R
RebeccaJ
Guest
Smith and others close to him (including Brigham Young) also practiced polyandry…ie, men took for them a polygamous wife who was already married to another man.
Your opinion of our beginnings is noted…and is certainly your right…as is your opinion of Catholic beginnings. I disagree with them, of course—but your opinion and my opinion of our joint beginnigs is irrelevant.The “beginning” to which you refer is 1830, in New York, founded by Joseph Smith, a treasure seeker, who “saw things” by looking through “peep stones” in his hat. The 2000-year-old Catholic Church, which built western civilization, was founded by the God-Man Jesus Christ, Second Person of the Blessed Trinity. Hardly a comparison.
Interesting. Y’all were celebrating Mass two years or so before Jesus was crucified?a.d. 33.
Hey, Diana!Interesting. Y’all were celebrating Mass two years or so before Jesus was crucified?
…and lay women are allowed to celebrate Mass?
The first Mass was the Last Supper.Interesting question…
What year were women allowed to pray in Mass?
Diana are you asking what year women were allowed to pray in Mass?Interesting question…
What year were women allowed to pray in Mass?
I answer PM’s, PRmerger! (well, I do unless the person sending it is on my ignore list, anyway…in which case I don’t even see them) Have you sent me one I didn’t answer? If so, I’m sorry.Hey, Diana!
(Sorry to usurp this thread, but I don’t think you answer PMs so I have to ask this publicly)…
What’s the quote you had a few months ago in your signature that went something like this:
“The mark of a humble man is the person who changes his mind even if the person he was arguing with will crow about it and take it as a victory”.
or something like that.
Clearly, it was more eloquent than what I posted.![]()
Yep, I sure did. But, no biggie.I answer PM’s, PRmerger! (well, I do unless the person sending it is on my ignore list, anyway…in which case I don’t even see them) Have you sent me one I didn’t answer? If so, I’m sorry.
Oh! It was your quote, not something you were citing?and yeah, that’s pretty close to what I wrote.
So…do you have the answer to this question regarding whether laywomen can celebrate Mass? (I found out where in some period of history an Abbess could.) I haven’t found anything about that.
Catholic women have been abbesses, mother superiors, CEOs of hospitals, orphanages, doctors of the church and have been able to pray since the Virgin Mary, the first Catholic woman, offered her beautiful Magnificat.Mormon women have been allowed to offer public prayer and speak in Sacrament meeting since the beginning.
As Tokotikiguy was referring, not to private prayer, but to public prayer (as in opening/closing) and perhaps even speaking in Sacrament meeting, I was refering to the equivalent; Catholic women who were allowed to publically celebrate Mass, as a priest is.The first Mass was the Last Supper.
Women, of course, were there. It was a supper, wasn’t it? (Who did the cooking?)
Of course women were allowed to pray there!
No. Women have never publicly celebrated the Mass. It’s ontologically impossible. Women cannot be fathers.As Tokotikiguy was referring, not to private prayer, but to public prayer (as in opening/closing) and perhaps even speaking in Sacrament meeting, I was refering to the equivalent; Catholic women who were allowed to publically celebrate Mass, as a priest is.
Well, of course. I never said that the women who cooked the food at the Last Supper consecrated the Eucharist. :whacky:and cooking the food for the Last Supper is no more participating and officiating in it any more than baking the wafers is the same as consecrating them for administrating the Eucharist.
By the way, there is absolutely no evidence (absent some speculation about the presence of Mary Magdalene) that there was anybody at the last supper but Jesus and His apostles. It was held in an ‘upper room,’ a meeting room separate from the household. Certainly there is no indication anywhere (including Sacred Tradition as far as I am aware!) that there were women in on the meeting.I know, there are a lot of 'could’ves…" but not a single 'yep, she was there."
Agreed. Women were not in the upper room most likely. But whether they were allowed to pray, why in the heck wouldn’t they be allowed to pray?…and before I get nailed again, no, I do not think that this is proof that there were no women there. There is simply no mention of any.
I am aware that ‘celebrate’ has a very special meaning in regards to Catholics and Mass–which is why I used it. I am quite sure that Catholic women are allowed to pray in church; that’s obvious. However, the inference was that Mormon women were not allowed to have official parts in our Sacrament meetings: no public prayers, or perhaps even speaking. What we do in Sacrament Meeting (the opening/closing prayers and the speakers) are as close as we get to ‘celebrating’ in the Catholic term of the word.Diana are you asking what year women were allowed to pray in Mass?
Then you posted "Interesting. Y’all were celebrating Mass two years or so before Jesus was crucified?
…and lay women are allowed to celebrate Mass? "
Or celebrate it?
You chose two different words that, I am sure you realize, have distinctly different meanings in Catholic theology.![]()
Well, there you go.Yep, I sure did. But, no biggie.
Oh! It was your quote, not something you were citing?
Catholic women have been abbesses, mother superiors, CEOs of hospitals, orphanages, doctors of the church and have been able to pray since the Virgin Mary, the first Catholic woman, offered her beautiful Magnificat.
But celebrate Mass? No. Ontologically impossible.Women just can’t be fathers.
Oh, dear…No. Women have never publicly celebrated the Mass. It’s ontologically impossible. Women cannot be fathers.
Well, of course. I never said that the women who cooked the food at the Last Supper consecrated the Eucharist. :whacky:
Agreed. Women were not in the upper room most likely. But whether they were allowed to pray, why in the heck wouldn’t they be allowed to pray?
I am a latecomer to the conversation–I only joined to ask you about the quote I saw in your signature.
Anyway, can you articulate it better than I did–how you had it in your signature? I liked it!
**The Relief Society is not the same as giving the readings during the Mass…which Catholic women do all around the world every day. They are not in another room, they are church with us…extraordinary ministers administer the sacraments and many in our parish are women…is that a job for the women of the Relief Society? It wasn’t when I was a Mormon.Well, there you go.
Mormon women do not hold the priesthood, either…but we have the Relief Society, which is very much the same sort of thing you are referring to.
Nobody blesses and administers the Sacrament but priesthood holders. However, women now, and have always, been able to open and close meetings with prayer, and speak in church (give talks…)The Relief Society is not the same as giving the readings during the Mass
No, I meant the sort of thing you were refering to in regard to the role of women in the Catholic church in terms of service.
stormy99;7080256:
…which Catholic women do all around the world every day. They are not in another room, they are church with us…extraordinary ministers administer the sacraments and many in our parish are women…is that a job for the women of the Relief Society? It wasn’t when I was a Mormon.
stormy
ive never viewed LDS women to be subservient and downtrodden. but…correct me if im wrong my friend, is it not taught in the COJCOLDS that a woman must have a husband to be ressurected?and that their eternal state is that of an eternal incubator? that in a sense puts them in a lower class than the men. its interesting to note too, that humanly speaking, women do not need men. men however for some odd reason really need a female!No, I meant the sort of thing you were refering to in regard to the role of women in the Catholic church in terms of service.
Nobody blesses and administers the Sacrament but priesthood holders. However, women now, and have always, been able to open and close meetings with prayer, and speak in church (give talks…)
So…I think we have established that this attempt to portray Mormon women as downtrodden, illiterate second class citizens who are utterly subservient and subject to men is now defeated?
It is not my “opinion” – it is verifiable, historical fact.Your opinion of our beginnings is noted…and is certainly your right…as is your opinion of Catholic beginnings. I disagree with them, of course—but your opinion and my opinion of our joint beginnigs is irrelevant.
The facts are still as I stated them.