Missing the Nuns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dj87
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if there is correlation between the loss of sisters with a ruler and the amount of modern catholics that cringe at the thought of having to kneel during a rosary. I greatly miss those great ladies who knew that if you spare the rod you spoil the child.
 
Just few clarifications.

First, the woman religious is not the counterpart of the priest. There is no counterpart to priests. Priests belong to the second degree of Holy Orders, the degrees being: deacon, presbyter and bishop.

Women religious do not fall under Holy Orders. I believe the confusion may come from the word “order”. Religious orders and Holy Orders are not the same thing.

Holy Orders is a sacrament with three degrees, as I said above.

Religious Orders are institutes of men or women who have been called to consecrate their lives to Christ by living the Gospel in communion with each other. They surrender their personal will and wishes by a vow of obedience. They surrender their right to own property by a vow of poverty. They surrender the right to be spouses and they take on the responsibility for their brothers or sisters in their community, just as a spouse and parent does within the family. This is the vow of chastity.

Priests do not make vows. It is easy to become confused, because in the Roman Church every deacon who is single must make a promise to remain celibate. This is not the same as the vow of chastity. He promises not to marry. He does not take on the obligations of community life a woman religious does.

He also promises to obey his bishop, but only in pastoral matters. The bishop has no authority over his life, private activities, place of dwelling, finances, relationship, prayer life, posessions or anything else that is outside of his assigned duties. Whereas, the woman religious submits to her superiors in all areas of life and can only decide for heself those areas of life that the constitutions of her community allow her to define for herself.

As you can see, there is a major difference between the call to consecrated life, which is what a woman religious lives, and the call to Holy Orders, which is what deacons, priests and bishops live.

That being said, there are many consecrated religious men whom God calls to be deacons, priests or bishops, but this is not common. Only about 30% of all ordained men are consecrated religious. Most ordained men are secular men, unlike the sisters who are not secular in any way.

Moving right along, there are not thousands of women entering religious life. Let’s put things into perspective. There have been waves in Church history. During those waves, hundreds of thousands of men and women enter religious life. Then the wave dies out and another hundred to several hundred years pass with small numbers entering.

Why these waves? There are many anthopological and social theories. But none of them can be proven. Let’s just say that it’s part of God’s plan.

What we have today is very normal. The number of women (or men) entering the consecrated life of the religious is very small. That’s the way is should be. The consecrated life is for a select few. If it were for everyone, then we would have a serious problem with generativity. Just as most women are not called to remain virgins, most are not called to be sisters or nuns. That would be catastrophic to the human race.

We have to learn to think in positive terms. We tend to believe that there is a decline in the number of vocations. There is such a decline, but it’s not necessarilly a bad thing. You want the best, not the most.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
There is a huge shortage in my neck of the woods!! I can’t tell you the last time I saw a nun here in West Michigan. Every report I read says they have declined:

In 1965, 104,000 sisters were teaching, while in 2002 there were only 8,200 teachers (79% decline).

BBC reported on February 5, 2008

Priests. While the number of priests in the United States more than doubled to 58,000, between 1930 and 1965, since then that number has fallen to 45,000. By 2020, there will be only 31,000 priests left, and more than half of these priests will be over 70.

Ordinations. In 1965, 1,575 new priests were ordained in the United States. In 2002, the number was 450. In 1965, only 1 percent of U.S. parishes were without a priest. Today, there are 3,000 priestless parishes, 15 percent of all U.S. parishes.

Seminarians. Between 1965 and 2002, the number of seminarians dropped from 49,000 to 4,700, a decline of over 90 percent. Two-thirds of the 600 seminaries that were operating in 1965 have now closed.

Sisters. In 1965, there were 180,000 Catholic nuns. By 2002, that had fallen to 75,000 and the average age of a Catholic nun is today 68. In 1965, there were 104,000 teaching nuns. Today, there are 8,200, a decline of 94 percent since the end of Vatican II.

Religious Orders. For religious orders in America, the end is in sight. In 1965, 3,559 young men were studying to become Jesuit priests. In 2000, the figure was 389. With the Christian Brothers, the situation is even more dire. Their number has shrunk by two-thirds, with the number of seminarians falling 99 percent. In 1965, there were 912 seminarians in the Christian Brothers. In 2000, there were only seven. The number of young men studying to become Franciscan and Redemptorist priests fell from 3,379 in 1965 to 84 in 2000.

Catholic schools. Almost half of all Catholic high schools in the United States have closed since 1965. The student population has fallen from 700,000 to 386,000. Parochial schools suffered an even greater decline. Some 4,000 have disappeared, and the number of pupils attending has fallen below 2 million – from 4.5 million.

From where I’m standing there has been a decline in Sisters but hopefully I am mistaken.🙂
 
There is a huge shortage in my neck of the woods!! I can’t tell you the last time I saw a nun here in West Michigan. Every report I read says they have declined:

In 1965, 104,000 sisters were teaching, while in 2002 there were only 8,200 teachers (79% decline).

BBC reported on February 5, 2008

Priests. While the number of priests in the United States more than doubled to 58,000, between 1930 and 1965, since then that number has fallen to 45,000. By 2020, there will be only 31,000 priests left, and more than half of these priests will be over 70.

