Miserable with NFP!

  • Thread starter Thread starter gurneyhalleck1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
True… but you mentioned not being affected by a lack of intimacy…
Also, those that are affected may be more inclined to be intimate during menstruation (for some it’s not a problem) in order to have more intimate time.
So, it’s not a matter of health that keeps you from intimacy… just a personal preference to avoid during menstruation.
If you are truly trying to avoid, you have to be careful during your period, because it is very difficult to assess fertility during this time if it is anything more than spotting. I personally know of people that have gotten pregnany during their period even though it may be low risk. For those that have a problem with intimacy during menstruation, it is more difficult. It’s kind of nice to be able to enjoy the intimacy, otherwise…what’s the point?🤷

Plus, I’m not really affected by lack of intimacy, because I really haven’t used NFP to avoid at this point in time. I have either been pregnant or breastfeeding for the last 9-10 years.😉
 
I’m not sure, or maybe missed exactly what searching06’s problem is regarding NFP. But A lot of couples have a harder time with NFP than abstaining for 7 days per cycle. If “7 days” is your experience, then I’m happy for you. But I think many people have a much harder time relying on their observations, or have inconsistent cycles.
How I wish “7 days” was my experience. 😦 The message I meant to convey is that some people give up on NFP when they run in to difficulty because they lack access to practical support. I have a tough time using it myself, but I am actively seeking practical information and trying new things to facilitate my own NFP use.
 
I agree with this to some extent, but you aren’t really comparing apples to apples when comparing abstinence with a single person to abstinence with married persons. It’s a whole different thing. You are living with the person that you have become one with on a daily basis when you are married. The person you love (hopefully) with all your heart, which sometimes makes abstinence a little more difficult. It’s not just about sex or sexual pleasure, it’s about a consumation, reuniting, bonding. Wanting to be as close as possible to this person. It’s a “marital act”. Can’t have a marital act without a marriage. I don’t know the person who posted the comment about being single, but I do know being single has it’s own crosses.
It was me. Well, if abstaining from sex because you are single is easier than abstaining from sex while you’re married, why do 99% of orthodox Catholics choose to get married fully realizing they will practice NFP? Obviously they believe that will be easier than remaining single. I rest my case.
 
(this is luvmykidz posting, not luvmykids)

I’m sorry to “butt” in…not even sure what has been said with the exception of the last 3-4 posts, but I struggle a lot with nfp and family planning. I pray evreyday about what to do, and after having our 3rd child, will resort back to nfp and follow the churches teachings.

I just have to correct you “michael saint” that the catholic church has recognized and I know it’s published somewhere that a vast majority of catholics practice the bcp or using condoms. I want to say about 25%, but I could be wrong. A lot of catholics “know” to use nfp when they marry, but knowing is different than practicing it.

Okay, I’m done.
 
Michael Saint did qualify this - he said “orthodox catholics”. That is the Catholics who get up every day, and do their level best to follow the teachings of the Church in everything they say and do.

The dictionary says orthodox means:
1.of, pertaining to, or conforming to the approved form of any doctrine, philosophy, ideology, etc.

Sadly, we have many heterodox catholics out there, that is those who check the “catholic” box on questionarres and never try to learn more.

Again, from the dictionary:

1.not in accordance with established or accepted doctrines or opinions, esp. in theology; unorthodox.
 
Searching 06,

I don’t know if I read this or not. Did you say that you had been married 23 years and have four children. If so why are you so concerned about a possible pregnancy? After I had my son at age 42, I still had periods until age 50 but I never conceived again even though I used nothing.
originally posted by Rob’s wife
  1. The reasons truely are not serious, but the couple is still unwilling to have more for whatever reason given that actually boils down to, 9 times out of ten, they are simply fearful of trusting Him with this. Eventually they will either learn to accept more children gladly, find their need to wait is more serious than they thought and thus easier to wait, or they will gradually decline into the 2nd issue below.
 
Wow. Reading this has been very enlightening.

I am getting married in about six and a half months, and we started our NFP classes last month. I just finished my first cycle of charting and I am already frustrated. My signs are difficult to interpret (I accept that this might be because it is my first month), they don’t seem to logically align and I have an infertile time of 5 days per cycle.

I really have deep sympathy for the people who are struggling with health problems, depression, etc - I hope you can find the proper resources. Searching06, it really sounds like, in some ways, your problems are beyond NFP and NFP may be what is highlighting them. As somebody who has struggled with depression and suicidal impulses in the past, I really hope you can get some kind of counselling and comfort.

