S
SirThomasMore
Guest
That certainly excludes the LDS I have seen here…except maybe MurdockPahoran;6970801 [QUOTE said:]It is just possible that some of us who are intellectually honest might have already considered this.
That certainly excludes the LDS I have seen here…except maybe MurdockPahoran;6970801 [QUOTE said:]It is just possible that some of us who are intellectually honest might have already considered this.
You spoke of Private Revelation a lot, but I would argue that Mr. Smith recieved the BoM from Private Revelation. Jesus was seen and known by everybody, to the point that Roamn historians at the time mention him in their writings. Mr. Smith’s claims are based solely on his claims, i.e. private revelation.SMAD0142,
Another aspect of being able to see when the “precepts of men” have gotten in the way of personal revelation from God, is when a person would say that your grandma is “not a Christian” because she is a Mormon. This is a sure evidence that such a person making such a comment has been taught to make that comment by the “precepts of men.” They have not been taught to make that comment through personal revelation from the Holy Ghost. It simply would not happen. It means they are being guided by the precepts of men in order to have such a belief and make such a comment.
Have a wonderful day, and I hope you have learned to understand your grandma’s beliefs a little bit better, and can thus have great, kindly interactions with her.![]()
First there is no better breed of people Parker…all fallenSMAD0142,
What Christ told Joseph Smith about “all their creeds” being “an abomination” is along the lines of the following passage in Matthew 15:
1 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
3
.
If you believe in the Christian Creed, that there is One God above all things and that by Him all things hold together, one creator of all things weather in all the heavens and of all the earths and of all powers and principalities, and that Jesus is the second person of the Godhead not created like us than we would have no problem calling you Christian. But these are not the beliefs of the LDS church. Your Church choose to go against all Christian churches because of one mans testimony against them. The contention started on the LDS side and continues. It originates with your Church and its prophet. I do see the Mormon Church becoming Christian in the future. You will loose a lot of members but those with open minds will stay and be rewarded with true humility. And then it may start to grow again as in the past. Offering not only a very clean family life but even more importantly offering it all up to Jesus and His Cross. As he did die for you Parker as well. Jesus needs to be your only hope in order to progress back to Him forever. Worshipping anything else but Jesus is worshipping false idols. This includes the family as well. We are all His. All worship goes to Him in Chritianity. When it does not we go to ConfessionSMAD0142,
Another aspect of being able to see when the “precepts of men” have gotten in the way of personal revelation from God, is when a person would say that your grandma is “not a Christian” because she is a Mormon. This is a sure evidence that such a person making such a comment has been taught to make that comment by the “precepts of men.” They have not been taught to make that comment through personal revelation from the Holy Ghost. It simply would not happen. It means they are being guided by the precepts of men in order to have such a belief and make such a comment.
Have a wonderful day, and I hope you have learned to understand your grandma’s beliefs a little bit better, and can thus have great, kindly interactions with her.![]()
It actually has nothing to do with Matthew because Smith was asking which church he should join. He was allegedly told none of them for they were all an abomination which, when combined with the chapter heading of 1 Nephi 14, makes it clear that there are only two churches: one of the Lamb, and of founded by Satan. If the church of the Lamb is the LDS, we know where the theology leaves the rest of us.SMAD0142,
What Christ told Joseph Smith about “all their creeds” being “an abomination” is along the lines of the following passage in Matthew 15:
Along with those changes there needs to be in place a real belief that the eventual goal of those changes is to become “like Christ” in word and deed. So whenever people mock the LDS belief that we are to seek to really receive a “joint throne” with Christ and become like Him, by His grace and power and by the Father’s mercy, then what that says to me is that they haven’t understood what the eventual goal is–and how can they reach the goal if they don’t even have the goal in mind as the promised outcome from becoming sanctified?
Catholic-RCIA,If you believe in the Christian Creed, that there is One God above all things and that by Him all things hold together, one creator of all things weather in all the heavens and of all the earths and of all powers and principalities, and that Jesus is the second person of the Godhead not created like us than we would have no problem calling you Christian. But these are not the beliefs of the LDS church. Your Church choose to go against all Christian churches because of one mans testimony against them. The contention started on the LDS side and continues. It originates with your Church and its prophet. I do see the Mormon Church becoming Christian in the future. You will loose a lot of members but those with open minds will stay and be rewarded with true humility. And then it may start to grow again as in the past. Offering not only a very clean family life but even more importantly offering it all up to Jesus and His Cross. As he did die for you Parker as well. Jesus needs to be your only hope in order to progress back to Him forever. Worshipping anything else but Jesus is worshipping false idols. This includes the family as well. We are all His. All worship goes to Him in Chritianity. When it does not we go to Confession
SMAD0142,You spoke of Private Revelation a lot, but I would argue that Mr. Smith recieved the BoM from Private Revelation. Jesus was seen and known by everybody, to the point that Roamn historians at the time mention him in their writings. Mr. Smith’s claims are based solely on his claims, i.e. private revelation.