Ordinations. In 1965, 1,575 new priests were ordained in the United States. In 2002, the number was 450. In 1965, only 1 percent of U.S. parishes were without a priest. Today, there are 3,000 priestless parishes, 15 percent of all U.S. parishes.

Seminarians. Between 1965 and 2002, the number of seminarians dropped from 49,000 to 4,700, a decline of over 90 percent. Two-thirds of the 600 seminaries that were operating in 1965 have now closed.

Sisters. In 1965, there were 180,000 Catholic nuns. By 2002, that had fallen to 75,000 and the average age of a Catholic nun is today 68. In 1965, there were 104,000 teaching nuns. Today, there are 8,200, a decline of 94 percent since the end of Vatican II.

Religious Orders. For religious orders in America, the end is in sight. In 1965, 3,559 young men were studying to become Jesuit priests. In 2000, the figure was 389. With the Christian Brothers, the situation is even more dire. Their number has shrunk by two-thirds, with the number of seminarians falling 99 percent. In 1965, there were 912 seminarians in the Christian Brothers. In 2000, there were only seven. **The number of young men studying to become Franciscan and Redemptorist priests fell from 3,379 in 1965 to 84 in 2000. **

Catholic schools. Almost half of all Catholic high schools in the United States have closed since 1965. The student population has fallen from 700,000 to 386,000. Parochial schools suffered an even greater decline. Some 4,000 have disappeared, and the number of pupils attending has fallen below 2 million – from 4.5 million.

From where I’m standing there has been a decline in Sisters but hopefully I am mistaken.🙂
The bold is mine.

You must factor into this that the orders that belong to the Franciscan family have a surplus of priests. As a result, our General Chapters decided not to ordain as many men as we did in the past.

We do not need the large numbers of priests that we had. Our work and life is to be centered around obedience, prayer, brotherhood with each other, and living among the poor. When we had the large numbers of priests we needed to do something with them. They were bored.

We took on parishes. This was a good thing . . . at the time. Most of the parishes served immigrants and poor people. This is no longer the case in the USA. Only about 1/4 of the parishes in the USA serve immigrants and the poor. Most parishes in the USA serve the middle class and up.

During the 1980s the Capuchin Franciscans were the first to realize that we were serving the middle class, to our horror and surprise. A group of very courageous Capuchin Franciscan Friars set out to renew the Franciscan Order by leaving the middle classes and returning to live and work among the poor. Other Franciscan communities quickly followed.

This resulted in new constitutions being written that state that the friars must leave a neighborhood the minute that the middle class moves in. Also, the new constitutions state the the friars may not take on new parishes, unless they are for the benefit of the poor and the immigrant. Many parishes were given back to the bishops. Some had to be closed, because the bishops did not have enough diocesan priests to staff them and no other religious orders would take them. Other parishes were merged and many were handed over to parish administrators including deacons, brothers or sisters.

Because we serve in areas where there is less need for priests, there is also less need to ordain as many of our friars. The number of men entering the Franciscan family has not dropped as much as it appears, only the number of men to whom permission is given for ordination. The number of Franciscan men around the world dropped between 1960 to 2000 by about 10%. The number of ordained Franciscan men was deliberately dropped by about 60%.

Where we had 100 men becoming Franciscans, we now have 90. Where we had 100 men being ordained we have only 40.

This is why you will notice that communities like the Franciscans of the Renewal are sending more men to serve in South America, Africa, and even some cities in Europe, rather than sending them to many places in the USA. It’s because we have a large middle class that Franciscans are not supposed to serve.

This sounds horrible to say that we do not serve the middle class. It’s not meant to sound that way. It’s simply that this particular group of people are to be served by diocesan priests and religious of other communities that were founded for this purpose.

We still serve many middle class people in very special situations such as: pregnancy centers, hospitals, nursing homes, retreat centers, prisons, and other places where people are vulnerable, regardless of their economic class.

The truth is that in the USA alone there are now 10 renewed branches of the Franciscan family of men. Ten new branches of an order is a large number for one country alone. But if you belong to the middle class, it is likely that you will not encounter the friars in your area.

I hope this clarifies the meaning of those numbers.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
yes, I agree all the numbers in that report were all talking only about the francesican order - there is no decline in the number of people taking orders there is an increase. That report was just talking about one order!
 
We have to be very careful how numbers are used. Most of us on CAF were probably born after WW II. We grew up in the Catholic Church of the second half of the 20th century and in the USA. The numbers of priests and religious after WW II was unprecedented. If we want to get a realistic view of the state of religious and clerical vocations we must look at the numbers prior to 1900. When we do so, we find that the numbers of men entering diocesan seminaries and religious orders and the number of women entering religious orders and religious congregations is actually about the same today as it was prior to WW II.

Those of us who were born between 1940 and 1960 were used to seeing large numbers of people entering the seminary or the religious life and we grew up believing that this was normal. But it was not. this was an explosion that happens every couple of generations.

