'More than able to hold her own,' girl gets boot from Catholic football league

  • Thread starter Thread starter Myqyl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope the diocese does not back down. Political correctness and faux equality should not rule the day.
Heaven forbid women were able to excel in a common sport. It’s bad enough they are educated and have become CEO’s of multi million dollar companies, scientists, engineers, telephone line workers, professors, mathematicians, inventors, innovators. Goodness knows after they were granted to right to “vote”, it started to go downhill from there. They started to want to drive a car, buy a car, own a car, buy their own home, invest in their 401K, all without “permission” from their husbands or the government. Instead of going to college to get their “MRS” degree, they decided to start a career, make their “own” money and then settle down. Very wise in this economy.

Geez louise, they want to play hockey, football, basketball, baseball over softball. They should be happy with croquet and badminton. Oh, and boxing, can you believe it, boxing:eek: And now our federal government said they can be in the front lines in combat. I don’t know, with an AR15 going off they might break a nail.🤷

much a do about nothing. If a girl/woman has the physical, mental and desire to play football, she should be able to play, period. She should be drafted based upon her abilities to play the game and play it well, just like the boys.

Reminds me of a wise Priest I used to know, who was head of a Catholic high school, back about 30 yrs ago. It seems a female student became pregnant, and the school board decided to suspend her based on her moral conduct. This wise Priest asked if the father of the child was a student at the Catholic high school. The answer was yes. He called the parents of both parties, the school board for a meeting. The school board had the Diocese blessing to suspend the girl. The Priest on the other hand, said, “Well, then we must suspend the boy as well.” The school board was shocked…whatever for? The Priest said, he is just as culpable, is he not?" But…but…the parents of the boy said, he is the quarterback for the football team, he has a game on Saturday, you can’t…that’s not fair…" The school board chimed in and agreed with the boys parents, The Priest said, “well, I can’t help that, rules are rules. Either they are both suspended or they both stay in school.” Imagine that, it’s the “girls” fault and she pays the price for the pregnancy and the boy goes on to win one for the team. Rah, Rah. Long story short, they both stayed in school and were not suspended. I believe it was because of football. Go figure.🤷
 
Why do you say so? Because, as far as I know, there are no commonly integrated sports.

The Olympics require the sexes to compete separately.

All professional clubs/conferences require the sexes to compete separately.

Maybe this particular girl is 180 and 5’10. Maybe she has the upper body strength and musculature more commonly found in adolescent and grown men. Even if this unusual girl is capable it would only encourage girls who aren’t capable. The result, especially in football, is a very dangerous and risky game. Injuries.

I’ve probably known 2-3 girls in my entire life (being a 30 something) who could take a full body hit from a sprinting 200lb high school linebacker.

Is boxing integrated? Is MMA? No, and for good reason.

EDIT: After reading the article, IMO no kids that small should be playing football.
 
even though im a progressive catholic, i must agree with their decision. this whole feminist insanity has siezed the world in its claws. women and men are fundamentally different we will never be the same no matter how much we delude ourselves. it is just something feminists must accept.
 
Heaven forbid women were able to excel in a common sport. It’s bad enough they are educated and have become CEO’s of multi million dollar companies, scientists, engineers, telephone line workers, professors, mathematicians, inventors, innovators. Goodness knows after they were granted to right to “vote”, it started to go downhill from there. They started to want to drive a car, buy a car, own a car, buy their own home, invest in their 401K, all without “permission” from their husbands or the government. Instead of going to college to get their “MRS” degree, they decided to start a career, make their “own” money and then settle down. Very wise in this economy.

Geez louise, they want to play hockey, football, basketball, baseball over softball. They should be happy with croquet and badminton. Oh, and boxing, can you believe it, boxing:eek: And now our federal government said they can be in the front lines in combat. I don’t know, with an AR15 going off they might break a nail.🤷

much a do about nothing. If a girl/woman has the physical, mental and desire to play football, she should be able to play, period. She should be drafted based upon her abilities to play the game and play it well, just like the boys.