Anyway, these are my thoughts so far:
I think NFP needs to be viewed not just as a method or technique but as a philosophy and THAT is what is critical for Catholics to adopt. Thankfully, for the past four years I have been developing this philosophy, when somebody happened to introduce me to TotB. But I can honestly see how terribly difficult all of this would be for somebody who has always viewed sex, marriage and children the secular way, and is trying to apply NFP for that.

I think there are big problems in the way NFP is promoted and supported. After my third class this Saturday, I will have no more access to an NFP instructor, and I feel like it is when I’m married that I’ll really need answers. Luckily I do have a few friends who are instructors or users but others are not so lucky. Also, I do have heard the ‘la la la, NFP Is so great and wonderful’ talk…I think we need to be more upfront that this is going to be a STRUGGLE, and it isn’t going to magically make your marriage better. If anything, it may highlight any other faults in the marriage.

As for abstinence, my fiance and I have discussed that we may not have a ‘normal’ sex life because I have so few infertile days…but we are okay with that, because we are very intimate already without having any kind of sex or ‘arousal’. We have worked very hard on this, the way we view each other. We know that marriage is not a pass for all the sex we want and it’s not just about what makes us happy. Also, we know that eventually this time will pass; within a few years we will be definitely ready for children and can just have them as they come. Ideally we would like to have one within our first year, but we just aren’t sure if we will be able to handle it yet for various reasons.

I do have a question though - what is allowed during the abstinent times? Obviously no genital stimulation or deliberate arousal, or anything leading to orgasm. And I know we could still do anything we do now (ie, snuggling, light kissing, holding hands, talking) But what about other forms of affection are not sexual, but that we don’t practice right now out of prudence, or things like being naked? (I like to sleep in the nude, and it would be nice to do once we get married, whether or not we are going to have sex, just for the nonsexual affectionate feeling of the other person close by) I don’t see that as an issue with us in terms of driving us to lust or needing to have sex.

And yeah, it’s going to be frustrating when we want it but can’t have it, and having children will also be it’s own struggle…but I can see how with a lot of work this WILL help us to holiness.

I’m glad I found this forum though, because it will be nice to have somewhere to go to get help and education on these struggles. I do Sympto-Thermal right now, and that works fairly well for me because I have a very regular schedule (the temperatures really help because I have a LOT of trouble with my mucus signs) but I didn’t know it is so difficult when you are breastfeeding, etc.

I have one other question…the reason I have such a short window of infertile days is because I had a high temp (luteal) phase of 8 days. This is seen as abnormal, and actually an indicator of poor ovulation if it turns out to be a consistent observation for me. Basically it means that my body doesn’t produce enough progesterone to sustain a pregnancy favoring state until implantation. Does this mean that I should never have sex at all? It seems to me that any egg that does get fertilized will die, and therefore, since I KNOW this, I will just be having abortions month after month. I’m not sure what the teaching is when you know you are prone to miscarrying or can’t sustain pregnancy.
 
It was me. Well, if abstaining from sex because you are single is easier than abstaining from sex while you’re married, why do 99% of orthodox Catholics choose to get married fully realizing they will practice NFP? Obviously they believe that will be easier than remaining single. I rest my case.
You are missing my point, and I’m not exactly sure if I can explain it well enough.

Are you saying that you think that these orthodox Catholics are choosing to get married, because they can’t live without sex, or do you think that it might be because they found the person they love, want to have children with, and want to spend the rest of their lives with?

I do not really think that 99% of orthodox Catholics are deciding to get married just because they can’t live without sex.

I do not know the reasons you are single, but I am assuming it is because you currently do not have someone with whom you are feeling called to marry. Therefore, are not currently living with someone on a daily basis, of the opposite sex, that you love with all your heart, and are sleeping with them every night! That is difficult to do when you are trying to abstain.😉
 
Natural family Planning does not cater to the individual, nor does it recognize the different biological constraints put onto individuals. It is an alternative to abstinence. Abstinence also, does not cater to the individual, nor is it good or right for every couple. You are coming across a dilema that all people of faith meet. I’m told it’s “right” but is it actually right for me?

I do not like the mindset of “one rule suits all” and if some-one struggles with that rule, they are not “good with God” by default.

You are the only one that needs to face God one day. The church can only guide you and give you it’s intpretation of the truth.

You alone, can decide what is right.

Bringing children into this world, that we cannot resonsibly take care of is imo a crime. Forcing couples to live without physical intimacy when that is the greatest bond between them and keeps them together through troubles, is imo a crime.

I…as you can tell support contraception. Not the pill however. I support NFP, and when in doubt, use a condom.

I don’t care if some-one tells me that I must “resist” condom usage as though I’m being raped. I know the difference, and the use of the condom is respect for me, and for human life that needs to be created responsibly.

I’m also not catholic(though I do like these forums…hehe).