The Church certainly prays for more vocations to the priesthood, but she must also pray for more male vocations to the religious life. We need more monks, friars and clerks regular to live the consecrated life.

I worry that the lay faithful may not appreciate the value of a religious life for men where the men do not do parish work, but live among the poor, spend time alone or together in community prayer and community activities. This causes me worry because it makes me wonder if our faithful Catholic have become product oriented, meaning focused on the productivity of the religious instead of the quality of the spiritual life of the religious, which is really how religious men serve the Church.

It is also disconcerting that most Catholics think that religious should be priests. Most priests are not religious and most religious orders were not founded as orders of priests. We serve the Church by earning graces for the world. The more faithful that we are to what God called us to be, the more graces the Church receives.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
We have to be very careful how numbers are used. Most of us on CAF were probably born after WW II. We grew up in the Catholic Church of the second half of the 20th century and in the USA. The numbers of priests and religious after WW II was unprecedented. If we want to get a realistic view of the state of religious and clerical vocations we must look at the numbers prior to 1900. When we do so, we find that the numbers of men entering diocesan seminaries and religious orders and the number of women entering religious orders and religious congregations is actually about the same today as it was prior to WW II.

Those of us who were born between 1940 and 1960 were used to seeing large numbers of people entering the seminary or the religious life and we grew up believing that this was normal. But it was not. this was an explosion that happens every couple of generations.

The Church certainly prays for more vocations to the priesthood, but she must also pray for more male vocations to the religious life. We need more monks, friars and clerks regular to live the consecrated life.

I worry that the lay faithful may not appreciate the value of a religious life for men where the men do not do parish work, but live among the poor, spend time alone or together in community prayer and community activities. This causes me worry because it makes me wonder if our faithful Catholic have become product oriented, meaning focused on the productivity of the religious instead of the quality of the spiritual life of the religious, which is really how religious men serve the Church.

It is also disconcerting that most Catholics think that religious should be priests. Most priests are not religious and most religious orders were not founded as orders of priests. We serve the Church by earning graces for the world. The more faithful that we are to what God called us to be, the more graces the Church receives.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
I knew of the religious orders for women. And mens Holy orders. Only by reading more about religion and experiencing visitations from Sisters, and priests in the hospital did I learn about the difference. That was at the age of 5. The fact that my mother was raised Catholic, went to Catholic grade school and high school and graduted from a Catholic highschool, [that she was discerning being a nun cloistered, and consecrated to our Lord, but during discernment, missed her family too much, and was sent home]
She taught me by showing me her high school yearbook the teachers were given the title ‘sister’’ and priests ‘‘father’’ monks ‘‘hermit’’ , and friars ‘‘brother’’.
It is good to point these things out to people, but remember, those who pray for the religious may not understand the terminology, but they most likely have the intention of praying for an increase of all of the faithful where they are needed, and sustainability where there are enough religious members. The point to be made by those who were originally posting was that they are hoping for the church to sustain itself even through the storms. Human frailty and doubt creep in and make people wonder about Christ’s promise that He will always be with us now and until the end of time. The church IS in good shape, there are enough ordainments, the religious will be continually called by God, and the CC will endure. And the gates of Hell will not prevail against Her… Did I say too much or should I just go sit in a corner with the ‘‘dunce’’ cap on?
:o God Bless you all
 
First . . . nuns at your parish school.

Nuns have never been allowed in parishes or anywhere outside of monasteries. They are enclosed. The women religiuos who teach school and do other external apostolic work are not nuns. To be a nun you must belong to a religious order and you must be in solemn vows. Only women who are enclosed can be members of religious orders and make solemn vows.

Women who teach, nurse, and do other corporal works of mercy, even Mother Teresa, are not nuns, because they do not belong to an order or make solemn vows. They are consecrated women religious called sisters. They belong to congregations and make simple vows. Gotcha! 😃

Second . . . praying for religious vocations.

Most lay people do not know the difference between sacrament of Holy Orders and the consecrated life. Therefore when they pray for religious vocations they usually think of women religious.

The consecrated life was actually founded for brothers, not priests or women religious. St. Scholastica is the first known woman religious. Notice that I said known.

The oldest consecrated religious are the Carmelite men. They were a community of brothers, not priests. To this day, consecrated religious are brothers, sisters and nuns. When the Church asks us to pray for religious vocations she’s asking us to pray for more brothers, sisters and nuns. Priests may become brothers by virtue of the fact that they may join a religious order. Many orders and congregations also allow their brothers to be ordained. However, ordination is not a requirement for the religious life, because the Sacrament of Holy Orders is accidental not essential to the religious life. It is a separate calling.

How many lay people pray for more male religious who are not priests but instead are theologians, doctors, teachers, spiritual directors, parish administrators, hospital chaplains, seminary professors, cooks, gardners, mechanics, soup kitchen and shelter administrators, hermits, monks, social workers, child care givers, work pregnancy centers, do street ministry, and more?

If you’re only praying for women religious and for male religious who are priests, but not for other male religious, then you are not praying for religious vocations. You’re praying for a very specific group of people, not for the religious life, Gotcha! 😛

I have a very good friend who is a diocesan priest and I asked him if he prayed for religoius vocations. He said “Of course.” When I asked him to explain, every male religious that he mentioned was an ordained religious. He completely forget that religious men are not always priests. Just thought I throw something in there before you got down your knees to pray for more SISTERS, also pray for more male religious. Thanks.

