M
MarcoPolo
Guest
Here is a thread from a while back collecting examples of miracles that underwent scientific scrutiny.
Is that what their stories say?so what about those so called miracles which allegedly proves Mohammad as a true prophet of Allah? in their stories he was able to split the moon in half.
so is this a lie, or is it god’s will:If it was God’s will it happened. If not they lied.
I don’t know… before the Savior things were slightly different.so is this a lie, or is it god’s will:
2 Kings 2:22-24
*And the waters were healed unto this day, according to the word of Eliseus, which he spoke.
And he went up from thence to Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, little boys came out of the city and mocked him, saying: Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
And looking back, he saw them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord: and there came forth two bears out of the forest, and tore of them two and forty boys.*
massacred 42 boys for teasing a so called “prophet”!
obviously a lie.
Some of the miracles related in the Bible are perhaps paraphrases of actual events. In any case, miracles are outside the domain of science. Science is limited and can not explain all we encounter (I say this as a physicist who has published and worked in the field). Read C.S. Lewis “Miracles” and Fr. Stanley Jaki “The Limits of a Limtless Science” to get a better notion of why science has nothing to say about miracles. By the way, there is proof for many current miracles. For example, the miracles at Lourdes–seeIn the Bible we read about many miracles.
For example: Sun stopping its movement, water starting to pour from a rock, Turning water into wine, Jesus walking on water, Peter walking on water, resurrection of Lazarus …
The proof that these miracles happened is only through oral and written tradition. I have no photographs or videos of Peter walking on water. Even if I had the videos these could be fake. Very clearly these miracles go totally against common sense and against all recorded experiments at least few hundred years back.
Don’t you think that believing in these miracles makes us catholics very foolish in other people’s eyes?
How do we explain these miracles? If they really happened, does it mean that all existing theories in today’s physics are only valid temporarily (that they are only valid until God decides so?) I mean, if somebody demonstrated an experiment like changing water to wine in few hours I think he’d receive the Nobel prize…
I should add that science depends on reproducible results of measurements made under controlled conditions; miracles, by definition, are irregular occurences, irreproducible and do not occur under controlled conditions. Please inform yourself about what science can and can not understand–again, I strongly recommend you read Fr. Jaki’s book, “The Limits of a Limitless Science”.In the Bible we read about many miracles.
For example: Sun stopping its movement, water starting to pour from a rock, Turning water into wine, Jesus walking on water, Peter walking on water, resurrection of Lazarus …
The proof that these miracles happened is only through oral and written tradition. I have no photographs or videos of Peter walking on water. Even if I had the videos these could be fake. Very clearly these miracles go totally against common sense and against all recorded experiments at least few hundred years back.
Don’t you think that believing in these miracles makes us catholics very foolish in other people’s eyes?
How do we explain these miracles? If they really happened, does it mean that all existing theories in today’s physics are only valid temporarily (that they are only valid until God decides so?) I mean, if somebody demonstrated an experiment like changing water to wine in few hours I think he’d receive the Nobel prize…
I see you have your list of " talking points. " My Bible has this as 4 Kings 2:23-24. This was answered in CA in 2009 :so is this a lie, or is it god’s will:
2 Kings 2:22-24
*And the waters were healed unto this day, according to the word of Eliseus, which he spoke.
And he went up from thence to Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, little boys came out of the city and mocked him, saying: Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
And looking back, he saw them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord: and there came forth two bears out of the forest, and tore of them two and forty boys.*
massacred 42 boys for teasing a so called “prophet”!
obviously a lie.
What do you classify as a “real miracle”? You are looking for explanations for things where there are no explanations, thus why they are called miracles. Saints are canonized by the Pope after they have had a minimum of two, validated miracles attributed to them. In the modern day, this investigation is intense. Scientists and doctors and real data is used to try and essentially attribute a cure for a disease to something other than a “miracle.” Only when it is determined that there is no explainable cause for something will the Church validate a miracle.if they really happened there would ba a dramatic reduction in the number of atheists and agnostics. there would also be a huge migration of converts from other religions into the one that was able to produce the miracle.
the important question is: why arent there any real miracles around?
Absolutely not. Miracles by definition do not have natural explanations.In the Bible we read about many miracles.
For example: Sun stopping its movement, water starting to pour from a rock, Turning water into wine, Jesus walking on water, Peter walking on water, resurrection of Lazarus …
The proof that these miracles happened is only through oral and written tradition. I have no photographs or videos of Peter walking on water. Even if I had the videos these could be fake. Very clearly these miracles go totally against common sense and against all recorded experiments at least few hundred years back.
Don’t you think that believing in these miracles makes us catholics very foolish in other people’s eyes?
