P
ParkerD
Guest
Your conclusion would evidently be because you don’t believe what Genesis 3:6 says and what they said when they provided an accounting of why they partook of the forbidden fruit. That would evidently mean you think the serpent’s temptation and rationale was appealing solely in how the serpent presented the enticement, meaning they could not think for themselves. Eve shows evidence in her accountability that she thought for herself, desired wisdom, realized that God had said that the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil was a way to begin to gain wisdom, and decided to make that choice. She did say “the serpent beguiled me”, but Genesis 3:6 explains her rationale and does not say what it was that the serpent beguiled her about specifically. However, the serpent had said “Ye shall not surely die”, so if she believed that (not sure myself whether she did, but it was a beguiling statement) then she was being truthful when she said “the serpent beguiled me.” He also beguiled her about being “as gods”–but the verses never say she believed that. Verse 6 only describes three motives for her partaking the fruit."No. God knows well that the moment you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like gods who know what is good and what is bad. (Gen 3:5)
Concluding that they were tempted by the words of the serpent when he said “be like gods” is jumping to an unwarranted conclusion? By what do you think they were tempted? A nice piece of fruit? They were tempted by the very thing that would make them like gods, knowledge of good and evil. More importantly, they were commanded in very specific terms not to do it. They chose to disobey God for their own personal gain.