I also got totally confused about your traditions of men comment.
Also a creed much earlier than Nicea, which I suppose must also be rejected by this Personage, is:
I believe in the Father almighty, and in Jesus Christ, our Savior; and in the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, in the holy Church, and in the remission of sins.
What do Mormons find objectionable in this creed?
*This comes from Denzinger who is quoting French and German archeaological (sp?) texts from the years 150-180 AD.
Thank you Parker, your kindness and paitence are a welcome respite from the usual tone of these threads.
NickyBR,WOW. How did this turn from ’ I’d like to learn more about your faith’ to ‘You have to defend your faith!’?
Sheesh.
I do have a question for the Mormons and I am not interested in debating. I just wish to know what you believe.
“In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage.” (Matthew 22:30)
- Where/what supports the idea that you each will be given your own planets to rule? (give biblical passages and/or BOM passages. I don’t mind either sources, I just wish to understand the reasoning)
- Further, why believe in marriage after death when Jesus himself said there will be no marriage after death.
I’m just curious to hear the LDS explanation for these two things. And I promise I won’t argue or debate the issue once you’ve given your answer but I can’t promise the same for other posters here. ):
I’ve read that Jesus is saying people do not MARRY in heaven but that doesn’t mean they cannot be married already… but that doesn’t make sense to me at all especially when considering the story given before he gives the above answer. Just curious to hear your interpretation.
Dear ParkerCatholic-RCIA,
That was exactly my point. All that language used in your post was taught you by the precepts of men, not by the Bible, and certainly not by the Holy Spirit through personal revelation. Peace to you.
Catholic-Rcia,Dear Parker
The language I used came from the promtings of the Holy Spirit. What part is precepts of men? That there is only one God?
That is a pretty big judgment of my soul Parker. But that’s ok.
I would have no problem showing you the scriptures in context that support what I have written very clearly.
It was the Scriptures, the living words that helped me receive the revelation that I have received. What’s amazing about this is I am around many who have had the very same revelations. This includes the Apostles themselves. It was not hard for me to become Catholic because most of what I was taught about it through Apostolic Tradition and of course the Scriptures I had already thought about prior to becoming Catholic. After a years worth of studying the Scriptures, falling in love with Christ, I was baptized into Christ. After which all the dots of healing became to be seen more clearly. All the dots when connected form an image of Jesus. Let me know and I will get them . I really have a hard time believing you believe what you just wrote
Take what I wrote and post it, then can you be more specific about what you consider precepts of men, please get right to the point. Then I will show you the Scriptures that support what I have written. But even though I will show you, you have to have the Holy Spirit in you to see these things clearly as I have been blessed to see them. It is not at all baout what I know, rather how it is passed on to others.Catholic-Rcia,
I know you’re very sincere and that you’ve studied and feel strongly about your beliefs. But the Bible doesn’t specifically support many of those statements, particularly the exclusionary part. It’s not what the apostles taught, nor how they taught.
If you want to try and demonstrate the specific language (the wording phrases with the same kind of context) that matches yours from the Bible, then you can go ahead if you wish and when I get time, I’ll be interested in where you think you have seen those words.
Again, peace to you.
