More Democrat Hypocrisy and Treason

[thestickman]

Richardols:

Is that akin to the Republicans’ Pro-Choice Coalition, the Republican Majority for Choice, and the Republican Alliance For Choice? What do you think the Republicans are supporting there?

The groups aren’t the Republican Party but a part of it. Their views on abortion, thankfully are not the offical policy of the Republican Party.

Don’t tell me the Dems are all pro-abortion

I didn’t. Never suggested it. Instead I wrote, clearly “The Democrat Party’s support”–which is a valid statement. The Democrat *Party *supports a mother’s right to chose to kill her baby in utero. No amount of spin will make that fact vanish, Richard. It’s been a part of the Democrat Party’s platform for decades now.

and Republicans are all anti-abortion!

Another apples and oranges response to something no one was asserting or suggesting. The discussion is about the Democrat Party’s official stance on abortion/mother’s killing their babys in utero, but since you mentioned it: The Republican groups you named–their views on a mother killing her baby in utero (which I disagree with 100%) are not a part of the offical policy of the Republican Party. A policy I hope the Republican Party never changes and one the Democrat Party needs to change immediately.

 

[mlchance]

Richardols:

They don’t support “killing children in utero.”

Am I going to have to quote the Democratic Party Platform yet again? I guess so:
Democratic Party Platform of 2004:

Because we believe in the privacy and equality of women, we stand proudly for a woman’s right to choose, consistent with Roe v. Wade, and regardless of her ability to pay.

Now maybe there’s an abortion procedure out there that doesn’t involve killing children in utero, but, then again, maybe there isn’t.

And here’s the Democratic Party supporting the destruction of human life for medical experimentation:
Democratic Party Platform:

President Bush has rejected the calls from Nancy Reagan, Christopher Reeve and Americans across the land for assistance with embryonic stem cell research. We will reverse his wrongheaded policy.

And, incidentally, the official recount of votes in Florida in 2000 showed the President Bush won that state by about 500 votes. Al Gore lost in 2000, despite his typically Democratic Party best efforts to falsify the election results.

The Democratic Party: the party of abortion-on-demand and human experimentation!

– Mark L. Chance.

 

[Syn_kobiety]

legeorge:

Why didn’t I ever hear anything about this? This is disturbing, to say the least.

Middleton was never chief of staff. I doubt the veracity of the rest of this allegation, too.

 

[Lizzie]

Syn kobiety:

Middleton was never chief of staff. I doubt the veracity of the rest of this allegation, too.

Mark Middleton served as Special Assistent to the President. He was aide to President Clinton.

The veracity of the above ‘allegations’ can be verified by a simple google search.

 

[mjdonnelly]

The Democratic party has only become the abortion party as evidenced by it’s recent objections to judicial nominees based solely on their views of Roe vs Wade.

 

[David_Paul]

Lizzie:

Mark Middleton served as Special Assistent to the President. He was aide to President Clinton.

The veracity of the above ‘allegations’ can be verified by a simple google search.

Thanks Lizzie. I mean really. You can fill library shelves with the books on this subject. Yet Democrats claim it never happened and these are “allegations”.

Sheesh…

A few minutes at google brought up this:

"(MIddleton was) assistant to White House Chief of Staff Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty from 1993-95. During and after his White House service, Middleton became a key liaison to Asian scandal figures like Charlie Trie, James Riady and John Huang. Five days after a 1994 White House meeting between Middleton, Riady and Huang, a Riady company sent Webster Hubbell $100,000 . . .While Middleton’s involvement with shady Asian figures like Riady was widely known, Chung’s testimony links Middleton for the first time to the Communist Chinese government.

In dramatic testimony before Chairman Dan Burton (R-Ind.) and the House Government Reform Committee on May 11, Chung not only told of how a Chinese military made cash gifts to Clinton-Gore’s reelection, but also of threats to his family if he talked, and the promise of hush money if he didn’t. In response, the FBI hid Chung and his family for three weeks.

