A
adrian1
Guest
If morality is objective, then why do some cultures practice female genital mutilation, cannibalism, infanticide, and other atrocities which we deem unacceptable?’
Someone tell me that consensus majority decides what is wrong and what is right. What in the past was right, now this can be wrong and vice versa, because the morality evolve over time. Was the “consensul social majority argument” a strong argument against moral argument?
Someone tell me that consensus majority decides what is wrong and what is right. What in the past was right, now this can be wrong and vice versa, because the morality evolve over time. Was the “consensul social majority argument” a strong argument against moral argument?