Mohamed's name in the Old Testament claim?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PbloPicasso
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
rbrownr said:
What I heard from Muslims is they believe in principle that revelations of God were sent down to the previous prophets but unfortunately their contents were not preserved properly by their followers. Furthermore their messages were limited to their nations-not universal.
…
Click to expand...
And Mohammed used these “not-preserved-properly” documents on which to base Islam. Any idea that uses an erroneous idea to prove itself will necessarily be in error.
 
Alright…If Christ is God, then when he died ( due to whatever reason ), did he die as God or prophet or king ?

Besides when you say ‘Christ is God’ , you mean he is God Almighty the first person of “Trinity”} ?
 
Dave_Noonan said:
Interesting–I’ve never heard this. A question right off the bat–so for this to work, wouldn’t Mohammed have to be spelled مخمد instead of محمد ? Sorry if this has already been addressed in an older post–but I didn’t see that it had.

To my mind, ח equates to خ and ح equates to ה. It doesn’t seem to me that this works.
Click to expand...
what about listenning to rabbis and find out how they pronounce it
youtube.com/watch?v=cur_6aYs_7k&feature=&p=0424D7DAAE31E76A&index=0&playnext=1

if you havn’t time to watch the entire movie then watch from the third minute
 
elwill said:
what about listenning to rabbis and find out how they pronounce it
youtube.com/watch?v=cur_6aYs_7k&feature=&p=0424D7DAAE31E76A&index=0&playnext=1

if you havn’t time to watch the entire movie then watch from the third minute
Click to expand...
Very enlightening and shocking video. Thanks a lot.

There is no doubt that Biblical text is not inspired by God. Otherwise you would not have found any discripency/contradiction or strange thing.

Unknown authors of Biblical books have written or quoted by unknown people of later generations, out of memory/stories told to them by their ancestors. In the process, words of Jesus or about Jesus cannot be preserved properly/accurately thus we find so many contradictions. In this regard Islamic claim is absolutely right.

Now after watching this Video, Islamic claim sounds more accurate because despite all kinds of tampering/interpolations in the un-inspired text of so many Bibles, mention of Islamic prophet name is remarkable.
 
elwill said:
what about listenning to rabbis and find out how they pronounce it
youtube.com/watch?v=cur_6aYs_7k&feature=&p=0424D7DAAE31E76A&index=0&playnext=1

if you havn’t time to watch the entire movie then watch from the third minute
Click to expand...
After watchig the link you gave I even watch part II. Very shocking to me it was.
Then out of curiosity I checked with freetranslation.com/ and enter the Hebrew word “מחמד” in Hebrew and press Translate in Englash ] and result was : Muhammad

WOW !!!
This video is not a propaganda, as the contents are verifiable.

Thanks again for the Videos.
 
My 2 cents for what its worth –

Do you think that Mohammed took the name to himself because he read it in the hebrew bible and liked it? After all, Mohammed came way after the OT.
 
century153 said:
My 2 cents for what its worth –

Do you think that Mohammed took the name to himself because he read it in the hebrew bible and liked it? After all, Mohammed came way after the OT.
Click to expand...
I thought the same first. But historically, the name Muhammed was given to him by his grandfather. Because his father, Abdullah, died almost six months before he was born.
 
century153 said:
My 2 cents for what its worth –

Do you think that Mohammed took the name to himself because he read it in the hebrew bible and liked it? After all, Mohammed came way after the OT.
Click to expand...
According to Mohammed himself, he protested when the angel Gabriel commanded him to read, saying that he couldn’t read.
 
There is only one being that:
  • would deny Jesus’ crucifixion.
  • would want you to believe that he faked Jesus’ crucifixion.
  • would allow Jesus’ mother Mary at the cross in pain thinking it was her son being crucified.
  • would want to lead Jesus’ followers to false conclusions after then saw HIM walking around later after HIS ressurrection.
  • would allow Muslims to think that a false religion based on the understanding that GOD so loved the world that HE sent HIS on SON to die on the cross in payment of our sins.
 
schaick said:
There is only one being that:
  • would deny Jesus’ crucifixion.
  • would want you to believe that he faked Jesus’ crucifixion.
  • would allow Jesus’ mother Mary at the cross in pain thinking it was her son being crucified.
  • would want to lead Jesus’ followers to false conclusions after then saw HIM walking around later after HIS ressurrection.
  • would allow Muslims to think that a false religion based on the understanding that GOD so loved the world that HE sent HIS on SON to die on the cross in payment of our sins.
Click to expand...
Lol.

Because Satan would really want to inspire a religion that stresses God’s almighty power… right.
 
What does the Catholic Church teach about the Quran? Is it from the GOD of the Bible?

Muslims do think they are worshipping GOD but who is this allah?

What does the Catholic Church teach about Mohammad? Is he a prophet?

The folowing is what Islam teaches:
  • allah leads those who he wants astray
  • Jesus was not crucified
  • allah made it appear to everyone that Jesus was crucified
Which leads to:
  • would allow Jesus’ mother Mary at the cross in pain thinking it was her son being crucified.
  • would want to lead Jesus’ followers to false conclusions after then saw HIM walking around later after HIS ressurrection.
  • would allow Muslims to think that a false religion based on the understanding that GOD so loved the world that HE sent HIS on SON to die on the cross in payment of our sins.
 
Actually it is not off topic at all- you are missing the point. This is a completely different angle, everyone has covered the meaning, spelling, etc

Why would Mohammad’s name be in the Old Testament when the Old Testament tells us why we need a Saviour and gives prophecies about who that Saviour is.

Think about what Islam teaches-something completely different then what the Old Testament teaches- there is no way Mohammad would be mentioned exept possibly in a negative way.

The whole Bible leads to the loving Triune GOD and HIM sacrificing HIS SON for all of us.
 
7For there are (N)three that testify:

** 8**the Spirit and the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.

9(O)If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater; for the testimony of God is this, that (P)He has testified concerning His Son.

10The one who believes in the Son of God (Q)has the testimony in himself; the one who does not believe God has (R)made Him a liar, because he has not believed in the testimony that God has given concerning His Son.

11And the testimony is this, that God has given us (S)eternal life, and (T)this life is in His Son.

12(U)He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life. **

This quotation from the 1 John 5 I believe is pointing to the trinity – this is why I believe that Islam is deceptive. I pray that all true Muslims who want to know God (truly know Him) will receive a revelation from the Savior. Seek the Lord and you will find Him.**
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top