Mormonism vs Catholicism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Truth_Faith13
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thankyou for your response!

If I may ask a couple of questions about Catholicism in relation to some of what you said…

Why do Catholics believe revelation ended in 1st century?
Why do Catholics believe marriage ends at death?
Not sure what the issue is here. LDS accept the designation of Jesus as the Word in both John 1 and in modern day revelation.

D&C 93:8 Therefore, in the beginning the Word was, for he was the Word, even the messenger of salvation

(See lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/93.33?lang=eng)

1 Peter 3:7 clearly contradicts what you say.

Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered. (KJV)

Husband and wife together inherit Eternal Life, not separately. The “grace of life” being referred to here can’t be mortal life since each already has that. The only other option is Eternal Life.

Isn’t it odd that this fully revealed teaching in the Bible hasn’t found its way into orthodox Christian theology? I, for one, am grateful for modern prophets who are able to bring to light ancient Christian teachings that were lost for a time.
Bolding mine
This is a clear example of what my response states.
 
Bolding mine
This is a clear example of what my response states.
Right, Mormons think fully revealed means they can understand the mysteries of God.

But, Catholic teaching is, God’s plan for humanity is fully revealed in Jesus Christ. God’s plan, is our salvation and eternal life. Mormonism, concocts “new” revelation, that is not found in the full Revelation of Jesus Christ, and calls the innovations and novelty “restoration”.

As already pointed out, they are not the first to claim additional revelation. These types of claims started far early than the 19th century restorationist movements of Mormon, Campbellite, Seventh Day Adventists and their offshoots. St. Paul was cautioning the Galatians against innovations in his time. The Montanist heresy rivals the restorationists and came over a thousand years before.

Some people like novelty and that is what they search for. Some of us see the beauty of continuity, Jesus Christ forever faithful to His Bride.
 
1 Peter 3:7 clearly contradicts what you say.

Likewise, husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be hindered. (KJV)

Husband and wife together inherit Eternal Life, not separately. The “grace of life” being referred to here can’t be mortal life since each already has that. The only other option is Eternal Life.

Isn’t it odd that this fully revealed teaching in the Bible hasn’t found its way into orthodox Christian theology? I, for one, am grateful for modern prophets who are able to bring to light ancient Christian teachings that were lost for a time.
Again, the Bible does not mean what the Mormon Church and Mormons think it does. Therefore, it is not odd that beliefs made up by Mormon “prophets” are not Christian teachings.
 
I have been looking into both and while reading the tracts on Mormonism on this site I am struggling to see the suggested differences.

Firstly I noticed that it states that the mormon’s belief in eternal progression (becoming god) is blasphemous however in the catechism of the Catholic Church it states…

Also the LDS view of the Godhead, I can’t see why it’s any worse than the Trinity. There are three personages all divine that make up one God?

Would appreciate any help and explanations of these!
Mormons believe God was once a human being and progressed to being God, so eternal progression means to become God. Christian’s believe we will share in God’s divinity, but we could never become God as Mormon’s believe.
Yes it is about the truth. I probably didn’t explain myself properly. What I mean is when a Mormon explains the Godhead and a Catholic explains the Trinity, I struggle to see a difference which would make Catholicism monotheistic and Mormonism polytheistic. Both have a 3 in 1 idea of God
Christians have “a 3 in 1 idea of God.” Mormons have a 3 are 3 idea of God; three persons and three beings. Also because of their belief in internal progression, reason tells us they ultimately believe in many Gods. Christian’s believe in one God.
 
1 Peter 3:7 clearly contradicts what you say.

Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered. (KJV)
Luke 20:34-36 clearly contradicts what you say:

Jesus told them, The children of this world marry and are given in marriage; but those who are found worthy to attain that other world, and resurrection from the dead, take neither wife nor husband; mortal no longer, they will be as the angels in heaven are, children of God, now that the resurrection has given them birth.
 
Any serious inquiry into Mormonism begins and ends with the truthfulness of Book of Mormon and whether Joseph Smith was a prophet.
I agree.
And that knowledge ultimately can only be known by communication from the Holy Spirit to an individual.
No, Joseph Smith claimed the Book of Mormon was a history of all the American Indians, which means it is not a faith claim but a science claim, therefore science is where the answer can be found. We know from science that Joseph Smith’s claim about the Book of Mormon is false.
Comparing and contrasting doctrines of different faiths is a helpful exercise but relying on rational examination alone won’t produce sufficient justification to join a religion in the same way that rational examination alone doesn’t justify the belief that Jesus is our Savior. (see 1 Corinthians 12:3) Good luck!!
But reason can justify NOT joining a religion. Science not supporting Joseph Smith’s science claim about the Book of Mormon is why I could never take Mormonism seriously.
 