Reminds me of a wise Priest I used to know, who was head of a Catholic high school, back about 30 yrs ago. It seems a female student became pregnant, and the school board decided to suspend her based on her moral conduct. This wise Priest asked if the father of the child was a student at the Catholic high school. The answer was yes. He called the parents of both parties, the school board for a meeting. The school board had the Diocese blessing to suspend the girl. The Priest on the other hand, said, “Well, then we must suspend the boy as well.” The school board was shocked…whatever for? The Priest said, he is just as culpable, is he not?" But…but…the parents of the boy said, he is the quarterback for the football team, he has a game on Saturday, you can’t…that’s not fair…" The school board chimed in and agreed with the boys parents, The Priest said, “well, I can’t help that, rules are rules. Either they are both suspended or they both stay in school.” Imagine that, it’s the “girls” fault and she pays the price for the pregnancy and the boy goes on to win one for the team. Rah, Rah. Long story short, they both stayed in school and were not suspended. I believe it was because of football. Go figure.🤷
👍
 
THis is no matter of faith and morals. I disagree with the school here.

They need to pick their battles and this isn’t a good one.
 
When my son was in high school, he wrestled girls, played hockey with them and as a freshman, had a girl on his football team. However, she was an offensive center and I thought that was an odd position for her to choose. It didn’t sit well with me and must admit, I’m against it.
 
Heaven forbid women were able to excel in a common sport. It’s bad enough they are educated and have become CEO’s of multi million dollar companies, scientists, engineers, telephone line workers, professors, mathematicians, inventors, innovators. Goodness knows after they were granted to right to “vote”, it started to go downhill from there. They started to want to drive a car, buy a car, own a car, buy their own home, invest in their 401K, all without “permission” from their husbands or the government. Instead of going to college to get their “MRS” degree, they decided to start a career, make their “own” money and then settle down. Very wise in this economy.

Geez louise, they want to play hockey, football, basketball, baseball over softball. They should be happy with croquet and badminton. Oh, and boxing, can you believe it, boxing:eek: And now our federal government said they can be in the front lines in combat. I don’t know, with an AR15 going off they might break a nail.🤷

much a do about nothing. If a girl/woman has the physical, mental and desire to play football, she should be able to play, period. She should be drafted based upon her abilities to play the game and play it well, just like the boys.

Reminds me of a wise Priest I used to know, who was head of a Catholic high school, back about 30 yrs ago. It seems a female student became pregnant, and the school board decided to suspend her based on her moral conduct. This wise Priest asked if the father of the child was a student at the Catholic high school. The answer was yes. He called the parents of both parties, the school board for a meeting. The school board had the Diocese blessing to suspend the girl. The Priest on the other hand, said, “Well, then we must suspend the boy as well.” The school board was shocked…whatever for? The Priest said, he is just as culpable, is he not?" But…but…the parents of the boy said, he is the quarterback for the football team, he has a game on Saturday, you can’t…that’s not fair…" The school board chimed in and agreed with the boys parents, The Priest said, “well, I can’t help that, rules are rules. Either they are both suspended or they both stay in school.” Imagine that, it’s the “girls” fault and she pays the price for the pregnancy and the boy goes on to win one for the team. Rah, Rah. Long story short, they both stayed in school and were not suspended. I believe it was because of football. Go figure.🤷
-The fact you think soldiers use AR-15s indicates you have no real knowledge of what you are talking about in regards to the recent actions of the government in regards to women and the military. Do some research and you’ll find that the government is actually ignoring scientific research which proves that women can’t reach and or maintain the same level of physical strength and endurance without dramatically increasing injury rates and health risks. You can review one of my posts in the women in combat thread in the blog sub-forum for some of these studies.