Chung said how he was introduced to General Ji Shengde, chief intelligence officer of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) by Liu Chao-ying, a daughter of a PLA Lt. General. Ji told Liu that he would wire $300,000 to her to provide to Chung for a gift to the Democratic Party. Chung also testified that Liu told him of a transaction in which the Communists “gave a Singapore group $500,000” for Middleton. . . .more"

INVESTIGATION OF ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES
IN CONNECTION WITH 1996 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS
FINAL REPORT of the COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
SENATE Rept. 105-167 - 105th Congress 2d Session - March 10, 1998

Various news accounts of Chinagate .

 

[estesbob]

Richardols:

Is that akin to the Republicans’ Pro-Choice Coalition, the Republican Majority for Choice, and the Republican Alliance For Choice? What do you think the Republicans are supporting there?

Don’t tell me the Dems are all pro-abortion and Republicans are all anti-abortion!

o

The Democrat party platform calls for taxpayer funded abortions up to the moment of birth.

The groups you mention are no more repubican groups than Cathoilcs for choice is a catholic group.

 

[Syn_kobiety]

See the latest about Valerie Wilson? She and her husband were donors to the 2000 Bush campaign.

David_Paul:

See the lastest about Valerie Plame? She was a donor to “American Coming Together”–the group George Soros spent $10 million creating. Plame lied and said she was “retired” on the FEC form (there is no regulation against CIA employees donating to campaigns, she didn’t have to lie).

 

[Lizzie]

Syn kobiety:

See the latest about Valerie Wilson? She and her husband were donors to the 2000 Bush campaign.

The Wilsons/Plames gave more money to guy who pretended he was Irish.

 

[Syn_kobiety]

David_Paul:

Sheesh…

A few minutes at google brought up this:

"(MIddleton was) assistant to White House Chief of Staff Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty from 1993-95.

David_Paul:

Anyone know where Mark Middleton is today? Remember him? Clinton’s chief of staff? He was the highest ranking member of the executive branch ever to take the Fifth.

OK, we get it … Democrats=bad and Republicans=good (even if we have to stretch the truth to make the case).

 

[aimee]

Syn kobiety:

OK, we get it … Democrats=bad and Republicans=good

I’m glad you understand

 

[Richardols]

estesbob:

The groups you mention are no more repubican groups than Cathoilcs for choice is a catholic group.

Sorry. Those groups and Dina Merrill are Republicans in good standing and good fundraisers for the GOP. Pro-choicers belong to both parties, just as pro-lifers belong to both parties.

 

[ej1111]

Well, my mom and dad were both life long Democrats. They are now Republicans. The Democrats don’t stand for the same values they onces stood for. You would never hear a Democrat today say “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.” A military career was once seen as honorable by Democrats, today Howard Dean, and Sen Turbin Durbin compares our military to Pol Pot, Hitler, and Gulags. Todays Democrats are breeding a new “swiftboat vets” generation. Todays Democrats are out of touch with the main stream of society.

The Left has nothing to do with it. If you think that Pat Buchanan is “Left” then maybe you should find out what “Left” means.

 

[David_Paul]

Pat Buchanan is not the person he was before 1992. After the GOP dumped him (and it did, he didn’t leave it), he was financed by Roger Milliken. Then got close to Lenora **Falani. Neither the mill owner nor the marxist are friends of the right.

Yes, I know the media likes to pretend he is a conservative but he is no such thing.

Most don’t share this but, in my estimation, he never was.

Nixon adminstrated LBJ’s Great Society Programs. Buchanan was the PR man for that as well as the misguided concept of “detente.”

Now Pat finds an audience at antiwar, Counterpunch and similiar anti-Israeli, left wing and pseudo-conservative publications.

**

 

[bones_IV]

David_Paul:

Pat Buchanan is not the person he was before 1992. After the GOP dumped him (and it did, he didn’t leave it), he was financed by Roger Milliken. Then got close to Lenora **Falani. Neither the mill owner nor the marxist are friends of the right.

Yes, I know the media likes to pretend he is a conservative but he is no such thing.

Baloney!**

Most don’t share this but, in my estimation, he never was.

Nope. Wrong again.

