The doctrine on Theosis or exaltation is not changing. It is also the doctrine of the Catholic Church as taught by the Catechism:
460 The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:“For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God.” “For the Son of God became man so that we might become God.” "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."
Question: Critics often accuse LDS of being polytheistic because the term ‘gods’ is used. Given that the Catechism uses the exact same term, Catholics would also be polytheists. Interesting. Of course, if it is false, which I assume you will confirm, then it is about time that the silly claim about LDS being polytheists is dropped on this web site.
barnes - Here is an edited commentary on the
CCC 460:
Musings on Theosis or Divinization: “God became man so that man might become a god”
The Early Church had many battles with those who deny Jesus’ divinity. Because they defended His divinity they had the chance to meditate on what it means for the Logos to become man. One of the great riches that came from their meditations was the teaching that
“God became man so that man might become a god.” (cf. St. Athanasius, De Incarnatione or On the Incarnation 54:3, PG 25:192B; also Catechism of the Catholic Church paragraph 460)
This may sound weird at first because Christianity is a monotheistic religion and this means that there can be no other God than the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob:
“Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord alone!” (Deuteronomy 6:4)
Both the Christians and the heretics held to this doctrine in the early days of the Church. The Christians wanted to pass on the apostolic tradition that the Logos was God and became flesh (John 1:1,14) and at the same time keep the doctrine that there is only one God. The heretics tried to limit mystery and couldn’t understand how there can be three Persons in one God. They put a lot of effort in trying to understand the relationship between God and Jesus Christ while, like the faithful Christians, keeping the doctrine that there is only one God. This led them to assert many erroneous views such as Jesus being a creature or that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are only “modes” of the one true God.
By the power of the Holy Spirit, the Church has faithfully kept the apostolic faith that there are three Persons in one God and rejected the heretics’ erroneous views.
**Because the Church Fathers believed that the Logos became flesh, this means that the **
nature of God and the nature of man are united in one Person. What does this imply? **One ****of the answers is that man can be divinized **(cf. 2 Peter 1:4; 1 John 3:1-3). **This does not ****mean that man’s nature changes into the nature of God. This simply means that ****man can partake in the divine nature of God. **This has been a consistent teaching of the Fathers and even St. Thomas Aquinas. According to Aquinas, the Son is the Eternal Wisdom and “man is perfected in wisdom (which is his proper perfection, as he is rational) by participating [in] the Word of God” (ST III, q. 3. a. 8) and that the reason for the Incarnation is for
"the full participation of the Divinity, which is the true bliss of man and end of human life; and this is bestowed upon us by Christ’s humanity; for Augustine says in a sermon (xiii de Temp): ‘God was made man, that man might be made God’ " (ST III, q. 1 a. 2).
Based on this commentary, it is evident that Mormons and Catholics do not see this use of “gods” the same. We do not believe, nor have we ever taught, that we will become gods of our own world. Or are you saying that Mormons agree with the CCC definition?
It is necessary to read the writings of St. Augustine, Aquinas, Athanasius etc to understand the meanings of many concepts in Catholicism, or at least refer to commentary.