Truth_Faith13,

I happened to stumble across your thread over on Religious Forums (religiousforums.com/threads/for-lds-only-some-tricky-questions.185065/). This provides some context to understand where you’re coming from.

When you say you are “looking into both”, I’m curious what you mean by that. As you may know, I left Catholicism for Mormonism for a few years, then reverted back to Catholicism. The main reason why I returned to Catholicism was because, despite the things that I loved about being LDS, I simply found no Biblical nor historical support for a total apostasy of Jesus Christ’s Church. Also, many of the things that I liked about Mormonism are actually found right in Catholicism (such as the temple concept). As a Catholic, I love the fact that the continuity of the Church is based on the simple fact that God is always faithful, even when we are not. He doesn’t abandon us, even when we abandon Him. The Church is a hospital for sinners, not a museum of perfect saints. Christ is at the head of His Body, and He protects His Body. That idea is so abundantly clear in the Catholic Church, established by Jesus Christ over 2000 years ago, here still to this day.

Keep asking your questions here as well as wherever else you desire. 👍
 
Luke 20:34-36 clearly contradicts what you say:

Jesus told them, The children of this world marry and are given in marriage; but those who are found worthy to attain that other world, and resurrection from the dead, take neither wife nor husband; mortal no longer, they will be as the angels in heaven are, children of God, now that the resurrection has given them birth.
Dang! You beat me to it. I heard this reading in Mass today and felt it would serve this thread well.

Mormons worrying about marriage after death is like someone worrying about what happens to our drivers licenses when we die - it’s just utterly nonsensical theology.
 
Also the LDS view of the Godhead, I can’t see why it’s any worse than the Trinity. There are three personages all divine that make up one God?

Would appreciate any help and explanations of these!
When understanding similarities and/or differences between Catholic and Mormon views, you have to understand that terminology may be the same, but the meaningbehind the words may not be. Also, I’ve noticed that sometimes, on the surface, the beliefs may sound very similar, however when you get under the surface, and understand related beliefs, it’s clear that there really isn’t any equivalence.

A prime illustration of this is whether or not the Persons of the Trinity, specifically God the Son, are eternal. Trinitarians believe that God eternally exists as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. They exist in an eternal relationship with each other, a relationship that has never changed.

In contrast, to understand the Mormon view, you must understand a few things. Firstly, Mormonism claims that we are all literal spirit children of heavenly parents (i.e. Heavenly Father and Heavenly Mother). This includes God the Son and God the Holy Ghost, we are literal spirit children of Heavenly Father and Heavenly Mother, with Jesus being the literal firstborn spirit child. Also, Mormons believe that we all have a core “intelligence” that was never created. It has always existed. It is that intelligence that allows Mormons to claim that they believe that Jesus is eternal (though of course this also means that we are all eternal, as this isn’t a quality unique to Jesus or to Godhood). So, while we are all eternal by virtue of having eternal intelligences, there was some sort of creative/organizing process that occurred in the pre-mortal existence that allows Mormons to be able to claim that we are all literal spirit sons and daughters of loving heavenly parents, including the Son and Holy Ghost. These ideas are all of course rejected by orthodox Christianity (including the idea that the Father has a spouse, Heavenly Mother, with some LDS prophets having taught that the Father had multiple spouses).

In my view, Mormonism is explicitly polytheistic, at least in one sense (I will allow that perhaps in another sense it is monotheistic). Its leaders and scriptures refer to “the Gods” and the idea that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are “three Gods”. This is polytheism. No Trinitarian would ever refer to the Persons of the Trinity in such ways.
 
Thankyou for your response!

If I may ask a couple of questions about Catholicism in relation to some of what you said…

Why do Catholics believe revelation ended in 1st century?
You have to understand that Catholics believe “public revelation” has ended. Public revelation refers to all that is necessary for salvation, or the Deposit of Faith. That is complete. There will be nothing else revealed that affects how one can receive eternal life. There won’t suddenly be a new sacrament revealed that is now required for eternal life.

Having said that, as you may be aware, Catholic history is literally overflowing with revelations and visions from Heaven, much more so than Mormonism could even dream, to be honest. We have many stories of visitations of angels, Mary, Jesus, etc, many that have been formally recognized by the Church. We have many stories of healings, miracles, etc. God is still very much active in our lives, and has never stopped talking. Heaven is not closed, and never has been. We believe that God guides His Church, and has never stopped doing so.
Why do Catholics believe marriage ends at death?
More appropriately, Catholics believe that marriage is fulfilled in Heaven. In Heaven, you won’t stop knowing your spouse or have some sort of amnesia. In Heaven, we become like God, and we love the way He loves. If you and your spouse are saved, you will be there, together, along with the other sons and daughters of God in Jesus Christ, as members of the one family of God.
 
