D
Discerning13
Guest
Would it be morally acceptable to kill someone who murders the unborn on a daily bases?
No. The Church’s moral code isn’t built on utilitarian philosophy.Would it be morally acceptable to kill someone who murders the unborn on a daily bases?![]()
No.Would it be morally acceptable to kill someone who murders the unborn on a daily bases?![]()
Killing someone is not something that an individual can abrogate to himself unless self defense is in question.Would it be morally acceptable to kill someone who murders the unborn on a daily bases?![]()
Wait, so if we were to live in a place where self defense was illegal, it would then be immoral to defend ourselves or others? Wouldn’t such a law be unjust?Killing someone is not something that an individual can abrogate to himself unless self defense is in question.
So someone is intent in killing you or someone in your presence and you are defending yourself or the other person, if the law allows for self defense you are “allowed” to take the attacker’s life. Carefull though that we should NOT do it out of hatred or rage.
Because that unborn baby cannot be protected by the self defense laws you cannot claim self defense in their cases. YES they were objectively murdered. But since you cannot take the place of jury, judge and executioner YOU are not allowed to take the life of the murderer. BUT do not worry. GOD’s justice is perfect. Pray for his conversion and repentance.
Many have “repented” and changed their hearts, it is possible.
Peace![]()
In other words, would it be OK to be a pro-life murderer? – think about that for a moment.Would it be morally acceptable to kill someone who murders the unborn on a daily bases?![]()
Jesus taught us to turn the other cheek.Wait, so if we were to live in a place where self defense was illegal, it would then be immoral to defend ourselves or others? Wouldn’t such a law be unjust?
Definitely not saying we should murder abortionists, just trying to understand the concept.![]()
Maybe developing this a bit further. What about not killing abortionists but causing injury to them in such a way that they can no longer pursue their occupation as abortionists, for example by shooting them in the hand or elbow. That would not be contrary to “pro life” as you wouldn’t be taking a life. But it would still be a malicious act.In other words, would it be OK to be a pro-life murderer? – think about that for a moment.
I think that deliberately maiming someone IS contrary to pro-life.Maybe developing this a bit further. What about not killing abortionists but causing injury to them in such a way that they can no longer pursue their occupation as abortionists, for example by shooting them in the hand or elbow. That would not be contrary to “pro life” as you wouldn’t be taking a life. But it would still be a malicious act.
OK, I just looked it up in the Catechism and it says that killing in self-defense falls under the principle of double effect, and is only justified if the person’s intention was to save their own life, and killed the aggressor as an unintended consequence. This makes sense to me.Jesus taught us to turn the other cheek.
So in fact present laws that say you may kill somebody in self defence are already not in line with Jesus’ teaching.
Comes down to you cannot address a wrong with another wrong. ‘Two wrongs don’t make a right.’ It may seem hard in such circumstances, BUT that is the reality.Would it be morally acceptable to kill someone who murders the unborn on a daily bases?![]()
So Catholic teaching on self-defense and the principle of the Just War is … not in line with what Christ taught?Jesus taught us to turn the other cheek.
So in fact present laws that say you may kill somebody in self defence are already not in line with Jesus’ teaching.