T
Tarquin
Guest
It is NOT “that simple,” because “apostle” has multiple uses, as explained previously.He was/is an Apostle. It’s that simple.
It is NOT “that simple,” because “apostle” has multiple uses, as explained previously.He was/is an Apostle. It’s that simple.
Do you mean does the LDS Church notify an independent auditor like Price Waterhouse each time a priesthood ordination takes place so that said independent auditor can vouch the ordination lineage of each priesthood holder?Can you provide a non LDS source for this with links?
This is why I already said, a comparison can’t be made because definitions are not the same.He was/is an Apostle. It’s that simple.
Quit acting dense.Do you mean does the LDS Church notify an independent auditor like Price Waterhouse each time a priesthood ordination takes place so that said independent auditor can vouch the ordination lineage of each priesthood holder?
Basically, the LDS Church tracks its own priesthood ordinations.
Not sure if this is a non-LDS source you’re looking for, but en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priesthood_(Latter_Day_Saints states:
Requirement of priesthood succession
Very early in his ministry, Joseph Smith began to advocate the position that priesthood does not come directly from God through the Holy Spirit, as many Protestants believe, but through a line of direct or apostolic succession. Thus, Latter Day Saints generally believe that priesthood originates with Jesus, and is passed to others through a line of succession. Only one who holds the priesthood can pass it to another. Thus, in 1829, Smith and his associate claimed that the Aaronic priesthood was given to him by John the Baptist, who was thought to have authority through the lineage of his father Zacharias, who was an Aaronic priest. Later, Smith also claimed to have received the Melchizedek priesthood from the apostles Peter, James, and John, who were given their authority by Jesus.
Matthew 10:1-4He was/is an Apostle. It’s that simple.
Jesus had an earthly ministry. During his ministry, he taught his disciple all they needed to know for salvation. Many of his disciples were called Apostles. The term ‘Apostle’ means one who is sent. Jesus selected The Twelve: Simon (Peter/Cephas/Rock), James (the Greater/son of Zebedee/brother of John), John (the Evangelist/the brother of James), Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James (the Lesser/the son of Alphaeus), Jude (Thaddaeus), Simon (the Zealot/Canaanite), and Judas Iscariot. Christ sent the Twelve (Matthew 10:5). Christ selected 70 more and they were sent (Luke 10:1). Mark and Luke the Evangelists are referred to as Apostles. By tradition, James, Luke, and Mark were members of the seventy. Paul and Barnabas were called Apostles (Acts 14:14, Gal 2:9, Acts 13:1-3). Barnabas was taught by the Twelve and was with Paul on his first journey. These Apostles are the witnesses and recorders of Christ’s earthly ministry. Most were witnesses to his resurrection.Why does the Catholic Church have Bishops as the Apostles successors instead of Apostles? Surely if Apostolic Succession is true, the Pope should be an Apostle not a Bishop?
Our Primary colors are one, two, three–LDS do have statements of belief
Now that’s a creed I can get behind!!!Our Primary colors are one, two, three–
Red, yellow, and blue.
Each one has a message for you and me.
Each is a symbol true!
Red is for courage to do what is right,
Yellow for service from morning till night.
Blue is for truth in our thought and our deed.
We will be happy when this is our creed.
![]()
I’m not sure how one independently documents an intangible, such as, passing divine authority from one person to another. Do Catholics claim independent verification of their lines of authority?Quit acting dense.
I asked if you could provide a non LDS source for the claim you made of the priesthood can trace it’s line back to Jesus Christ. And no Wikipedia is not a good source as the material they use in support of this claim is from the LDS.
Indeed, I have fond memories of primary. Too bad that what is taught to young Mormons isn’t the fullness of truth, about Mormonism.Now that’s a creed I can get behind!!!
You used to be LDS? I’m assuming you were born into the church if you went to primary? Would you mind telling me your story? How long were you LDS? What made you question the Church? When did you finally decide to leave and why?Indeed, I have fond memories of primary. Too bad that what is taught to young Mormons isn’t the fullness of truth, about Mormonism.
So when you say eternal life, what you mean is the celestial kingdom? I thought eternal life was granted to all, even those who are in the lesser kingdoms?Those who had no opportunity to have a marriage solemnized in an LDS temple in this life will receive that blessing in the next life.
Those who purposely avoided marriage in an LDS temple in this life will not receive Eternal Life.
LDS believe that a marriage performed outside of an LDS temple ends at the death of one of the spouses.
D&C 131:1 *In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;
2 And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];
3 And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.
4 He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase.*
I hope this helps…
I’m a little confused. Of course the original twelve are just that… the original 12. I’m not sure how the LDS having Apostles contradicts this since the Bible does say and some were given as Apostles, prophets etc. I don’t think the Prophet of the LDS Church (who is an Apostle) would say he was one of the original 12??? (Or does he?)This is why I already said, a comparison can’t be made because definitions are not the same.
Also an issue where Mormonism lacks a historical context, in Christian history.
Apostle is rooted in Greek, meaning one who is sent. The Twelve were sent in a manner that no one can claim today. They lived, walked, ate, slept, travelled, questioned and were taught for three years by the Master Himself. Then they were sent, as we can read, by Jesus in His great commission to go out into the world to spread what they were taught and what they witnessed, firsthand. Again, there is no one that can make this claim today.
Paul argued quite fervently that his calling was equal to the Twelve, and indeed he was sent, and indeed he was an apostle, specifically set apart by the Twelve as an apostle to the Gentiles. But he was not one of the Twelve.