And OP, I would suggest that if you’d like to see some “behind closed doors” Mormon practices yourself, you check out this video:

youtube.com/watch?v=Ms6ny86rXU4

It was secretly recorded by a former member and is one of the several Mormon temple rituals that Mormons do not discuss. As a former Mormon who went through the ceremony, I can attest to its authenticity.

In there you will see the masonic grips and tokens that Mormons believe are necessary to face God again, the sacred new name (actually from an auto-generated list), and the “true order of prayer.” Remember, Mormons believe that Jesus himself taught this nonsense to the original twelve apostles, and through the wickedness and falling away of the Catholic/Orthodox churches, these rituals were lost until a man literally convicted of conning his neighbors by professing he could find buried treasure claimed to restore them in the 1830’s.

It’s a long video to watch, but I suspect you will come out of it feeling the same way I did the first time I went through - it’s a cult!
Yeah Ive watched that video and others like it several times!
 
Well, this is a Mormon claim about Catholicism, so you seem to be presenting the Mormon sophistry about Catholic teaching.

First off this has been discussed several times and you can search the forum for the same topic.

What Mormons who come here with this entry from the CCC do, is apply Mormon belief to Catholic teaching. It’s what Mormonism does, in multiple areas of religion and history. Borrows from this and that and makes it its own with entirely new meanings, and then will say it’s the same!

Don’t fall for the sophistry. When it comes to what Mormonism has co-oped from Christianity, all Christian words and phrases have been given new definitions. They are never the same in meaning or teaching.

Catholic teaching in the CCC, that you cite here, is associated with the Eucharist and the communion of saints. Both of which Mormonism rejects, so already at that rejection you can see that as a comparison, we are not discussing the same things.
That particular Catholic teaching in the CCC I happened to know myself anyway from my research into Catholicism so when I was reading the Catholic answers tract on Mormonism and there belief on becoming gods, it reminded me and I came here to ask the difference. Not meaning to put a Mormon spin on it, if I had wanted to do that, I woud have asked a Mormon 🙂
 
Mormons believe God was once a human being and progressed to being God, so eternal progression means to become God. Christian’s believe we will share in God’s divinity, but we could never become God as Mormon’s believe.

Christians have “a 3 in 1 idea of God.” Mormons have a 3 are 3 idea of God; three persons and three beings. Also because of their belief in internal progression, reason tells us they ultimately believe in many Gods. Christian’s believe in one God.
Thank-you for those explanations
 
Truth_Faith13,

I happened to stumble across your thread over on Religious Forums (religiousforums.com/threads/for-lds-only-some-tricky-questions.185065/). This provides some context to understand where you’re coming from.

When you say you are “looking into both”, I’m curious what you mean by that. As you may know, I left Catholicism for Mormonism for a few years, then reverted back to Catholicism. The main reason why I returned to Catholicism was because, despite the things that I loved about being LDS, I simply found no Biblical nor historical support for a total apostasy of Jesus Christ’s Church. Also, many of the things that I liked about Mormonism are actually found right in Catholicism (such as the temple concept). As a Catholic, I love the fact that the continuity of the Church is based on the simple fact that God is always faithful, even when we are not. He doesn’t abandon us, even when we abandon Him. The Church is a hospital for sinners, not a museum of perfect saints. Christ is at the head of His Body, and He protects His Body. That idea is so abundantly clear in the Catholic Church, established by Jesus Christ over 2000 years ago, here still to this day.

Keep asking your questions here as well as wherever else you desire. 👍
Thank-you 🙂 I’m in a bit of a yo-yo with it at the moment so I’m spending a lot of time studying and asking questions. I’ve been looking into Catholicism for a couple of years but I am focusing on Mormonism at the moment. I go to RF to ask LDS questions and here to ask Catholic questions. I understand that they are very different but they are also similar in some ways
 
Good luck in your studies!

Having spent decades in Mormonism and now several years investigating Catholicism, the similarities are honestly superficial. I just don’t see them. Catholicism encompasses the authority and orthodoxy that Mormonism claims to have.

Between the years when I came to the realization Mormonism wasn’t true and started to consider Catholicism, I was a cynical agnostic. When you come to the truth about Mormonism, it’s honestly hard to shake their claim that all other churches are false and sort of fall into distrust of religious claims in general.
 
