This thread doesn’t seem to have a topic or purpose, when really we should be discussing doctrinal issues. Mormons believe what they do for practically the same reasons that other people believe what they do. It is no surprise that there are “scholars” that are Mormon, just like how there are “scholars” that are Catholic, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, etc. If anything, advertising Mormon Scholars Testify can be seen as proselytizing, so we’ll let the mods decide.
Oh, I think there is a point to be made here. One of the most common prejudices against Mormonism is that Mormons are stupid. A lot of people believe that the only reason a person could believe in Joseph Smith is because of ignorance. For a lot of people, the accusation of stupidity constitutes their entire grounds for critiquing Mormonism. Mormons who do apologetics are greeted by this attitude more often than they would like or deserve. In fact, the book I mentioned on the other thread,
Shaken Faith Syndrome, has a whole chapter on that subject alone. And he’s not wasting ink - it is a real prejudice that needs a response.
One fallacious point that the authors of that book and this website want to drive home, however, is not just that Mormons are indeed educated, but that Mormons tends to be involved in their Church at higher rates corresponding to higher levels of education, whereas in other Churches education tends to corresponds to lowered belief and lower involvement. This suggests that Mormonism is probably more intellectually robust than other religions.
The problem with this of course is that it takes “education” simply without considering what kind of education, and more importantly what philosophy of education. If you are educated in modern America - like it or not - you are going to get indoctrinated with a materialist worldview that stresses materialist and utilitarian values. That worldview is destructive to Catholicism, but not to Mormonism, which already reflects the Enlightenment principles that have brought academia into opposition with Christianity. For instance, if a physics professor teaches his class that empirical studies demonstrate that only material causes account for existence, that God’s existence cannot be known from observation of the universe but is only a faith claim, that the Bible is a poor source of knowledge because it contains many corruptions and errors, and that nothing, including God, can be said to exist if it is not comprehensible to reason, he will challenge the beliefs of all his Catholic students, but not his Mormon ones. They have already been taught these things as Church doctrine.
That last paragraph might sound cynical, but I think it is true. I am not saying it because I feel threatened by LDS scholarship - I read LDS scholarship and am not threatened by it - I say it because I have actually encountered a lot of post-modern thinking among Mormon scholars themselves, even their apologists.