Our Bishops today come from a succession that goes back to the Twelve, where they are set apart to go out into the world to teach the Good News of Jesus Christ. They are apostles, as they are sent as the Twelve were sent but they are not one of the Twelve. They are their successors.
To be fair to Catholicism, Rebiba was in the 16th century, a century also known as The Protestant Reformation. It is very probable given the amount of Catholic buildings and items that were burnt, that any records of his ordination and those before him have been destroyed.95% of Catholic Bishops today cannot trace their lineage back to an Apostle. These 95% all go through Cardinal Rebiba and no one knows who ordained him a Bishop.
On the other hand, each LDS Priesthood holder can trace his authority directly to Jesus Christ via Peter, James, and John, via Joseph Smith.
Since you seem to be unable to provide sources with links to your claim I have to assume there is none. The Catholic Church can trace it’s apostolic succession down from St. Peter. The LDS can not do the same. You have nothing prior to Joseph Smith in way of documents, tradition, or proof.I’m not sure how one independently documents an intangible, such as, passing divine authority from one person to another. Do Catholics claim independent verification of their lines of authority?
I am praying about it and reading! I will rely on the answer from God in the long term!
The issue at the moment is as Jane said, learning to understand His voice so that I am not “scammed” by a fake call. I have been spending lots of time with the Sisters and I really enjoy spending time with them. They are coming over today to watch films (the ones they are allowed to) and chill. I definitely get a “feel good” feeling with them but whether it is the Spirit, I don’t know. It does feel different to when I pray. So it could just be me “enjoying” their company as opposed to the Spirit telling me I am on the right path. I am also just coming to the end of an episode of postnatal anxiety and so am not making any decisions while I’m still taking medication and still feeling anxious at times!
I certainly won’t be making a decision soley based on who “wins the argument”. My questions are more for me to fully understand the doctrines of both Catholicism and Mormonism. I’ve already learnt something new about Catholicism as had misinterpreted their understanding of apostolic succession. Obviously if one doctrine appears to be anti biblical then that’s a different matter. I’m not so concerned with extra biblical. To give an example the Bible clearly states baptism. Obviously churches disagree about the methods, age, what it means etc but as a whole baptism is clearly and plainly in the Bible. However the salvation army do not baptise.
Some of my questions are just trying to make sure I am understanding you all (Catholics and LDS) so I may question/critique etc but it’s not necessarily because I disagree with your points, just that I’m trying to make sure I understand them correctly.
Some are just general interest and will have no bearing on my decision.
Mainly it’s because I don’t want history to repeat itself. I’m taking my time this time. Ive had days where I have wanted to be LDS and days where I have wanted to be Catholic. Most of my days I am unsure. Im trying to make sure I separate, the spiritual from the social, the truth from the worldly.
Catholicism probably has more teachings that Im unsure on but there is a lot in Catholicism I can understand. Mormonism has a lot I like (but again it’s not about what I like) specifically Godhead, degrees of glory and plan of salvation. I probably feel more spiritual in a Catholic Church but that may be a consequence of growing up loving stained glass windows, incense, statues, the liturgy etc. I also went to Catholic primary school. Just as a Pentecostal worship conference can give you that high of excitement, Catholic Churches do the same for reverence, spirituality, and a thinking space to shut off from the world.
I suppose from a historical, logical perspective, Im currently more for Catholicism but from a want perspective, Im more for mormonism. I actually want Mormonism to be true and I dont want Catholicism to be true but I am drawn to both and its not about what I want.
I prefer the Catholic view of angels specifically guardian angels. I thought I believed the real presence but after reading a non denominational article, his points made sense and Im now not sure. I love the modern worship songs of the evangelical, Pentecostals etc. I love communion in the Church of England and how you kneel to receive the bread and wine.
Even silly things, like my two children are christened. I did a party with a cake and ivory silk clothes for them to wear and they have three godparents (the church of England tradition, two of same sex, one of different). I’m very big on trying to do the same for each child and we are planning another…
I’m not sure about the esoteric nature of Mormonism (is that the right word). As you can tell, I like to have my information before making a well informed (alongside spiritual) decision.
I hope this gives you some insight into the craziness of my mind at the moment and where I am at. I’m waiting for some books to arrive to star doing my own research as well at the same time as trying to understand what Gods voice sounds like!
Immortality is granted to all, including those in lesser kingdoms. But eternal life is reserved from those sincerely striving to keep God’s commandments. This link sums this up nicely: lds.org/topics/eternal-life?lang=engSo when you say eternal life, what you mean is the celestial kingdom? I thought eternal life was granted to all, even those who are in the lesser kingdoms?
I hope this helps…Eternal life is the phrase used in scripture to define the quality of life that our Eternal Father lives. The Lord declared, “This is my work and my glory—to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39). Immortality is to live forever as a resurrected being. Through the Atonement of Jesus Christ, everyone will receive this gift. Eternal life, or exaltation, is to live in God’s presence and to continue as families (see D&C 131:1–4). Like immortality, this gift is made possible through the Atonement of Jesus Christ. However, to inherit eternal life requires our “obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel” (Articles of Faith 1:3).
Yes it does! ThankyouImmortality is granted to all, including those in lesser kingdoms. But eternal life is reserved from those sincerely striving to keep God’s commandments. This link sums this up nicely: lds.org/topics/eternal-life?lang=eng
I hope this helps…