Monsignor 'won't run' from Pa. church abuse

  • Thread starter Thread starter SFNyssa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is anyone tracking the court case in Philadelphia that started this Monday morning? It seems to be a landmark case.

google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gEl9oyqZPvTBanuzzPsgUu6uQaoQ?docId=7612cf77739d49a786a2b8a0e76cbbfd
Just read about it on Yahoo and the accusations are disgusting. One priest has already plead guilty to sexual assault of a 10 year old boy. As Christians we know that our faith will tested. Unfortunately, most of us never thought that it would be tested by the very men who have been entrusted with guarding the flock. By the Bible speaks of men who will infiltrate the flock, posing as sheep, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. This kind are among the most evil and dangerous because their actions are being used to try and discredit the Church and shake the faith of its weaker members. Frankly, without sounding uncharitable, they need to be puniushed to the fullest extent of the law.
 
Much of what I read about it is very slanted. It is hard to get the actual details. I found this which offers some information.
 
I clicked on your link and it took me to an old NYTimes article on Kansas City. There is a recent article in the Washington Post about the misdemeanor charge against Bishop Finn of KC being brought before the court on Tuesday. It is also a first - holding a Bishop responsible for child endangerment. But the case in Philadelphia is a different case, and as the Associated Press laid out, it is three men being charged, one already pleading guilty. It brings before the court the inner workings of the diocesan office, which I think is going to set precedence. Any other insights on this?
 
I clicked on your link and it took me to an old NYTimes article on Kansas City.
Ooops, linked the wrong one and now I lost the link. Anyone find any interesting details on what is happening or have a particularly enlightening article?
 
Just read about it on Yahoo and the accusations are disgusting. One priest has already plead guilty to sexual assault of a 10 year old boy. As Christians we know that our faith will tested. Unfortunately, most of us never thought that it would be tested by the very men who have been entrusted with guarding the flock. By the Bible speaks of men who will infiltrate the flock, posing as sheep, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. This kind are among the most evil and dangerous because their actions are being used to try and discredit the Church and shake the faith of its weaker members. Frankly, without sounding uncharitable, they need to be puniushed to the fullest extent of the law.
Yes, I completely agree with you. I grew up in the diocese and personally know people who were abused by priests in the diocese, as well as knew two of the priests in the accused list from the most recent grand jury report. One of them was a teacher at my high school. Another was a pastor of my former parish. So many in the diocese have been feeling pummeled, beaten down and betrayed. When all of this first came out about 10 years ago, I refused to believe it. The Church was the place I went to for spiritual comfort when I dealt with the after affects of sexual molestation (not by a priest) as a little girl. It was difficult for me to accept that there were evil men in the Church who acted just like the pervert who destroyed my childhood innocence. But then I continued to read more, found out how many people I knew personally were directly affected and then knowing good priests who were just as outraged and disgusted, especially with the last archbishop, who was not directly involved, but did not do enough to help the situation. It got to the point within the last year of his tenure that some priests were openly outraged with him. Many people were happy that he went and Archbishop Chaput came in.

I read the grand jury reports, but couldn’t stomach reading all the details regarding the various abuses. To me, if any of those men are truly guilty of these heinous and disgusting crimes, they do deserve to be punished. I just can’t believe that the defrocked Edward Avery will only get between 2 1/2 to 5 years in prison.

I apologise in advance if I sound a bit too emotional. I admit that this is something which hits very close to home to me. I’ve seen too many people in that diocese affected by this either directly or indirectly. In many ways, those involved in these crimes have hurt the faithful more than anyone from the outside. And those priests who are doing God’s will and doing good are very affected by it. People I have talked to have admitted that they sometimes have a difficult time trusting the priest at their parishes, especially when more news come out on it. Good priests are afraid to do things with kids for fear of being accused. Good parents look at these good priests askance asking themselves if the genuine goodness is just a cover for ulterior motives. It has angered and saddened me.