Thank-you 🙂 I’m in a bit of a yo-yo with it at the moment so I’m spending a lot of time studying and asking questions. I’ve been looking into Catholicism for a couple of years but I am focusing on Mormonism at the moment. I go to RF to ask LDS questions and here to ask Catholic questions. I understand that they are very different but they are also similar in some ways
So what questions do you have about Catholicism?

Of all the choices out there, why are you considering either Catholicism or LDS?
 
Dang! You beat me to it. I heard this reading in Mass today and felt it would serve this thread well.

Mormons worrying about marriage after death is like someone worrying about what happens to our drivers licenses when we die - it’s just utterly nonsensical theology.
Yes, this was today’s reading, but there is also Matthew 22:29-30 which is almost identical (and more succinct):

And Jesus answering, said to them: You err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they shall neither marry, nor be given in marriage: but shall be as the angels of God in heaven.
 
Any serious inquiry into Mormonism begins and ends with the truthfulness of Book of Mormon and whether Joseph Smith was a prophet.
Being gullible and willing to give the other person the benefit of the doubt, I did used to believe this. But after calming down and giving due consideration using my reasoning, I decided that this is not true. Of course an inquiry into Mormonism, whether serious or not,could hardly escape mention of Smith and the Book of Mormon. That’s more like an “introduction.” The investigation itself, if it truly is serious, requires comparison of known evidence (“facts”) with the claims of Mormonism, whether in the Book of Mormon or not, and whether voiced by Smith or not - maybe it’s in the Doctrine and Covenants, or it’s something Brigham Young claimed was doctrine. So, as already mentioned, a serious inquiry into Mormonism can be expected to include some archaeological, historical, and Biblical investigation at the very least. One could also include metallurgy, botany, linguistics, and zoology, as well as methods of travel (land and sea), worship, finance, and so on.
Comparing and contrasting doctrines of different faiths is a helpful exercise but relying on rational examination alone won’t produce sufficient justification to join a religion in the same way that rational examination alone doesn’t justify the belief that Jesus is our Savior. (see 1 Corinthians 12:3) Good luck!!
I think there are probably many people who would disagree, some partly, some wholly. John Henry Newman, partly; C. S. Lewis, by some accounts, wholly. St. Augustine testified that reason puts man on the road toward God, which he applied as wholly as he could. He also believed that reason is “informed and elevated” by faith. But reason comes first. People who rely only on faith - that’s the reason they join harmful groups like Aum Shinrikyo and the later People’s Temple. I would not join a faith system that I did not believe was rationally defensible. From what I have learned so far, Catholicism is one of the very few religions to apply solid reasoning and clear (not confusing) logic to determine as well as defend its theology. I am a fan of scholastic reasoning and Robert Spitzer. The reason I believe God exists has everything to do with the reasoning of Thomas Aquinas, the Scholastics, and Robert Sptizer, and virtually nothing (less than 1%) to do with pure “faith.” I hope my strong reliance on reason isn’t too disappointing to those who trust faith as a more sure confirmation.
 
So what questions do you have about Catholicism?

Of all the choices out there, why are you considering either Catholicism or LDS?
I believe that Christ established His Church (a visible one) and gave the keys to the kingdom along with the power to loose and bind to Peter. While I believe that each Christian Church has elements of truth to them, I believe that there will only be one that Christ Himself founded. Catholicism and Mormonism are the only ones I know that make that claim and can make that claim.

I heard an interesting story from I believe one if the LDS people I know about how a member of the Catholic Church stated how if the Catholic Church is wrong, then the only other Church that could be true is Mormonism for all other churches came from Catholicism (mostly), that if the Catholic Church did fall into an apostasy then then would be need for a restoration. However if there wasn’t an apostasy, there would be no need for a restoration and the only Church which could be true is the Catholic Church (that’s a terrible paraphrasing job on my part but I hope you get the idea!)

I did ask a couple of questions in this thread…

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=1016818

However I went away for a couple of weeks and it was pages longer than I had left it so need to catch up on what’s going on! When I started this thread I wasn’t looking into Mormonism officially. The real presence is the one thing that is holding me back from Mormonism.

The one question I do have on my mind at the moment is does/did the CC teach that children who are not baptised go to limbo?
 
Limbo is not an official teaching of the Church. The Catechism says:
1261 As regards children who have died without Baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus’ tenderness toward children which caused him to say: “Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,” allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without Baptism. All the more urgent is the Church’s call not to prevent little children coming to Christ through the gift of holy Baptism.
This implies Limbo. Limbo is in limbo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top