My community is one of those that has only 20% ordained men. We don’t run parishes or celebrate sacraments outside of our houses. Therefore, we do not need the large numbers of ordained brothers. But we do need many brothers to care for the sick, elderly and unborn. Please pray for more vocation for us too.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
I’ve learned so much from these posts, thanks for taking the effort!
 
JREDUCATION

Are not priests sorely needed for absolution and consecrating the eucharist. And for
serving parishes in these needs. I have a holy priest who is my confessor (which
cannot be accomplished by a religious) and spiritual director. There is a vast difference
between priests and male religious.
Reindeer
 
I would never dare question the motives of the people who pray for vocations. I do have serious questions about the desires of our faithful. Since the explosion of the Internet we get to hear more from the average Catholic than we did before. Many of us who are religious men have serious concerns about what we see and hear from the average Catholic concerning the religious life of men.

That’s the point that is disconcerting, that the average Catholic does not know what a male religious is and believe that we are all priests. In my own religious house we have no priests. In my religious community only 10% of our men are priests and none are deacons. We do not allow permanent deacons. We have one bishop.

When we (male religious) look at these threads and listen to you guys we become concerned that you may not know that we are here and what we are. We are men who are consecrated to living the Gospel in obedience, poverty and chastity. We follow the rule of our founders and their vision for holiness. Our lives center around prayer and brotherhood with each other. We serve you, the laity, by surrendering our lives to Christ and praying for you while you’re at work, asleep, taking care of your children and doing what you need to do to keep our world running smoothly and hopefully running according to God’s plan.

Some of us go out and do specific ministries among you. Many of us never get to meet you. We reamin behind closed doors quietly praying and working alongside each other. Whether we teach in your schools, preach in your churches or retreat houses, feed the hungry in your cities, provide for the unborn, the sick and the dying or we’re rocket scientists, the fact remains that our lives are shared with you through the mystery of prayer, faith and sacraments.

Many of us never celebrate mass, hear confessions, baptize, burry the dead or visit a parish. Many of us never get to meet you, because most of you are probably middle class and most of us do not work among the middle class. It’s contrary to the vision of our founders. But we’re your brothers who do penance for you, in case you forget to do it for yourselves. We bring you with us to chapel every day when we gather to pray the Liturgy of the Hours. When we visit the poor we bring to them your message of love and your desire for their well-being, because we do not go in our name, but in the name of the Church to which you belong along with us.

What we notice is that we are very aware of your presence in the world, but you don’t seem to know that we’re here. It is often sad to realize that you forget to pray for us and forget to ask God to send us more brothers to live this life of total dedication to the Gospel for the common good of all men and women.

I know that male religious are a mystery to most of you. Many of you know what a deacon, priest, bishop and sister is. But a male religious is not someone that you frequently meet. There are a few male religious that do serve in your parishes. These are often those male religous who are ordained and take on parishes to help the bishops.

But we’d like you, the laity to know, that those of our brothers who are ordained are not representative of our life. They are a small number of us. There are many of us who will never set foot in your parishes, because we’re doing other things in other parts of the world and in other Church ministries. The most important ministry in which we engage is the ministry of prayer and contemplation.

We hope that when you pray for vocations to the religious life, don’t just pray for more religoius to serve you in your parishes as priests. However, please pray for more male religious whom you will never meet or see in a parish, but who will give their lives on the cross, along with Christ, in faithful obedience to God the Father doing whatever God wishes us to do for his greater glory and for the salvation of all people.

Pray for your sons, that one of them will someday serve God as a religious. He may not be ordained, but he may save many souls in a soup kitchen, a monastery farm, a hospital, or walking the streets alone at night just making friends with the homeless who live under bridges and sleep on sidewalks in many of our cities.

In closing I will share with you that my own family thought that it was ludicrous that I should spend eight years in college and graduate school to get a doctorate in theology in order to sleep on a cot and spend my days folding baby clothes in a pregnancy center. They wanted to know what I was going to do with all that education. When I told them that I was going to work in a baby room at a pregnancy center they almost lost it. They wondered why I was not goin to be ordained and serve in a parish or at a college or university. I explained that my superior was the voice of Christ and only if he called me to Holy Orders would I ever be ordained. They could not believe it. They thought that if you went to the seminary and went to Rome to get a fancy theology degree you should do something better than fold baby clothes. Today, they are surprised at how much I do for the unborn child and how peaceful and happy I am going from house to house delivering pampers with my Doctor of Theology behind my name.

This is not unusual for male religious. But it is a dimension of our life that I hope most of you never experience. I would hate for most of you to experience an unwanted pregnancy, hunger, homelessness, disease, drug addiction, rape, loneliness or abandonement. When you pray for vocations, pray that your sons, brothers and even widowed fathers may be called to serve God by giving up their lives among the poor and in the silence and secracy of a religious house. It’s the best gift that you can give them.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
JR your commentary has certainly opened my eyes greatly and the fact that this thread has had some truly wonderful comments and educated a lot of people is fantastic. I learned more about Monks, friars, brothers, nuns and sisters than I ever knew before and I think it is superb the things you folks do for us.