That archdiocese needs prayers big time for their clergy, religious and the laypeople… especially those who have been directly hurt by this abuse. Prayers for Archbishop Chaput that he will have the strength to help heal the huge wound continuously being opened in that diocese.
 
Sarabande, thank you for your posting. Your compassion and integrity came through. I think many of us know children who raped over and over again, and now, as adults, are haunted and scarred. This trial will do two things - it will punish the guilty priests, and it will open the possibility of punishment for crimes of the men who allowed this to happen, and then covered it up. I don’t think the Bishops and their administrators have ever been challenged in the legal system before. And now they are. I don’t know what will happen. Will every Bishop who covered up criminal priests be charged and sent to prison? It is hard to imagine. We will have to see what happens in Philadelphia, and then in Kansas City.
 
Yes, I completely agree with you. I grew up in the diocese and personally know people who were abused by priests in the diocese, as well as knew two of the priests in the accused list from the most recent grand jury report. One of them was a teacher at my high school. Another was a pastor of my former parish. So many in the diocese have been feeling pummeled, beaten down and betrayed. When all of this first came out about 10 years ago, I refused to believe it. The Church was the place I went to for spiritual comfort when I dealt with the after affects of sexual molestation (not by a priest) as a little girl. It was difficult for me to accept that there were evil men in the Church who acted just like the pervert who destroyed my childhood innocence. But then I continued to read more, found out how many people I knew personally were directly affected and then knowing good priests who were just as outraged and disgusted, especially with the last archbishop, who was not directly involved, but did not do enough to help the situation. It got to the point within the last year of his tenure that some priests were openly outraged with him. Many people were happy that he went and Archbishop Chaput came in.

I read the grand jury reports, but couldn’t stomach reading all the details regarding the various abuses. To me, if any of those men are truly guilty of these heinous and disgusting crimes, they do deserve to be punished. I just can’t believe that the defrocked Edward Avery will only get between 2 1/2 to 5 years in prison.

I apologise in advance if I sound a bit too emotional. I admit that this is something which hits very close to home to me. I’ve seen too many people in that diocese affected by this either directly or indirectly. In many ways, those involved in these crimes have hurt the faithful more than anyone from the outside. And those priests who are doing God’s will and doing good are very affected by it. People I have talked to have admitted that they sometimes have a difficult time trusting the priest at their parishes, especially when more news come out on it. Good priests are afraid to do things with kids for fear of being accused. Good parents look at these good priests askance asking themselves if the genuine goodness is just a cover for ulterior motives. It has angered and saddened me.
what about a ‘‘go and sin no more’’ sentence? Every time i go to confession the words of christ just rings in my head he say go and sin no more. I confess all the filtiness to a priest i dont expect him to be infalliable.
Anyone who uses the priesthood as a medium of pepetuating evil act has done something very wrong, they have betrayed the trust on the priesthood, betrayed the church, member of their parish e.t.c. Pedophile is a sin with great gravity, a sin in our society, it is part of that big tree called sin, a human nature that need healing. All i find is punishment for bad priest i cant find anyone talking about healing. Yeah everybody who trangress the civil laws gets a civil sentence but that is not a solution. Why is there nothing like a program where sexual predator, acused priest and ex and convicted priest get phychological help? Or what do you think christ would be more interested in? Condemnation or healing. The punishment for sexually endagering a minor is about 28yr(more or less) and maybe some other punishment from the church, for abuse about 2 to 5yr plus probably dismisal from clerical state what i dont see is a program that tell the abuser and ther guy involved in the cover up the impact of their action and gives them help so they dont remain predators.
Maybe im not making sense but i feel that while the abuser must face civil and…punishment, that is not the solution, it does not address the problem, we need a solution that help them ‘‘sin no more’’ even after dismisal from clerical state and jail terms.
I know a blog called sylvia blog that has a story on the issue, google sylvia blog and the blog comes up(it is dedicated to covering the abuse. there is no guarantee that the reports are not slanted though). Peace.
ubenedictus
 
Ubenedictus, you have a good point about the clergy needing healing, and civil punishment is not enough. From what we have read, the Bishops and Dioceses have tried sending the priests to places (Church facilities) where they could get some kind of treatment, and it never worked. They then brought the priests back into the system and the rapes continued. It became a cycle that hurt more and more people. In today’s Associated Press, it talked about Avery’s history of being sent for help.

