Hurry up and drink your milk” is a common admonishment to children. The National Dairy Council says, “For athletes like Carmelo Anthony, milk is the perfect fuel to keep them in the game. With nine essential nutrients, including calcium for strong bones and protein to build muscle, it’s a natural power drink.” An article in Nutrition Today said that milk is the most reliable source of calcium. It is superior to calcium-fortified beverages. Adding calcium to drinks is not a nutritional substitute for milk. Milk provides calcium, protein, phosphorus, vitamin D, and many other nutrients (Heaney 40).
Milk is the ideal medium for chemicals. Hormones given to cows increase milk production. Drinking commercial milk exposes us to genetically engineered growth hormones. RBRH is one of the toxic chemicals in milk. It is technically known as bovine somatotropin. Bovine growth hormones are not natural. They cause inflammation of the udder and reproductive organs. Cows require greater quantities of antibiotics to combat the inflammation caused by rBRH. The antibiotics then contaminate the milk. The widespread use of rBRH increases the risk of breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer.
Once taken in orally by humans, IGF-1 from rBGH enriched milk enters the blood stream. “It is highly likely that IGF-1 promotes transformation of normal breast epithelium to breast cancer” (Harris). “IGF-1 maintains the malignancy of human breast cancer cells, including their invasiveness and ability to spread to distant organs” (Lippman). Additionally, IGF-1 from rBGH-enriched milk increases the risk of lung, prostate and colon cancer. "Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), in particular IGF-I and IGF-II, strongly stimulate the proliferation of a variety of cancer cells, including those from lung cancer. High plasma levels of IGF-I were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Plasma levels of IGF-I are higher…in patients with lung cancer than in control subjects” (Journal 2). “Selected studies have shown that men with an IGF-1 level between 300-500 mg/dl have more than four times the risk of developing prostate cancer compared to those with a level between 100 to 185 mg/dl. The risk is more pronounced in men over 60 years of age, where the risk of prostate cancer is eight times higher than control. The elevated IGF-1 levels were present several years before an actual diagnosis of prostate cancer” (Lam 5).
There have been a number of scientific studies on rBHR. The Canadian Veterinary Medical Association and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons found that the veterinary effects of rBGH were an increased incidence of mastitis, lameness and reproductive problems (Epstein). “Cows injected with rBGH show heavy localization of IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factors) in breast (udder) epithelial cells; this does not occur in untreated cows” (Furlanetto, Gregor and Cambell).
Both Europe and Canada bann rBGH laced milk. “The Codex Alimentarius Commission, the U.N. Food Safety Agency representing 101 nations worldwide, has ruled unanimously in favor of the 1993 European moratorium on Monsanto’s generically engineered hormonal milk” (Epstein). However, the Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of Monsanto’s genetically modified milk (rBGH) in 1994. The FDA is a government watchdog that does not always bark. The FDA allows the sale of unlabeled treated milk to be sold to unsuspecting and uninformed consumers. Given the cancer and other health risks, why is rBRH milk still in the marketplace?