R
ringil
Guest
Well, the Church is both human and divine. I hate to read this stuff as well but I trust the Holy Father implicitly. I pray this political intrigue, if true, passes away very soon.
Your affiliation says Baptist. Baptists are not Catholic. No one is a Catholic apart from Christ’s Church. The Church is impeccable (incapable of sinning) and infallible (prevented by Christ and the Spirit from teaching error). Christ loves His Church; He “handed himself over for her, to sanctify her, cleansing her by the bath of water with the word, that he might present to himself the church in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing” Ephesians 5:25-33. A Catholic, by definition, believes everything the Church teaches, since it was revealed by God who does not deceive. However, the Church’s members are human beings, and they are sinners, every one, most notably me. Lord, have mercy!I think it is not my place to speak for all Catholics just me. If someone doesn’t think I am “Catholic” enough because I don’t believe everything a clergy person says that is ok by me. I do not answer to those people or the Church. I answer to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I am Catholic because I believe in the faith past down to us by Christ through Peter, not because I bow to the Church.
The title “Catholic” is not an exclusive copyrighted possession of the Catholic Church headquartered in Vatican City. “Catholic” is ordinarily used and generally understood to refer to Christians loyal to Rome, but the word itself is used by some other churches in their name, and is used, hyphenated, in such terms as Anglo-Catholic, Anglican Catholic and Catholic Anglican to describe people, beliefs and practices within Anglicanism which affirm the Catholic, rather than Protestant, heritage and identity of the Anglican churches.Your affiliation says Baptist. Baptists are not Catholic. No one is a Catholic apart from Christ’s Church.
Oh really, “senior church officials” and who might they be? Daily embarrassments? Force the Pope? This isn’t news this is editorial spin on a minor story that nobody has any facts about, so they just decide to make them up, to get their readers interested. This is how the entire article unfolds, the very next paragraph uses the phrase “power struggle” and continue to cite a bishop with “direct knowledge of the Vatican’s affairs.”Senior church officials interviewed this month said almost daily embarrassments that have put the Vatican on the defensive could force Pope Benedict to act to clean up the image of its administration - at a time when the church faces a deeper crisis of authority and relevance in the wider world.
I would agree with you, except that my cousin who was born, raised and lives in Italy, has a very negative view of the Church hierarchy because of stuff like this. He says what filters into the American media is just the tip of the iceberg. He thinks American Catholics are woefully naive.This is the worst piece of dribble I have ever seen passed off as news. If you look closely, they didn’t actually report any facts. Some “allegations” by unnamed sources, some unrelated facts (8 Italians are being raised to Cardinal and 7 of those worked under Bertone) and mashed that together with speculation that this is some sort of coordinated plot (regardless of the fact as Italians have always had the majority in the cardinalate, and the curial offices) . They certainly didn’t report the facts of the supposed leaked documents. No quotes, nothing, except something about how some people knew that a diplomat had reported corruption before he was transferred (to Washington non the less). I don’t know much about Vatican governance, but going from a deputy governor where you are #2 in care of grounds and infrastructure to becoming a Washington diplomat doesn’t really sound like a demotion.
The language used is also unprofessional of a journalist. I particularly “love” this paragraph.
Oh really, “senior church officials” and who might they be? Daily embarrassments? Force the Pope? This isn’t news this is editorial spin on a minor story that nobody has any facts about, so they just decide to make them up, to get their readers interested. This is how the entire article unfolds, the very next paragraph uses the phrase “power struggle” and continue to cite a bishop with “direct knowledge of the Vatican’s affairs.”
Yeah, sorry. That’s not a simple explanation. That’s a conspiracy theory with a lot less reporting and facts to back it up than that article had in it.Call me a cynical child of my age, but I think there is a fairly simple explanation for these anti-Catholic—baseless—stories today. Quite simply, they are a result of the USCCB’s efforts to oppose this hard left administrations agenda to enforce an equally hard left ‘health system’ on Americans. Having dared to stand up to the secular tide (at long last) they, the bishops, are now going to be mauled more viciously than anyone but socialist apparatchiks can imagine. The administration will also not hesitate to slander the Holy Father and Curia as well. Yahoo (which I despise, DESPISE, as the tool of hell’s denizens which it is—prove me wrong, check their headlines often, e.g. “Analysis: Vatican is Evil, Pope Benedict looks like Star Wars Emperor after our Yahoo Contributors’ Graphic Enhancements”) and its involvement in this only makes me believe my hypothesis all the more.