<<Avery was admitted to St. John Vianney in Downingtown for nearly a year of sex therapy and mental-health treatment.

Lynn told Avery’s parishioners that their outgoing, energetic pastor was on a “health leave” - but made no mention of the abuse allegation.

St. John Vianney never diagnosed Avery as a pedophile, but said he should not be around adolescents or work as a DJ.

Lynn next recommended that Avery go to a Philadelphia parish with a tough pastor, although that parish had a school attached. Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua instead sent Avery to work as a hospital chaplain, with residency at St. Jerome’s Parish. The northeast Philadelphia parish was home to many of the city’s police and firefighters - and also had an elementary school.

Avery, 69, admitted last week that he sexually assaulted a fifth-grader there in 1999, forcing the altar boy to strip naked after Mass in the church sacristy. Instead of going on trial with Lynn, Avery pleaded guilty to sexual abuse and conspiracy, and will serve 2 1/2 to five years in prison.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/27/2717122/memo-philly-parish-misled-about.html#storylink=cpy>>

As I said previously, the turning point in all this is to get the Dioceses who were complicit in the crimes to be responsible. And with Phila and Kansas City, they are starting to be so.
 
I don’t see anything wrong with programs and psychological help for these seriously demented and perverted people. Proper psychological treatment can’t hurt, as it is very helpful for the victims. But, like you, also believe in severe punishment as they destroyed lives. When they are freed from civil punishment, I would assume that they would be placed on a list. I know where I live, I can go to a list of all sexual predators residing in my town. If not defrocked, then they should always be kept away from any kind of work which will give them access to children. They should have a close eye kept on them afterwards as well because I feel they would be held responsible for the actions of these men if they are priests.

What I think needs to be done even more so, is a complete overhaul in how these situations are handled. As we now see, it was not handled well at all, even through the 1980s to the late 1990s when people knew better, and it has made many very distrustful of those in charge. Whenever this subject comes up amongst my family and friends, there is a belief that the Archdiocese was/is more concerned with protecting their own and reputation rather than protecting the innocent. This is because of how the last three archbishops have handled it. I think if they could see real proof from the Archdiocese that it is truly serious about making things right, the perception will change and trust will grow again in those in charge in the archdiocese.

Another one of the problems is that psychological treatment was provided, at least in that archdiocese, yet they were continuously placed in parishes and situations where they would be an endangerment to children. I get that in the past there probably was a sincere belief that they could possibly “cure” these people with treatment. A wonderful priest I once worked for, admitted as such, but also said that by the 80s and 90s they did know better, yet the problems were ignored, even when past victims or families reached out to the Church to make sure that some of the men did not damage and hurt any more children. It is now believed that these men don’t change. Even if they work hard against their inclination, they are still an endangerment to children. I, for one, would never trust leaving my child or anyone’s child alone with a person who molested, raped or assaulted another child, even if I believed he was repentant. It would be irresponsible and criminal of me. It actually makes me more upset and depressed that it was ignored and covered up. I liken them to being our parents/guardians in charge of taking care of the Church’s flock, Her children. Instead we were all thrown to the wolves. I admit my faith in the Church was shaken as were many others, BUT my faith in God was never shaken. That has always stayed stalwart. It has taken much for me to look at this as humans desecrating the beauty and truth of the Church and not the actual Church, itself, and our God who leads it.

My mind is rambling. Hope I make sense.
 
The Philadelphia trial continues, and more records are entered into evidence. The stories are just horrible. Priests joking about how hard it is to keep raping so many boys. About the rotation system another priest used. About going from tent to tent at summer camp. These were all in the records that were vaulted away by the Archdiocese. It is so very horrible.

news.yahoo.com/trial-priest-joked-abusing-3-boys-week-205857367.html
 
Sarabande, thank you for your posting. Your compassion and integrity came through. I think many of us know children who raped over and over again, and now, as adults, are haunted and scarred. This trial will do two things - it will punish the guilty priests, and it will open the possibility of punishment for crimes of the men who allowed this to happen, and then covered it up. I don’t think the Bishops and their administrators have ever been challenged in the legal system before. And now they are. I don’t know what will happen. Will every Bishop who covered up criminal priests be charged and sent to prison? It is hard to imagine. We will have to see what happens in Philadelphia, and then in Kansas City.
Your quote, “I think many of us know children who were raped over and over again” is a gross exageration. It suggests that these circumstances are somehow representive of the norm within the Roman Catholic Church, rather than extreme exceptions.

In fact, the entire use of that sort of exagerative verbal manipulation is very common among those whose sole interest in these cases is to take pleasure in further slandering the church. What is your particular motivation in using such an obvious (and overused) hyperbolic mischaracterization? I am really very curious to know.
 
When I said that many of us know children who were raped over and over again, I meant it quite literally. I can count 20+ adults I know who went through years of rape. And many of my friends and colleagues in the world of religion have the same numbers. It is common to know people who went through that in their childhoods. My only concern is that this stops and that the abusers and rapists are tried and punished. AND that the system within churches no longer allow this to happen. It is time for repentance and owning up to the horrors. And I’m afraid it includes the hierarchy.
 
When I said that many of us know children who were raped over and over again, I meant it quite literally. I can count 20+ adults I know who went through years of rape. And many of my friends and colleagues in the world of religion have the same numbers. It is common to know people who went through that in their childhoods. My only concern is that this stops and that the abusers and rapists are tried and punished. AND that the system within churches no longer allow this to happen. It is time for repentance and owning up to the horrors. And I’m afraid it includes the hierarchy.
Charitably speaking, I am incredulous at you assertions. If you are implying that your friends “in religion” are Catholic, and by extrapolation every Catholic, “just has to know”, innumerable victims of clerical sexual abuse, you are being false. I have been a Roman Catholic my entire life and I know of no one who has been molested by a priest.

There is a myth (a slander, in point of fact) which has been germinated from the false presumption promulgated by vitriolic enemies of the faith that, “every Catholic knows someone who was abused by a priest”. Wrong! That is a lie. That is an out and out slander.

Respectfully submitted, your commentary has all the earmarks of imflamatory rhetoric rather than deeply felt, empathetic, and restrained discourse. This subject has deeply affected we members of the Roman Catholic Church, but it has also cautioned us to be circumspective with regards to outsiders who seem to relish dumping salt into our open wounds.
 
Charitably speaking, I am incredulous at you assertions. If you are implying that your friends “in religion” are Catholic, and by extrapolation every Catholic, “just has to know”, innumerable victims of clerical sexual abuse, you are being false. I have been a Roman Catholic my entire life and I know of no one who has been molested by a priest.

There is a myth (a slander, in point of fact) which has been germinated from the false presumption promulgated by vitriolic enemies of the faith that, “every Catholic knows someone who was abused by a priest”. Wrong! That is a lie. That is an out and out slander.

Respectfully submitted, your commentary has all the earmarks of imflamatory rhetoric rather than deeply felt, empathetic, and restrained discourse. This subject has deeply affected we members of the Roman Catholic Church, but it has also cautioned us to be circumspective with regards to outsiders who seem to relish dumping salt into our open wounds.
Maybe no one felt safe enough with you to share their horror stories. You sound like someone that would have ground them into the ground even further.
 
Maybe no one felt safe enough with you to share their horror stories. You sound like someone that would have ground them into the ground even further.
So now you have a new name, three posts, and list as a Catholic. There is fraud going on here.
 
MODERATOR NOTICE

Please charitably discuss the issues, not each other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top