How do we explain these miracles? If they really happened, does it mean that all existing theories in today’s physics are only valid temporarily (that they are only valid until God decides so?) I mean, if somebody demonstrated an experiment like changing water to wine in few hours I think he’d receive the Nobel prize…
real miracles? those of biblical proportions- things everyone could see with their own eyes and recordable.What do you classify as a “real miracle”? You are looking for explanations for things where there are no explanations, thus why they are called miracles. Saints are canonized by the Pope after they have had a minimum of two, validated miracles attributed to them. In the modern day, this investigation is intense. Scientists and doctors and real data is used to try and essentially attribute a cure for a disease to something other than a “miracle.” Only when it is determined that there is no explainable cause for something will the Church validate a miracle.
how is that a miracle? the human body works in mysterious ways. regardless of belief some people get seriously sick all of a sudden, and sometimes the seriously sick recovers all of a sudden.I’d encourage you to read stories about various saints canonized in just the last 20-30 years who maybe even lived in the 20th century (i.e. Padre Pio) or had miracles attributed to them in the 21st century. Take the recent canonization of Saint Kateri and the validation of the second miracle:
“On December 19, 2011, Pope Benedict XVI approved the second miracle needed for Blessed Kateri’s canonization.[28] The authorized miracle dates from 2006, when a young boy in Washington state survived a severe flesh-eating bacterium. Doctors had been unable to stop the progress of the disease by surgery and advised his parents he was likely to die. The boy received the sacrament of Anointing of the Sick from a Catholic priest. As the boy is half Lummi Indian, the parents said they prayed through Tekakwitha for divine intercession, as did their family and friends, and an extended network contacted through their son’s classmates.[29] A Catholic nun, Sister Kateri Mitchell visited the boy’s bedside and placed a relic of Tekakwitha, a bone fragment, against his body and prayed together with his parents.[30] The next day, the infection stopped its progression. [31]”
catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=154
As a Catholic, I’m a believer that the Sacred Scripture was written by authors inspired by the Holy Spirit. I have Faith and belief in all that was written – including those older miracles – just because there weren’t sophisticated ways of recording, proving, and validating these things in ancient history does not mean they didn’t exist. After all, we have ways today of validating miracles, and people will still claim they don’t exist.
I have a feeling you will not want to believe it, but here it is: clairval.com/lettres/en/2006/12/08/2061206.htm.real miracles? those of biblical proportions- things everyone could see with their own eyes and recordable.
saints? scientists & doctors? riiiiiiiiight!
how is that a miracle? the human body works in mysterious ways. regardless of belief some people get seriously sick all of a sudden, and sometimes the seriously sick recovers all of a sudden.
a true miracle would be if someone suddenly grows a new limb!![]()
its from a biased source. a 400 year old story. how would i know it really happened?I have a feeling you will not want to believe it, but here it is: clairval.com/lettres/en/2006/12/08/2061206.htm.
So, the fact that it fully documented cuts no ice with you? You asked for an example and you’ve been given it. That you won’t accept it is entirely up to you. We’re not here to convince you, but to provide evidence. What you do with it is your own affair.its from a biased source. a 400 year old story. how would i know it really happened?
how come the best of miracle stories can only come from legends. there are now 5 billion people. and not one miracle.
Miracles happen all the time. Many are not reported, many are not investigated.its from a biased source. a 400 year old story. how would i know it really happened?
how come the best of miracle stories can only come from legends. there are now 5 billion people. and not one miracle.
my friend, cameras are all around. even in the 3rd world. and people will post anything and everything in youtube. and the likes of cnn scours it for anything newsworthy.Miracles happen all the time. Many are not reported, many are not investigated.
i’m sorry but its documented by one of little credibility.So, the fact that it fully documented cuts no ice with you? You asked for an example and you’ve been given it. That you won’t accept it is entirely up to you. We’re not here to convince you, but to provide evidence. What you do with it is your own affair.![]()
What proof do you have beside oral and written tradition for any ancient event or person? Babylon? Persia? Rome? Sparta? Socrates? Nero?The proof that these miracles happened is only through oral and written tradition.
Google is your friend. Search on recent Vatican approved miracles.my friend, cameras are all around. even in the 3rd world. and people will post anything and everything in youtube. and the likes of cnn scours it for anything newsworthy.
You probably believe in the miracle story of biological evolution, despite credible third party scientific evidence to the contrary. Correct your own religion first before you critique ours, thanks.Would you believe miracle stories by muslims just because its ‘documented’ by their religion? of course not! you will demand for a credible NEUTRAL third party confirmation!
FYI, the vatican believes in evolution. so whats your problem with it?You probably believe in the miracle story of biological evolution, despite credible third party scientific evidence to the contrary. Correct your own religion first before you critique ours, thanks.