The only point I was trying to make was that in our community there has been a tremendous decline in the number of you religious folks --the obvious sisters and priests who are in out community. While these numbers may have had a spike since World War Two as you say, in my lifetime, I was born in 1968 the area around our city had fourteen Catholic churches, all of these had schools attached to them, a convent full of Sisters that were the teachers for most every grade in the schools, and they had three to four priests in the rectory. Nowadays these same fourteen parishes have only one priest in the rectory, the convents are empty having been changed to parish offices or day care centers, There are no sisters teaching in the schools and six of the schools have been closed. In this sense I still believe that this form of religious is dwindling and I’m sure that is one of the things my priest is talking about when he asks us to pray for vocations, and the diocese means with its, Few, The Proud, The Called Campaign promoting vocations.

I really do Thank You for educating me more with regard to Religious Vocation and now my prayers will include you folks that do so much for all of us.🙂
 
I think the Catholic faithful are outright afraid. There simply afraid there will not be enough priests in the parishes to consecrate and serve us the Eucharist to serve Mass, to marry us and bury us and hear our confessions. The very thought is becoming terrifying to many.

So it really should come as no surprise that the prayers for vocations are leaning towards the priesthood.

The nuns, sisters and some male religious have also not done themselves well by losing there habits. The habits are the very visual sign to society that they are out there and changing the world. The habit had the impact to make even the most secular person think of God for just a moment. It even helped vocations. You wanted to talk to someone in the habit, because it was so different, so holy and so intriguing to the average person. It made us think and ponder. That mystery is long gone. It’s very rare that the average parishiner comes into contact with a religious and it’s deplorable that when they do, they don’t even know it due to the lack of the habit. It is not all the fault of the laity that they do not know or think of the religious like they used to.

I can only hope that we are in the dip period that Brother JR spoke of and that someday we will once again see an uptick in vocations.
 
I would never dare question the motives of the people who pray for vocations. I do have serious questions about the desires of our faithful. Since the explosion of the Internet we get to hear more from the average Catholic than we did before. Many of us who are religious men have serious concerns about what we see and hear from the average Catholic concerning the religious life of men.

That’s the point that is disconcerting, that the average Catholic does not know what a male religious is and believe that we are all priests. In my own religious house we have no priests. In my religious community only 10% of our men are priests and none are deacons. We do not allow permanent deacons. We have one bishop.

When we (male religious) look at these threads and listen to you guys we become concerned that you may not know that we are here and what we are. We are men who are consecrated to living the Gospel in obedience, poverty and chastity. We follow the rule of our founders and their vision for holiness. Our lives center around prayer and brotherhood with each other. We serve you, the laity, by surrendering our lives to Christ and praying for you while you’re at work, asleep, taking care of your children and doing what you need to do to keep our world running smoothly and hopefully running according to God’s plan.

Some of us go out and do specific ministries among you. Many of us never get to meet you. We reamin behind closed doors quietly praying and working alongside each other. Whether we teach in your schools, preach in your churches or retreat houses, feed the hungry in your cities, provide for the unborn, the sick and the dying or we’re rocket scientists, the fact remains that our lives are shared with you through the mystery of prayer, faith and sacraments.

Many of us never celebrate mass, hear confessions, baptize, burry the dead or visit a parish. Many of us never get to meet you, because most of you are probably middle class and most of us do not work among the middle class. It’s contrary to the vision of our founders. But we’re your brothers who do penance for you, in case you forget to do it for yourselves. We bring you with us to chapel every day when we gather to pray the Liturgy of the Hours. When we visit the poor we bring to them your message of love and your desire for their well-being, because we do not go in our name, but in the name of the Church to which you belong along with us.

What we notice is that we are very aware of your presence in the world, but you don’t seem to know that we’re here. It is often sad to realize that you forget to pray for us and forget to ask God to send us more brothers to live this life of total dedication to the Gospel for the common good of all men and women.

I know that male religious are a mystery to most of you. Many of you know what a deacon, priest, bishop and sister is. But a male religious is not someone that you frequently meet. There are a few male religious that do serve in your parishes. These are often those male religous who are ordained and take on parishes to help the bishops.

But we’d like you, the laity to know, that those of our brothers who are ordained are not representative of our life. They are a small number of us. There are many of us who will never set foot in your parishes, because we’re doing other things in other parts of the world and in other Church ministries. The most important ministry in which we engage is the ministry of prayer and contemplation.

We hope that when you pray for vocations to the religious life, don’t just pray for more religoius to serve you in your parishes as priests. However, please pray for more male religious whom you will never meet or see in a parish, but who will give their lives on the cross, along with Christ, in faithful obedience to God the Father doing whatever God wishes us to do for his greater glory and for the salvation of all people.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
Thank you Br JR, we have a lot to think about. We thank you for your post. I will and do pray that there is an increase in the religious orders of Brothers, nuns, priests, and monks, as well as Clerks regular, I hope we have not upset you. And I apologize if I have upset you. We will pray for these things.
God Bless You Br. JR.
Magdelaine 1173
 
JR your commentary has certainly opened my eyes greatly and the fact that this thread has had some truly wonderful comments and educated a lot of people is fantastic. I learned more about Monks, friars, brothers, nuns and sisters than I ever knew before and I think it is superb the things you folks do for us.