It’s a tough one. But be responsible. Don’t create human life just because you can. Only create it, because you can care for it in the BEST possible way.
 
Wow. Reading this has been very enlightening.

I am getting married in about six and a half months, and we started our NFP classes last month. I just finished my first cycle of charting and I am already frustrated. My signs are difficult to interpret (I accept that this might be because it is my first month), they don’t seem to logically align and I have an infertile time of 5 days per cycle…
Congratulations on your engagement. What an exciting time this must be for you!

You may benefit from reading Marilyn Shannon’s book Fertility, Cycles & Nutrition. She has some excellent tips for dealing with cycle abnormalities. I’ve extended my own luteal phase (from as little as 9 days some cycles) to 13 days over the last few months by following some of her dietary suggestions.

My signs are also difficult to interpret, even with sympto-thermal NFP, so I sympathize with you. From what I’ve read here at CAF, it seems of all methods, Creighton Model NFP is most concerned with getting to the bottom of ambiguous fertility signs. Their website has a feature that helps you find an instructor in your area. I’m planning to visit a Creighton instructor soon, I hope you’ll consider looking into this method as well.

It honestly seems like Creighton users are never “miserable with NFP”. That’s why I’m looking into it.

You can sleep in as little as you like, as long as it doesn’t compromise your ability to abstain when necessary. You’ll probably know pretty quickly if your fh has a hard time with this.

Catholic teaching against abortion refers to* induced *abortion. The inability to carry a pregnancy is another matter altogether.
 
Natural family Planning does not cater to the individual, nor does it recognize the different biological constraints put onto individuals. It is an alternative to abstinence. Abstinence also, does not cater to the individual, nor is it good or right for every couple. You are coming across a dilema that all people of faith meet. I’m told it’s “right” but is it actually right for me?

I do not like the mindset of “one rule suits all” and if some-one struggles with that rule, they are not “good with God” by default.

You are the only one that needs to face God one day. The church can only guide you and give you it’s intpretation of the truth.

You alone, can decide what is right.

**And then Eve ate the apple.

(she decided what was right for her, wanted to be “her own god”.)

There IS moral truth. Just as there is mathematical truth. **

Bringing children into this world, that we cannot resonsibly take care of is imo a crime. Forcing couples to live without physical intimacy when that is the greatest bond between them and keeps them together through troubles, is imo a crime.

**I guess my birth mother committed a crime then when she had me. Luckily for me she decided that it was better to follow God’s will and be open to life. I know plenty of people who were born in less than perfect circumstances. NOT A CRIME!

If physical intimacy is the greatest bond between a couple, then God help them. It should NOT be the greatest bond. The greatest bond is CHRIST. No one is “forcing” anyone to ive without intimacy, they are just waiting for a little bit.**

I…as you can tell support contraception. Not the pill however. I support NFP, and when in doubt, use a condom.

Using a condom is NOT NFP

I don’t care if some-one tells me that I must “resist” condom usage as though I’m being raped. I know the difference, and the use of the condom is respect for me, and for human life that needs to be created responsibly.

Using a condom is NOT respectful of you. It is USING you. I suggest reading “Good news about sex and marriage” to change your thinking on this matter.
I’m also not catholic(though I do like these forums…hehe).

It’s a tough one. But be responsible. Don’t create human life just because you can. Only create it, because you can care for it in the BEST possible way.

Sick. Just sick. SO you think that God has nothing to do with the creating of the human life? NFP is cooperating with God’s plan, not working against it. He will not give someone more than they can handle. Being responsible means evaluting every month whether there is a need to NOT have a child, not evaluating whether TO have a child.
 
Thanks for the suggestion! I think my instructor also reccomended that book…I love to read so I’ll have to look into it 🙂 Some people in the infertility thread suggested B supplements, and if that doesn’t work I can go to my OB/GYN for hormone supplements.

I like Sympto-Thermal right now because I do have a very normal sleep pattern and I like the temp measurement…I think some of my frustration might be due to my newness in evaulating the mucus signs, and that this month my peak day came a lot later than I thought it would…but I knew it when I saw it. I’m glad to know there are other methods to look into though, and that I’ve found a place where I can get info and support 🙂 I think some of the people I know in Church are Creighton instructors, actually.
 
Are you saying that you think that these orthodox Catholics are choosing to get married, because they can’t live without sex, or do you think that it might be because they found the person they love, want to have children with, and want to spend the rest of their lives with?QUOTE]

Well, let me put it this way: what do single people think is easier - being single or being married? Most people do not get married thinking life is going to get tougher; most people get married thinking it will solve the loneliness of their single state - and this is really what most people consider a burden heavier than anyone who is married.

Yes, in HINDSIGHT people realize how silly this is. But not at the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top