As for Rush et al. jumping in…don’t get me wrong, I love Rush, a lot, but he is not the sharpest tool in the barn vis-à-vis geopolitical subtleties and I think has dived into this story from his typical, limited perspective of ‘right good, left bad’. And from what I heard he was not being anti-Catholic at all really, just quoting the commentary story listed above and putting his ‘right good, left bad’ spin on it. I am a bit disappointed that Rush got involved in this snowball from hell manufactured by Yahoo (no doubt on orders from the Glorious Leader), but as he said, he had a bit of a cold today and he is not at his best.
EDIT: Cathgal, my thoughts exactly!
Allow me to simplify it for you:Yeah, sorry. That’s not a simple explanation. That’s a conspiracy theory with a lot less reporting and facts to back it up than that article had in it.
Dang, this wound me up.This is Dan Brown-style factless sensationalism packaged to appear as legitimate journalism, and the implications of it are alarming. Unconfirmed anonymous inuendo being promulgated as factual reportage and cynically being fed to deliberately wound the Roman Catholic Church. Why? It is malicious, and it is premeditated.
Just another spear thrust into the side of the Church. They smell blood, and they are bloodthirsty. Step back, and gather your wits when you read these things, because they are designed to confuse and demoralize us. Please beware of the cunning of our enemies. They have malice in their hearts. In their incivility is shown their vile natures.
Always remember that we obtain our Baptism from the priests of our Holy Church; they do not. We receive our Eucharist from the priests of our Church; they do not. We confess our sins, we get married…we receive Last Rights from priests of our Roman Catholic Church; they do not. It is OUR faith, OUR religion, and the beauty and majesty found therein is OURS, not theirs. Who are they to attack, with impunity, OUR religion, more than any other institution, with lies and unsubstantiated slanders?
We all know that our Roman Catholic Church is the one true religion in which the full deposit of the Christian faith is held, venerated, and expressed fully and sacramentally. Evil does not seek to destroy another evil; evil seeks to destroy only what is good. The Roman Catholic Church is the target of attacks because it is the last standing impediment to the moral relativism, nihilism and atheism espoused by this world’s elites. It is simply Good vs. Evil. Please don’t let them fool you.
Go into church, and go up to the altar, and kneel, then look around and take in the breadth of your religion, and what it means to you. What they would destroy is something which they can’t even fathom. But we can. We are the Church. Don’t allow them to infuence what your heart knows to be true, good, and holy. Stand your ground.
That doesn’t change the fact that the article gave no facts, no quotes, no details what so ever. I was completely waiting for them to drop the “bombshell” of the leaked letters. But from my reading of the article there either was nothing in the letters that needed to be reported, or they didn’t actually say what this “journalist” wanted them to say. They didn’t tell me what was even leaked, I wanted to know!!!I would agree with you, except that my cousin who was born, raised and lives in Italy, has a very negative view of the Church hierarchy because of stuff like this. He says what filters into the American media is just the tip of the iceberg. He thinks American Catholics are woefully naive.
So when I read stuff like this and evaluate it against history - I tend to believe it even if I wish it weren’t true. There is never any real way to tell. It’s not like the Church hierarchy is famous for their transparency. All we can do is pray God will send us good priests. At least that’s what my Italian mother always taught me.
My non-practicing siblings are very quick to list failings of the Church for their lack of personal holiness. So immediately, my antennas went up with your cousin’s excuses. But you know him?I would agree with you, except that my cousin who was born, raised and lives in Italy, has a very negative view of the Church hierarchy because of stuff like this. He says what filters into the American media is just the tip of the iceberg. He thinks American Catholics are woefully naive.
Perhaps – at least at this time – you are unable to distinguish between members of the Church and the Church Herself. Was Judas a member or was he the Church?Sorry should change my profile to Catholic.
I am glad you can stand by all the Church has ever done
The Church has never taught error. The Church has always been infallible when teaching faith and morals – as it was in the beginning in A.D. 33, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, Amen.and taught.
Jesus IS His Church. He said so Himself. Quote: “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting ME?” He [Saul] said, “Who are you, sir?” The reply came: “I am Jesus whom you are persecuting.” End quote. Saul (St. Paul), as we know, was persecuting the Church, killing Catholics.Perhaps one day I will too but as for today I put my trust in Jesus. If that makes me not Catholic in your eyes or even the eyes of the church so be it. I have come to peace with that.
Thank you.But I trust in your unfailing love; my heart rejoices in your salvation.
Psalm 13:4-6