The only point I was trying to make was that in our community there has been a tremendous decline in the number of you religious folks --the obvious sisters and priests who are in out community. While these numbers may have had a spike since World War Two as you say, in my lifetime, I was born in 1968 the area around our city had fourteen Catholic churches, all of these had schools attached to them, a convent full of Sisters that were the teachers for most every grade in the schools, and they had three to four priests in the rectory. Nowadays these same fourteen parishes have only one priest in the rectory, the convents are empty having been changed to parish offices or day care centers, There are no sisters teaching in the schools and six of the schools have been closed. In this sense I still believe that this form of religious is dwindling and I’m sure that is one of the things my priest is talking about when he asks us to pray for vocations, and the diocese means with its, Few, The Proud, The Called Campaign promoting vocations.

I really do Thank You for educating me more with regard to Religious Vocation and now my prayers will include you folks that do so much for all of us.🙂
I believe there are several new phenomenon that took place during the second half of the 20th century. This is the emergence of a middle class. The emergence of the middle class created some new and daunting challenges for the Church, especially in regards to vocations.

The old model of the urban parish with everyone in the same neighborhood evolved… As Catholics continue to spread far and wide over suburbia, there is a need for more parishes. Populations of Catholics are no longer concentrated in the city, but they are all over the place. This need for parishes places a great stress on bishops who have to spread their man power thin. It also places a burden on religious communities who are trying to help the bishops serve the many Catholics all over the place. It’s not an easy challenge to meet.

There is also the daunting novelty of middle class. For religious, the middle class is problematic. With few exceptions, religious generally served the poor. There were orders of preachers and teachers such as the Dominicans and Jesuits who served all the social classes. But most congregations of sisters were founded to serve the poor. The large orders of men, such as the Franciscans, Vincentians, Salesians and others were founded to live and work among the poor. We never lived and served among the wealthy and there was no real middle class prior to WW II. It was very small compared to today.

Many religious communities that served in parishes, be they as priests, brothers or sisters became very disappointed when they found themselves back in the same middle class that they had left behind when they entered. I’m sharing this, because our young men who are entering today ask this. They want a guarrantee that they will not be sent back to the middle class. This is why communities such as the Franciscans of the Renewal are thriving. They live a very traditional Franciscan life among the poor and they can show their candidates that there is no danger of being sent back to the middle classd, because they have legislation that says that they must close any community as soon as the neighborhood begins to prosper and they must leave immediately.

Many of the teaching sisters were founded for the same reason, to teach the poor and the immigrants. When they found themselves in middle class schools, they began to look for other avenues of ministry. This created a great deal of confusion among them and they lost numbers very quickly. Sisters who were dedicated to teaching everyone, did not lose the numbers. But these are very few. One of them is the Dominican Sisters of St. Cecilia. Of course, keeping the habit helped them. They could be among the middle class and be different at the same time.

Women like the Sisters of St. Joseph, who numbered in the thousands, were very upset when Vatican II ordered them to return to their roots. This meant “leave the local Catholic school and go back to running education programs for poor children in the inner city, farms, and missions.” These women had entered after WW II. They had entered a community that was well grounded in the modern American Catholic school. Now they were told by the Church that they were in the wrong place, because their early sisters in France did not do this kind of ministry or live this way. Many left in frustration and others remained and tried to muddle through to find their old way of life. I’m not sure that they have been that successful.

There are many challenges to be met. Let’s pray that the Holy Spirit will guide us and show us how to do this.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I think the Catholic faithful are outright afraid. There simply afraid there will not be enough priests in the parishes to consecrate and serve us the Eucharist to serve Mass, to marry us and bury us and hear our confessions. The very thought is becoming terrifying to many.

So it really should come as no surprise that the prayers for vocations are leaning towards the priesthood.
Fear is a very human thing. I think that most of us understand this. But do not be afraid. God does not abandon his people.
The nuns, sisters and some male religious have also not done themselves well by losing there habits. The habits are the very visual sign to society that they are out there and changing the world. The habit had the impact to make even the most secular person think of God for just a moment. It even helped vocations. You wanted to talk to someone in the habit, because it was so different, so holy and so intriguing to the average person. It made us think and ponder. That mystery is long gone. It’s very rare that the average parishiner comes into contact with a religious and it’s deplorable that when they do, they don’t even know it due to the lack of the habit. It is not all the fault of the laity that they do not know or think of the religious like they used to.
The habit is a very tricky question. It is true that there is a mytique that goes with the habit. It is also true that many founders had no intention of investing their members in habits. In some religious communities that habit was a matter of fact from the beginning. But in others it was imposed on them by bishops or simply by custom. Those communities upon whom the habit was imposed were given permission to put it aside. In Vita Consacrata, Pope John Paul II explicitly tells religious communities that were founded to be habitless, to do so and those that were founded to wear a habit to do that as well.