Nixon adminstrated LBJ’s Great Society Programs. Buchanan was the PR man for that as well as the misguided concept of “detente.”

Now Pat finds an audience at antiwar, Counterpunch and similiar anti-Israeli, left wing and pseudo-conservative publications.

I disagree with your comments regarding Pat Buchanan being anti-Israeli, left wing. Besides he condemned the starving to death of Terri Schiavo, you call that left wing? And grapes grow with oranges right. Yeah right! And he defended Pius XII too, in my view is a good Catholic. Your arguements hold no ground.

 

[David_Paul]

bones_IV:

I disagree with your comments regarding Pat Buchanan being anti-Israeli, left wing. Besides he condemned the starving to death of Terri Schiavo, you call that left wing? And grapes grow with oranges right. Yeah right! And he defended Pius XII too, in my view is a good Catholic. Your arguements hold no ground.

I didn’t say Pat was left wing. He is out there someplace in no-man’s land.

One can be on the left and be against euthanasia. There aren’t many we hear of because the movement and its fat cat supporters such as Soros, Bing, Lewis etc support the Culture of Death but they exist. Now and then a lefty, an honest one, will not slander Rome too.

Pat’s sponsorship by Roger Milliken bothered me more than his flirtation with
Lenora Falani. Milliken gave millions to Pat’s causes including the Reform Party. He wants protectionism. Buchanan defends that by going back before any of us were alive and relationg how the Federal government was funded largely by tarrifs. True enough. Republicans supported it too. But that was then and this is now. We probably trade more goods in a week than we did in 6 months back then. Slapping across the board tariffs on trade would wreck the world economy. Pat knows that. He knows it won’t happen too.

So his game is…something or other.

Nothing productive.

Btw…I don’t really care about his stance on Israel and do not critize him on those grounds.

 

[bones_IV]

Which is easier to say David_Paul, your sins are forgiven or rise up and walk? Pat Buchanan is a fine catholic gentlemen and am shocked at your remarks about him. Unless I see some documentation, I won’t believe you. Dr. William Carroll “Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran, whom I know slightly, and in many ways admire, are far too suspicious of Bush’s pro-life commitment.” Judie Brown of ALL a 100% pro-life organization highly commends Pat Buchanan in “Death of the West.”

 

[Lizzie]

I can’t understand why Pat picked that woman to be his vice-president.

 

[David_Paul]

bones_IV:

Unless I see some documentation, I won’t believe you.

Well I guess unless you look for it yourself you will never believe me then because I do not play the “Prove it” game.

The history of the Reform Party and those I mentioned is well known. A few clicks will get you all the information you want.

Buchanan is now making cooing noises toward Cindy Sheehan. That is inexcusable. She is in with the Code Pink/A.N.S.W.E.R/WWP crowd. We are not talking Michael More Land. This “activists” are north of the 38th parallel. In fact, Brian Becker has visited and written articles praising Kim Jong Il. Hadi Jawad co-founded the “Crawford Peace House” which is sponsoring Cindy. Jawad is AMA, CAIR and the Dallas Peace center. Apologists (and some say a lot more) for Hamas and Hezbollah.

Pat Buchanan knows what these people are. He fought the New Left when he worked for Nixon. But here we have him today supporting one of their prize trophies.

I wish he would regain his senses. His bitterness toward the events of 1992 and 1996 has overwhelmed him.

Btw…I don’t blame him for being bitter. What was done to him was inexcusable. Mike Barnacle let it slip once on Imus. After Pat won the primary, the word went out in the media to do anything , anything to destroy Pat. Barnacle said that was such a shame as everyone liked Pat as a person. But Buchanan knows the game and the stakes. He should have been able to take it.

 

[David_Paul]

Lizzie:

I can’t understand why Pat picked that woman to be his vice-president.

Me neither. Pat isn’t the type to pick up his ball and go home because he doesn’t get what he wants. But that sure appears to be what he did after 1992. Rather than continue the battle, he started aiding and abetting those he had spent his life opposing.

Perhaps it was being more or less irrelevant to the two biggest conservative events of his life: Reagan and the win in 1994.