Moral argument objection

  • Thread starter Thread starter adrian1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

adrian1

Guest
If morality is objective, then why do some cultures practice female genital mutilation, cannibalism, infanticide, and other atrocities which we deem unacceptable?’

Someone tell me that consensus majority decides what is wrong and what is right. What in the past was right, now this can be wrong and vice versa, because the morality evolve over time. Was the “consensul social majority argument” a strong argument against moral argument?
 
Why can’t all humans agree on a few (10) moral objectives and let’s all live by them???
 
Due to original sin, human beings cannot know the whole moral law easily, certainly, and without admizture of error, without the aid of divine revelation. Thus it is that evil practices can be regarded as good for even long periods of time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top