-While looking for the studies mentioned above I also ran across similar studies done concerning sports. The bottom line for these studies was that mixed gender sports usually (usually because different sports have different physical risks and requirements; football would be among the “usually”) increases the injury and health risks for women players and decreases the fitness and quality of men players.
 
How is the church shooting herself in the foot? This has nothing to do with church teaching.
 
Heaven forbid women were able to excel in a common sport.
Heaven forbid we should make an distinctions based on gender. Oh the horror. It must mean females are inferior and males are superior. That is the only conclusion we can draw from this evil decision. It is about oppression. Men and women are exactly the same. Like cogs in a machine. Totally interchangeable. These gender constructs are made by men to enslave women. We all know there is no differences except what society makes up. Mean old Church. How dare they!
 
even though im a progressive catholic, i must agree with their decision. this whole feminist insanity has siezed the world in its claws. women and men are fundamentally different we will never be the same no matter how much we delude ourselves. it is just something feminists must accept.
Exactly. Any difference is deemed inequality. We must be the same in every way or it is unjust. Equality is the god we strive for. Anything less is immoral and oppressive.
 
EDIT: After reading the article, IMO no kids that small should be playing football.
I think a very good case can be made for that. The damage done to growing bodies is just as dangerous to boys as to girls.

According to the story she is age 11. I am guessing she hadn’t started puberty yet, and thus hasn’t experienced the body changes it brings. If that is the case, I am not sure there is any physical reason to forbid her to play.

But the archdiocese is convening a panel of experts to consider the matter.
“Traditionally, football is a boys only sport due to its full contact nature. Most parents and players have preferred this; some now disagree. An archdiocesan panel of coaches, parents, pastors and experts in the sports medicine and pediatrics fields will evaluate the current rule. Calls for an immediate change in the policy are premature and unwise without adequate consultation, especially given the potential safety issues involved,” the statement continued.
cnn.com/2013/02/14/us/philadelphia-archdiocese-boys-only-football/?hpt=us_c1

(I re-posted a link to the article, just in case anyone else had trouble getting the first one to work.)
 
-The fact you think soldiers use AR-15s indicates you have no real knowledge of what you are talking about in regards to the recent actions of the government in regards to women and the military. Do some research and you’ll find that the government is actually ignoring scientific research which proves that women can’t reach and or maintain the same level of physical strength and endurance without dramatically increasing injury rates and health risks. You can review one of my posts in the women in combat thread in the blog sub-forum for some of these studies.

-While looking for the studies mentioned above I also ran across similar studies done concerning sports. The bottom line for these studies was that mixed gender sports usually (usually because different sports have different physical risks and requirements; football would be among the “usually”) increases the injury and health risks for women players and decreases the fitness and quality of men players.
If she is qualified to play and “knows” the risks…she should be able to play.
 
Distinctions are fine. Limitations…not so much
Calling it a limitation is redefining things. Can a man play on a women’s volleyball team? Is that a limitation? Why are distinctions wrong?
 
If she is qualified to play and “knows” the risks…she should be able to play.
Explain to me how a minor female child can be deemed competent enough to “know” the health risks associated with engaging in sports on a male level but is deemed not competent enough when it comes to civil and criminal law, health care (except, for some reason, getting an abortion), finances, and living on her own without a legal guardian.
 
fix;10363022 Can a man play on a women’s volleyball team? Is that a limitation? [/QUOTE said:
Funny you should mention that. There was a group of boys who wanted to play middle school volley ball in one area catholic school. There is no boys volleyball league, so they were allowed to play against the girls teams. It was one of the most fun matches of the year when they played my daughter’s team! I think that was a good decision…and I think it worked out great for everyone that they weren’t put in their tidy little gender boxes and that was that.

If a girl is good enough to compete in football, then let her play.
 
If a girl is good enough to compete in football, then let her play.
Exactly. It’s a just stupid game. If she wants to play and is good enough, who cares?

Actually I agree with what MattinTex said, NO kids should be playing football.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top