In some orders the habit is very vague. I know that in our own Franciscan tradition the habit is mentioned once in the Rule of St. Francis. But he does not go into specifics. He says that the brothers shall have two tunics with a hood and a chord. He never defines what this tunic is to look like, color, fabric and so forth. He does not define how and when it’s to be worn. As a result, we have more than 10 different versions of the Franciscan habit. The common element to it is the chord and the hood. You have grey, brown, black, blue and even white Franciscans. You have tunics that go down to the floor and tunics that go down to the hips and are worn with trousers. Then you have everything in between.

For the Franciscan women, Clare never mentioned a habit in her rule. She and her sisters never wore one. It was Pope Gregory IX who insisted that they drop the Franciscan rule and adopt the Benedictine rule. When they did, they adopted the Benedictine habit. Clare spent the rest of her life trying to persuade the pope to allow her and her nuns to go back to the Franciscan rule. Two days before her death the permission came. The habit became a non question, since it is not mentioned in Clare’s rule. Franciscan women have worn everything from a very Benedictine habit as you see Mother Angelica and her sisters wearing to no habit as you see with many Franciscan sisters.
I can only hope that we are in the dip period that Brother JR spoke of and that someday we will once again see an uptick in vocations.
It’s funny that you say this, because most religious communities are hoping that we don’t have another explosion for a very long time. Large communities are very hard to govern. It’s very difficult to live intimate fraternal lives in large communities. They are frat houses, rather than families. In the large communities of men, the priests took over and turned them into clerical institutes where everything revolved around the clerics and their work. All other ministries were suppressed. The community schedule and life was guided by the work of the priests. If Father had to hear confessions at a certain time, you could not have community prayer, recreation or meals. Every man had his own schedule to follow. I don’t think God wants that from religious men. Externally, it gives the impression of meeting a need of the faithful. But in fact, it does not. The greatest need that God’s people have is the need for holiness. It’s hard to cultivate holiness in frat houses. It can be done, but it’s not easy.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I believe there are several new phenomenon that took place during the second half of the 20th century. This is the emergence of a middle class. The emergence of the middle class created some new and daunting challenges for the Church, especially in regards to vocations.

The old model of the urban parish with everyone in the same neighborhood evolved… As Catholics continue to spread far and wide over suburbia, there is a need for more parishes. Populations of Catholics are no longer concentrated in the city, but they are all over the place. This need for parishes places a great stress on bishops who have to spread their man power thin. It also places a burden on religious communities who are trying to help the bishops serve the many Catholics all over the place. It’s not an easy challenge to meet.

There is also the daunting novelty of middle class. For religious, the middle class is problematic. With few exceptions, religious generally served the poor. There were orders of preachers and teachers such as the Dominicans and Jesuits who served all the social classes. But most congregations of sisters were founded to serve the poor. The large orders of men, such as the Franciscans, Vincentians, Salesians and others were founded to live and work among the poor. We never lived and served among the wealthy and there was no real middle class prior to WW II. It was very small compared to today.

There are many challenges to be met. Let’s pray that the Holy Spirit will guide us and show us how to do this.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
Intersting post and quite correct.

I live in Queens NYC, which is part of the Diocese of Brooklyn. At one time, it was made up of mostly western European immigrants such as the Italians, Irish, Germans and the like. The Churches in this city are large baroque style buildings, very beautifully and artfully built in the old European style. They used to be full from front to back and each ethnicity even had it’s own Mass. There were 3 or 4 priests in each parish, sisters teaching in the schools and every Church had a man selling soft NY style pretzels outside for after Mass. (Heck, do I miss that!). We had huge bazaar’s that were neighborhood events and feasts were everywhere along with school dances. The Catholic way of life, and it truly was a way of life, was beautiful and our Church’s and our Parochial schools thrived. Even the Knights of Columbus, of which I am a member, thrived and had huge buildings for there councils and they had nearly unlimited resources for charitable giving.

Today, it’s quite different. Most of these huge Church’s are half empty on any given Sunday and many are struggling and some are closing. Bazaars and feasts are few, dances nearly non-existant and the Knights of Columbus, once so powerful here, hang on by a shoe-string using whatever resources they can muster just to stay open. Those beautiful Church’s that could never be replicated again even if you had an unlimited resources, are closing due to diminishing attendance. The Italian and Irish immigrants that once filled the pews, now in there second and third generation, are long gone for the suburbs. I’m sorry to have to say it, but I think suburbia has ruined America. Families are split up, childhood friends are long gone, parents drive hours to work, grandparents cannot see their grandchildren,our ethnicity and customs of the old country are a distant past, and our Catholic way of life is gone, and for what, a piece of grass in the backyard? And what comes next? Those suburbs that once seemed so appealing and private are now more crowded than the old neighborhood they left. Sorry, I hate it. The neighborhoods that nurtured us and raised us well are now looked at with derision by suburbans. And those big, beautiful Houses of Worship sadly sit half empty.

To me, it’s all very sad.