There is no such “Christian creed” in the Bible, nor the use of the word “creed” to describe the beliefs and teachings, so this is a “precept of men.”If you believe in the Christian Creed
Not a quote from the Bible nor a statement consistent with Biblical teachings, so this is a “precept of men.”that there is One God above all things and that by Him all things hold together, one creator of all things weather in all the heavens and of all the earths and of all powers and principalities
He is, but that language is not from the Bible.and that Jesus is the second person of the Godhead
.we would have no problem calling you Christian
.even more importantly offering it all up to Jesus and His Cross
Confession under that context is not described or taught in the Bible. That is a precept of men.When it does not we go to Confession
**The Creed was not made from precepts of men. It was written to defend against heresy. It was what all Christians already believed. It is still e what all Christians believe Catholic or Protestants. They may not believe in Apostolic succession this is why they would use a Small c on Catholic where it is used. But we all believe in the same God, the Same Jesus and the Same Holy spirit. The creed was made to defend against others who would want to change these beliefs for their own power. Please look up the Scriptures I have placed throughout this Creed. I will post more tonight. It all fits so tightly together. It is what it is…TRUTH **Catholic-Rcia,
I suppose that I owe you an answer to your request, so here you go using your earlier post that I had commented on:
There is no such “Christian creed” in the Bible, nor the use of the word “creed” to describe the beliefs and teachings, so this is a “precept of men.”
Not a quote from the Bible nor a statement consistent with Biblical teachings, so this is a “precept of men.”
He is, but that language is not from the Bible.
not created like us than
.
The word “Christian” as used in the Bible deals with the kind of life the people lived who came into the fold of Christ and became His people. It does not deal with a creed. That is a precept of men.
.
That is a statement that uses language and context that are the precepts of men.
Confession under that context is not described or taught in the Bible. That is a precept of men.
So, since you asked, there you go. Have a sweet and peaceful day.
I’m sure that you will be very glad to learn that we don’t believe, or teach, that we will each 'be given our own planets to rule."WOW. How did this turn from ’ I’d like to learn more about your faith’ to ‘You have to defend your faith!’?
Sheesh.
I do have a question for the Mormons and I am not interested in debating. I just wish to know what you believe.
Where/what supports the idea that you each will be given your own planets to rule? (give biblical passages and/or BOM passages. I don’t mind either sources, I just wish to understand the reasoning)
The way you couch your questions is interesting; formed as attacks, not simple requests for information. They are not “what do you believe about this and why,” but “why do you believe this when…???” The first is a request for understanding. The second forces the questionee into defense mode, simply by the form of the question.Further, why believe in marriage after death when Jesus himself said there will be no marriage after death.“In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage.” (Matthew 22:30)
The problem is, nicky, you already DID argue about it, by the way you asked the question!!! Believe me, we’ve all 'been there, done that."I’m just curious to hear the LDS explanation for these two things. And I promise I won’t argue or debate the issue once you’ve given your answer but I can’t promise the same for other posters here. ):
I understand that it ‘may not make sense’ to you. That does not, however, mean that it doesn’t make sense to us, or that the reasons we give are not the reasons we believe. You, as a Catholic, believe things that I don’t agree with, and the reasons for those beliefs seem to me to be invalid. That doesn’t mean that I dismiss them as lies.I’ve read that Jesus is saying people do not MARRY in heaven but that doesn’t mean they cannot be married already… but that doesn’t make sense to me at all especially when considering the story given before he gives the above answer. Just curious to hear your interpretation.
Rich,that there is One God above all things and that by Him all things hold together, one creator of all things weather in all the heavens and of all the earths and of all powers and principalities.
Parker: Not a quote from the Bible nor a statement consistent with Biblical teachings, so this is a "precept of men."
Col:1
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
For in him were created all things in heaven and on earth, the visible and the invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers; all things were created through him and for him.
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
He is the head of the body, the church. 9 He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things he himself might be preeminent.
For in him all the fullness 10 was pleased to dwell,
and through him to reconcile all things for him, making peace by the blood of his cross 11 (through him), whether those on earth or those in heaven.
Quote Rich:
and that Jesus is the second person of the Godhead
Parker: He is, but that language is not from the Bible.
Agreed that there is no other Savior besides Christ, and that He is without beginning of days or end of years, and is Alpha and Omega. “Second person of the Trinity” are not words from the Bible.Rich: So explain to me what being the second person of the Trinity means to you. Is it the same as what Christians throughout the whole world believe? Have believed for 2 thousand years that Jesus is both our Lord and our God? That there is no other God besides Him? That He has no beginning and no end?
Agreed.John 1
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
He was in the beginning with God.
3 All things came to be through him, and without him nothing came to be. What came to be
through him was life, and this life was the light of the human race”;
Take away His light and non of us would exist. But He would still remain; He would still be the light.
You are speaking about the followers of Christ.
I know I was speaking about the followers of Christ, Christians. I am a follower of Christ. I know He lives just as I know I am sitting here typing on the computer.
Quote Rich: