L
losh14
Guest
In my company’s break room, there’s a bulletin board used by various organizations. The Multicultural committee wanted to put up information about holidays at this time of year - including Chanukah, Kwanzaa and Christmas. The below was written about Christmas:
"Christmas supposedly marks the birth of Jesus Christ on December 25. But there is no mention of December 25 in the Bible and most historians actually believe he was born in the spring. December 25 was probably chosen because it coincided with the ancient pagan festival Saturnalia, which celebrated the agricultural god Saturn with partying, gambling, and gift-giving…
The well-known reason we give presents at Christmas is to symbolize the gifts given to baby Jesus by the three wise men. But it may also stem from the Saturnalia tradition that required revelers to offer up rituals to the gods."
I read this half an hour ago and I’ve been chewing over what to say. I finally just asked for a meeting with the head of the committee and said simply “I feel like I’ve been misrepresented and I wanted to clarify that misrepresentation.” There’s no reason to throw shade like that on a religion that has a number of adherents using that break room. I’d like to tell her that it would have been sufficient to note “Christians observe the birth of Jesus Christ on December 25th in many parts of the world, although some observe it on January 7th”.
I’m honestly offended by the link back to Saturnalia. Historians can pundit all they want, it has nothing to do with modern celebrations of Christmas, secular or religious. The tone of the piece feels dismissive, and there was no doubt cast upon the origins of Kwanzaa or that the Maccabees held out for 8 nights in the temple.
What would you say to the person who organized this board, and keep in mind they’re a director-level answering to a vice president.
"Christmas supposedly marks the birth of Jesus Christ on December 25. But there is no mention of December 25 in the Bible and most historians actually believe he was born in the spring. December 25 was probably chosen because it coincided with the ancient pagan festival Saturnalia, which celebrated the agricultural god Saturn with partying, gambling, and gift-giving…
The well-known reason we give presents at Christmas is to symbolize the gifts given to baby Jesus by the three wise men. But it may also stem from the Saturnalia tradition that required revelers to offer up rituals to the gods."
I read this half an hour ago and I’ve been chewing over what to say. I finally just asked for a meeting with the head of the committee and said simply “I feel like I’ve been misrepresented and I wanted to clarify that misrepresentation.” There’s no reason to throw shade like that on a religion that has a number of adherents using that break room. I’d like to tell her that it would have been sufficient to note “Christians observe the birth of Jesus Christ on December 25th in many parts of the world, although some observe it on January 7th”.
I’m honestly offended by the link back to Saturnalia. Historians can pundit all they want, it has nothing to do with modern celebrations of Christmas, secular or religious. The tone of the piece feels dismissive, and there was no doubt cast upon the origins of Kwanzaa or that the Maccabees held out for 8 nights in the temple.
What would you say to the person who organized this board, and keep in mind they’re a director-level answering to a vice president.