Sorry for rambling. I’m just nostalgic for the good ol days I guess…😦
 
So, what did St. Clare wear if not a habit? I actually think that I saw her habit in Assisi.
 
Actually I found in the “Form of LIfe of Clare of Assisi,” the papal document of August 9, 1253 from Pope Innocent that the habit is mentioned. This is the official document that gave the Poor Clares the privilege of holy poverty. St. Clare died 2 days later on August 9, 1253. (Not that I at all want to contradict you, Brother JR- just that I, too, have a great love for St. Clare and Poor Clares and Franciscans in general and thus am interested in the right information being “out there.”)

In Chapter II of the document we find: “After her hair has been cut all around and her secular clothes set aside, she may be permitted three tunics and a mantle…Let no one receive the veil during the period of probation…” We also find, “Young girls who are received into the monastery before the age established by law may have their hair cut all around; and, after putting aside their secular clothes, let them be clothed in religious garb, as the abess sees fit. However, when they reach the age required by law, let them, clothed in the same way as the others, make their profession.”

To be fair, St. Clare wrote in some flexibility to her rule: “…let the abbess, with discernment, provide them with clothing according to the diversity of persons, places, seasons, and cold climates, as in necessity she shall deem expedient.”

Further, in language typical of St. Clare, she says in this rule, “Out of love of the most holy and beloved Child wrapped in poor little swaddling clothes and placed in a manger and of His most holy Mother, I admonish, beg, and encourage my sisters always to wear poor garments.” This is not some sterile document written by on outsider, it was written by our beloved St. Clare herself. There were previous “forms of life” but this is the one from St. Clare herself.

At the start of this document Pope Innocent says, “We, therefore, confirm forever for all of you and all who will succeed you in your monastery, and we ratify by the protection of this document this form of life, the manner of holy unity and of the highest poverty that your blessed Father St. Francis gave you for your observance in word and in writing…”

St. Clare, pray for us!

Peace to all!
 
JREDUCATION

Are not priests sorely needed for absolution and consecrating the eucharist. And for
serving parishes in these needs. I have a holy priest who is my confessor (which
cannot be accomplished by a religious) and spiritual director. There is a vast difference
between priests and male religious.
Reindeer
Priests are cetainly needed for parish ministry. There is no doubt about this.

That being said, many male religious are ALSO priests. The reason that you may not see many in parishes is as I have said in other posts, most religious orders ordain only those men that the superior calls for ordination and they are ordained for the ministries of the order. If you happen to be in an area or a popopulation that the order serves, those religious who are ordained will take care of your sacramental needs.

That being said, there is also a great need for religious men. Christ revealed to the Church that he wants these men and where he wants them. The way that the Church views it is this way. The religious life is essential to the life of the Church. It is the spinal column of the Church. While the secular priest or the religious male who is a priest serves the faithful in much needed parish ministry, the Church needs the sacrifice and life of prayer that the religious brings to the table, which a diocesna priest does not, because it’s not his calling.

The Church also needs the service of the religious among the poorest of the poor, the lost souls, the unchurched. Then there is the greatest need and the highest vocation to which some religious men are called, the enclosed monastic life. Without the enclosed monks the our spiritual lives, yours and mine will come tumbling down like a house of cards. These men are the ones who make it possible for us to be faithful, to be contrite, to be charitable, and to remain in communion with the Church. Even though they are few, they are essential and we cannot allow them to disappear. Even if you have all the priests that you need in a parish, without the monastic life, the life of prayer, desperately needed by the Church, will suffer.

We have to strike a balance between sacrament, contemplation and presence among the poor. The Christian life, without a blance, ceases to be the Christian life. I can assure you, the more consecrated religious men you have, the greater your chances of having good holy diocesan priests. The life of prayer and intimacy between these men and Christ are the force behind the outpouring of great graces.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
So, what did St. Clare wear if not a habit? I actually think that I saw her habit in Assisi.
She wore the Benedictine habit. Remember, I said that it was imposed on her until two days before her death when the rule written by her and St. Francis was finally approved and sealed with a Papal Bull so that it can never be touched again. That’s how many Poor Clares came to wear the Benedictine habit, but not all. Others designed their own habits and others have never worn a habit, because it was not in Clare’s rule. Every Poor Clare Monastery is autonomous.

St. Francis did not want the Poor Clares to be subject to any ecclesial authority except the pope. Therefore, they do not have a superior general and general council like the friars and the Secular Franciscans do.

Their situation is a little different from other Franciscan religious. They are invited into a diocese by a bishop. They depend on the bishop for their spiritual needs. It is his job to provide them with a priest to celebrate mass for them and hear their confessions. Outside of that, the community chapter is the highest authority in the house. The chapter makes the rules that are not already in Clare’s rule. The chapter also elects the abbess and her council. The chapter dictates to the abbess how to govern. The chapter consists of all nuns who have already made solemn vows. Nuns in simple vows may attend the chapter and may speak, but may not vote. Novices and postulants may not attend the chapter.

They have a monthly chapter to deal with everyday things and a canonical chatper every three years to make laws and elect the abbess.

Does not help?

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top